Real-World Effectiveness of Intravenous Stroke Thrombolysis is more than the Expectation of Practicing Neurologists

Combined Therapy With Hyperbaric Oxygen and Melatonin Effectively Reduce Brain Infarct Volume and Preserve Neurological Function After Acute Ischemic Infarct in Rat

This study tested the hypothesis that combined hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and melatonin (Mel) was superior to either one for protecting the brain functional and parenchymal integrity from acute ischemic stroke (IS) injury. Adult-male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into groups 1 (sham-operated control), 2 (IS), 3 (IS + HBO), 4 (IS + Mel), and 5 (IS + HBO-Mel). By day 28 after IS, the brain infarct area (BIA) was lowest in group 1, highest in group 2, significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 than in group 5, but not different between groups 3 and 4. The neurological function at day 7, 14, and 28 exhibited an opposite pattern to BIA among the 5 groups. The protein expressions of inflammatory (IL-1β/IL-6/iNOS/TNF-α/p-NF-κB), apoptotic (cleaved-caspase3/cleaved-PARP/mitochondrial Bax), mitochondrial/DNA-damaged (cytochrome-C/γ-H2AX), oxidative stress (NOX-1/NOX-2), and autophagy (i.e. ratio of CL3B-II/CL3B-I) biomarkers displayed an identical pattern of BIA among 5 groups. Cellular expressions of inflammation (F4/80+/GFAP+) and DNA-damaged biomarker (γ-H2AX+) exhibited an identical pattern, whereas the integrities of myelin sheath/neuron (MPB+/NeuN+), endothelial cell (CD31+/vWF+), and number of small vessels exhibited an opposite pattern of BIA among the 5 groups. Combined HBO-Mel therapy offered an additional benefit in protecting the brain against IS injury.

Efficacy of Tirofiban Administered at Different Time Points after Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy with Alteplase in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of tirofiban administered at different time points within 24 hours of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase and fulfilled other inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the time points of tirofiban administration: Group A (2 h), Group B (2-12 h), Group C (12-24 h), and Group D (control). The changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, modified Rankin Scale score, and adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

At 7 ± 1 day, the efficacy in Group A was better than that in Group C (P = .006) and Group D (P = .001), but there was no significant difference in the efficacy between Groups A and B (P = .268). Similarly, at 14 ± 2 d, the efficacy in Group A was better than that in Group C (P = .026) and Group D (P = .001), but there was no significant difference in the efficacy between Groups A and B (P = .394). As evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale, the prognosis in Groups A, B, and C was better than that in Group D (P = .042, .008, .027, respectively), which was unrelated to the time points of tirofiban administration. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events among the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban combined with alteplase is effective and safe, and particularly beneficial when administered at 2 hour and 2-12 hours after intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke.