Low frequency of BRAF V600E immunoexpression in mandibular ameloblastomas: An institutional study

Identification of Molecular Mechanisms of Ameloblastoma and Drug Repositioning by Integration of Bioinformatics Analysis and Molecular Docking Simulation

Background

Ameloblastoma (AM) is a benign tumor locally originated from odontogenic epithelium that is commonly found in the jaw. This tumor makes aggressive invasions and has a high recurrence rate. This study aimed to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), biological function alterations, disease targets, and existing drugs for AM using bioinformatics analysis.

Methods

The data set of AM was retrieved from the GEO database (GSE132474) and identified the DEGs using bioinformatics analysis. The biological alteration analysis was applied to Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis and hub gene identification were screened through NetworkAnalyst. The transcription factor-protein network was constructed via OmicsNet. We also identified candidate compounds from L1000CDS2 database. The target of AM and candidate compounds were verified using docking simulation.

Results

Totally, 611 DEGs were identified. The biological function enrichment analysis revealed glycosaminoglycan and GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) signaling were most significantly up-regulated and down-regulated in AM, respectively. Subsequently, hub genes and transcription factors were screened via the network and showed FOS protein was found in both networks. Furthermore, we evaluated FOS protein to be a therapeutic target in AMs. Candidate compounds were screened and verified using docking simulation. Tanespimycin showed the greatest affinity binding value to bind FOS protein.

Conclusions

This study presented the underlying molecular mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, biological alteration, and important pathways of AMs and provided a candidate compound, Tanespimycin, targeting FOS protein for the treatment of AMs.

Differential Profile of Primary and Recurrent Ameloblastomas Among Afro-descendants and Non-Afro-descendants-a Systematic Review

Ameloblastoma is an aggressively growing jaw tumor with high recurrent properties. Reports on global and racial distribution of ameloblastoma are variable and inconclusive. The role of race and ethnicity on ameloblastoma growth characteristics, genetic mutational profile, and recurrence is also still unclear. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess genetic, racial, and ethnic distribution of primary and recurrent ameloblastoma from published literature. The secondary aim was to assess potential correlations between ethnicity, genetic mutation, and disparities in ameloblastoma treatment outcomes in Afro-descendants and non-Afro-descendants. Twenty-three eligible articles were selected based on preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA), and a total of 169 ameloblastoma cases were evaluated. Data on patient demographics, ameloblastoma growth characteristics, and genetic status were collected for quantitative analysis. Among a total of 169 ameloblastoma cases, Afro-descendant patients had higher primary and recurrent ameloblastomas at 15.5% and 4.7% respectively compared to non-Afro-descendant at 10.7% and 1.8% respectively. Additionally, BRAF V600E was positively associated with 48.8% of all ameloblastomas and strong predilection for Afro-descendants. Despite the paucity of information on genetic profile of ameloblastomas in the Afro-descendant patient cohort, this ethnic group still accounted for 2.95% of all BRAF V600E-positive tumors. These suggest that Afro-descendants are understudied regarding ameloblastoma characteristics, genetic profile, and recurrence profile. Mutational analysis of ameloblastoma tumors in Afro-descendants should be promoted.

Differential expression of PEA3 in odontogenic cysts and tumors

BACKGROUND

PEA3 transcription factor has been identified as a downstream target of the MAPK and PI3K pathways, and PEA3 overexpression has been observed in a variety of tumor types. We aimed to evaluate PEA3 expression in odontogenic cysts and tumors and compare the expression among odontogenic lesions. In addition, the correlations between PEA3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of conventional ameloblastoma and unicystic ameloblastoma were investigated.

METHODS

This study was performed on 165 samples of odontogenic cysts and tumors including 20 dentigerous cysts, 20 odontogenic keratocysts, 16 adenomatoid odontogenic tumors, 5 ameloblastic fibromas, 45 unicystic ameloblastomas, and 59 conventional ameloblastomas. The sections were immunohistochemically stained with mouse monoclonal anti-PEA3 antibody and PEA3 expression was evaluated as the immunoreactive score.

RESULTS

PEA3 expression was absent in all dentigerous cysts (DCs) and odontogenic keratocysts, while all adenomatoid odontogenic tumors showed either no (75%) or low (25%) expression of PEA3. Most of the ameloblastic fibromas (60%) displayed no PEA3 expression. A high expression of PEA3 was observed in a substantial number of unicystic ameloblastomas (48.9%) and conventional ameloblastomas (49.2%) in our study. PEA3 expression in DCs, odontogenic keratocysts and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors were significantly different from that in conventional ameloblastomas and that in unicystic ameloblastomas (p < 0.05). The expression of PEA3 was significantly different in the age groups of unicystic ameloblastomas and histological subtypes of conventional ameloblastomas (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PEA3 overexpression is predominant in unicystic ameloblastomas and conventional ameloblastomas compared to other odontogenic lesions, indicating a pivotal role of PEA3 as a downstream effector of MAPK pathway in these two odontogenic lesions.

