The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in survival of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma

Lymph node yield in treatment naïve cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: en bloc lymphadenectomy versus level-by-level dissection

BACKGROUND

Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield.

METHODS

This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020.

RESULTS

From 123 patients, 182 neck dissections were analysed, of which 133 were selective and the rest were comprehensive: 55 had level-by-level sampling and 127 had undergone en bloc dissection. The level-by-level method yielded more nodes in all neck dissections combined (20 vs 17; p = 0.097), but the difference was significant only for the subcohort of selective neck dissection (18.5 vs 15; p = 0.011). However, the gain in average nodes per level achieved by level-by-level sampling was significant in both groups (4.2 vs 3.33 and 4.4 vs 3, respectively; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sampling of cervical lymph nodes level-by-level yields more nodes than the en bloc technique. Further studies could verify whether neck dissection sampling technique has any impact on survival rates.

Lymph node characteristics and their prognostic significance in oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of various histopathologic lymph node-based biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) needs further evaluation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 212 OSCC patients with regional metastasis to determine the association of extranodal extension (ENE), extent of ENE, size of metastatic deposit, lymph node yield (LNY), lymph node ratio (LNR), and topography of involvement with survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The presence of ENE, larger nodal deposit, higher pN stage, lymph nodes in the lower levels, and patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment had poor disease-free survival (DFS). In addition, more positive nodes and high LNR showed worse overall survival (OS). ENE beyond 5 mm resulted in poorer outcomes. Larger sizes of metastatic deposit predisposed to ENE. Multivariate analyses showed only lower level of neck involvement to affect both DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis to lower levels and other lymph node characteristics affect prognosis and must be considered in the evolution of staging systems for OSCC.

Prognostic capacity of the lymph node ratio in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Lymph node density or lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the quotient between the total number of positive lymph nodes and the total number of dissected lymph nodes, has demonstrated a prognostic capacity in several tumour models, including patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). The aim of the present study is to analyse the prognostic value of LNR in a wide cohort of patients with HNSCC.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study of a cohort of 1,311 patients with HNSCC treated with unilateral or bilateral neck dissections. Of the patients included in the study, 55.0% had lymph node metastases (pN+). We proceeded to calculate the value of the LNR, and its categorization through a recursive partition analysis considering specific survival as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Three categories were defined according to the value of the LNR with a cut-off point at the values < of .025 and .118. The 5-year specific survival for patients with an LNR less than .025 (n=654, 49.8%) was 87.2%, for patients with a LNR .025-.118 (n=394, 30.1%) it was 51.6%, and for patients with a LNR greater than .188 (n=263, 20.1%) it was 27.3% (P=.0001). According to the results of a multivariate analysis, the LNR significantly related to specific survival.

CONCLUSION

The LNR can be a prognostic variable to be considered in the pathological staging of the lymph nodes.

The prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in oral cancer differs for anatomical subsites

The aim of this study was to validate the prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients suffering from oral squamous cell carcinoma in regard to different anatomical subsites. A cohort of 430 patients was investigated to determine the rates of primary metastasis and local and regional disease recurrence. Correlation analysis of the LNR with relevant clinical and pathological parameters was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic impact for different subsites. Significantly differing rates of primary metastasis and loco-regional disease recurrence were found for cancer of different anatomical subsites of the head and neck. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis suggested that LNR has prognostic relevance in subsets of cancer (tongue, P< 0.001; alveolar process, P= 0.04; maxilla, P= 0.03; buccal mucosa, P= 0.02). The LNR of cancer located in the soft palate (P= 0.6) and floor of the mouth (P= 0.11) showed little or no association with the clinical outcome. There is the need for a more sensitive consideration of the LNR as a factor in the assessment of risk and the treatment decision, as the anatomical subsite plays a crucial role in its impact on the clinical outcome.