Comparative efficacy of medical treatment versus surgical sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure

Tailored lateral internal sphincterotomy (T-LIS) for chronic anal fissure by LigaSure Small Jaws©: a comparison with other non-conservative treatments for anal fissures

An anal fissure is a small tear in the thin tissue (mucosa) that lines the anus. Anal fissures typically cause pain and bleeding with bowel movements. The cause is not fully understood, but low intake of dietary fiber may be a risk factor. Chronic anal fissure was defined as a split or ulceration in the posterior or anterior anoderm for at least 6 weeks: have distinct anatomic features such as muscle fibers visible in the wound. Anal fissures can be attributed to constipation or repeated straining: a hard fecal bolus cut the mucosa of anal canal that is relatively thigh at sphincter level management and optimal treatment of the disease is controversial. Many studies recommend conservative and medical treatment modalities as the initial treatment options since they are non-invasive and do not have risks such as anal sphincter injury. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is considered the gold standard for treatment of chronic anal fissure. Nonetheless, anal incontinence is one of the worrisome complications of LIS. Fissurectomy is another option among those techniques which address the issues with LIS. LigaSure© (Valleylab) is a bipolar electrosurgical device designed to deliver high current and very low voltage to tissue. It monitors tissue impedance between the jaws of the instrument and continuously adjusts the delivery of energy. The use of LigaSure Small Jaw was never reported for anal fissures in literature. We have applied the use of this device to a group of patients complaining for chronic anal fissure in order to verify if there is any advantage to perform it compared to traditional technique (blade, scissors, electrocautery).

Comparing closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy for management of chronic anal fissure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials

Chronic anal fissure is one of the most common benign anorectal health conditions, causing significant morbidity, quality of life, and economic loss. Eight randomized controlled trials with a total population size of 1035 were eligible for analysis. Seven studies included both males and female, while one only included females. The majority of randomized controlled trials involved female dominance [54.9% (43.5-66.3)] and posterior midline location [86.1% (95% CI 81.5-90.8%)]. This meta-analysis of randomised control trials found that overall postoperative healing was 90.2%, recurrent anal fissure was 3.7%, and postoperative incontinence was 8.9% after LIS. Even though there was no statistically significant difference, closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) had higher rates of recurrent anal fissure (RR = 1.73 (95% CI 0.86-3.47, p = 0.90, I2 = 0%) and lower rates of postoperative incontinence rate (RR = 0.60 (95% CI 0.37-0.96, p = 0.76, I2-0) as compared with open LIS. We recommended that closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is a safe and effective surgical treatment option for chronic anal fissures.

The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure

INTRODUCTION

The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature.

METHODS

A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.

Comparative Efficacy of Topical Metronidazole and Glyceryl Trinitrate Versus Topical Glyceryl Trinitrate Alone in the Treatment of Acute Anal Fissure: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and objective An anal fissure is a longitudinal, oval lesion in the anal canal. In over 90% of instances, the anal fissures are located posterior to the midline and produce discomfort upon defecation and/or bleeding owing to spasms of the internal anal sphincter that leads to ischemia. This research aimed to determine if topical metronidazole treatment when combined with glyceryl trinitrate 0.2% (GTN), is more successful than GTN alone in reducing the time for an acute anal fissure to heal. Material and methods This study was a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted at the DHQ Hospital Okara from January 2022 to August 2022. Patients of both genders, aged 18 to 70 years, with acute anal fissures, were included. One hundred forty patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were randomized through the lottery technique and were divided into two groups (70 in each group). Group A contained patients who got metronidazole combination with GTN, while in Group B, patients treated with GTN alone without metronidazole. The primary endpoint was fissure healing, confirmed as finding a scar where the fissure was. While the secondary endpoint was maximum pain on defecation assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v24. Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact tests were done for statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Three patients lost the follow-up. Out of the remaining 137, 70 (51.1%) patients were male. The patient's ages ranged from 22 to 68 years, with a mean age of 39.18 ± 11.52. One hundred twenty six (92%) complained of pain on defecation with a mean VAS of 6.01 ± 2.35. 80 (58.4%) patients complained of perianal itching, while 25 (18.2%) patients complained of bleeding on defecation. On week 1 follow-up, in group A out of 69 patients, 27 (39.1%) had complete healing, 38 (55.1%) had partial healing, while in group B out of 68 patients, one (1.4%) had complete healing, 43 (63.2%) had partial healing (p = < 0.001, significant).  On week 3 follow-up, in group A out of 69 patients, 47 (68.1%) had complete healing, and 22 (31.8%) had partial healing, while in group B out of 68 patients, 16 (23.5%) had complete healing, 49 (72%) had partial healing (p = < 0.001, significant). Mean VAS score of group A was 0.61 ± 1.38 while that of group B was 2.57 ± 2.50 (p = < 0.001, significant). Conclusion Using topical metronidazole as an addition to standard therapy may reduce the chronicity of acute anal fissures and prevent surgical treatments with high rates of complications.