Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques

Safety and Efficacy of the Erbium Laser in Debonding Dental Accessories: A Narrative Review

Objective: This article aims to review the safety and efficacy of the Er:YAG laser in debonding dental accessories. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Articles published between 2010 and 2022 on the removal of dental accessories using erbium laser were searched. The selected articles were then classified according to the accessories used: adhesives, brackets, restorations, or implant crowns. Enamel surface roughness, shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, duration time (t), pulp chamber temperature (T), morphology (M), and other variables were then noted. Results: The dental accessories and adhesives used were described along with the laser parameters used, such as frequency, pulse width, irradiation time, scanning mode, water-air cooling, and other variables. Conclusions: Laser removal using Er:YAG laser of dental accessories such as brackets, crowns, and veneers is fundamentally safe, time-saving, and does not cause damage to the enamel nor the underlying dentin. However, there was no distinct advantage with laser removal seen, such as those residual adhesives of brackets on the tooth surface and temporary adhesives of restorations.

Noninvasive diagnostic method using optical coherence tomography detected a vulnerable dentin enamel junction created by phosphoric acid etching

To investigate the influence of phosphoric acid etching on the dentin enamel junction (DEJ) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Human teeth were assigned to four groups: 1. control, no additional treatment (CT); 2. The primer of "SE Bond2" was applied (SE), 3. "Enamel Conditioner" was applied (EC), 4. "K-etchant syringe" was applied (KE). After treatment, the DEJ was observed using a laser microscope (CLSM), OCT, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additionally, an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) test at the DEJ was performed. No cracks were observed by CLSM. In contrast, cracks were observed all samples by SEM. Additionally, OCT revealed a white line along the DEJ in all KE specimens and some EC specimens. The UTS test showed a significant difference between CT and KE. This study found that phosphoric acid etching may cause excessive demineralization and weaken the DEJ. This fragility was observed using a non-invasive diagnostic method using OCT.

Reliability of qualitative and quantitative assessment of adhesive remnants after debonding of ceramic brackets bonded with Transbond™XT on human molar teeth: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that there are any differences between qualitative and quantitative methods of adhesive remnants index (ARI) scores on the buccal surfaces of the upper molar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 34 upper first human molars. After etching for 20seconds by using 35% orthophosphoric acid (Ultra-Etch, Ultradent Products Inc., USA) and then rinsed with distilled water for 15seconds, the adhesive (Transbond™XT, 3M™, USA) was applied and cured with the polymerization lamp (Bluephase Style, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) for 10seconds. Ceramic brackets (Damon® Clear™, Ormco, USA) were placed by composite (Transbond™XT, 3M™, USA) on the buccal surface of the molars. Following 24-hour storage of the samples in distilled water (WB-12, Phoenix Instrument, Gabsen, Germany) at 37°C, the brackets were debonded using a debonding plier (Damon Clear Debonding Plier, Ormco, USA). ARI and a modified ARI-scoring system were used. Three independent observers scored the ARI with the naked eye under 10x, 20x, and 32x magnifications using Stereomicroscope Stemi DV4 (Zeiss, Germany). Afterward, the digital microscope VHX-5000 (Keyence, Japan) under 50x magnification was used for the quantitative analysis of the adhesive remnants by just one evaluator. The Fleiss' Kappa-coefficient test was used to assess interrupter reliability.

RESULTS

Fleiss' Kappa-coefficient test show that the highest amount of agreement between observers is observed using the naked eye for both of the scoring methods P<0.001. Increasing the magnification led to the moderate decrease of inter-observer agreement. For evaluations with naked eye, a higher agreement is observed for the modified ARI score compared to the ARI scored. The agreement between the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the ARI score rose with increasing magnification.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of adhesive remnants should be done either with naked eye or under 10x magnification, as they showed the highest rate of intra-observer agreement.