Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes of Amblyopia Across Age Groups

Longitudinal evaluation of macular vascular density alterations in unilateral amblyopic children undergoing therapy: An optical coherence tomographic angiography study

Importance

Understanding the pathophysiology of the macula in amblyopic eyes is an active research area.

Objective

To correlate macular retinal vascular density changes with best-corrected visual acuity changes following occlusion therapy for amblyopia in children.

Design

A prospective cohort study of children visiting the Pediatric Ophthalmology Division of our institution between January 2020 and January 2022 was conducted.

Setting

A specialist eye hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Participants

Thirty children with unilateral amblyopia.

Exposure

Occlusion therapy for amblyopia.Main Outcome and Measures: Best corrected visual acuity (logMAR) before and at each of the four optical coherence tomographic angiographies was compared in amblyopic and fellow eyes. The effect of pretreatment determinants on the correlation between best-corrected visual acuity and retinal vascular density changes was reviewed.

Results

In this cohort of 30 amblyopic and 30 fellow eyes from 30 children (mean age 8.7 ± 1.4 years; male: female 18:12. The best-corrected visual acuity improved from a median of 0.6 (interquartile range 0.5; 1.1) pretreatment to a median of 0.4 (interquartile range 0.2; 0.6) posttreatment in amblyopic eyes, and from a median of 0.1 to 0.05 in the fellow eyes. The total percentage change in retinal vascular density in the amblyopic eye was significantly higher than that in the fellow eye (Z = -1.92, P = 0.05). The change in best-corrected visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after a median of 98 months (interquartile range, 69-126 months) of intervention was significantly correlated with the refraction-adjusted change in retinal vascular density (B = -0.03, 95 % confidence interval -0.04, -0.02, P < 0.001) and was influenced by strabismus (B = -0.46, 95 % confidence interval -0.59, -0.34, P < 0.001), type of amblyopia (B = 0.24, 95 % confidence interval 0.12, 0.36, P < 0.001), duration of occlusion (B = -0.43, 95 % confidence interval -0.65, -0.22, P < 0.001), and occlusion compliance (B = 0.24, 95 % confidence interval 0.11, 0.36, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

and Relevance: The RVD in amblyopic eyes in the first six months of therapy was significantly lower than that in fellow eyes, but not in subsequent assessments.

Clinical profile of amblyopia in a tertiary care facility without proper vision screening in Saudi Arabia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical profile of amblyopia among patients referred to a tertiary care facility in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

All patients between 1 and 14 years presenting to the amblyopia clinic from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Amblyopia was defined as visual acuity <0.2 LogMAR (20/30) in the worse eye or two-line difference between the two eyes. We classified patients into strabismic, refractive, mixed strabismic, and refractive and deprivation amblyopia. We subclassified our cohort according to age (< and ≥5 years).

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty-three patients (199 male 54%) were seen in our clinic. Seventeen patients were excluded because they did not meet our inclusion criteria. The mean age at presentation was 5.05 ± 2.49 years. Strabismic amblyopia was found in 180 (49%), refractive in 101 (27.6%), mixed in 69 (19%), and deprivation in 16 (4.2%). Anisometropia in 85.25% and isometropia in 14.75%. Hyperopic astigmatism was the most common refractive error in 246 (67.2%). Esotropia was the most common deviation (90%). Strabismic amblyopia was significantly higher in the <5 years group (62.4% vs. 36.7%). While refractive amblyopia was significantly higher in ≥5 years group (38.8% vs. 15.7%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Strabismic amblyopia was the most commonly diagnosed in our cohort, especially among patients <5 years of age. Refractive amblyopia was more common in older patients and may be under-detected due to the lack of proper vision screening. The implementation of proper vision screening should help in early detection and successful treatment at an early age.

Analysis of the improvement in monocular amblyopia visual acuity caused by the changes in non-amblyopia visual acuity in 74 adults

To observe the clinical phenomenon of amblyopia vision improvement in patients with monocular amblyopia over 18 years old after non-amblyopia diseases, analyze the conditions and causes of vision improvement, explore the plasticity of the adult optic nerve, and provide a clinical basis for the treatment of adult amblyopia. A total of 74 patients with monocular amblyopia combined with non-amblyopia visual acuity decline from 2018 to 2021 were collected. The patient's age, initial best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), pattern visual evoked potential examination results, and visual acuity regression were recorded. The BCVA of amblyopia was recorded every 3 months using an early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity chart. In the 3rd month, BCVA increased by 16.2%, reaching 98% in the 9th month and 100% in the 12th months. According to the age of patients, the group aged 18 to 35 years was better than the group aged 35 to 60 years, whereas the group aged 35 to 60 years was better than the group aged over 60 years (P < .05). According to the comparison of initial visual acuity, the BCVA of the < 5 letter group was lower than that of the other 2 groups (P < .05). According to the pattern visual evoked potential results, the peak time of the < 10 ms group was better than that of the 10 to 20 ms group; the 10 to 20 ms group was better than that of the > 20 ms group; the peak decrease of the < 30% group was better than that of the 30% to 50% group; and the 30% to 50% group was better than that of the > 50% group (P < .05). The visual acuity regression of amblyopia in the 0.5 to 1-year group was higher than that in the other 2 groups (P < .05). This study confirms that adult amblyopia can still be cured under certain conditions. This visual plasticity is related to age, initial visual acuity, and excitability of the visual center. This study provides new clinical evidence and diagnostic ideas for the study of the pathogenesis of adult amblyopia.

