Impact of a Pharmacist-driven Spirometry Clinic Service within a Community Family Health Center: A 5-year Retrospective Review

Implementation of a pharmacist-led spirometry clinic

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common chronic conditions, with spirometry serving as the gold standard for diagnosis. However, a lack of available resources, providers, and time limits appropriate diagnosis of COPD and disease staging. These factors culminate in suboptimal therapeutic management of the disease and often pharmacotherapy regimens that are not supported by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of the study was to develop and implement a pharmacist-led spirometry clinic to assess the confirmation of COPD diagnosis and pharmacotherapy management.

PRACTICE DESCRIPTION

Two federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Ohio: Family Health Services of Darke County (FHS) and Rocking Horse Community Health Center (RHCHC). Both FQHCs have clinical pharmacists on staff who provide disease state management services for chronic disease states through a collaborative practice agreement.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

At each FQHC, a pharmacist-led COPD and spirometry management service was implemented. This service consisted of disease state education, therapy modifications, and spirometry services for annual and confirmation of diagnosis for COPD patients.

EVALUATION METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted. Data collection occurred from December 2021 to May 2022. Patients included were 18 years and older with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD. Therapies before spirometry services, COPD assessment test scores, age, gender, and history of exacerbations within the last 12 months were collected.

RESULTS

Eight patients at FHS and 1 patient at RHCHC were included in the data analysis. Two patients had their disease state confirmed after postbronchodilator spirometry. Five pharmacotherapy modifications were made for patients evaluated in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists in FQHC's are crucial resources to design, implement, and lead spirometry services for the management of COPD within the primary care setting, therefore increasing adherence to guideline recommendations.

Pharmacist Provided Spirometry Services: A Scoping Review

Purpose

Despite international guidelines' recommendations, spirometry is underutilized in the diagnosis and management of asthma and COPD. Spirometry may be an opportunity for trained pharmacists to meet the needs of patients with suspected or diagnosed lung conditions. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the literature including pharmacist provided spirometry services, specifically to identify: 1) the models of pharmacist provided spirometry services, and additional services commonly offered alongside spirometry, 2) pharmacist training and capability to obtain quality results, and (3) pharmacist, physician, and patient perspectives.

Methods

In September 2020, a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and EMBASE was conducted to identify all relevant literature on the topic of pharmacist provided spirometry services using the search term: "pharmacist or pharmacy" and "spirometry or pulmonary function test or lung function test." Literature was screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria and selected articles were charted and analyzed using the themes above.

Results

A total of 27 records were included. The scoping review found that pharmacist provided spirometry has been conducted around the world in community pharmacies and clinic settings. Community pharmacists may increase access to spirometry screening; the lack of communication with primary care providers and remuneration are barriers that need to be overcome to optimize the utility of the service. Clinic-based services are interprofessional and collaborative, allowing a patient to receive the test, results, diagnosis, and medication changes in one visit. Following comprehensive training, pharmacists felt confident in their ability to perform spirometry and met quality standards at acceptable rates.

Conclusion

Spirometry is an opportunity for pharmacists to improve evidence-based practice for screening and diagnosing lung conditions along with providing comprehensive services to complement testing. Data around provider and patient perspectives is limited and should be further investigated to determine if providers and patients would value and collaborate with pharmacists providing spirometry services.

Factors Affecting Community Pharmacist's Knowledge About Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Management in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Purpose

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has become a significant risk factor that threatens public health. Many studies have confirmed that the professional services for COPD patients by community pharmacists can improve comprehensive benefits. However, there's less research investigating the factors affecting community pharmacists' knowledge about COPD management. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the knowledge of COPD among community pharmacists in China and analyze the factors affecting community pharmacist's knowledge about COPD management.

Methods

This study employed a face-to-face, self-administered questionnaire survey targeting community pharmacists from three cities (Nanjing, Zhuhai, Qingyang) in China. Descriptive statistics, t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for data analysis.