Does BRAF V600E mutation affect recurrence rate of ameloblastomas? Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to critically evaluate the available data on the association of the BRAF V600E mutation and recurrence rate of ameloblastomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was registered in Prospero (CRD42020183645) and performed based on the PRISMA statement. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases was performed in order to answer the question "Does BRAF V600E mutation affect recurrence rate of ameloblastomas?" Methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies were assessed with JBI Critical Appraise Tool. Meta-analysis of quantitative data was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and Jamovi 2.3.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 302 articles, and 21 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 855 subjects with ameloblastoma were included in the analysis. The pooled measures for frequency of BRAF V600E mutation was 65.30% (95% CI: 0.56-0.75; p < .001; I2  = 90.85%; τ = 0.205; p < .001), and the pooled recurrence rate was 25.30% (95% CI: 0.19-0.31; p < .001; I2  = 79.44%; τ = 0.118; p < .001). No differences in recurrence rate were observed between the BRAF V600E and wild type BRAF ameloblastomas, with a pooled Odds Ratio of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-1.54; p = .78; I2  = 31%; p = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF V600E mutation is a frequent event in ameloblastomas, but does not increase nor reduce its recurrence rate, and thus have a limited value in predicting its prognosis.

BRAF V600E Mutation in Ameloblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The discovery that ameloblastoma has a high mutation incidence of BRAF V600E may enable a better investigation of pathophysiology. However, there is inconsistent evidence regarding this mutation occurrence and its association with clinical information. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to pool the overall mutation prevalence of BRAF V600E in reported ameloblastoma cases and to determine its association with patient demographic and clinicopathological features. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive article search was conducted through four databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science). Seventeen articles between 2014 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria with 833 ameloblastoma cases. For each included study, the significance of BRAF V600E on the outcome parameters was determined using odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analysis prevalence of BRAF V600E in ameloblastoma was 70.49%, and a significant meta-analysis association was reported for those younger than 54 years old and in the mandible. On the contrary, other factors, such as sex, histological variants, and recurrence, were insignificant. As a result of the significant outcome of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastoma pathogenesis, targeted therapy formulation can be developed with this handful of evidence.

Precision drugging of the MAPK pathway in head and neck cancer

The mitogen-activating protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is central for cell proliferation, differentiation, and senescence. In human, germline defects of the pathway contribute to developmental and congenital head and neck disorders. Nearly 1/5 of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) harbors MAPK pathway mutations, which are largely activating mutations. Yet, previous approaches targeting the MAPK pathway in HNSCC were futile. Most recent clinical evidences reveal remarkable, or even exceptional pharmacologic vulnerabilities of MAPK1-mutated, HRAS-mutated, KRAS-germline altered, as well as BRAF-mutated HNSCC patients with various targeted therapies, uncovering diverse opportunities for precision drugging this pathway at multiple “genetically condemned” nodes. Further, recent patient tumor omics unveil novel effects of MAPK aberrations on direct induction of CD8⁺ T cell recruitment into the HNSCC microenvironment, providing evidences for future investigation of precision immunotherapy for this large subset of patients. MAPK pathway-mutated HNSCC should warrant precision therapy assessments in vigorous manners.

The Molecular Pathology of Odontogenic Tumors: Expanding the Spectrum of MAPK Pathway Driven Tumors

Odontogenic tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of lesions that arise from the odontogenic apparatus and their remnants. Although the etiopathogenesis of most odontogenic tumors remains unclear, there have been some advances, recently, in the understanding of the genetic basis of specific odontogenic tumors. The mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (MAPK/ERK) pathway is intimately involved in the regulation of important cellular functions, and it is commonly deregulated in several human neoplasms. Molecular analysis performed by different techniques, including direct sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and allele-specific qPCR, have uncovered mutations in genes related to the oncogenic MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in odontogenic tumors. Genetic mutations in this pathway genes have been reported in epithelial and mixed odontogenic tumors, in addition to odontogenic carcinomas and sarcomas. Notably, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) and KRAS proto-oncogene GTPase (KRAS) pathogenic mutations have been reported in a high proportion of ameloblastomas and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors, respectively. In line with the reports about other neoplasms that harbor a malignant counterpart, the frequency of BRAF p.V600E mutation is higher in ameloblastoma (64% in conventional, 81% in unicystic, and 63% in peripheral) than in ameloblastic carcinoma (35%). The objective of this study was to review MAPK/ERK genetic mutations in benign and malignant odontogenic tumors. Additionally, such genetic alterations were discussed in the context of tumorigenesis, clinical behavior, classification, and future perspectives regarding therapeutic approaches.

