Psychological Aspects of Utilizing Telecytology for Rapid On-Site Adequacy Assessments

Telecytology rapid onsite evaluation, with real-time communication between cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, and proceduralist, offers better adequacy rates for lymph node, but not thyroid, fine-needle aspirations

INTRODUCTION

Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) decreases rates of inadequate fine-needle aspirations (FNAs). Telecytology allows pathologists to perform ROSE without being physically "on site", thereby saving cytopathologists' travel time and allowing them to perform ROSE for multiple institutions. Little research exists comparing telecytology to non-telecytology ROSE for FNA inadequacy rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using previously obtained quality metrics, we compared inadequacy rates for lymph node and thyroid FNAs with and without ROSE and with non-telecytology ROSE compared with telecytology ROSE. Use of ROSE was determined by the proceduralist. Type of ROSE was location-based, as only certain locations at our institution have telecytology capabilities. Chi-squared testing was used to compare proportions of populations and P value was set to 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 1168 lymph node and 1177 thyroid FNAs were included in our adequacy analysis. We found any ROSE decreased our inadequacy rate for both lymph node (20.4% to 12.7%, P = 0.002) and thyroid (34.7% to 4.8%, P = 7.4 × 10-18) FNAs. We found telecytology further decreased our inadequacy rate for lymph node (13.8% to 5.9%, P = 0.016), but not thyroid (3.3% to 5.0%, P = 0.34), FNAs.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, when using telecytology, slides are read in real time with the cytotechnologist and the proceduralist looking at slides together near the patient bedside, while the cytopathologist is on the phone looking at slides on the computer screen via Dameware. When non-telecytology ROSE is performed, the cytotechnologist evaluates a slide, brings it to the cytopathologist's office and then the cytopathologist calls the proceduralist to discuss the slide. We believe telecytology offers an opportunity for more inclusive communication thereby improving adequacy rates for more complex cases, like lymph nodes, without affecting adequacy rates for cases where assessment of adequacy is less complex, like thyroid. This research supports use of telecytology especially for complex cases.

Telecytology versus in-room cytopathologist for EUS-guided FNA or fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rapid on-site-evaluation (ROSE) with an in-room cytopathologist (ROSE-P) has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of specimens obtained from patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA or fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNAB) of pancreatic lesions. Recently, there has been an increased interest and use of ROSE using telecytology (ROSE-T) to optimize clinical workflows and to address social distancing mandates created during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic outcomes of ROSE-P and ROSE-T.

METHODS

A single-center cohort study of patients who underwent EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic lesions with ROSE was conducted. The primary outcome was overall diagnostic yield of cancer. All patients who underwent EUS-FNAB were entered into a prospectively maintained database. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics and univariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 165 patients in each arm. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between ROSE-P and ROSE-T (96.4% vs 94.5%, P = .428). ROSE-T was associated with an increased use of 22-gauge needles (P = .006) and more needle passes (P < .001). No significant differences were found in age, gender, lesion size, needle type, procedure times, or adverse events between the 2 groups (P < .05 for all). More pancreatic tail lesions were sampled in the ROSE-P group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ROSE-T was not associated with any difference in final histologic diagnosis for EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic masses. This has important implications for optimizing clinical workflows.

Incorporating cytologic adequacy assessment into precision oncology workflow using telepathology: An institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Tumor sample quality and quantity determine the success of somatic mutation analysis. Thus, a rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) tumor cytology adequacy assessment was incorporated into the workflow of precision oncology at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City. Optimal samples were obtained from 68 patients with metastatic cancer.

METHODS

Cytopathologists performed ROSE on fine-needle aspirate samples via telepathology, and subsequently core-needle biopsies were obtained. In a retrospective manner, the concordance between adequacy assessment and the success rate of the procedure was evaluated to obtain sufficient tumor tissue for next-generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Out of the 68 procedures, 43 were documented as adequate and 25 were documented as inadequate. The diagnostic yield of adequate procedures was 100%. Adequacy evaluation predicted the success rate of molecular profiling in 40 of 43 procedures (93%; 95% CI, 80.9-98.5 procedures). The success rate of molecular testing was significantly higher in the adequate group: 93% compared with 32% in the inadequate group (P < .0005). Seven procedures that failed to provide quality material for mutational analysis and pathological diagnosis were evaluated as inadequate. Cell block provided sufficient DNA for NGS in 6 cases. In 2 cases, a core biopsy could not be performed; hence, the fine-needle aspirate material confirmed the diagnosis and was used for NGS testing.

CONCLUSION

These results support the incorporation of ROSE into the workflow of precision oncology to obtain high-quality tissue samples from metastatic lesions. In addition, NGS testing of concurrent cytology specimens with adequate cellularity can be a surrogate for NGS testing of biopsy specimens.

Rapid On-Site Evaluation With Telecytology Significantly Reduced Unsatisfactory Rates of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated telecytology rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for thyroid ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first case-control clinical trial of thyroid telecytology.

METHODS

We introduced on-site ROSE in our institution's thyroid clinic for 6 months, followed by telecytology for 12 months. Our institution's ultrasound clinic, where ROSE is not provided, was used as a control group for each period.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar initial unsatisfactory rates (thyroid clinic: 8.8%; ultrasound clinic: 8.0%) before the study began. The thyroid clinic's unsatisfactory rate was significantly reduced to 1.6% after on-site ROSE (P = .001) and to 3.8% after telecytology ROSE (P = .010), with no significant difference between on-site and telecytology ROSE periods (P > .05). The ultrasound clinic's unsatisfactory rate was unchanged for both periods. Concordance between telecytology ROSE and final adequacy was 97% (κ = 0.699).

CONCLUSIONS

Telecytology ROSE reduces unsatisfactory rates for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration without compromising patient care.

Telecytology implementation: Deployment of telecytology for rapid on-site evaluations at an Academic Medical Center

INTRODUCTION

There are limited publications that address technical and practical informatics considerations when implementing telecytology for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). Our aim was to share the experience of deploying telecytology for ROSE at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Key informatics issues relevant to adopting telecytology for ROSE at our institution were appraised including workflow, information technology (IT), validation, training, and quality assurance (QA).

RESULTS

A dynamic telemicroscopy solution was selected that required trained cytotechnologists to attend on-site procedures for ROSE. For validation 60 cases were reviewed using the first camera at each facility, but only 20 cases to validate subsequent cameras. A concordance rate of >90% between ROSE interpretation performed digitally to original interpretations was required for clinical validation. After reviewing 440 cases from two comparable time periods before and after implementation, employing telecytology was shown to decrease cytopathologists' work time per ROSE case from an average of 20.95 min per case to 2.91 min per case (86% time savings). The non-diagnostic rate for traditional ROSE was 7.7% compared with 4.1% after the implementation of telecytology, and the deferral rate went from 43.6% for traditional ROSE to 44.1% with telecytology. Traditional ROSE diagnoses correlated with final diagnoses in 91.8% cases, compared to 95.5% with telecytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges when implementing telecytology for ROSE included technical issues, workflow concerns, and incorporating trainees into daily practice. The end result of our implementation was the adoption of an innovative way to deliver a ROSE service that maximised efficiency for cytopathologists without compromising diagnostic performance.