1
|
Mao SPH, Han-Oh S, Moore J, Huang E, McNutt TR, Souranis AN, Briner V, Halthore A, Alcorn SR, Meyer JJ, Viswanathan AN, Wright JL. Selective de-implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023:e13953. [PMID: 36877712 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
As cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become the localization method for a majority of cases, the indications for diode-based confirmation of accurate patient set-up and treatment are now limited and must be balanced between proper resource allocation and optimizing efficiency without compromising safety. We undertook a de-implementation quality improvement project to discontinue routine diode use in non-intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) cases in favor of tailored selection of scenarios where diodes may be useful. After analysis of safety reports from the last 5 years, literature review, and stakeholder discussions, our safety and quality (SAQ) committee introduced a recommendation to limit diode use to specific scenarios in which in vivo verification may add value to standard quality assurance (QA) processes. To assess changes in patterns of use, we reviewed diode use by clinical indication 4 months prior and after the implementation of the revised policy, which includes use of diodes for: 3D conformal photon fields set up without CBCT; total body irradiation (TBI); electron beams; cardiac devices within 10 cm of the treatment field; and unique scenarios on a case-by-case basis. We identified 4459 prescriptions and 1038 unique instances of diode use across five clinical sites from 5/2021 to 1/2022. After implementation of the revised policy, we observed an overall decrease in diode use from 32% to 13.2%, with a precipitous drop in 3D cases utilizing CBCT (from 23.2% to 4%), while maintaining diode utilization in the 5 selected scenarios including 100% of TBI and electron cases. By identifying specific indications for diode use and creating a user-friendly platform for case selection, we have successfully de-implemented routine diode use in favor of a selective process that identifies cases where the diode is important for patient safety. In doing so, we have streamlined patient care and decreased cost without compromising patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena P H Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Han-Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ellen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Todd R McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Annette N Souranis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Valerie Briner
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aditya Halthore
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sarah R Alcorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Akila N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jean L Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ade N, du Plessis FCP. Out-of-field scattering from the Integral Quality Monitor® in megavolt photon beams. Appl Radiat Isot 2020; 168:109449. [PMID: 33317891 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate out-of-field scattered doses from the Integral Quality Monitor (IQM) transmission detector in megavoltage photon beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS We measured out-of-field point doses for 20 × 20 cm2 6-15 MV photon beams using 10 × 2 cm2 Gafchromic EBT3 film strips placed across the surfaces of 5-cm thick water-equivalent RW3 slabs. The films were placed at 10 cm intervals from the central axis (CAX) of each beam, up to 1.0 m away on opposite sides of the CAX. The measurements were conducted at 80 cm and 100 cm source-to-surface distances (SSD) without the IQM, and were repeated with the IQM in the paths of the beams. Measurements were also performed at 90 cm SSD for 20 × 20 and 30 × 30 cm2 15 MV fields. Surface dose profiles were then constructed from the measurements for each beam setup with and without the IQM to examine the differences in scattered dose off-axis. The dose profile for each beam setup was normalised to dose maximum measured on the CAX. RESULTS Overall, surface dose profiles acquired with the IQM in the paths of the beams were higher than the corresponding profiles without the IQM. The out-of-field dose increased with increase in photon energy, field size, and shorter SSDs, and decreased with off-axis distance. At 80 cm SSD for the 20 × 20 cm2 field, the IQM-induced surface dose ranged from -0.6% ÷ 1.9%, -0.3% ÷ 3.0%, and 0.3% ÷ 6.8% for 6, 10, and 15 MV beams, respectively. CONCLUSION The higher surface dose profiles measured with the IQM attached to the linac compared to the profiles without the IQM indicates that the device is acting as an additional source of scattered radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Ade
- Medical Physics Department, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.
| | - F C P du Plessis
- Medical Physics Department, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|