Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in patients who have undergone radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A prospective randomized clinical study of two silicone catheters (clinical benefit of antibiotic silicone material)

Prevention and management of urinary tract infections after cystectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview of the most relevant recent literature about urinary tract infections (UTI) after radical cystectomy and to discuss them in the context of new individualized therapy approaches and possible preventive measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

UTI following radical cystectomy is a common complication associated with significant morbidity and readmission risk. Recent literature focuses on the identification of risk factors and the optimization of management. The risk factors most commonly associated with increased risk for UTI were perioperative blood transfusions and orthotopic neobladder (ONB). Furthermore, the effect of perioperative antibiotic regimens on rates of postoperative infections has been studied, but no consistent significant changes in UTI rates have yet been identified. Guidelines should be based on urologic studies and, wherever appropriate, should be uniform in design to encourage more frequent adherence. Furthermore, understanding the pathomechanisms leading to the development of UTI after radical cystectomy needs to be more central to discussions.

SUMMARY

Uniform definition of UTI, characteristics of bacterial pathogens involved, and type and duration of antibiotics used and identification of clinical risk factors must be the focus of well designed prospective studies to enable reduction of the most common complication after radical cystectomy.

Catheter-Associated Urinary Infections and Consequences of Using Coated versus Non-Coated Urethral Catheters-Outcomes of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Coated urethral catheters were introduced in clinical practice to reduce the risk of catheter-acquired urinary tract infection (CAUTI). We aimed to systematically review the incidence of CAUTI and adverse effects in randomized clinical trials of patients requiring indwelling bladder catheterization by comparing coated vs. non-coated catheters. This review was performed according to the 2020 PRISMA framework. The incidence of CAUTI and catheter-related adverse events was evaluated using the Cochran−Mantel−Haenszel method with a random-effects model and reported as the risk ratio (RR), 95% CI, and p-values. Significance was set at p < 0.05 and a 95% CI. Twelve studies including 36,783 patients were included for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the CAUTI rate between coated and non-coated catheters (RR 0.87 95% CI 0.75−1.00, p = 0.06). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the risk of CAUTI was significantly lower in the coated group compared with the non-coated group among patients requiring long-term catheterization (>14 days) (RR 0.82 95% CI 0.68−0.99, p = 0.04). There was no difference between the two groups in the incidence of the need for catheter exchange or the incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms after catheter removal. The benefit of coated catheters in reducing CAUTI risk among patients requiring long-term catheterization should be balanced against the increased direct costs to health care systems when compared to non-coated catheters.