Genetic Study of BRAF V600E and SMO L412F Mutations in Japanese Patients with Ameloblastoma

Background and aim: Ameloblastoma is a benign, intraosseous, progressively growing, epithelial, odontogenic neoplasm. BRAF and SMO mutations have been reported in ameloblastoma. In this study, we evaluated BRAF V600E and SMO L412F mutations; and assessed the relationship between BRAF V600E mutant expression and the clinicopathological features in Japanese patients with ameloblastoma. Methods: We examined 24 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. All specimens were from patients with mandibular ameloblastoma: 20 were conventional ameloblastoma and 4 were unicystic ameloblastoma. The BRAF V600E mutation was assessed by Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemistry, and the SMO L412F mutation was assessed only by Sanger sequencing. Results: Twenty of the 24 (83%) ameloblastoma samples carried the BRAF V600E mutation; 22 of the 24 (92%) samples were immunohistochemically positive for BRAF V600E. However, the SMO L412F mutation was not detected in any of them. The BRAF V600E mutation status did not correlate with the clinicopathological features, such as age, sex, location, method, recurrence, and subtype. Conclusion: BRAF inhibitors could be a potential treatment option for Japanese patients with ameloblastoma, harboring the BRAF V600E mutation.

Analysis of BRAF V600E expression and disease-free survival in patients with ameloblastoma

The correlation between BRAF mutation and the aggressiveness of ameloblastoma remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of BRAF V600E expression with clinicopathological features and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with ameloblastoma. Seventy-four conventional ameloblastoma samples were collected. Immunohistochemistry using anti-BRAF V600E antibody was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrieved from the patient medical records. BRAF V600E immunoreactivity was detected in 50/74 cases (67.6%); 39 were strongly positive and 11 weakly. There was a significant difference in BRAF V600E expression between ameloblastoma and dental follicle (P = 0.034). However, there was no significant association of BRAF V600E expression with any clinicopathological features, including sex, age, location, duration, tumour size, radiographic appearance, cortical perforation, recurrence, and histological subtype. DFS analysis revealed that patients with BRAF-mutated ameloblastoma had a shorter median survival time (84 months vs 168 months) and lower 5-year survival rate (59% vs 67%) compared to the BRAF wild-type group; however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.169). Moreover, logistic regression analysis revealed that treatment with enucleation was an independent risk factor for tumour recurrence (odds ratio 9.236; P = 0.028). This study demonstrated that the BRAF V600E mutation was not associated with any clinicopathological features of ameloblastoma. A trend towards earlier recurrence in tumours with BRAF mutation was observed, but this requires further investigation. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the treatment modality is an important factor in determining recurrence in ameloblastoma despite genetic alterations.

Upfront rational therapy in BRAF V600E mutated pediatric ameloblastoma promotes ad integrum mandibular regeneration

Ameloblastoma is a neoplasm arising in the craniofacial skeleton. Proliferating odontogenic epithelial cells comprise this benign, yet locally invasive tumor, often causing severe disfiguration. High recurrence rate entails ablative surgical resection, which is the current standard of care, resulting in subsequent critical size osteocutaneous defects. The high incidence of BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma, most notably the BRAF V600E mutation, enabled the use of BRAF inhibiting agent in a neoadjuvant setting. In this investigator-initiated, open-label study, three consecutive pediatric patients, with confirmed BRAF V600E ameloblastoma deemed marginally resectable, were treated with BRAF inhibiting agents, prior to undergoing surgery. The use of upfront BRAF inhibitor treatment resulted in substantial tumor regression, allowing for non-mutilating complete surgical removal, ad integrum bone regeneration and organ preservation. All patients showed a marked radiologic and clinical response to medical treatment, enabling successful conservative surgery. Microscopically, all patients showed evidence of minimal residual tumor with extensive tumor necrosis, fibrosis and generation of new bone. At a median follow-up of 31 months, all patients remained free of disease. Face preservation therapy was achieved in pediatric patients presenting with BRAF V600E mutated ameloblastoma. Our study demonstrates the translational potential of targeted therapy as a neoadjuvant agent. Patient-specific organ preservation therapy should be considered as the new standard of care in ameloblastoma, mainly for children and adolescents.

