Keratoconus Asymmetry between Both Eyes Based on Corneal Tomography

Enhanced morphological assessment based on interocular asymmetry analysis for keratoconus detection

PURPOSE

To clarify the interocular asymmetry of corneal morphological descriptors and evaluate its discriminant ability of keratoconus (KC).

METHODS

This retrospective study recruited 344 normal participants and 290 KC patients, randomized to training and validation datasets. Interocular correlation and agreement were evaluated on 44 corneal morphological descriptors derived from Schiempflug tomography. Logistic regression models were constructed using binocular data and of which diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

RESULTS

Interocular agreement of corneal descriptors is better in the normal than in KC except for dimensions of cornea and anterior chamber. The interocular asymmetry increases along with the severity of KC. Interocular asymmetry in maximum anterior keratometry, mean anterior keratometry and higher-order aberrations of anterior surface show high AUC above 0.950. Binocular logistic regression index reaches an AUC of 0.963 with high specificity (95.2%) and brings gain to monocular parameters in distinguishing the normal eyes from KC (NRI = 0.080 (0.042 ~ 0.118), P < 0.001) and IDI = 0.071 (0.049 ~ 0.092), P < 0.001). Interocular asymmetry benefits even more in subclinical keratoconus (SKC) detection reflected by NRI (0.4784 (0.2703-0.6865), P < 0.001) and IDI (0.2680 (0.1495-0.3866), P < 0.001) measures.

CONCLUSION

Interocular asymmetry is a well-characterized feature of KC and related to the severity. It is feasible to apply the interocular asymmetry in diagnosis of KC and SKC as a replenishment of monocular parameters and in progression tracking.

The Efficiency of Using Mirror Imaged Topography in Fellow Eyes Analyses of Pentacam HR Data

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of flipping left corneas topography and analysethem quantitively along with fellow right corneas based on the assumption that they are mirror images of each other. Methods: The study involved scanning both eyes of 177 healthy participants (aged 35.3 ± 15.8) and 75 keratoconic participants (aged 33.9 ± 17.8). Clinical tomography data were collected for both eyes using the Pentacam HR and processed by a fully automated custom-built MATLAB code. For every case, the right eye was used as a datum fixed surface while the left cornea was flipped around in the superior–inferior direction. In this position, the root-mean-squared difference (RMS) between the flipped left cornea and the right cornea was initially determined for both the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. Next, the iterative closest point transformation algorithm was applied on the three-dimensional flipped cornea to allow the flipped left corneal anterior surface to translate and rotate, minimising the difference between it and the right corneal anterior surface. Then, the RMS differences were recalculated and compared. Results: A comparison of the dioptric powers showed a significant difference between the RMS of both the flipped left eyes and the right eyes in the healthy and the KC groups (p < 0.001). The RMS of the surfaces of the flipped left corneas and the right corneas was 0.6 ± 0.4 D among the healthy group and 4.1 ± 2.3 among the KC group. After transforming the flipped left corneas, the RMS was recorded as 0.5 ± 0.3 D and 2.4 ± 2 D among the healthy and KC groups, respectively. Conclusions: Although fellow eyes are highly related in their clinical parameters, they should be treated with care when one eye topography is flipped and processed with the other eye topography in an optic-related research analysis where translation might be needed. In KC, an asymmetric disease, it was observed that a portion of the asymmetry was due to a corneal apex shift interfering with the image acquisition. Therefore, transforming the flipped left eyes by rotation and translation results in a fairer comparison between the fellow KC corneas.

Fellow Eye as a Predictor for Keratoconus Progression Following Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking

PURPOSE

To assess the fellow eye as a predictor for keratoconus progression following bilateral same-day accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL).

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of data from a prospective study of bilateral A-CXL for progressive keratoconus between 2013 and 2015. The primary outcome measures were absolute change in maximum keratometry (Kmax) (diopters [D]), relative change in Kmax (%), and A-CXL progression (increase in Kmax > 2.00 D). Responses in both eyes were measured by the change in Kmax, with the right eye serving as the "predictor" of progression for the left eye.