Comparison of novel clinic-based approach (amblyopia school) Vs. home-based occlusion for amblyopia therapy - A retrospective study

Purpose

To compare visual outcomes of standard occlusion therapy at home versus clinic in amblyopic children.

Methods

A retrospective study of case records of children aged <15 years with diagnosis of strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia or both was conducted at a tertiary eye hospital located in rural North India between Jan 2017-Jan 2020. Those with at least 1 follow-up visit were included. Children with ocular co-morbidities were excluded. Treatment in clinic by admission or at home was based on the parents' discretion. Children in clinic group underwent part time occlusion & near work exercises for minimum 1 month, in classroom format which we called amblyopia school. Those in home group underwent part time occlusion as per PEDIG recommendations. Primary outcome measure was improvement in number of Snellen's lines at the end of 1 month & at final follow-up.

Results

We included 219 children with mean age of 8.8±3.23 years, out of which clinic group had 122 (56%) children. At one-month, visual improvement in clinic group (2.1±1.1 lines) was significantly greater than home group (mean=1.1±0.8 lines) (P < 0.001). Both groups continued to improve vision on follow-up, however the vision in the clinic group (2.9±1.2 lines improvement at mean follow-up of 4.1±1.6 months), continued to be better than home group (2.3±1.1 lines improvement at mean follow-up 5.1±0.9 months) (P = 0.05).

Conclusion

Clinic based amblyopia therapy in the form of an amblyopia school can help expedite visual rehabilitation. Thus, it may be a better option for rural settings where patients in general tend to be poorly compliant.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the agreement of non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic agreement of non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children.

METHOD

The study methodology followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for comparative studies exploring refraction performed on children under non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions. There was no restriction on the year of publication; however, only publications in the English language were eligible. Inclusion criteria consisted of children aged ≤12 years, any degree or type of refractive error, either sex and no ocular or binocular co-morbidities. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise data from all included studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken for those studies with a risk of bias.

RESULTS

Ten studies consisting of 2724 participants were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The test for overall effect was not significant when comparing non-cycloplegic Plusoptix and cycloplegic autorefractors (Z = 0.34, p = 0.74). The pooled mean difference (MD) was -0.08 D (95% CI -0.54 D, +0.38 D) with a prediction interval of -1.72 D to +1.56 D. At less than 0.25 D, this indicates marginal overestimation of myopia and underestimation of hyperopia under non-cycloplegic conditions. When comparing non-cycloplegic autorefraction with a Retinomax and Canon autorefractor to cycloplegic refraction, a significant difference was found (Z = 9.79, p < 0.001) and (Z = 4.61, p < 0.001), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Non-cycloplegic Plusoptix is the most useful autorefractor for estimating refractive error in young children with low to moderate levels of hyperopia. Results also suggest that cycloplegic refraction must remain the test of choice when measuring refractive error ≤12 years of age. There were insufficient data to explore possible reasons for heterogeneity. Further research is needed to investigate the agreement between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in relation to the type and level of refractive error at different ages.

Refractive amblyopia among children aged 4-12 years in a hospital-based setting in Gaza Strip, Palestine

Background

Refractive amblyopia is the most common cause of amblyopia in the Gaza Strip. However, the pattern of this condition has not yet been studied in this region. This study aimed to determine the pattern of refractive amblyopia in Gazan children aged 4‒12 years.

Methods

This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study using a purposive sampling method. Children aged 4‒12 years who attended the Children's Unit at Gaza Ophthalmic Hospital, Gaza Strip, Palestine from September 2019 to July 2020, were examined. A comprehensive eye test was conducted for all participants. Those who failed the eye examinations and were diagnosed with refractive amblyopia were included in the study. Demographic data and amblyopic refractive error patterns were analyzed accordingly.

Results

Of the 107 children, 72.9% were newly diagnosed with refractive amblyopia. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) of age of the children who participated was 7.85 (1.55) years. Approimately two-thirds of the patients were female (57.9%). Unilateral amblyopia was predominant in 60.7% of the cases. Moderate amblyopia was common (81.9%). A total of 149 amblyopic eyes were examined in total, with a mean (SD) (range) of best-corrected distance visual acuity and spherical equivalent of 0.45 (0.19) (0.2 to 1.3) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and + 0.76 (4.51) diopters (- 10.25 to + 11.50). Astigmatism was the most common amblyogenic factor (53.7%) among children with amblyopia.

Conclusions

The frequency of refractive amblyopia was 72.9%, and meridional amblyopia accounted for the highest percentage. Girls were more commonly affected than boys. The majority were in the 7-year-old age group. Most cases were unilateral with moderate refractive amblyopia. Our study yields insights into the patterns of refractive amblyopia among children in the Gaza Strip.