1
|
Vis AN, Bergh RCN, Poel HG, Mottrie A, Stricker PD, Graefen M, Patel V, Rocco B, Lissenberg‐Witte B, Leeuwen PJ. Selection of patients for nerve sparing surgery in robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2021; 3:6-18. [PMID: 35475150 PMCID: PMC8988739 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the standard surgical procedure for localized prostate‐cancer (PCa). Nerve‐sparing surgery (NSS) during RARP has been associated with improved erectile function and continence rates after surgery. However, it remains unclear what are the most appropriate indications for NSS. Objective The objective of this study is to systematically review the available parameters for selection of patients for NSS. The weight of different clinical variables, multiparametric magnetic‐resonance‐imaging (mpMRI) findings, and the impact of multiparametric‐nomograms in the decision‐making process on (side‐specific) NSS were assessed. Evidence acquisition This systematic review searched relevant databases and included studies performed from January 2000 until December 2020 and recruited a total of 15 840 PCa patients. Studies were assessed that defined criteria for (side‐specific) NSS and associated them with oncological safety and/or functional outcomes. Risk of bias assessment was performed. Evidence synthesis Nineteen articles were eligible for full‐text review. NSS is primarily recommended in men with adequate erectile function, and with low‐risk of extracapsular extension (ECE) on the side‐of NSS. Separate clinical and radiological variables have low accuracy for predicting ECE, whereas nomograms optimize the risk‐stratification and decision‐making process to perform or to refrain from NSS when oncological safety (organ‐confined disease, PSM rates) and functional outcomes (erectile function and continence rates) were assessed. Conclusions Consensus exists that patients who are at high risk of ECE should refrain from NSS. Several multiparametric preoperative nomograms were developed to predict ECE with increased accuracy compared with single clinical, pathological, or radiological variables, but controversy exists on risk thresholds and decision rules on a conservative versus a less‐conservative surgical approach. An individual clinical judgment on the possibilities of NSS set against the risks of ECE is warranted. Patient summary NSS is aimed at sparing the nerves responsible for erection. NSS may lead to unfavorable tumor control if the risk of capsule penetration is high. Nomograms predicting extraprostatic tumor‐growth are probably most helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André N. Vis
- Department of Urology Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands
| | | | - Henk G. Poel
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands
- Department of Urology NKI/AVL Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marcus Graefen
- Martini‐Klinik University Hospital Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Vipul Patel
- Global Robotics Institute Florida Hospital Celebration Health Orlando Florida USA
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
| | - Birgit Lissenberg‐Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. Leeuwen
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands
- Department of Urology NKI/AVL Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christophe C, Montagne S, Bourrelier S, Roupret M, Barret E, Rozet F, Comperat E, Coté JF, Lucidarme O, Cussenot O, Granger B, Renard-Penna R. Prostate cancer local staging using biparametric MRI: assessment and comparison with multiparametric MRI. Eur J Radiol 2020; 132:109350. [PMID: 33080549 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The value of adding dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging to T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to improve the detection and staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is unclear. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic performance of non-contrast biparametric MRI (bpMRI) with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), for local staging of PCa. METHODS Ninety-two patients who underwent prostate MRI on a 3-Tesla MRI system before radical prostatectomy for PCa were included retrospectively. Four readers independently assigned a Likert score (ranging from 1 to 5) for predicting extra-prostatic extension (EPE) on T2W + DWI (bpMRI) and then on T2W + DWI + DCE imaging (mpMRI). MRI-based staging results were compared with radical prostatectomy histology. A prediction of EPE generalized linear mixed model was used to assess the added-value of DCE and discriminative power of staging accuracy by area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC ROC). RESULTS AUC was not significantly improved by DCE (mpMRI, AUC = 0.73 [95%CI: 0.655‒0.827] vs. bpMRI, AUC = 0.76 [95%CI: 0.681‒0.846]). After applying a selection procedure, only MRI criteria were retained in a multivariate model. The following criteria were significantly associated with local extension: localization in the peripheral zone (p < 0.001), maximal diameter of the lesion (<0.0001), curvilinear capsular contact on T2W (p < 0.0001), capsular irregularity on T2W (p < 0.0001), bulging on T2W (p < 0.001) and seminal vesicle hypo-signal (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Use of bpMRI did not result in a decrease in local staging accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Christophe
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Montagne
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Bourrelier
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Academic Department of Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, GRC n° 5, Oncotype-Uro, Paris, France
| | - Eric Barret
- Montsouris Institute, Urology Department, Paris, F-75014, France
| | - François Rozet
- Montsouris Institute, Urology Department, Paris, F-75014, France
| | - Eva Comperat
