1
|
Sun Y, Liu P, Wang Z, Zhang H, Xu Y, Hu S, Yan Y. Efficacy and indications of gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent low-and high-grade glioma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:37. [PMID: 38183008 PMCID: PMC10768340 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11772-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the indications and efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) as a salvage treatment for recurrent low-and high-grade glioma. METHODS This retrospective study of 107 patients with recurrent glioma treated with GKRS between 2009 and 2022, including 68 high-grade glioma (HGG) and 39 low-grade glioma (LGG) cases. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The log-rank test was used to analyze the multivariate prognosis of the Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse reactions were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. The prognostic value of main clinical features was estimated, including histopathology, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), recurrence time interval, target location, two or more GKRS, surgery for recurrence, site of recurrence, left or right side of the brain and so on. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 74.5 months. The median OS and PFS were 17.0 months and 5.5 months for all patients. The median OS and PFS were 11.0 months and 5.0 months for HGG, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 49.0 months and 12.0 months for LGG, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that two or more GKRS, left or right side of the brain and brainstem significantly affected PFS. Meanwhile, the KPS index, two or more GKRS, pathological grade, and brainstem significantly affected OS. Stratified analysis showed that surgery for recurrence significantly affected OS and PFS for LGG. KPS significantly affected OS and PFS for HGG. No serious adverse events were noted post-GKRS. CONCLUSION GKRS is a safe and effective salvage treatment for recurrent glioma. Moreover, it can be applied after multiple recurrences with tolerable adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 110016, Shenyang, China
| | - Peiru Liu
- Beifang Hospital of China Medical University, 110016, Shenyang, China
| | - Zixi Wang
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, 116000, Dalian, China
| | - Haibo Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 110016, Shenyang, China
| | - Ying Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 110016, Shenyang, China
| | - Shenghui Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 110016, Shenyang, China
| | - Ying Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 110016, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stenman M, Benmakhlouf H, Wersäll P, Johnstone P, Hatiboglu MA, Mayer-da-Silva J, Harmenberg U, Lindskog M, Sinclair G. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the brain: optimizing patient selection for gamma knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:333-342. [PMID: 32902689 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04537-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effects of single-fraction gamma knife radiosurgery (sf-GKRS) on patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases (BM) in the era of targeted agents (TA) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are insufficiently studied. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clear cell metastatic RCC patients treated with sf-GKRS due to BM in 2005-2014 at three European centres were retrospectively analysed (n = 43). Median follow-up was 56 months. Ninety-five percent had prior nephrectomy, 53% synchronous metastasis and 86% extracranial disease at first sf-GKRS. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ranged from 60 to 100%. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and adverse radiation effects (ARE). RESULTS One hundred and ninety-four targets were irradiated. The median number of targets at first sf-GKRS was two. The median prescription dose was 22.0 Gy. Thirty-seven percent had repeated sf-GKRS. Eighty-eight percent received TA. LC rates at 12 and 18 months were 97% and 90%. Median OS from the first sf-GKRS was 15.7 months. Low serum albumin (HR for death 5.3), corticosteroid use pre-sf-GKRS (HR for death 5.8) and KPS < 80 (HR for death 9.1) were independently associated with worse OS. No further prognostic information was gleaned from MSKCC risk group, synchronous metastasis, age, number of BM or extracranial metastases. Other prognostic scores for BM radiosurgery, including DS-GPA, renal-GPA, LLV-SIR and CITV-SIR, again, did not add further prognostic value. ARE were seldom symptomatic and were associated with tumour volume, 10-Gy volume and pre-treatment perifocal oedema. ARE were less common among patients treated with TA within 1 month of sf-GKRS. CONCLUSIONS We identified albumin, corticosteroid use and KPS as independent prognostic factors for sf-GKRS of clear cell RCC BM. Studies focusing on the prognostic significance of albumin in sf-GKRS are rare. Further studies with a larger number of patients are warranted to confirm the above analytical outcome. Also, in keeping with previous studies, our data showed optimal rates of local tumour control and limited toxicity post radiosurgery, rendering GKRS the tool of choice in the management of RCC BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Stenman
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - H Benmakhlouf
