In-hospital post-transplant acute hepatitis A viral (HAV) infection in a liver transplant recipient who was HAV seropositive pre-transplant

Eliminating viral hepatitis in children after liver transplants: How to reach the goal by 2030

Viral hepatitis infections are a great burden in children who have received liver transplant. Hepatotropic viruses can cause liver inflammation that can develop into liver graft fibrosis and cirrhosis over the long term. Immunological reactions due to viral hepatitis infections are associated with or can mimic graft rejection, rendering the condition difficult to manage. Prevention strategies using vaccinations are agreeable to patients, safe, cost-effective and practical. Hence, strategies to eliminate viral hepatitis A and B focus mainly on immunization programmes for children who have received a liver transplant. Although a vaccine has been developed to prevent hepatitis C and E viruses, its use is not licensed worldwide. Consequently, eliminating hepatitis C and E viruses mainly involves early detection in children with suspected cases and effective treatment with antiviral therapy. Good hygiene and sanitation are also important to prevent hepatitis A and E infections. Donor blood products and liver grafts should be screened for hepatitis B, C and E in children who are undergoing liver transplantation. Future research on early detection of viral hepatitis infections should include molecular techniques for detecting hepatitis B and E. Moreover, novel antiviral drugs for eradicating viral hepatitis that are highly effective and safe are needed for children who have undergone liver transplantation.

Immunity to hepatitis A virus in liver transplant recipients: A population-based study in Iran

BACKGROUND

Acute hepatitis A is usually a self-limited viral disease but can be severe and even fatal in special groups of patients including those with chronic liver disease and recipients of liver transplantation. To take appropriate preventive measures, it is important to determine the immune status against the hepatitis A virus in patients at risk of grave clinical outcomes following infection. To assess the need for immunization against hepatitis A, we aimed to determine the immune status against hepatitis A in a population of liver transplant recipients. We also investigated the association between hepatitis A immune status and demographic factors such as age and sex, underlying liver disease, source of drinking water, geographical area of residence and socioeconomic status.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed on 242 recipients of allogenic liver transplants at Abu Ali Sina Organ Transplant Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, between January 2017 and April 2017. The level of immunity was assessed using hepatitis A antibody detection kits.

RESULTS

The rate of immunity against hepatitis A was detected as 88.8% in our study population. In the multivariable logistic regression model, younger age (OR=1.175, P<0.001) and higher education level (OR=2.142, P=0.040) were the main determinants of non-immune status. However, hepatitis A immunity was independent of gender, monthly family income, water supply source, residential area and underlying liver disorder.

CONCLUSION

Although a significant proportion of liver transplant recipients in this study showed evidence of natural immunity to hepatitis A, a considerable proportion of younger patients and those with a higher level of education were non-immune. The results of this study signify the importance of screening for hepatitis A immunity in this at-risk population of patients and the need for vaccinating non-immune patients.

Immunoglobulin G Immunity to Hepatitis A Virus in Liver Transplant Candidates: A Serosurvey from Iran

Background: Becoming infected with hepatitis A virus (HAV) is deadlier in patients with end-stage liver disease. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of chronic immunity to HAV in liver transplant (LT) candidates to determine whether HAV vaccination is necessary for them or not. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on adult LT candidates who were referred to the LT center of Shiraz, Iran. The patients were interviewed for filling the data collection forms. These forms consisted of demographic information, medical backgrounds, etiology of chronic liver disease, a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, laboratory findings, and abdominal sonography report. Furthermore, a 3-cc blood sample was obtained from each patient, and anti-HAV IgG was detected by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using standard Diapro kits. Univariable and multivariable data analyses were performed using SPSS version 20. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered the significant cutoff in regression analysis. Results: A total of 291 patients with a mean age of 47.73 ± 12.9 years were recruited in this study of whom, 197 (67.7%) patients were males, 237 (81.4%) were married, 229 (78.7%) were educated lower than 12 years, 250 (85.9%) were living in urban areas, and (221) 75.9% had access to sanitary water in their living area. anti-HAV IgG was detected in 269 (92.4%, 95% CI: 89.4 - 95.4%) patients. Multivariable analysis showed that lower knowledge of hepatitis A transmission routes (OR: 11.9, 95% CI: 1.39 - 101.8, P = 0.024), no waterpipe smoking (OR: 9.5, 95% CI: 1.6 - 55.5, P = 0.014), and older age (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1 - 1.24, P = 0.03) were the main predictors of HAV immunity, in sequence. Conclusions: Most LT candidates are HAV IgG positive, but due to the growing number of LT candidates and high mortality of HAV in non-immune cases, LT candidates should be checked for HAV IgG, especially younger or waterpipe smoking patients who are less immune. Also, all non-immune patients should be vaccinated against HAV, if possible.