Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Single-Site, Mitomycin C-Augmented Trabeculectomy Combined with Phacoemulsification versus Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery

Efficacy and Safety of Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery With Trabeculectomy Versus Phacotrabeculectomy in Patients With Glaucoma and Cataract: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The coexistence of two globally leading causes of blindness, glaucoma and cataracts, is common. Combining trabeculectomy with cataract surgery is a common practice while determining the preferred surgical management for patients is a complex consideration. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of two surgical procedures, manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) combined with trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library published up to March 2023. Articles not indexed in those databases were also searched. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were also retrieved to compare the outcomes estimating efficacy and safety. Biases in selected studies were assessed. A total of seven studies consisting of 352 eyes for MSICS with trabeculectomy and 348 eyes for phacotrabeculectomy were included. Postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was comparable between the two techniques (MD: -0.45; 95% CI: -1.07 to 0.16; p = 0.15). Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) <6/12 (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.53; p = 0.52), complete success (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.67; p = 0.78), and postoperative complications (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.75 to 2.15, p = 0.38) did not differ significantly. This meta-analysis indicated comparable efficacy and safety profile between MSICS with trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy. Further high-quality studies are required to confirm these findings.

Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification/Trabeculectomy for the Treatment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Coexistent with Cataract: A Comparative Study

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and coexistent cataract treated with phacoemulsification cataract surgery, either alone or in combination with trabeculectomy. Methods: Participants in this retrospective study were 52 patients diagnosed with previously controlled POAG and coexistent cataract, who underwent either uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery (Group I, n = 27) or combined uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery and trabeculectomy (Group II, n = 25), with at least a 24-month postoperative follow-up. We recorded the changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and in the need of anti-glaucoma medications before and after surgical procedures. Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in IOP at postoperative day 7 in both groups (p < 0.001), which remained until the end of the 24-month follow-up. At month 24, the two groups did not differ significantly in terms of IOP (14.3 ± 1.4 vs. 13.1 ± 1.2 for Group I and Group II, respectively; p = 0.447). In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in the number of anti-glaucoma medications needed at postoperative day 7 in both groups (p < 0.001 for both groups compared to baseline). At month 24, patients in both groups needed about one additional anti-glaucoma medication to control their IOP. Of note, during the first month after surgery, 20% of patients in Group II needed 0.1 mL 5-FU injections to the bleb, although antimetabolites were not used in the primary surgery. Conclusions: Both surgical interventions, namely phacoemulsification cataract surgery alone and phacoemulsification/trabeculectomy, were found to be effective in the management of POAG with coexistent cataract, presenting a significant decrease in IOP and in the need of anti-glaucoma medications postoperatively at a long-term follow-up period of 24 months.