Evaluation of carotid plaque vulnerability using shear-wave elastography: An observational comparative study

Shear Wave Elastography for Carotid Artery Stiffness: Ready for Prime Time?

Carotid artery stiffness is associated with aging and atherosclerotic disease, leading to cerebrovascular events. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) is a novel ultrasound technique offering a direct, quantitative assessment of the arterial wall elasticity. The aim of this study is to validate the technical feasibility of SWE in measuring carotid stiffness (CS). A literature search was performed across the PubMed and Scopus databases, with keywords including "carotid stiffness", "Shear Wave Elastography", "atherosclerosis", and "vascular elasticity". The findings reveal the potential of SWE in quantifying carotid Intima-Media Complex (IMC) stiffness, with implications for the early diagnosis of vascular disease, aiding in clinical decision making and prognostic assessment. Based on the findings of the literature search, a small pilot study was conducted involving 10 participants, using the Philips EPIQ Elite system for the SWE measurements. The technical analysis revealed optimizing the region of interest (ROI) size, probe positioning, and cine-loop analysis as crucial factors for obtaining accurate results. The results of the literature review and small pilot study demonstrate the potential of SWE as a non-invasive method for assessing carotid stiffness. Certain technical adjustments, such as smaller ROIs and careful probe placement, improved the accuracy and repeatability of carotid SWE measurements. Further studies are needed to assess and standardize carotid SWE across larger patient populations.

Performance evaluation of commercial and non-commercial shear wave elastography implementations for vascular applications

BACKGROUND

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is mainly used for stiffness estimation of large, homogeneous tissues, such as the liver and breasts. However, little is known about its accuracy and applicability in thin (∼0.5-2 mm) vessel walls. To identify possible performance differences among vendors, we quantified differences in measured wave velocities obtained by commercial SWE implementations of various vendors over different imaging depths in a vessel-mimicking phantom. For reference, we measured SWE values in the cylindrical inclusions and homogeneous background of a commercial SWE phantom. Additionally, we compared the accuracy between a research implementation and the commercially available clinical SWE on an Aixplorer ultrasound system in phantoms and in vivo in patients.

METHODS

SWE measurements were performed over varying depths (0-35 mm) using three ultrasound machines with four ultrasound probes in the homogeneous 20 kPa background and cylindrical targets of 10, 40, and 60 kPa of a multi-purpose phantom (CIRS-040GSE) and in the anterior and posterior wall of a homogeneous polyvinyl alcohol vessel-mimicking phantom. These phantom data, along with in vivo SWE data of carotid arteries in 23 patients with a (prior) head and neck neoplasm, were also acquired in the research and clinical mode of the Aixplorer ultrasound machine. Machine-specific estimated phantom stiffness values (CIRS phantom) or wave velocities (vessel phantom) over all depths were visualized, and the relative error to the reference values and inter-frame variability (interquartile range/median) were calculated. Correlations between SWE values and target/vessel wall depth were explored in phantoms and in vivo using Spearman's correlations. Differences in wave velocities between the anterior and posterior arterial wall were assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated for a sample of ten patients as a measure of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of SWE analyses in research and clinical mode.

RESULTS

There was a high variability in obtained SWE values among ultrasound machines, probes, and, in some cases, with depth. Compared to the homogeneous CIRS-background, this variation was more pronounced for the inclusions and the vessel-mimicking phantom. Furthermore, higher stiffnesses were generally underestimated. In the vessel-mimicking phantom, anterior wave velocities were (incorrectly) higher than posterior wave velocities (3.4-5.6 m/s versus 2.9-5.9 m/s, p ≤ 0.005 for 3/4 probes) and remarkably correlated with measurement depth for most machines (Spearman's ρ = -0.873-0.969, p < 0.001 for 3/4 probes). In the Aixplorer's research mode, this difference was smaller (3.3-3.9 m/s versus 3.2-3.6 m/s, p = 0.005) and values did not correlate with measurement depth (Spearman's ρ = 0.039-0.659, p ≥ 0.002). In vivo, wave velocities were higher in the posterior than the anterior vessel wall in research (left p = 0.001, right p < 0.001) but not in clinical mode (left: p = 0.114, right: p = 0.483). Yet, wave velocities correlated with vessel wall depth in clinical (Spearman's ρ = 0.574-0.698, p < 0.001) but not in research mode (Spearman's ρ = -0.080-0.466, p ≥ 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed more variation in SWE values among ultrasound machines and probes in tissue with high stiffness and thin-walled geometry than in low stiffness, homogeneous tissue. Together with a depth-correlation in some machines, where carotid arteries have a fixed location, this calls for caution in interpreting SWE results in clinical practice for vascular applications.

