Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens

Poor visual outcome and associated factors among patients underwent cataract surgery at Debre Markos and Felege Hiwot comprehensive specialized hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the proportion of poor visual outcome and associated factors among adult patients who underwent cataract surgery at Debre Markos and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals in northwestern Ethiopia in 2023.

METHODS

A hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted on 418 adult patients who had undergone cataract surgery from June 07 to August 07, 2023. Patients were recruited using systematic random sampling with an interval of 2. A pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire, medical record review, and ophthalmologic examination were used to collect data. The collected data was entered into Epi-info version 7 and exported to SPSS version 25 software for analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with poor visual outcomes of cataract surgery. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.05 in the multivariable binary logistic regression were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 408 study participants with a median age of 65 years and a response rate of 97.6% took part. The proportion of poor visual outcomes of cataract surgery from 4 weeks to one year was 25.7% (95%CI: 21.6%, 30.3%). Factors responsible for poor visual outcomes of cataract surgery were intraocular lens implantation without a posterior chamber (AOR = 2.91, 95%CI:1.46,5.80), per-existing central corneal opacity (AOR = 3.83, 95%CI:1.52,9.69), pseudoexfoliation (AOR = 3.91,95%CI:1.39,11.88), age-related macular degeneration(AOR = 3.75, 95%CI:1.22, 11.88), glaucoma (AOR = 3.11, 95%CI:1.06,9.17) and striate keratopathy(AOR = 3.4, 95%CI: 1.11, 10.88).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the proportion of poor visual outcomes of cataract surgery is higher than the World Health Organization recommendation. The study found that implantation of an intraocular lens without a posterior chamber, pre-existing central corneal opacity, pre-existing age-related macular degeneration, pre-existing glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation, and striate keratopathy were significantly associated with poor visual outcomes of cataract surgery. We recommend that ophthalmologists and cataract surgeons prioritize the reduction of surgical complications and pre-existing ocular co-morbidities to enhance post-operative visual acuity. Improving pre-operative assessment and refining surgical techniques like phacoemulsification will aid in achieving this goal.

Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation Versus Four-Flanged Scleral Fixation Technique for Patients With Loss of Capsular Support During Routine Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC-IOL) implantation versus the four-flanged scleral fixation technique in eyes with loss of capsular support during routine cataract surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in whom an IOL was implanted either during or after short-term aphakia due to loss of capsular and sulcus support in a routine cataract surgery with at least 6 months of follow-up time between 2015 and 2023 in a tertiary medical center in Israel. Two different IOL implantation techniques were compared: the implantation of an angle-supported ACIOL and four-flanged scleral fixation. Main outcome measures included postoperative complications such as pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, loss of intraocular pressure control and glaucoma, IOL subluxation, and retinal detachment.

RESULTS

Sixty-five eyes of 65 patients were included in the study, 33 eyes in the AC-IOL group and 32 eyes in the flange group. Follow-up time was 29.92 ± 20.02 months in the AC-IOL group and 20.17 ± 15.56 months in the flange group (P = .087). Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy was observed in 10 (30.3%) patients in the AC-IOL group and in 1 (3.1%) patient in the flange group (P = .04). This association remained significant using survival analysis (P = .006). In 4 (12.1%) patients in the AC-IOL group, a glaucoma filtering procedure was performed to control the intraocular pressure compared with none in the flange group (P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of loss of capsular support during routine cataract surgery, four-flanged scleral fixation showed an overall lower rate of complications and significantly reduced rate of subsequent surgical interventions. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e520-e526.].

Scleral Fixated Secondary IOLs: An Outcomes Comparison Between the Yamane and Gore-Tex-Sutured Techniques

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Among secondary intraocular lens (IOL) techniques, scleral fixated IOLs (SFIOLs) offer advantages in cases without capsular support. In this article, we compare outcomes between two types of Gore-Tex scleral sutured IOLs with the Yamane technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent SFIOL implantation.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in final postoperative visual acuity (VA) for sutured SFIOLs (P < 0.001, Envista (n = 29) 95% CI 0.47 to 1.04, Akreos (n = 23) 95% CI 0.32 to 0.81) with no statistical improvement in the Yamane group (P = 0.44, n = 15, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.71). Outcomes analysis revealed greater incidences of cystoid macular edema (CME) in the Yamane cohort (P < 0.05) and a higher rate of reoperations in the Akreos cohort (P < 0.02). All complications related to suture material (n = 4) and IOL decentration (n = 2) occurred in the sutured SFIOL group.

CONCLUSIONS

The sutureless Yamane technique offered fewer subsequent surgeries and suture-specific complications while revealing diminished VA improvement in long-term follow-up compared to the sutured SFIOLs. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:384-390.].

