Statin Type and Cancer Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Type 2 and Solid Tumors

Impact of statin use in head and neck cancer: a nested case-control study

PURPOSE

Dyslipidemia and statin use are associated with an increased risk of various cancers. However, the association in head and neck cancer (HNC) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of dyslipidemia and statin use on the development of HNC.

METHODS

Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort from 2002 to 2019, we compared two groups HNC patients (n = 1006) and matched control participants (n = 4024) after propensity score overlap weighted balancing. The odds ratios (ORs) for HNC development according to dyslipidemia and statin use duration were assessed using propensity score overlap-weighted multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Individuals with untreated dyslipidemia had significantly lower odds of developing HNC than those of normal participants (OR 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.82). Conversely, patients with dyslipidemia who received statin therapy (< 60 days) showed a nearly two-fold increase in the odds of HNC (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.29-2.90). Long-term statin use (≥ 60 days) aligned the odds with those of normal participants (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76-1.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The adverse effect of short-term statin use on HNC development requires further study, and long-term statin use for dyslipidemia treatment does not increase the odds of HNC.

Association between statins exposure and risk of skin cancer: an updated meta-analysis

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between statin (lipophilic statin and hydrophilic statin) exposure and the risk of skin cancer. The incidence of skin cancer under statin exposure was used as the primary outcome, and the relevant studies were screened from Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO electronic database until September 2022. Ten observational studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The statistical results indicated that in lipophilic statins, the exposed group had a higher risk of skin cancer than the non-exposed group (OR: 1.09, P = 0.003). However, compared with the non-exposed group, there was no significant difference between hydrophilic statins exposure and the incidence of skin cancer (OR: 1.02, P = 0.341). Further subgroup analysis of the subtypes of statins revealed that compared with the non-exposed group, exposure to lovastatin (OR: 1.18, P = 0.048) or simvastatin (OR: 1.11, P < 0.001) was a risk factor for skin cancer. Besides, subgroup analysis based on the subtypes of skin cancer demonstrated that the risks of melanoma (OR: 1.13, P = 0.009), basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (OR: 1.05, P = 0.036), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (OR: 1.13, P = 0.026) under lipophilic statin exposure were significantly higher than those in the non-exposed group. On the contrary, compared with the non-exposed group, the risk of BCC was significantly reduced under the exposure of hydrophilic statins (OR: 0.93, P = 0.031). This study showed that the relationship between statin exposure and skin cancer risk was affected by the subtypes of statins and skin cancer subtypes.

Effects of the Prior Use of Statins on Head and Neck Cancer Risk: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study

Mechanisms related to the potential beneficial effects of statins on cancer are mainly related to the inhibition of the mevalonate pathway. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between prior use of statins and the risk of head and neck cancer. A hospital-based case-control study was conducted at the Dentistry Hospital of the University of Barcelona, including 101 incident cases of head and neck cancer and 101 controls matched to cases by age and sex. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association between prior statin exposure and head and neck cancer risk. Of the 202 patients included in total, 28.2% had previously received prescriptions for statins. Prior use of statins was found in 25.7% of cases and 30.7% of controls. Exposure to statins was not associated with head and neck cancer risk (OR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.28-1.84; p = 0.49). There was also no time- or dose-dependent association. Similar trends were observed when analyzed by subsites of cancer and recurrence rate. Our findings do not support a beneficial effect of prior statin exposure on head and neck cancer risk. Future research relying on observational data should emulate randomized clinical trials before clinical implications for repurposing drugs can be drawn.