1
|
De la Cruz Ku G, Desai A, Narvaez-Rojas AR, Zheng C, Collier A, Weber L, Kassira W, Avisar E, Möller MG. Modified oncoplastic lift, lymphatic excision, and reconstruction: Introduction of a novel technique in oncoplastic breast surgery with simple surgical principles. Surgeon 2023:S1479-666X(23)00151-8. [PMID: 38161142 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oncoplastic surgery is an important component of the management of breast cancer. As prognosis has improved, the need for proficient techniques to achieve disease eradication while maintaining cosmesis for naturally appearing breasts has gained importance. This study describes an easy-to-learn modified oncoplastic technique for patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment. DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE Tumor resection is performed through different peri-areolar, inframammary, or radial incisions. To reduce the size of the surgical defect created after tissue resection, an internal purse-string is performed parallel to the chest wall or base of the wound with subsequent staggering in three or more layers as needed, while maintaining the parallel orientation of the needle. This is followed by the creation and overlapping of internal breast tissue flaps that are rearranged to decrease the dead space with the aim of improving cosmesis. The redundant skin is removed for the skin envelope to maintain shape. The wound is closed in layers. We also describe steps in performing sentinel lymph node and tumor extraction through the same periareolar, inframammary, or radial incisions for tumors located in outer quadrants. Following closure, contour and projection of the breast were maintained without indentation or loss of projection, with a symmetrical appearance to the contralateral side. CONCLUSION This simplified oncoplastic (MOLLER) technique can be easily learned and used by surgeons who treat cancer patients and have limited oncoplastic training. It uses basic known surgical principles to decrease the size of the defect created while minimizing the need for larger incisions/pedicles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel De la Cruz Ku
- Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru; Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | - Anshumi Desai
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alexis R Narvaez-Rojas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; International Coalition on Surgical Research, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Caiwei Zheng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Amber Collier
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lee Weber
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Wrood Kassira
- Division of Plastic Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Eli Avisar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mecker G Möller
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; International Coalition on Surgical Research, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua, Managua, Nicaragua; Department of Surgery, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago. Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou H, Chen H, Cheng C, Wu X, Ma Y, Han J, Li D, Lim GH, Rozen WM, Ishii N, Roy PG, Wang Q. A quality evaluation of the clinical practice guidelines on breast cancer using the RIGHT checklist. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1174. [PMID: 34430615 PMCID: PMC8350626 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-2884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in women. The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on breast cancer has been shown to be heterogeneous. The aim of our study was to evaluate the quality of breast cancer CPGs published in years 2018-2020, using the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist. Methods We searched Medline (via PubMed), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) as well as websites of guideline organizations for CPGs on breast cancer published between 2018 and 2020. We used the RIGHT checklist to evaluate the reporting quality of the included guidelines by assessing whether the CPGs adhered to each item of the checklist and calculated the proportions of appropriately reported RIGHT checklist items. We also presented the adherence reporting rates for each guideline and the mean rates for each of the seven domains of the RIGHT checklist. Results A total of 45 guidelines were included. Eighteen (40.0%) guidelines had an overall reporting rate below 50% and only three (6.7%) reported more than 80% of the items. The domains “Basic information” and “Background” had the highest reporting rates (75.9% and 62.5%, respectively). The mean reporting rates of the domains “Evidence”, “Recommendation”, “Review and quality assurance”, “Funding and declaration and management of interests” and “Other information” were 42.7%, 53.0%, 33.3%, 45.0%, and 44.4%, respectively. Conclusions The reporting quality varied among guidelines for breast cancer, showing the need for improvement in reporting the contents. Guideline developers should pay more attention to reporting the evidence, review and quality assurance, and funding and declaration and management of interests in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanqiong Zhou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Haiyang Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Cheng Cheng
- Department of Hematology, Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xuan Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yanfang Ma
- School of Chinese Medicine of Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jing Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ding Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Geok Hoon Lim
- Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Warren M Rozen
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Naohiro Ishii
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Nasushiobara, Japan
| | - Pankaj G Roy
- Department of Breast Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, Oxford, UK
| | - Qiming Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|