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Wersäll
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Johnstone
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M A Hatiboglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - J Mayer-da-Silva
- Centro Gamma Knife, CUF Infante Santo Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - U Harmenberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindskog
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - G Sinclair
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Oncology, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Franca SA, Tavares WM, Salinet ASM, Teixeira MJ, Paiva WS. Laser interstitial thermal therapy as an adjunct therapy in brain tumors: A meta-analysis and comparison with stereotactic radiotherapy. Surg Neurol Int 2020; 11:360. [PMID: 33194293 PMCID: PMC7656052 DOI: 10.25259/sni_152_2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive procedures are gaining widespread acceptance in difficult-to-access brain tumor treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the preferred choice, however, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as a tumor cytoreduction technique. The present meta-analysis compared current SRS therapy with LITT in brain tumors. METHODS A search was performed in Lilacs, PubMed, and Cochrane database. Patient's demographics, tumor location, therapy used, Karnofsky performance status score before treatment, and patient's outcome (median overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events) data were extracted from studies. The risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane collaboration tool. RESULTS Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis. LITT and SRS MOS in brain metastasis patients were 12.8 months' versus 9.8 months (ranges 9.3-16.3 and 8.3-9.8; P = 0.02), respectively. In a combined comparison of adverse effects among LITT versus SRS in brain metastasis, we found 15% reduction in absolute risk difference (-0.16; 95% confidence interval P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION We could not state that LITT treatment is an optimal alternative therapy for difficult-to-access brain tumors due to the lack of systematic data that were reported in our pooled studies. However, our results identified a positive effect in lowering the absolute risk of adverse events compared with SRS therapy. Therefore, randomized trials are encouraged to ascertain LITT role, as upfront or postoperative/post-SRS therapy for brain tumor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wagner Malago Tavares
- Department of Research, Instituto Paulista De Saude Para Alta Complexidade, Brazil
- Institute of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sinclair G, Stenman M, Benmakhlouf H, Johnstone P, Wersäll P, Lindskog M, Hatiboglu MA, Harmenberg U. Adaptive radiosurgery based on two simultaneous dose prescriptions in the management of large renal cell carcinoma brain metastases in critical areas: Towards customization. Surg Neurol Int 2020; 11:21. [PMID: 32123609 PMCID: PMC7049890 DOI: 10.25259/sni_275_2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The long-term benefits of local therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been widely documented. In this context, single fraction gamma knife radiosurgery (SF-GKRS) is routinely used in the management of brain metastases. However, SF-GKRS is not always feasible due to volumetric and regional constraints. We intend to illustrate how a dose-volume adaptive hypofractionated GKRS technique based on two concurrent dose prescriptions termed rapid rescue radiosurgery (RRR) can be utilized in this particular scenario. Case Description: A 56-year-old man presented with left-sided hemiparesis; the imaging showed a 13.1 cc brain metastasis in the right central sulcus (Met 1). Further investigation confirmed the histology to be a metastatic clear cell RCC. Met 1 was treated with upfront RRR. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 10 months showed further volume regression of Met 1; however, concurrently, a new 17.3 cc lesion was reported in the boundaries of the left frontotemporal region (Met 2) as well as a small metastasis (<1 cc) in the left temporal lobe (Met 3). Met 2 and Met 3 underwent RRR and SF-GKRS, respectively. Results: Gradual and sustained tumor ablation of Met 1 and Met 2 was demonstrated on a 20 months long follow- up. The patient succumbed to extracranial disease 21 months after the treatment of Met 1 without evidence of neurological impairment post-RRR. Conclusion: Despite poor prognosis and precluding clinical factors (failing systemic treatment, eloquent location, and radioresistant histology), RRR provided optimal tumor ablation and salvage of neurofunction with limited toxicity throughout follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Sinclair
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Oncology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - M Stenman
- Department of Immunology Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - H Benmakhlouf
- Departments of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Johnstone
- Department of Oncology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - P Wersäll
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindskog
- Department of Immunology Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M A Hatiboglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - U Harmenberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|