BRAF p.V600E status in epithelial areas of ameloblastoma with different histological aspects: Implications to the clinical practice

BACKGROUND

BRAF p.V600E is reported in up to 80% of ameloblastomas. Despite the high frequency, the presence of this mutation in different histopathological areas of the tumour has not been investigated. This information has an important role in the use of BRAF p.V600E assessment as an auxiliary tool in the differential diagnosis between unicystic ameloblastoma and other odontogenic cystic lesions, especially when only incisional biopsies are available. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate BRAF p.V600E heterogeneity in unicystic ameloblastoma.

METHODS

Five cases of ameloblastoma and two dentigerous cysts were analysed. The regions exhibiting different microscopic characteristics were selected from each ameloblastoma case and manually dissected. TaqMan allele-specific qPCR or Sanger sequencing was performed to determine BRAF p.V600E status.

RESULTS

We screened the mutation in a small cohort of UA and no molecular heterogeneity was found. Four cases of ameloblastoma (80%) exhibited BRAF p.V600E in all different areas evaluated. One case did not harbour the mutation in any microscopic region analysed. The BRAF mutation was absent in the dentigerous cysts.

CONCLUSION

Ameloblastomas appear to exhibit a homogeneous profile regarding the BRAF p.V600E no matter what histological feature is observed under light microscopy, suggesting that this molecular test may contribute to establish the correct diagnosis in cases microscopically resembling other odontogenic lesions.

Absence of BRAFV600E immunohistochemical expression in sporadic odontogenic keratocyst, syndromic odontogenic keratocyst and orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is a unique developmental odontogenic cyst that has the potential to behave aggressively and is associated with the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is a distinct, uncommon odontogenic cyst. It significantly differs from OKC not only in its epithelial lining but also in proliferating kinetics, clinical, immunohistochemical and biological behaviour. BRAF gene located on chromosome 7q34 encodes a cytoplasmic serine-threonine kinase. Various immunohistochemical studies have been conducted to express the BRAFV600E gene mutation in various odontogenic cyst and tumours with varying results. The present study was conducted to evaluate the possible role of BRAFV600E in the pathogenesis of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC by immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks of 15 diagnosed cases each of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC were retrieved from the archives of Department of Oral Pathology and subjected to immunohistochemical staining for the detection of BRAFV600E mutation using a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody clone RM8.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis showed complete absence of BRAFV600E mutation in all cases of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC.

CONCLUSION

The negative immunohistochemical expression of BRAFV600E in sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC suggests that BRAFV600E plays no role in the pathogenesis of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC.

High frequency of BRAF V600E mutation in Iranian population ameloblastomas

Background

Ameloblastoma is a common locally invasive but slow-growing neoplasm of the jaws with an odontogenic origin. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and clinicopathologic features and behavior of ameloblastoma remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate BRAF V600E gene mutation and expression of its related proteins with clinicopathologic parameters in conventional ameloblastoma.

Material and Methods

50 Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks were included in this study. Immunohistochemistry was done using rabbit monoclonal BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody VE1. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was used for evaluating of BRAF V600E mutation.

Results

Expression of BRAF V600E antibody was Positive in 42 out of 50 cases (84%). 46 (92%) out of 50 specimens showed BRAF V600E mutation. There were 13 cases of recurrence (26%). 3 out of 4 cases with negative mutations did not show recurrence.

Conclusions

We report the highest frequency (92%) of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastomas in the Iranian population. Although there was not a significant association between BRAF V600E‑positive immunoexpression and recurrence and clinicopathologic parameters, its high frequency could emphasize its role as a therapeutic marker in the future.

Key words:Conventional ameloblastoma, BRAF V600E, recurrence.

Frequency of BRAF V600E mutation in a group of Thai patients with ameloblastomas

OBJECTIVE

BRAF V600E mutation has recently been reported in a high proportion of ameloblastomas. This study was conducted to investigate the frequency of this mutation in ameloblastoma and unicystic ameloblastoma. The correlation between clinicopathologic data and BRAF V600E mutation was also analyzed.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 51 archival samples of ameloblastomas and 22 cases of unicystic ameloblastomas were examined for BRAF V600E mutation by using anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Positivity for anti-BRAF V600E antibody was detected in 72.5% (37 of 51) of ameloblastomas, but the mutation showed no significant correlation with the clinicopathologic parameters. With regard to unicystic ameloblastoma, 95.5% (21) of the 22 cases exhibited positive immunostaining for BRAF V600E, whereas only 1 case showed the mural subtype of wild-type BRAF.

CONCLUSIONS

A high frequency of BRAF V600E mutation was detected in a group of Thai patients with ameloblastomas, suggesting the future use of BRAF-targeted therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated ameloblastoma. However, no significant association between BRAF V600E mutation and the clinicopathologic characteristics of ameloblastomas was found in our study.