A retrospective analysis of surgical outcome in sutureless glueless scleral fixation of foldable intraocular lens

INTRODUCTION

Cataract surgery constitutes one of the highest volume surgeries performed worldwide approximating 10 million annually, varying from 100 to 6000 per million population. Implantation of scleral fixated intra-ocular lens (SFIOL) is getting popular in managing difficult situations like aphakia, subluxated lens, and dislocated cataracts.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective series evaluated our experience with foldable 3-piece acrylic SFIOL implantation for various challenging surgical scenarios in a tertiary care ophthalmic institute in the southern part of India.

RESULTS

The data from the first 150 patients, those operated in our hospital in the aforementioned technique, have been reviewed and analyzed. The mean age of the population was 46.43 years. The most common indication was found to be surgical aphakia (34.66%) followed by traumatic subluxated lens (8.33%). Postoperative BCVA at 3 months improved to 0.255 on the LogMAR scale from preoperative BCVA of 0.795 (P < 0.01). Intraocular pressure was found to stabilize over 3 months follow-up (P = 0.002). The various intraoperative and postoperative complications have been recorded. Ten patients required resurgery out of which eight had postoperative haptic dislocation. A detailed comparison of the role of a surgeon's experience in influencing outcomes has been evaluated.

CONCLUSION

The technique offers physiological IOL placement using minimal surgical maneuvers. We strongly recommend this as a technique of choice for the surgical management of complicated scenarios with inadequate capsular bag support.

Modification of intraocular lens insertion using 4-flanged fixation with a standard cartridge and a 2.4 mm corneal incision in eyes with no capsular support

A modification of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, using the 4-flanged IOL fixation technique, through a 2.4 mm corneal incision using a standard cartridge and injector, is presented. An IOL with 4 eyelets is used, through which a 6-0 polypropylene suture is threaded on one side and then loaded into a provided cartridge and inserted to the anterior chamber through a 2.4 mm corneal incision. Using the handshake technique, the suture ends are eventually threaded through the eyelets and secured outside the eye with the creation of 4 flanges. This technique was used in 6 eyes of 5 consecutive patients with the absence of capsular support. During all follow-up visits, the IOLs were well centered and stable, and the flanges were buried in the sclera and covered with the conjunctiva. No complications were recorded. This modification simplifies the technique and reduces the well-known complications of large corneal incisions.

Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: scleral-fixated vs retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses

Cataract surgery via phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) placement in the capsular bag is the gold standard in the presence of adequate capsular support. However, when capsule and/or zonular fibers are weak or absent, alternate fixation strategies are required. Common alternative options include retropupillary iris-claw IOLs (RP-IC IOLs) and scleral-fixated IOLs (SF IOLs). In the present review of 87 articles with 2174 eyes implanted with RP-IC IOLs and 2980 eyes with SF IOLs, we discuss the published literature with respect to safety and efficacy. Although the studies reporting outcomes of these IOLs have been performed in patients with different concomitant conditions, visual and refractive outcomes were found to be comparable between RP-IC IOLs and SF IOLs. RP-IC IOL implantation seemed to provide equivalent or a potentially lower rate of complications than SF IOL implantation. Data from the literature also suggest that the surgical technique of RP-IC IOL implantation is relatively simpler with correspondingly shorter surgical times.

Use of Techniques for Scleral and Iris Fixation in Secondary Implantation of Intraocular Lenses

Scleral and iris fixation of intraocular lenses (IOL) are useful in the treatment of surgical or traumatic aphakia, luxation, and subluxation of IOL if the patient does not present appropriate capsular support. However, there is no consensus in the literature about which of these 2 methods is safer and better. The authors performed a literature review searching the main postoperative outcomes obtained with the use of each surgical method. Scleral and iris fixation of IOL are efficient in correction of the patients' visual acuity, even though each technique presents distinct complications which depend especially on the experience of the surgeon with the performed surgical method. It is important to understand that individuals submitted to scleral or iris fixation present previous preoperative complications in their eyes. Besides, both procedures are very complex, involving intense manipulation of the eye globe. The success rate of these surgical techniques is highly variable and has a close relation to the preoperative conditions of the patient's eye and the improvement of the surgeon's learning curve.

[Morphofunctional changes and complications after out-of-the-bag intraocular lens implantation]

The article reviews morphofunctional changes and complications after using modern methods of out-of-the-bag implantation of the intraocular lens (IOL). Literature data shows that the smallest morphofunctional changes in intraocular structures and the best results are obtained after retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens and transscleral fixation of posterior chamber IOL.