- Sorbonne Universités, GRC n° 5, Oncotype-Uro, Paris, France; Academic Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean François Coté
- Academic Department of Pathology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Lucidarme
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Sorbonne Universités, GRC n° 5, Oncotype-Uro, Paris, France; Academic Department of Urology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Granger
- Department of Public Health, Pitié-Salpétrière Academic Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne Universités, AP-HP, CIC-P 1421, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, UMR 1136, CIC-1421, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, GRC n° 5, Oncotype-Uro, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Magnetta MJ, Catania R, Girometti R, Westphalen AC, Borhani AA, Furlan A. Prostate MRI: staging and decision-making. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:2143-2153. [PMID: 32047994 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02431-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Multi-parametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) plays a critical role in the diagnosis, staging, and evaluation of treatment response in patients with prostate cancer. Radiologists, through an accurate and standardized interpretation of mpMRI, can clinically stage prostate cancer and help to risk stratify patients who may benefit from more invasive treatment or exclude patients who may be harmed by overtreatment. The purpose of this article is to describe key findings to accurately stage prostate cancer with mpMRI and to describe the contexts in which mpMRI is best applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Magnetta
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roberta Catania
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Intensive Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, University Hospital, S. Maria della Misericordia, p.le S. Maria della Misericordia n. 15, 33100, Udine, UD, Italy
| | - Antonio C Westphalen
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, and Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amir A Borhani
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Furlan
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang F, Liu CL, Chen Q, Shao SC, Chen SQ. Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190480. [PMID: 31596123 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for detecting extracapsular extension (ECE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS AND MATERIALS We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library up to December 2018. We included studies that used mpMRI to differentiate ECE from organ-confined PCa with a combination of T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. All studies included had pathological diagnosis with radical prostatectomy. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of included studies by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios and receiver operating characteristic curve for mpMRI from 2 × 2 tables. RESULTS A total of 17 studies that comprised 3374 participants were included. The pooled data showed a sensitivity of 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.43, 0.66]) and specificity of 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.82, 0.91) for extracapsular extension detection in PCa. CONCLUSION First, our meta-analysis shows moderate sensitivity and high specificity for mpMRI to differentiate ECE from organ-confined prostate cancer before surgery. Second, our meta-analysis shows that mpMRI had no significant differences in performance compared with the former meta-analysis with use of T2WI alone or with additional functional MRI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE It is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of mpMRI in combination of TWI, diffusion-weightedimaging and dynamiccontrast-enhanced-MRI for extracapsular extension detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215001, China
| | - Chen-Lu Liu
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215001, China
| | - Qian Chen
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215001, China
| | - Sheng-Chao Shao
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215001, China
| | - Shuang-Qing Chen
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215001, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kozikowski M, Powroźnik J, Malewski W, Kawecki S, Piotrowicz S, Michalak W, Nyk Ł, Gola M, Dobruch J. 3.0-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging modifies the template of endoscopic, conventional radical prostatectomy in all cancer risk categories
. Arch Med Sci 2018; 14:1387-1393. [PMID: 30393494 PMCID: PMC6209726 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.77222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3.0-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in preoperative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) and its influence on the extent of resection during endoscopic radical prostatectomy (ERP) among cancer risk groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of 154 patients with PCa in whom mpMRI was performed prior to ERP between 2011 and 2015 were included. The initial decision whether to perform neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing surgery was based on EAU guidelines. mpMRI images were reevaluated prior to prostatectomy to modify the surgical template. Imaging was compared with pathological reports to investigate the diagnostic performance of mpMRI. RESULTS The surgical template was modified in 69 (44.8%) patients after reevaluation of mpMRI. More preserving NVB sparing was attempted in 17 (11.0%) men, in whom NVB would have been resected if mpMRI had not been available. More aggressive NVB resection was performed in 52 (33.8%) men, in whom innervation would have been spared if basing solely based on guidelines. Among all PCa risk groups mpMRI had an impact on the surgical template with more aggressive surgery in 63.0% and 33.3% of men in the low- and intermediate-risk group, respectively, and more preserving in 21.4% of the high-risk patients. The change in extent of resection was not correlated with a higher risk of positive surgical margins (p = 0.196). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative mpMRI exerts a significant impact on decision making concerning the extent of resection during ERP irrespective of the PCa risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mieszko Kozikowski
