Nikas IP, Vey JA, Proctor T, AlRawashdeh MM, Ishak A, Ko HM, Ryu HS. The Use of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.
Am J Clin Pathol 2022;
159:138-145. [PMID:
36370120 PMCID:
PMC9891409 DOI:
10.1093/ajcp/aqac132]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To perform the first meta-analysis regarding the pooled risk of malignancy (ROM) of each category of the Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration, as well as assess the latter's diagnostic accuracy using this new system.
METHODS
Two databases were searched, followed by data extraction, study quality assessment, and statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The "Insufficient," "Benign," "Atypical," "Suspicious," and "Malignant" Yokohama system categories were associated with a pooled ROM of 17% (95% CI, 10%-28%), 1% (95% CI, 1%-3%), 20% (95% CI, 17%-23%), 86% (95% CI, 79%-92%), and 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%), respectively. When both "Suspicious" and "Malignant" interpretations were regarded as cytologically positive, sensitivity (SN) was 91% (95% CI, 87.6%-93.5%) and false-positive rate (FPR) was 2.33% (95% CI, 1.30-4.14%). A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed and the pooled area under the curve was 97.3%, while the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 564 (95% CI, 264-1,206), indicating a high level of diagnostic accuracy. When only "Malignant" interpretations were regarded as cytologically positive, the pooled FPR was lower (0.75%; 95% CI, .39%-1.42%) but at the expense of SN (76.61%; 95% CI, 70.05%-82.10%).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite Yokohama's system early success, more data would be needed to unravel the system's value in clinical practice.
Collapse