Iris reconstruction: A perspective on the modern surgical armamentarium

Preclinical biocompatibility and biosafety evaluation of a new foldable brown diaphragm intraocular lens: An in vitro and in vivo study

BACKGROUND

A new foldable brown diaphragm intraocular lens (IOL) was preclinically evaluated in vitro and in vivo by comparing its biocompatibility and biosafety with those of a commercially available IOL.

METHODS

The new foldable iris-diaphragm IOL is composed of hydrophobic acrylic material, with a transparent optical zone and surrounding brown diaphragm. Cellular experiments evaluating lens epithelial cell morphology, adhesion, and migration were conducted to exclude cytotoxic effects. Twelve New Zealand rabbits underwent implantation of a brown diaphragm IOL in one eye, whilst an additional 12 had a commercially available foldable IOL implanted, followed by slit-lamp evaluations of inflammatory reactions and capsular opacification. Corneal endothelial cells density was measured before and after implantation. Aqueous humour samples were obtained weekly for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis to investigate dye leakage from the brown-diaphragm IOL. Following 12 weeks of observation, haematoxylin and eosin staining of ocular tissue and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the IOL surface were performed.

RESULTS

Results from in vivo experiments found no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative inflammation and capsular biocompatibility. No significant changes in corneal endothelial cell density were observed in either group before and after surgery. LC-MS/MS analysis showed that the target dye was not detected in aqueous humour samples. Histopathology of ocular sections and SEM imaging of IOL surfaces showed similar changes in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly invented IOL showed good biocompatibility and biosafety. Combined with its foldability and peripheral shading, it could be a new choice for patients with iris defects.

Endocapsular artificial iris implantation for iris defects: Reducing symptoms, restoring visual function and improving cosmesis

Background

To investigate repair of iris defects by endocapsular implantation of an artificial iris, in relation to visual outcomes, safety profile and patient satisfaction.

Methods

Retrospective, consecutive case series from Greenlane tertiary teaching hospital and Eye Institute, Auckland, New Zealand. Medical records of patients implanted with an endocapsular artificial iris were reviewed and followed for minimum 3 months. Patient characteristics, surgical management, clinical outcomes and subjective responses were recorded.

Results

Nineteen artificial irises were implanted in 18 patients. Etiologies were iris melanotic lesion excision (73.7%), trauma (10.5%), congenital aniridia (10.5%) and Urrets‐Zavalia syndrome (5.3%). During postoperative follow‐up [14.1 ± 12.4 months (range: 3 to 59 months)], best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) did not change significantly [BCVA, 0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (20/32 Snellen) preoperatively vs. 0.18 logMAR postoperatively (20/25 Snellen) (Z = −0.222, p = 0.824); IOP, 15 mmHg preoperatively vs. 17 mmHg postoperatively (Z = 1.377, p = 0.1447)]. Mild or self‐limiting complications included: elevated IOP (42.1%), cystoid macular oedema (15.8%); persisting postoperative uveitis (15.8%) and minor vaulting of the prosthesis (15.7%). Moderate or severe complications included significant vaulting of prosthesis requiring surgical revision (5.3%) and a single eye (5.3%) with trabeculectomy and corneal graft failure. 94.4% of patients were very satisfied with the cosmesis and would be highly likely to have the procedure again.

Conclusions

This study confirms that endocapsular insertion of an artificial iris is typically associated with good functional and cosmetic results and a relatively low risk of significant complications.

Visual Outcomes of Pupilloplasty in Ocular Trauma and Iatrogenic Damage

Purpose: To report the visual outcomes of different techniques for iris pupilloplasty in eyes after traumatic and iatrogenic damage. Methods: 70 consecutive eyes with posttraumatic (80%) and postoperative (20%) iris damage were included. According to the preoperative diagnosis, the eyes were divided into three groups: mydriasis (50%), partial iris defects (24%), and iridodialysis (26%). Multiple techniques were performed: the Siepser slip-knot technique, the “lasso” technique, and suturing to the sclera. These techniques were combined in some cases. Results: The best improvement of visual acuity was found for the Siepser slip-knot technique with a median of 0.7 (SD ± 0.83) before surgery and 0.52 logMAR (SD ± 0.65) after surgery with regard to the surgical technique, and for mydriasis with a median of 0.7 (SD ± 0.75) before surgery and 0.52 logMAR (SD ± 0.49) after surgery with regard to preoperative diagnosis. Pupilloplasty was combined with additional surgery (corneal suturing, secondary intraocular lens implantation, anterior or pars plana vitrectomy) in 80% of cases. Apart from corneal suturing, all additional procedures ensured improvement in visual acuity. Conclusions: The slip-knot technique was the only suturing technique that resulted in a significant improvement in visual acuity. Other surgical procedures are usually needed in the majority of cases that undergo pupilloplasty, and they also give visual gain.