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Jan Powroźnik
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Wojciech Malewski
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Szymon Kawecki
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Sebastian Piotrowicz
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Wojciech Michalak
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Łukasz Nyk
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Magdalena Gola
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| | - Jakub Dobruch
- Urology Clinic, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Urology, European Health Centre – Otwock, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grivas N, van der Roest RC, de Korne CM, KleinJan GH, Sikorska K, Schoots IG, Tillier C, van der Broek B, Jalink K, Heijmink SWTJP, Buckle T, van Leeuwen FWB, van der Poel HG. The value of periprostatic fascia thickness and fascia preservation as prognostic factors of erectile function after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2018; 37:309-315. [PMID: 29936567 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2387-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the correlation of preoperative fascia thickness (FT) and intraoperative fascia preservation (FP) with erectile function (EF) after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS Our analysis included 106 patients, with localized prostate cancer and no erectile dysfunction (ED) before RARP, assessed with preoperative 3 Tesla (3 T) multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). FP score was defined as the extent of FP from the base to the apex of the prostate, quantitatively assessed by the surgeon. Median fascia thickness (MFT) per patient was defined as the sum of the median FT of 12 MRI regions. Preserved MFT (pMFT) was the sum of the saved MFT. The percentage of pFMT (ppMFT) was also calculated. Fascia surface (FS) was measured on MRI and it was combined with FP score resulting in preserved FS (pFS) and percentage of pFS (ppFS). RESULTS FP score, pMFT, ppMFT, pFS and ppFS were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in patients with ED. In the multivariate regression analysis, lower FP score [odds ratio (OR) 0.721, p = 0.03] and lower ppMFT (OR 0.001, p = 0.027) were independent predictors of ED. ROC analysis showed the highest area under the curve for ppMFT (0.787) and FP score (0.767) followed by pMFT (0.755) and ppFS (0.743). CONCLUSIONS MRI-determined periprostatic FT combined with intraoperative FP score are correlated to postprostatectomy EF. Based on the hypothesis that a thicker fascia forms a protective layer for the nerves, we recommend assessing FT preoperatively to counsel men for the odds of preserving EF after RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rosanne C van der Roest
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clarize M de Korne
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs H KleinJan
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corinne Tillier
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bram van der Broek
- Department of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Jalink
- Department of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn W T J P Heijmink
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Buckle
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kwon T, Lee C, Jung J, Kim CS. Neurovascular bundle size measured on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging is associated with the recovery of erectile function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2017. [PMID: 28648413 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Erectile dysfunction is one of the complications occurring after radical prostatectomy (RP), and recovery of erectile function is quantitatively related to the preservation of the neurovascular bundles (NVB).We evaluated the significance of NVB area on functional outcomes after RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 141 patients who underwent bilateral, nerve-sparing, robot-assisted RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (clinically T2N0M0 on magnetic resonance imaging) and were evaluated at least 12 months after surgery. NVB area was measured as a region of interest that coincided with the outline of the maximum area of the posterolateral region of the prostate on T2-weighted axial imaging. Factors associated with functional outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 141 patients, 36 patients (25.5%) had no preoperative potency (group 1), 66 patients (46.8%) recovered potency (group 2), and 39 patients (27.7%) did not recover potency (group 3). Although the mean age of the entire cohort was 65.4 years, the mean age of group 1 was greater than groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.001). The NVB area of group 2 was larger than those of groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.001). Potency evaluations involved 105 patients (74.5%; groups 2 and 3), and patients with pre-existing erectile dysfunction were excluded. The median time to potency recovery was 3.0 months after surgery. The multivariable analysis revealed that the NVB area was the only significant factor predictive of potency recovery. CONCLUSIONS The NVB area in the posterolateral region of the prostate is an independent factor for predicting potency recovery. The degree of postoperative erectile function can be predicted based on the preoperative NVB area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taekmin Kwon
