The Expanding Role of Hip Arthroscopy in Modern Day Practice

Spin Bias Is Common in the Abstracts and Main Body of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Borderline Hip Dysplasia

Purpose

To assess the quality and presence of spin bias in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that evaluated the outcomes of using hip arthroscopy for the treatment of hip pathology in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia.

Methods

PubMed and Embase were searched using the terms "borderline hip dysplasia" and "systematic review" or "meta-analysis." Forty-one initial studies were identified, and 12 met the inclusion criteria. Study characteristics were then collected, and each study was evaluated for the 15 most common types of bias and study quality using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) rating system. Inclusion criteria included a systematic review with or without meta-analysis, published in a peer-reviewed journal, accessible in English, with outcomes after hip arthroscopy for borderline hip dysplasia.

Results

The 12 reviewed studies were published between 2016 and 2023, and 10 of the studies represented Level IV evidence (2 studies were Level III evidence). At least 1 form of spin was identified in 83% (10/12) of the included studies. Regarding the specific categories of spin type, misleading interpretation was identified in 58% (7/12) of the studies, misleading reporting in 67% (8/12) of the studies, and inappropriate extrapolation in 50% (6/12) of the studies. On the basis of the AMSTAR 2 assessment, 92% (11/12) were categorized as either low quality or critically low quality, with 1 study being categorized as moderate.

Conclusions

Spin bias is frequently encountered in the abstracts for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that evaluate outcomes after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of hip pathology in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Depression and anxiety are associated with worse baseline function in hip arthroscopy patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between baseline depression and anxiety and preoperative functional status in hip arthroscopy patients.

METHODS

A prospective, institutional review board-approved orthopaedic registry was used to retrospectively study 104 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Enrolled patients were administered baseline questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS) preoperative expectations, and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS).

RESULTS

The average baseline PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores were 49.9 ± 9.8 and 55.5 ± 9.3, respectively. Bivariate analysis demonstrated that greater baseline PROMIS Anxiety correlated with worse preoperative PROMIS PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), Social Satisfaction (p < 0.001), and NPS score (p = 0.013). Bivariate analysis showed that greater PROMIS Depression correlated with worse preoperative PROMIS PF (p = 0.001), PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), SS (p < 0.001), and NPS score (p = 0.004). After controlling for confounders, multivariable analysis confirmed increased PROMIS Depression as an independent predictor of worse preoperative PROMIS PF (p = 0.009), MODEMS Expectations (p = 0.025), and NPS score (p = 0.002). Increased PROMIS Anxiety was predictive of worse baseline PROMIS PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), and Social Satisfaction (p < 0.001). A previous clinical diagnosis of depression or anxiety was only an independent predictor of worse baseline PROMIS Fatigue (p = 0.002) and was insignificant in all other models.

CONCLUSION

Increasing severity of depression and anxiety correlated with and predicted worse functional status at baseline in hip arthroscopy patients. As compared to clinical diagnosis of anxiety and depression, PROMIS metrics have superior utility in recognizing potentially modifiable mental health concerns that predict worse preoperative status. Ultimately, the study identifies an at-risk population undergoing hip arthroscopy that requires particular attention and potential mental health intervention in the preoperative setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Acellular Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis Technique Improves the Results of Chondral Lesions Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement

PURPOSE

The study's main objective was to evaluate, in the short-term, the result of the autologous acellular matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) technique in a selected group of patients with 2-4 cm² full-thickness chondral lesions, undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center Level IV case series of 25 patients (28 hips) who underwent an arthroscopic hip surgery with a liquid acellular collagen matrix. Inclusion criteria for implantation were FAI diagnosis (cam or pincer type), grade IV chondral lesions (Outerbridge size 2-4 cm²); Tönnis stage 0-II, minimum follow-up of 24 months, and 1 year (12-15 months) evaluation with very high field 3-T MRI arthrography. Exclusion criteria were Tönnis III, joint space <2 mm, center-edge angle <20°, and <24 months of follow-up. Clinical assessments involved symptoms duration until surgery, changes in physical and work activity and range of motion, modified Harris Hip Score, reporting percentages of patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), pain with a VAS, and level of satisfaction. Radiological assessments: Tönnis stage, articular space, alpha and lateral center edge angle (Wiberg), and generated tissue characteristics at 1 year (based on the MOCART score), through 3-T MRI.

RESULTS

25 patients (28 hips) treated; 19 men and 6 women (mean age: 40.5 years; range: 25-55). Two women underwent joint replacement surgery. Thus, 23 patients (26 hips) were analyzed. At 29 months following surgery (range: 24-48), a significant improvement was obtained in all parameters assessed, focusing on the characteristics of the generated tissue in the MRI (MOCART scores). 95% of the patients met the MCID (improvement >12 points in the modified Harris Hip Score), and 100% scored >74 points, achieving the PASS. Patients' satisfaction was 86.6% (SD 16.4). All patients who practiced sports resumed them.

CONCLUSIONS

The liquid AMIC is a safe technique that shows good clinical and radiological outcomes in a 2-year follow-up in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and grade IV acetabular 2-4 cm² chondral defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Concomitant Labral Tears: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study

PURPOSE

The present study investigated the minimum 2-year outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and concomitant labral tears in Asian patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for both FAI and concomitant labral tears between January 2012 and December 2017 were included. Patients with hip osteoarthritis of Tönnis grade ≥2, previous hip surgery, or followed for less than 2 years were excluded. Clinical assessments were performed using the modified Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the rates of achieving threshold values of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state at the latest follow-up. Plain radiographs were acquired pre- and postoperatively for radiologic assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients (90 hips, 58 male, 15 female; mean age 34.4 years) who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI and concomitant labral tears were enrolled. Forty-three hips (47.8%) had cam-type, 7 (7.8%) had pincer-type, and 40 (44.4%) had mixed-type FAI. The mean follow-up duration was 5.2 years. In cam- and mixed-type FAI hips, the mean α angle significantly decreased from 66.7 ± 8.28° preoperatively to 44.9 ± 3.78° postoperatively (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.6°-22.8°; P < .001). The mean modified Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index increased from 74.8 ± 13.2 and 75 ± 12.7 preoperatively to 93 ± 8.1 (95% CI 15.4-20.9; P = .001) and 89.4 ± 8.4 postoperatively (95% CI 11.8-17; P = .001), respectively. Seventy-four hips (82.2%) crossed the minimal clinically important difference, and 85 hips (94.4%) had achieved the patient acceptable symptomatic state. There were 2 cases of pudendal nerve palsy and 1 case of sciatic nerve palsy. No additional surgeries were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip arthroscopy can be an effective treatment for FAI and concomitant labral tears in Asian patients as demonstrated in this study, with improved PRO scores and reoperation rates. Longer-term studies with larger cohorts are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.