RESULTS

Three-hundred ninety-two eyes (196 patients) with a mean age of 26.8 ± 7.7 years were included. There was a significant correlation in absolute and relative Kmax change (r = 0.26, P < .001 and r = 0.32, P < .001, respectively) between right and left eyes. In regression analysis, the only significant predictors of change in Kmax in the left eye were preoperative Kmax of the left eye (P < .02) and change in Kmax of the right eye (P < .001). Eyes that progressed in the right eye were more likely to progress in the left eye (29.4% versus 4.5%, odds ratio = 8.85, P < .001). In multiple regression, right eye progression of greater than 2.00 D was the significant predictor of left eye progression of greater than 2.00 D (odds ratio = 15.15, P < .007).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale study of keratoconus following A-CXL indicates that patients with progression in the right eye were 15.5 times more likely to have progression in the left eye. Patients with progression following A-CXL in one eye should be closely observed due to increased risk of progression in the fellow eye. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(3):186-191.].

A multicenter study of interocular symmetry of corneal biometrics in Chinese myopic patients

It is essential to know the normal range of the interocular symmetry of the cornea (ISC) for keratoconus diagnosis and corneal substitutes design. In the present study we investigated the interocular symmetry of corneal biometrics in 6,644 Chinese myopic patients from multiple ophthalmic centers. Corneal biometrics of both eyes were exported from the Pentacam instrument. Interocular symmetry of the corneal biometrics was analyzed by Spearman's correlation test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis and Bland-Altman plot. Significantly strong interocular correlations were found in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures, corneal diameter, corneal thickness, corneal volume, corneal eccentricity, and corneal asphericity (r = 0.87-0.98, all P < 0.001). Moderate interocular correlations were observed in whole corneal astigmatism (r = 0.78) and posterior corneal astigmatism (r = 0.73). ICC between the right and left eyes was 0.94-0.98 for anterior and posterior corneal curvatures, corneal diameter, corneal thickness and corneal volume, 0.80-0.88 for corneal eccentricity and asphericity, and 0.73-0.79 for corneal astigmatism (all P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plot showed that the 95% limit of agreement between both eyes was narrow and symmetric in most of the corneal biometrics, suggesting strong interocular agreements in these corneal biometrics. In conclusion, significant interocular symmetry of corneal biometrics is observed in Chinese myopia patients. Extra attention should be paid to patients with interocular corneal asymmetry.

Asymmetry between Left and Right Eyes in Keratoconus Patients Increases with the Severity of the Worse Eye

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the inter-eye asymmetry of keratoconus (KC) patients is different from a healthy control group and to investigate how asymmetry changes with increasing severity of the disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included both eyes of 350 patients with KC (age 35 ± 13 years) and 68 candidates planned for refractive surgery (control group, age 37 ± 11 years). Inclusion criteria for the KC group were keratoconus in at least one eye with Pentacam Topographical Keratoconus Classification (TKC) of at least 0.5. Patients eligible for refractive surgery in both eyes were included in the control group. Corneal tomography as well as Ocular Response Analyzer measurements were compared between both groups. Subgroup analysis was performed with respect to the TKC staging. Asymmetry was provided as worse eye (defined by higher TKC) minus fellow eye.

RESULTS

In the KC group, both eyes showed the same TKC staging in 30.6%, a difference of one stage in 34.0% and of two stages in 24.6% of the patients. The inter-eye asymmetry in the keratoconus group was significantly larger than that in the control group. Corneal power showed an asymmetry of 3.8 ± 4.0 D in keratoconus eyes versus 0.22 ± 0.17 D in the control group. Central corneal thickness (CCT) asymmetry was 34 ± 30 µm versus 6 ± 5 µm, respectively. The Keratoconus Match Index showed an asymmetry of 0.40 ± 0.35 versus 0.15 ± 0.14. The difference between both eyes increased with increasing TKC of the worse eye.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-eye asymmetry is larger in keratoconus than in normal eyes, and it increases with keratoconus severity in the worse eye.