- Department of Urology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Chanwoo Lee
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaeyoon Jung
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Choung-Soo Kim
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hatiboglu G, Simpfendörfer T, Uhlmann L, Bergero M, Macher-Goeppinger S, Pahernik S, Hadaschik B, Hohenfellner M, Teber D. A prospective randomized controlled trial for assessment of perineal hydrodissection technique for nervesparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot 2017; 13. [DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Revised: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G. Hatiboglu
- Department of Urology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110; Heidelberg Germany
| | - T. Simpfendörfer
- Department of Urology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110; Heidelberg Germany
| | - L. Uhlmann
- Department of Medical Biometry; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld; Heidelberg Germany
| | - M.A. Bergero
- Department of Urology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110; Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Urology; Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires; Buenos Aires Argentina
| | - S. Macher-Goeppinger
- Institute of Pathology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 220/221; Heidelberg Germany
| | - S. Pahernik
- Department of Urology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110; Heidelberg Germany
| | - B. Hadaschik
- Department of Urology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110; Heidelberg Germany
| | - M. Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110; Heidelberg Germany
| | - D. Teber
- Department of Urology; University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110; Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 366] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
10
|
Vasdev N, Agarwal S, Rai BP, Soosainathan A, Shaw G, Chang S, Prasad V, Mohan-S G, Adshead JM. Intraoperative Frozen Section of the Prostate Reduces the Risk of Positive Margin Whilst Ensuring Nerve Sparing in Patients with Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: First Reported UK Series. Curr Urol 2016; 9:93-103. [PMID: 27390582 DOI: 10.1159/000442860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nerve sparing during robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) considerably improves post-operative potency and urinary continence as long as it does not compromise oncological outcome. Excision of the neurovascular bundle (NVB) is often performed in patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer to reduce the risk of positive surgical margin raising the risk of urinary incontinence and impotence. We present the first UK series outcomes of such patients who underwent an intra-operative frozen section (IOFS) analysis of the prostate during RRP allowing nerve sparing. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively analysed the data of 40 patients who underwent an IOFS during RRP at our centre from November 2012 until November 2014. Our IOFS technique involved whole lateral circumferential analysis of the prostate during RRP with the corresponding neurovascular tissue. An intrafascial nerve spare was performed and the specimen was removed intra-operatively via an extension of the 12 mm Autosuture™ camera port without undocking robotic arms. It was then painted by the surgeon and sprayed with "Ink Aid" prior to frozen section analysis. The corresponding NVB was excised if the histopathologist found a positive surgical margin on frozen section. RESULTS Median time to extract the specimen, wound closure and re-establishment of pneumoperitoneum increased the operative time by 8 min. Median blood loss for IOFS was 130 ± 97 ml vs. 90 ± 72 ml (p = NS). IOFS was not associated with major complications or with blood transfusion. PSM decreased significantly from non-IOFS RRP series of 28.7 to 7.8% (p < 0.05). Intra-operative PSM on the prostate specimen was seen in 8/40 margin analysis (20%) leading to an excision of the contra-lateral nerve bundle. On analysis of the nerve bundle on a paraffin embedded block, 6 nerve bundle matched tumor on the specimen whereas 2 NVB were retrospectively removed unnecessarily in our series. All 40 patients have undetectable PSA at a mean follow up of 21.2 months (SD 7.79). Functional data at 18 months confirms a reduction in the urinary incontinence from 37% in the IOFS group vs 57% in the non-IOFS group (p = NS). IOFS technique has resulted in a significant increase in intravesical nerve sparing in both T2/T3 patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer when appropriately counselled and selected (T2 from 100% in the IOFS group versus 67% and T3 from 100% in the IOFS group to 42%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Introduction of the IOFS analysis during intrafascial nerve spare RRP has reduced PSM and the rate of urinary incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Vasdev
- Hertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK; School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Samita Agarwal
- Department of Histopathology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Hertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Arany Soosainathan
- Hertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Gregory Shaw
- Hertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | | | - Venkat Prasad
- Department of Anaesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Gowrie Mohan-S
- Department of Anaesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - James M Adshead
- Hertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Davis R, Salmasi A, Koprowski C, Kim S, Kwon YS, Faiena I, Patel N, Elsamra SE, Kim IY. Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer in Community Practice. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016; 14:e617-e622. [PMID: 27188968 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The presence of extracapsular extension (ECE) in prostate cancer (PCa) can influence a surgeon's decision to perform a nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy (RP). Preoperatively, multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) is often used to stage PCa. More recently, the use of mp-MRI has gained wide acceptance in fusion biopsy of the prostate. In this framework, the reported accuracy of mp-MRI has been highly variable, with data often originating from large referral centers with experienced radiologists. We sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of mp-MRI for detecting ECE in the community. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed a prospectively maintained database of men with PCa who had undergone RP. We recorded the prevalence of ECE at RP and determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRI for detecting ECE. We assessed these values according to the D'Amico risk groups and compared the predictive value of MRI to that of the Partin tables. RESULTS The prevalence of ECE was 11.5%, 28.1%, and 47.1% in the low-, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively, with an overall prevalence of 24.1%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRI was 12.5%, 93.1%, 36.4%, and 77.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION The reduction in the sensitivity of preoperative mp-MRI to determine ECE in the community setting is significant. Even with stratification using the D'Amico criteria and Partin tables, the performance of mp-MRI was not significantly improved. Because most cases of PCa are diagnosed and treated in the community, it is questionable whether mp-MRI is a suitable staging modality in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Davis
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Amirali Salmasi
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Christopher Koprowski
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Sinae Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Young Suk Kwon
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Izak Faiena
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Neal Patel
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Sammy E Elsamra
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Isaac Yi Kim
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The cavernous nerves, which course along the surface of the prostate gland, are responsible for erectile function. During radical prostatectomy, urologists are challenged in preserving these nerves and their function. Cavernous nerves are microscopic and show variable location in different patients; therefore, postoperative sexual potency rates are widely variable following radical prostatectomy. A variety of technologies, including electrical and optical nerve stimulation, dye-based optical fluorescence and microscopy, spectroscopy, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have all been used to study cavernous nerve anatomy and physiology, and some of these methods are also potential intraoperative methods for identifying and preserving cavernous nerves. However, all of these technologies have inherent limitations, including slow or inconsistent nerve responses, poor image resolution, shallow image depth, slow image acquisition times and/or safety concerns. New and emerging technologies, as well as multimodal approaches combining existing methods, hold promise for improved postoperative sexual outcomes and patient quality of life following radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Toner L, Weerakoon M, Bolton DM, Ryan A, Katelaris N, Lawrentschuk N. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: Comparative studies including radical prostatectomy specimens and template transperineal biopsy. Prostate Int 2015; 3:107-14. [PMID: 26779455 PMCID: PMC4685231 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2015.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an emerging technique aiming to improve upon the diagnostic sensitivity of prostate biopsy. Because of variance in interpretation and application of techniques, results may vary. There is likely a learning curve to establish consistent reporting of mpMRI. This study aims to review current literature supporting the diagnostic utility of mpMRI when compared with radical prostatectomy (RP) and template transperineal biopsy (TTPB) specimens. Methods MEDLINE and PubMed database searches were conducted identifying relevant literature related to comparison of mpMRI with RP or TTPB histology. Results Data suggest that compared with RP and TTPB specimens, the sensitivity of mpMRI for prostate cancer (PCa) detection is 80–90% and the specificity for suspicious lesions is between 50% and 90%. Conclusions mpMRI has an increasing role for PCa diagnosis, staging, and directing management toward improving patient outcomes. Its sensitivity and specificity when compared with RP and TTPB specimens are less than what some expect, possibly reflecting a learning curve for the technique of mpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Toner
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mahesha Weerakoon
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Damien M Bolton
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Ryan
- Department of Pathology, TissuPath Specialist Pathology Services, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nikolas Katelaris
