1
|
Goldsmith JD, Troxell ML, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Colasacco CF, Edgerton ME, Fitzgibbons PL, Fulton R, Haas T, Kandalaft PL, Kalicanin T, Lacchetti C, Loykasek P, Thomas NE, Swanson PE, Bellizzi AM. Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline Update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024; 148:e111-e153. [PMID: 38391878 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0483-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— In 2014, the College of American Pathologists developed an evidence-based guideline to address analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Fourteen recommendations were offered. Per the National Academy of Medicine standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, guidelines should be updated when new evidence suggests modifications. OBJECTIVE.— To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and develop updated evidence-based recommendations. DESIGN.— The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and update the original guideline recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS.— Two strong recommendations, 1 conditional recommendation, and 12 good practice statements are offered in this updated guideline. They address analytic validation or verification of predictive and nonpredictive assays, and recommended revalidation procedures following changes in assay conditions. CONCLUSIONS.— While many of the original guideline statements remain similar, new recommendations address analytic validation of assays with distinct scoring systems, such as programmed death receptor-1 and analytic verification of US Food and Drug Administration approved/cleared assays; more specific guidance is offered for validating immunohistochemistry performed on cytology specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Goldsmith
- From the Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Goldsmith)
| | - Megan L Troxell
- the Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (Troxell)
| | - Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
- the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Roy-Chowdhuri)
| | - Carol F Colasacco
- the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-based Guidelines, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Kalicanin, Thomas)
| | - Mary Elizabeth Edgerton
- the Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska (Edgerton)
| | - Patrick L Fitzgibbons
- the Department of Pathology, Providence St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, California (Fitzgibbons)
| | - Regan Fulton
- Array Science, LLC, Sausalito, California (Fulton)
| | - Thomas Haas
- Seagull Laboratory Consulting, Janesville, Wisconsin (Haas)
| | | | - Tanja Kalicanin
- the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-based Guidelines, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Kalicanin, Thomas)
| | - Christina Lacchetti
- Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Lacchetti)
| | - Patti Loykasek
- Molecular, Immunohistochemistry and Flow Cytometry, Pathology Laboratory Associates, Tulsa, Oklahoma (Loykasek)
| | - Nicole E Thomas
- the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-based Guidelines, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Kalicanin, Thomas)
| | - Paul E Swanson
- the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington (Swanson)
| | - Andrew M Bellizzi
- the Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (Bellizzi)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Abbadi MA, Barroca H, Bode-Lesniewska B, Calaminici M, Caraway NP, Chhieng DF, Cozzolino I, Ehinger M, Field AS, Geddie WR, Katz RL, Lin O, Medeiros LJ, Monaco SE, Rajwanshi A, Schmitt FC, Vielh P, Zeppa P. A Proposal for the Performance, Classification, and Reporting of Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology: The Sydney System. Acta Cytol 2020; 64:306-322. [PMID: 32454496 DOI: 10.1159/000506497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evaluation of lymph nodes (LN) by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is routinely used in many institutions but it is not uniformly accepted mainly because of the lack of guidelines and a cytopathological diagnostic classification. A committee of cytopathologists has developed a system of performance, classification, and reporting for LN-FNAC. METHODS The committee members prepared a document that has circulated among them five times; the final text has been approved by all the participants. It is based on a review of the international literature and on the expertise of the members. The system integrates clinical and imaging data with cytopathological features and ancillary techniques. The project has received the endorsement and patronage of the International Academy of Cytology and the European Federation of the Cytology Societies. RESULTS Clinical, imaging, and serological data of lymphadenopathies, indications for LN-FNAC, technical procedures, and ancillary techniques are evaluated with specific recommendations. The reporting system includes two diagnostic levels. The first should provide basic diagnostic information and includes five categories: inadequate/insufficient, benign, atypical lymphoid cells of undetermined/uncertain significance, suspicious, and malignant. For each category, specific recommendations are provided. The second diagnostic level, when achievable, should produce the identification of specific benign or malignant entities and additional information by utilizing ancillary testing. CONCLUSION The authors believe that the introduction of this system for performing and reporting LN-FNAC may improve the quality of the procedure, the report, and the communication between cytopathologists and the clinicians. This system may lead to a greater acceptance and utilization of LN-FNAC and to a better interdisciplinary understanding of the results of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mousa A Al-Abbadi
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Helena Barroca
- Serviço de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital S João-Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Maria Calaminici
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust and Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nancy P Caraway
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David F Chhieng
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Immacolata Cozzolino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Mats Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Pathology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Andrew S Field
- University of NSW Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Notre Dame Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - William R Geddie
- University Health Network, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Oscar Lin
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - L Jeffrey Medeiros
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sara E Monaco
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arvind Rajwanshi
- Department of Cytopathology and Gynecologic Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of Porto University (IPATIMUP), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde and Medical Faculty, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Pio Zeppa
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano, Salerno, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|