Standalone Instrumented Posterior Approach Used as Universal Approach for Tuberculosis Spondylodiscitis

Long-segment Continuous Multi-level Spinal Tuberculosis without Bony Destruction Leading to Rapid Paraplegia in an Immunocompetent Patient

Introduction

Spinal tuberculosis (STB) accounts for 1% of all tuberculosis (TB) cases and 50% of skeletal TB. The classic presentation is a paradiscal involvement leading to the destruction of bodies, progressive kyphosis that can end with neurological weakness. The advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has made detection early but at the same time, we find multilevel involvement which can be continuous/noncontinuous.

Case Report

A 26-year-old male, non-alcoholic, non-smoker presented with complete paraplegia involving the bladder and bowel. His clinical examination did not show any gibbus. He was started on empirical antitubercular therapy and then referred to us as he failed to show improvement. An MRI of the spine showed extensive long-segment continuous spinal involvement with epidural abscess. The patient was taken for surgery with posterior decompression and instrumentation which was proven to be TB. He received complete treatment of 1 year and had complete recovery of his sensory and incomplete recovery of motor of lower limbs (became a wheelchair ambulator) with regain of bowel and bladder control at the end of treatment.

Conclusion

This case report revealed that long-segment continuous STB without extensive destruction is atypical presentation. The clinical findings of paraplegia helped us to evaluate and clinch the diagnosis on MRI. However, the prognosis of rapid paraplegia remains guarded and patient had partial recovery of motor so he could become wheel chair ambulator only.

Traumatic spine injuries in Eastern India: A retrospective observational study

Background:

Trauma is the leading cause of hospitalization globally, and trauma-induced spinal injuries can be devastating and permanent. The objective of this study was to describe the pattern, association, and outcome in patients with traumatic spine injury (TSI).

Methods:

A retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken on patients with TSI who presented to the trauma and emergency department of a level 1 trauma center in eastern India between August 15, 2018, and August 14, 2019, by including 103 patients. Information pertaining to demography, mode of injury (MOI), fracture morphology, neurological grading, and associated spinal or other regional injuries was obtained. Correlation among injury severity score (ISS), neurological damage as per American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), and morphological patterns was determined.

Results:

The median age was 39 years, and the gender ratio was 5.87:1. Fall from height (43.7%) was the most common MOI. The median ISS was 21, and the percentage of patients with polytrauma was 73% (ISS > 15). The cervical region (n = 30) was the most common site of injury, and multiple vertebral involvement (n = 32) was more common than isolated involvement. Type A pattern (53.4%) was the predominant type, followed by types C and B (29.1% and 15.5%, respectively) for primary spine injury, and type A was the predominant type for secondary spinal injury. Severe neurological damage (ASIA A-C) was noticed in 69 patients. The correlation between ISS and ASIA scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.561, P < 0.001) and between morphology type and ASIA score (Pearson's χ ²= 69.7, P < 0.001) was statistically significant. In total, 53 patients were managed surgically and 24 patients were managed by conservative measures.

Conclusion:

Our study found a predominantly younger population, multilevel involvement, significant neurological damage, multiple associated injuries, and higher ISS among the patients of TSI. The pattern in eastern India is different from previous reports from other parts of the country.

There is no difference in perioperative results between posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in adults. A multicenter surveillance study from the German Spine Registry (DWG-Register)

BACKGROUND

Primary spondylodiscitis is a medically challenging disease that can lead to recurrent back pain, progressive kyphotic deformity, and neurologic deficits. The incidence rate of primary non-tuberculosis spondylodiscitis has been estimated from 2.2 to 2.4 cases per 100,000 person-years, and it has been reported to be increasing because of the aging population. The objectives were to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation (PI) with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in the treatment of primary spondylodiscitis by comparing perioperative data, functional outcomes, and overall infection-free survival.

METHODS

Analysis of data from the DWG registry on patients who have undergone posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis from the thoracolumbar junction to S1 (Th10-S1) at 10 institutions from January 2012 to December 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 420 posterior instrumentations with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in the thoracolumbar junction to S1 were identified in the registry; n=138 were exclusively percutaneous posterior instrumented (PPI), while n=102 underwent open posterior instrumentation (OPI) without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement and n=180 OPI with interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement. Clinical evaluation after surgery did not show a significant difference between groups including improvement of the mbilisation and infection-free survival. However, with PPI the duration of operation and blood loss was significantly less than OPI with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement as not indispensable for treatment in primary spondylodiscitis. Therefore, we encourage the use of posterior stabilization alone in the treatment of spondylodiscitis as less invasive procedure reducing costs in instrumentation.

Different kinetics of infectious processes in vertebral osteomyelitis of pyogenic or tuberculous origin explain different timing of surgery

Background: Whether surgery modalities vary according to kinetics of pathological processes responsible for vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) is unclear. We therefore compared surgical modalities in patients with haematogenous pyogenic VO (HPVO) or tuberculous VO (TVO).Methods: Patients who had surgery for HPVO or TVO between January 1997 and June 2018 in a university hospital were included. Surgical indications, timing, and procedures and outcomes were evaluated at the end of treatment.Results: Seventy-eight patients (50 men) were included: 39 with HPVO and 39 with TVO; median age was 64 and 41 years, respectively. In patients with HPVO, surgery was performed early: 17 (44%) had surgery within 72 h of admission; main indication for surgery was neurological deficit in 29 patients that persisted in 12 patients (27%). In patients with TVO, surgery was performed later (p<.001), after two weeks in 20 patients (51%), and was indicated by a neurological deficit in 23 patients; among them, only one (4%) had residual deficit.Conclusions: Different kinetic profiles of the infectious processes explain the more rapid indication for surgery in patients with HPVO and the more favourable neurological recovery in patients with TVO.