Lei M, Xie D, Hu C, Gu D, Cai C, Liu Y, Zeng G. Experiences in managing different consequences of forgotten ureteral stents.
Urol Ann 2022;
14:141-146. [PMID:
35711481 PMCID:
PMC9197003 DOI:
10.4103/ua.ua_165_20]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose
We reported the different consequences of forgotten stents and share our managing experiences.
Patients and Methods
From July 2011 to August 2019, eight patients (five men and three women) with forgotten encrusted ureteral stents were treated by different endoscopic procedures in our center. Plain-film radiography (kidney, ureter, and bladder [KUB]) and computed tomography were used to evaluate the position of stents, the site of encrustation, and the stone burden. Various sole or combined endoscopic techniques including percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and cystolitholapaxy were used to achieve stent removal.
Results:
The average age of the patients was 50.9 years (range: 25–72 years). The mean indwelling time of the stents was 32.9 months (range: 12–83 months). Mean stent stone burden was 15 mm × 10 mm. Three patients had stent stone burden larger than 20 mm. Three patients had a preoperative positive urine culture before treatment. The stent was fragmented in two patients. The ureteral stents and related stones were successfully removed without any complications by a sole or combined endoscopic techniques with stone-free status achieved in all patients. There is no complications occurred.
Conclusion:
Forgotten stents can lead to complicated urinary tract calculi, stent encrustation, urinary tract infection, vesicoureteric reflux, and even ureteral polyps. Various sole or combined endourological techniques can be used to manage the forgotten encrusted ureteral stents.
Collapse