Results

Out of the 794 pharmacists surveyed, 177 (22.3%) were completed and valid. The majority (91.0%) of participants had a positive attitude they were responsible for assisting patients to control the disease progression. Among 12 knowledge-related survey questions, only 34 (19.2%) pharmacists answered more than half of them correctly, showing that overall knowledge level of participants was generally low. The overall knowledge level was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with higher academic education, on-the-job training, and pharmacies selling drugs for treating COPD. Regarding medical knowledge, participants got higher accuracy rates at some questions as the symptoms of COPD and identifying the main causative factors but were weak in disease characteristics and guidelines for disease diagnosis. As for medication, participants had a certain understanding of different drugs for COPD and their adverse reactions. For non-drug treatment, participants could not entirely choose the best non-drug treatment for patients, while most of them recognize the importance of pulmonary rehabilitation.

Conclusion

This research indicated that community pharmacists in China lacked sufficient knowledge about COPD management. It is necessary to improve university education, strengthen on-the-job training, adjust the social insurance system, and develop service guidelines for licensed pharmacists to support their professional services for COPD patients.

Identification and resolution of drug-related problems in a tertiary hospital respiratory unit in China

Background The prevalence of drug-related problems in patients hospitalized at respiratory care units is unknown in mainland China. Objective To identify and categorize drug-related problems in a respiratory care unit in China. Setting Respiratory care unit in a tertiary university hospital in China. Methods Clinical pharmacy services were introduced and documented during an 18-months study period. The problems were categorized using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe DRP classification tool V8.02. Main outcome measures Problems and causes of drug-related problems, interventions proposed, and outcome of pharmacy recommendations. Results A total of 474 patients were reviewed, 164 patients had DRPs (34.6%). Total 410 problems were identified, an average of 2.5 per patient. Treatment effectiveness was the major type of problem detected (219; 53.4%) followed by treatment safety (140; 34.1%). The most common causes of the problems were patient-related (25.8%), drug selection (24.0%), and drug use process (23.4%). Pharmacist made 773 interventions; average 1.9 per drug-related problem. A total of 96.2% of these interventions were accepted leading to solving 81.9% of the identified problems. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of drug-related problems in patients hospitalized at the respiratory unit of this clinic. Clinical pharmacists should focus on improving prescribing practice and patient counseling.

Pharmacist-Driven Spirometry Screening to Target High-Risk Patients in a Primary Care Setting

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of proactive pharmacist identification of high-risk patients eligible for diagnostic spirometry testing on the percentage of appropriate spirometry referrals ordered and the percentage of spirometry tests completed in those that qualify. Methods: This prospective study compares spirometry referrals ordered and tests completed between an intervention site and control site within a federally qualified health center (FQHC) where pharmacists provide spirometry services. At both sites, all patients who had a primary care provider (PCP) appointment and qualified for spirometry screening on the designated intervention dates during a 12-week period were included in this study. At the intervention site, the pharmacist recommended a spirometry screening to the PCP prior to identified high-risk patients' appointments. At both sites, a chart review was completed to determine if referrals were ordered and tests were completed for patients who qualified. Results: The number of patients eligible for diagnostic spirometry testing at the intervention and control sites was 190 (n = 125 vs n = 65, respectively). Among eligible patients, the percentage of referrals ordered was significantly higher at the intervention site (47.2% vs 7.7%, P < .001). Among patients who qualified, completion of spirometry testing was significantly higher in the intervention site (23.2% vs 3.1%, P < .001). Conclusion: Results of this study suggest that pharmacists proactively identifying high-risk patients for spirometry screenings within an FQHC increases appropriate referrals ordered by PCPs and tests completed by high-risk patients. Pharmacists in the primary care setting can aid the PCP in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through significantly increased spirometry referrals and therapeutic clinical assessments and recommendations. They also can provide face-to-face motivational counseling for smoking cessation, inhaler education, and vaccine recommendations. This population health approach to spirometry testing represents an emerging role for pharmacists and could be adopted in other primary care settings.