Extending arterial stiffness assessment along the circumference using beam-steered ARFI and wave-tracking: A proof-of-principle study in phantoms and ex vivo

Background

To fully quantify arterial wall and plaque stiffness, acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)-induced wave-tracking along the entire vessel circumference is desired. However, attenuation and guided wave behavior in thin vessel walls limits wave-tracking to short trajectories. This study investigated the potential of beam-steered ARFI and wave-tracking to extend group velocity estimation over a larger proportion of the circumference compared to conventional 0° ARFI-induced wave-tracking.

Methods

Seven vessel-mimicking polyvinyl alcohol cryogel phantoms with various dimensions and compositions and an ex vivo human carotid artery were imaged in a dedicated setup. For every 20⁰ phantom rotation, transverse group wave velocity measurements were performed with an Aixplorer Ultimate system and SL18-5 transducer using 0⁰/20⁰/-20⁰-angled ultrasound pushes. Transmural angular wave velocities were derived along 60⁰-trajectories. A 360⁰-angular velocity map was composed from the top-wall 60⁰-trajectories 0°-data, averaged over all physical phantom rotations (reference). For each phantom rotation, 360⁰-angular velocity maps were composed using 0°-data (0⁰-approach) or data from all angles (beam-steered approach). Percentages of rotations with visible waves and relative angular velocity errors compared to the reference map as function of the circumferential angle were determined for both approaches.

Results

Reference 360°-angular velocity maps could be derived for all samples, representing their stiffness. Beam-steering decreased the proportion of the circumference where waves were untraceable by 20% in phantoms and 10% ex vivo, mainly at 0° push locations. Relative errors were similar for both approaches (phantoms: 10-15%, ex vivo: 15-35%).

Conclusion

Beam-steering enables wave-tracking along a higher proportion of the wall circumference than 0⁰ ARFI-induced wave-tracking.

Role of Preoperative Ultrasound Shear-Wave Elastography and Radiofrequency-Based Arterial Wall Tracking in Assessing the Vulnerability of Carotid Plaques: Preliminary Results

We aimed at evaluating the ability of point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) and of a radiofrequency (RF) echo-tracking-based method in preoperatively assessing the vulnerability of the carotid plaque in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for significant asymptomatic stenosis. All patients who underwent CEA from 03/2021 to 03/2022 performed a preoperative pSWE and an RF echo-based wall evaluation of arterial stiffness using an Esaote MyLab ultrasound system (EsaoteTM, Genova, Italy) with dedicated software. The data derived from these evaluations (Young's modulus (YM), augmentation index (AIx), pulse-wave velocity (PWV)) were correlated with the outcome of the analysis of the plaque removed during the surgery. Data were analyzed on 63 patients (33 vulnerable and 30 stable plaques). In stable plaques, YM was significantly higher than in vulnerable plaques (49.6 + 8.1 kPa vs. 24.6 + 4.3 kPa, p = 0.009). AIx also tended to be slightly higher in stable plaques, even if it was not statistically significant (10.4 + 0.9% vs. 7.7 + 0.9%, p = 0.16). The PWV was similar (12.2 + 0.9 m/s for stable plaques vs. 10.6 + 0.5 m/s for vulnerable plaques, p = 0.16). For YM, values >34 kPa had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 73.3% in predicting plaque nonvulnerability (area under the curve = 0.66). Preoperative measurement of YM by means of pSWE could be a noninvasive and easily applicable tool for assessing the preoperative risk of plaque vulnerability in asymptomatic patients who are candidates for CEA.

Arterial Stiffness Assessment in Healthy Participants Using Shear Wave Elastography

BACKGROUND

Arterial stiffness is an important biomarker for cardiovascular disease. Shear wave elastography (SWE) provides quantitative estimates of tissue stiffness.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to provide reference values for arterial wall, assessing the suitability of SWE to quantify elasticity of the common carotid artery (CCA) and evaluating inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.

METHODS

A Supersonic Aixplorer ultrasound system with L15-4 probe was used to scan longitudinal sections of the CCA. Young's modulus (YM) was measured within 2-mm regions of interest. Reproducibility was assessed within a subgroup of 16 participants by two operators (one novice and one experienced) during two sessions >one week apart.

RESULTS

This study involves seventy-three participants with a mean age of 40±10 years and body mass index of 26 ±6 kg/m2. YM estimates were 59 kPa ±19 in men and 56 kPa ±12 in women. The average YM of the CCA walls was 58 kPa ±15 (57 ±15 kPa for the anterior wall and 58 ±20 kPa for the posterior wall, p=0.75). There was no significant difference in the mean of YM estimates of the CCA between the observers (observer: one 51 ±14 kPa and observer two: 55 ±17 kPa [p=0.46]). inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was fair to good (Intra-class correlations, ranging from 0.46 to 0.71). Inter-frame variability was 28%.

CONCLUSION

In healthy individuals, SWE provided an estimate of YM of the CCA (58 kPa) with fair to good reproducibility. This study demonstrated the potential of using SWE for assessing biomechanical properties of blood vessels.