Nonsurgical treatment and stability of an adult with a severe anterior open-bite malocclusion

Management of a severe skeletal open bite case using temporary anchorage devices and multiloop edgewise arch wire technique

The primary cause of complex AOB malocclusion is typically a combination of dental, skeletal, functional, and habitual factors. Open bite correction is a challenging treatment due to its complexity and the requirement for long-term stability, therefore, multidisciplinary treatment is often the best option for achieving stable esthetic outcomes.

Treatment of an anterior open bite, bimaxillary protrusion and mesiocclusion by the extraction of premolars and the use of clear aligners

An anterior open bite may be orthodontically treated by either the intrusion of posterior teeth, the extrusion of anterior teeth, or a combination of both. An improvement in bimaxillary protrusion often involves the extraction of premolars and the retraction of the anterior teeth. The treatment of mesiocclusion mainly involves the mesial and/or distal movement of the molars. However, these three types of malocclusions pose significant treatment challenges when using clear aligners. The present case report describes the treatment of a 24-year-old female patient who presented with the above characteristics, which affected her confidence, willingness to smile and masticatory function. A four-premolar extraction plan was designed to resolve the problems using clear aligners as the patient rejected fixed or visible appliances. After 33 months of orthodontic therapy, except for the counter-clockwise rotation of the mandible and the decrease of facial height, the other objectives established in the pre-treatment plan were achieved, and the patient was satisfied with the results. The combination of clear aligners and premolar extractions effectively corrected the skeletal anterior open bite, bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion, and mesiocclusion.

Nonsurgical Orthodontic Treatment of a Severe Open Bite Case Using Miniscrews with Modified Multiloop Edgewise Arch Wire Technique

Skeletal open bite is one of the most challenging malocclusions to treat and maintain due to the difficulty and instability of correction. Although a combination of orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery may be the ideal approach in most cases, the complications, risks, and costs of surgery have sparked an interest in alternative treatment options that use temporary anchorage devices to achieve orthognathic-like effects. Adult patients can be treated without the need for special compliance using temporary anchorage devices such as miniscrews. This case report demonstrates a goal-oriented strategy for nonsurgical treatment of a complex skeletal open bite malocclusion in an adult patient using miniscrews and a modified multiloop edgewise arch wire (MEAW) technique, with the results evaluated clinically and cephalometrically.

Lingual treatment of an adult patient with an iatrogenic class II anterior open bite: Report of a case with a non-surgical orthodontic approach

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of adult patients presenting an open bite is a real challenge for orthodontists due to the complexity of the malocclusion. The diagnosis is essential to identify aetiological factors and establish the best aesthetic and functional therapeutic prognosis. Among the aetiological factors, iatrogenic treatment history has to be considered. It is the case here where a regrettable unsuitable splint for bruxism treatment forced an open bite to appear.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This case report presents an adult women with a large open bite due to an occlusal splint not covering the last mandibular molars. It was not really a vertical skeletal excess but more a mandibular clockwise rotation linked to the molar extrusions, which created a dento-alveolar open bite and labio-mental contractions during lip closure. Treatment objectives were the intrusion of the third and second molars, the extrusion of incisors to obtain a counter clockwise mandibular rotation. The patient was treated with an aesthetic and customized lingual appliance with no orthognathic surgery. A physiotherapy was followed by the patient when the open bite was closed in order to facilitate and stabilize the intercuspation.

RESULTS

A complete closing of the open bite was reached after two years of treatment. The superimposition showed the anticlockwise mandibular rotation. The levelling with posterior intrusion and the incisors extrusion reduced the vertical dimension with success. After 3years of retention, the occlusal stability was obtained.

CONCLUSION

The intrusion of the molars associated with a counter clockwise mandibular rotation made it possible the incisor extrusion. The occlusal balance with physiotherapy and patient compliance maintained the closure. In this way, the iatrogenic effects of the poorly designed bite splint were repaired.

Photoelastic analysis of tension distribution in different orthodontic approaches for closing anterior open bites

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate tension distribution in the anterior region of the mandible during two orthodontic mechanical approaches to treat anterior open bite.

METHODS

It was an in-vitro experimental study, that analyzed 5 models of photoelastic resin, simulating a lower dental arch. The anterior teeth underwent orthodontic forces of the Blue Elgiloy® 0.016" x 0.022" (MEAW technique) and Gummetal® 0.018"x 0.022" (GEAW technique) archwires. Tension distribution was assessed on three different points in the lower dental midline and was measured using a reflection polariscope. The archwires were evaluated with and without anterior elastic bands (6 oz, 170 g) installed between lateral incisors and lower canines, as recommended for anterior open bite.

RESULTS

The highest magnitudes of tension generated by the archwires were observed in the cervical regions of the teeth (on average 50% higher than those at the most apical point) regardless of the technique used. Comparatively, the GEAW technique showed significantly (P<0.05) lower tension values (16 MPa) than the MEAW technique using Blue Elgiloy (24 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

The GEAW technique showed a more favorable tension distribution pattern than the MEAW approach. The use of elastic bands improved tension distribution, regardless of the technique. The results also suggest that the use of anterior elastic bands in both techniques reduced the tensions released by the intrusive forces generated by the archwires.