Adductor canal and femoral triangle: Two different rooms with the same door

Motor-Sparing Effect of Adductor Canal Block for Knee Analgesia: An Updated Review and a Subgroup Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Based on a Corrected Classification System

OBJECTIVE

Discrepancies in the definition of adductor canal block (ACB) lead to inconsistent results. To investigate the actual analgesic and motor-sparing effects of ACB by anatomically defining femoral triangle block (FTB), proximal ACB (p-ACB), and distal ACB (d-ACB), we re-classified the previously claimed ACB approaches according to the ultrasound findings or descriptions in the corresponding published articles. A meta-analysis with subsequent subgroup analyses based on these corrected results was performed to examine the true impact of ACB on its analgesic effect and motor function (quadriceps muscle strength or mobilization ability). An optimal ACB technique was also suggested based on an updated review of evidence and ultrasound anatomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched studies describing the use of ACB for knee surgery. Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched with the exclusion of non-English articles from inception to 28 February 2022. The motor-sparing and analgesic aspects in true ACB were evaluated using meta-analyses with subsequent subgroup analyses according to the corrected classification system.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis includes 19 randomized controlled trials. Compared with the femoral nerve block group, the quadriceps muscle strength (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.33, 95%-CI [0.01; 0.65]) and mobilization ability (SMD = -22.44, 95%-CI [-35.37; -9.51]) are more preserved in the mixed ACB group at 24 h after knee surgery. Compared with the true ACB group, the FTB group (SMD = 5.59, 95%-CI [3.44; 8.46]) has a significantly decreased mobilization ability at 24 h after knee surgery.

CONCLUSION

By using the corrected classification system, we proved the motor-sparing effect of true ACB compared to FTB. According to the updated ultrasound anatomy, we suggested proximal ACB to be the analgesic technique of choice for knee surgery. Although a single-shot ACB is limited in duration, it remains the candidate of the analgesic standard for knee surgery on postoperative day 1 or 2 because it induces analgesia with less motor involvement in the era of multimodal analgesia. Furthermore, data from the corrected classification system may provide the basis for future research.

Comparing Analgesic Efficacy of a Novel Dual Subsartorial Block Using Two Different Volumes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Monocentric, Randomised Trial

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a life-changing joint surgery that improves health-related quality of life and functional status. Patients in need of this surgery mostly belong to the geriatric age group with limited functional reserves and multiple co-morbidities requiring utmost perioperative care with the most suitable analgesic modalities. Regional analgesia (RA) should provide effective analgesia while allowing early mobility, reduced opioid consumption, and early discharge. Dual subsartorial block (DSB) is a novel procedure-specific, motor-sparing, and opioid-sparing RA technique for TKA surgeries. Our study compared the analgesic efficacy of the two different combinations of volumes used in DSB.

Methods: This prospective randomized comparative study included patients between 25-75 years of age of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-II grades who underwent an elective cemented unilateral total knee replacement performed via medial approaches under neuraxial anesthesia. A total of 104 patients were divided into two equal groups based on the local anesthetic (LA) volumes (Group A 10/20 ml and Group B 20/10 ml) used in the DSB. Postoperative pain scores (using a visual analog scale) and quadriceps strengths (using neurological exam), and opioid consumption were measured at regular intervals till discharge.

Results: Most patients (71.2%) remained pain-free and comfortable until discharge, while 28.8% complained of pain within 12 hours of DSB. Mean quadriceps strength remained almost normal (4-5/5) until the discharge with no incidences of buckling or fall in either group. Over time, the postoperative trend between the groups showed a significant difference for dynamic pain (p = 0.002) and quadriceps strength (p = <0.001). There was an insignificant difference (p = 0.161) between the groups regarding opioid consumption, with the median oral morphine equivalent of zero in both groups. 

Discussion: The effective analgesic coverage of DSB is based on the involvement of all innervations of the procedure-specific pain generators of TKR surgeries. The specific focus on selective sensory innervations and the type/volume of the LA used makes DSB a motor-sparing RA alternative that facilitates early mobility and discharge. It can provide effective postoperative analgesia without compromising the motor strength of the quadriceps muscle when administered in either 10/20 or 20/10 volumes.