1
|
Reis AE, Spano M, Davis-Hayes C, Salama GR. Lumbar Puncture Complications: A Review of Current Literature. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:803-813. [PMID: 38776003 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01262-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper reviews the complications of lumbar puncture with a focus on post-dural puncture headache including pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Recent research has focused on understanding the multifactorial mechanisms of post-dural puncture headache and improving prevention and treatment strategies. Small caliber, pencil-point type needles are encouraged to minimize the risk of post-dural puncture headaches, especially in populations that are at higher risk for complication. While new medications and procedures show promise in small cohorts, conservative medical management and epidural blood patch are still the first and second-line treatments for PDPH. Post-dural puncture headache is the most frequent complication of lumbar puncture. There are both modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors to consider when performing this procedure. Conservative medical management and procedure-based therapies exist for when complications of lumbar puncture arise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra E Reis
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Matthew Spano
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Cecilia Davis-Hayes
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Gayle R Salama
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uppal V, Russell R, Sondekoppam RV, Ansari J, Baber Z, Chen Y, DelPizzo K, Dirzu DS, Kalagara H, Kissoon NR, Kranz PG, Leffert L, Lim G, Lobo C, Lucas DN, Moka E, Rodriguez SE, Sehmbi H, Vallejo MC, Volk T, Narouze S. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:471-501. [PMID: 37582578 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH. METHODS Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Uppal
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Robin Russell
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rakesh V Sondekoppam
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jessica Ansari
- Anesthesia Department, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Zafeer Baber
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kathryn DelPizzo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dan Sebastian Dirzu
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Hari Kalagara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Narayan R Kissoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter G Kranz
- Depatement of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa Leffert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale New Haven Health System; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Grace Lim
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Clara Lobo
- Anesthesiology Institute, Interventional Pain Medicine Department, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Dominique Nuala Lucas
- Department of Anaesthesia, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Eleni Moka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Creta Interclinic Hospital - Hellenic Healthcare Group (HHG), Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Stephen E Rodriguez
- Department of Anesthesia, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Herman Sehmbi
- Department of Anesthesia, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manuel C Vallejo
- Departments of Medical Education, Anesthesiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Thomas Volk
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Samer Narouze
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaushal S, Thakur S, Sharma A, Sharma A, Sharma N, Thakur P. Incidence and risk factors of “postdural puncture headache” in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with 26g quincke spinal needle, experience of medical college in rural settings in India 2019: A prospective cohort study design. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2022; 14:S209-S213. [PMID: 36110769 PMCID: PMC9469433 DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_72_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Almost every cesarean delivery is done under spinal anesthesia because of ease of doing, rapid onset, avoids maternal and fetal risk of general anesthesia, promotes early recovery. Major complication especially in young women undergoing LSCS under spinal anesthesia is post dural puncture headache (PDPH) which is caused by cerebrospinal fluid leakage. There is wide variation in reported incidence of PDPH (0.3% to 40 %) after spinal anesthesia being affected by various procedure and non procedure related risk factors like age, gender, needle size and type, numbers of spinal attempts and previous history of PDPH. Methods: Prospective cohort study was conducted in 335 patients posted for caesarean section under spinal anesthesia from January 2019 to September 2019 in medical College situated in rural India. Spinal anesthesia was given by 26 G Quincke spinal needle. All patients were evaluated for incidence and severity of PDPH from post operative day 1 to day 5. Result: Incidence of PDPH was 11.4% in this study. Majority of patients (62.5%) were having mild pain. All patients reported PDPH with 72 hours. Conclusion: Body mass index (BMI), h/o PDPH, multiple attempts for successful spinal anesthesia did not have any significant association with PDPH in our study.
Collapse
|