Radiographical and histological evaluation of bioactive synthetic bone graft putty in sinus floor augmentation: A pre- and post-intervention study

Resorption Rates of Bone Graft Materials after Crestal Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation and Its Influencing Factors

The aim of this study is to analyze the resorption rate of bone graft materials after crestal sinus floor elevation, study its influencing factors, and improve the long-term success rate of implants after crestal maxillary sinus floor elevation. Measurement and analysis were conducted at six postoperative timepoints (0 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and 30 months) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data on 31 patients from the Chenghuaxinguanghua Dental Clinic who underwent crestal maxillary sinus floor elevation, involving 38 graft sites. The materials resorption rates of the bone graft height (BH) and bone graft width (BW) were assessed. BH and BW resorption rates followed the same trend (p = 0.07), with BH and BW resorption rates decreasing with time (rBH = -0.32, p < 0.01; rBW = -0.18, p < 0.01), and were maximal in the 0-6 month interval, with BH and BW resorption rates of 3.42%/mth and 3.03%/mth, respectively. The average monthly BH and BW resorption rates in the 6-12 month interval rapidly decreased to 1.75%/mth and 1.29%/mth, respectively. The monthly BH and BW resorption rates in the 12-30 month intervals stabilized at 1.45%/mth (p > 0.05) and 1.22%/mth (p > 0.05), respectively. The higher the initial bone graft height (BH0), the lower the BH resorption rates (rBH = -0.98, p < 0.05), and the BW resorption rate was different for different graft sites (p = 0.01). The resorption rates of bone graft materials implanted through crestal maxillary sinus floor elevation decreased rapidly within the first 12 months post operation and remained stable after 12 months. BH0 was identified as a significant factor influencing the resorption rates of bone graft materials. These results could suggest dentists should pay attention to the trend of resorption rates over time and carefully manage the initial height of bone grafts and inspire the research of new bone grafting materials for crestal maxillary sinus floor elevation.

Evaluation of trephine osteotomy technique in direct sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement

BACKGROUND

Recently, in implant dentistry, trephine drills have been used instead of conventional drills to conserve the bone during osteotomy.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the effectiveness of trephine osteotomy for lateral sinus lifting technique associated with sinus floor augmentation using the autogenous bone resulting from implant drilling using specialized trephine drills.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

12 Patients were included and have been subjected to lateral sinus lifting using trephine osteotomy with simultaneous implant placement with delay loading. A bone graft used in sinus floor augmentation has been prepared using autogenous bone resulting from implant site preparation in addition to β-tricalcium phosphate.

RESULTS

After 6 months, the difference between the primary stability and implant stability was statistically significant p-value ≤ 0.05. After 6 months, the mean vertical bone height reached 11.71 ± 0.72 mm. The mean volume of the newly formed bone of the grafted area recorded after 6 months was 1126.7 ± 82.94 mm³.

CONCLUSION

Trephine osteotomy technique in both lateral approach of sinus lifting, and implant site preparation allows preservation of autogenous bone. Moreover, the trephine osteotomy technique in the lateral approach of sinus lifting eliminates the use of an absorbable membrane.

Orbital Volume and Axial Length Development in Individuals Ages 12 to 60 Years With Congenital Microphthalmia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the stimulating effect of axial length development on orbital volume development in patients (ages 12-60 years) with congenital microphthalmia.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 43 patients (86 eyes) with congenital microphthalmia. Three-dimensional images of the orbit were generated from past computed tomography scans, and digital orbital volume and axial length measurements were taken. The patients were divided into four age groups for analyses. Paired t tests and one-way analysis of variance tests were used to compare orbital volume and axial length between the affected and unaffected eyes. Pearson correlation analyses and scatter plots were used to investigate the correlations between age, orbital volume, and axial length in the affected and unaffected eyes. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the association between orbital volume and axial length.

RESULTS

The mean orbital volume in the affected and unaffected eyes was 17.08 ± 2.88 and 20.80 ± 2.55 cm3, respectively. The mean axis length in the affected and the unaffected groups was 12.73 ± 3.54 and 23.84 ± 1.43 mm, respectively. Significant differences were observed among orbital (t = 13.538, P < 0.001) volume and axial length (t = 21.339, P < 0.001) in the affected and the unaffected groups. There were no significant differences in affected orbital volume (F = 0.527, P > 0.05), unaffected orbital volume (F = 1.628, P > 0.05), affected axial length (F = 0.946, P > 0.05), and unaffected axial length (F = 2.217, P > 0.05) among the four age groups. According to the Pearson correlations, there were no significant correlations between age and affected volume, unaffected volume, affected axis, and unaffected axis (r = 0.095, 0.097, 0.084, and 0.022, respectively; all P > 0.05). Orbital volume was moderately correlated with axial length in the affected and unaffected groups (r = 0.470 and 0.410, respectively; both P < 0.01). Linear regression analysis revealed that a 1 mm change in axis length was associated with a 0.38 cm3 and 0.73 cm3 change in orbital volume in the affected and unaffected groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals ages 12 to 60 years old with congenital microphthalmia, the effect of axis length on the orbital volume growth of the affected eye is only half that of the unaffected eye. The eyeball, orbital tissue, and craniofacial development all play an important role in the growth of orbital volume.