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Diagnosis of Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer on Prostate MRI: Impact of Second-Opinion Readings by Subspecialized Genitourinary Oncologic Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205:W73-8. [PMID: 26102421 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to investigate the added value of second-opinion evaluation of prostate MRI by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists for the assessment of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective evaluation of initial and second-opinion radiology reports of 76 patients who underwent MRI of the prostate before prostatectomy for histologically proven prostate cancer. Initial outside reports and second-opinion reports were unpaired and reviewed in random order by a urologist who was blinded to patients' clinical details and histopathologic data. Histopathologic analysis of the prostatectomy specimen served as the reference standard. RESULTS Among cases with diagnostic-quality images available (71/76; 93%), disagreement between the initial report and the second-opinion report was observed in 30% of cases (21/71; κ = 0.35); in 18 of these 21 cases (86%), histopathologic analysis proved that the second-opinion report was correct. The second-opinion interpretations had statistically significantly higher sensitivity (66% vs 24%; p < 0.0001) than did the initial reports, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in specificity (87% vs 93%; p = 0.317). On ROC curve analysis, the second-opinion reports yielded a statistically significantly higher AUC for the detection of ECE (0.80 vs 0.65; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION The reinterpretation of prostate MRI examinations by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists improved the detection of ECE of prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
15
|
Katelaris NC, Bolton DM, Weerakoon M, Toner L, Katelaris PM, Lawrentschuk N. Current role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 2015; 56:337-45. [PMID: 25964833 PMCID: PMC4426504 DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.5.337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 04/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to evaluate the current role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in the management of prostate cancer (PC). The diagnosis of PC remains controversial owing to overdetection of indolent disease, which leads to overtreatment and subsequent patient harm. mp-MRI has the potential to equilibrate the imbalance between detection and treatment. The limitation of the data for analysis with this new technology is problematic, however. This issue has been compounded by a paradigm shift in clinical practice aimed at utilizing this modality, which has been rolled out in an ad hoc fashion often with commercial motivation. Despite a growing body of literature, pertinent clinical questions remain. For example, can mp-MRI be calibrated to reliably detect biologically significant disease? As with any new technology, objective evaluation of the clinical applications of mp-MRI is essential. The focus of this review was on the evaluation of mp-MRI of the prostate with respect to clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Damien Michael Bolton
- Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mahesha Weerakoon
- Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Liam Toner
- Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. ; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. ; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Andresen ED, Brown JA, Nepple KG. Value of preoperative MRI for prostate cancer staging and continence outcomes prior to prostatectomy: A review of the literature. World J Clin Urol 2015; 4:56-63. [DOI: 10.5410/wjcu.v4.i1.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Revised: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 12/31/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic imaging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer is primarily used for staging prior to definitive treatment. Over the past decade use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pre-surgical planning has increased, as well has he technology and methods for performing prostate MRI. To investigate and define the different MRI technologies available and further assess MRI technology ability to predict pathologic stage. Searching PubMed, we identified current published literature, where the cohort population underwent pre-operative MRI followed by prostatectomy. Keywords used in the PubMed literature search included: MRI, prostate cancer, prostate cancer staging, multiparamentric MRI and incontinence. Papers were included for review if they discussed use of MRI prior to prostatectomy and had corresponding pathologic data, staging, incontinence, and surgical outcomes. Primary information noted was MRI sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy for detecting extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle involvement (SVI). Secondary information derived included assessing the surgical influence of staging information, and identifying predictors of urinary incontinence recovery. Review of the literature showed that in regards to extracapsular extension the reported MRI accuracy ranged from 76%-98%, sensitivity from 20%-90% and specificity from 82%-99%. As for seminal vesicle involvement the reported MRI accuracy ranged from 76%-98%, sensitivity from 20%-90% and specificity from 82%-99%. There is a widely varying sensitivity and specificity for both ECE and SVI and the wide variability in the MRI technology used in the literature supports that use of MRI technology for prostate cancer remains investigational.
Collapse
|
17
|
Yao A, Iwamoto H, Masago T, Morizane S, Honda M, Sejima T, Takenaka A. The Role of Staging MRI in Predicting Apical Margin Positivity for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Int 2014; 93:182-8. [DOI: 10.1159/000358175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2013] [Accepted: 12/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|