Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuffing after preperitoneal and retroperitoneal perivesical ballooning

Total laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma under a single surgical position

BACKGROUND

To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of total laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) under a single surgical position.

METHODS

The medical data of 89 UUTUC patients were collected, who were treated in our institution from Jan 2016 to Jun 2018. The 45 cases that underwent total laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with a single position were allocated in the test group, while the 44 patients who received retroperitoneal laparoscopy combined with hypogastric oblique incision were assigned in the control group. We compared the two groups in perioperative indicators and tumor recurrence rate and analyzed the clinical effect of the new surgical treatment of UUTUC.

RESULTS

All 89 operations for UUTUC were successful and had no conversion to open surgery. No obvious complications occurred during the perioperative period. The test group had significantly shorter average operation time (96.58 ± 8.56 min versus 147.45 ± 9.16 min), less blood loss (39.58 ± 4.15 ml versus 46.50 ± 4.58 ml), earlier ambulation (7.47 ± 1.01 h versus 11.39 ± 1.82 h), and shorter length of stay in hospital (6.98 ± 1.14 days versus 9.89 ± 1.51 days) (P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the test group at 1 h, 12 h, and 24 h after operation were lower compared with those of the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the tumor stage, tumor grade, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time, follow-up time, and tumor recurrence rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the traditional surgical methods, the total laparoscopic treatment of UUTUC under a single surgical position had advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss, and early postoperative ambulation. The new operative method could shorten the length of stay and accelerate recovery of patients, and it is a viable surgical procedure which deserved clinical application and promotion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Our trial was approved and has been registered in the ethics committee of the Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital (Approval NO.[2015]171) .

Distal Ureter Management During Nephroureterectomy: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Standard of care in upper tract urothelial cancer is nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision (BCE). However, alternative techniques such as transurethral incision/resection have been used to simplify distal ureterectomy. The optimum strategy is unclear, and current guidelines do not specify a gold standard technique. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature, to compare BCE and transurethral distal ureter methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Cochrane and PRISMA-guided systematic literature search was conducted on English language articles from January 2000 to present, reporting on centers' experience with either BCE or transurethral distal ureterectomy. A cumulative meta-analysis comparison between the two procedures was performed. Primary outcome was intravesical recurrence. Secondary outcomes were local/distant recurrence, surgical margins, and disease-specific mortality (DSM). Groups were compared using chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 66 studies were included after excluding 1795. BCE and transurethral groups contained 6130 and 1183 patients, respectively. Mean/median age ranged from 57.5 to 75.2 years, and follow-up from 6.1 to 78 months. Level of evidence was low, with high risk of bias and small sample size (<100 patients) in 41 (62%) and 52 (79%) studies, respectively. Baseline cancer demographic analysis identified significantly higher rates of high grade, advanced stage, node-positive and carcinoma in situ disease in the BCE group. However, intravesical recurrence (23.6% vs 28.7%, p = 0.0002) and local/distant recurrence (17.9% vs 21.6%, p = 0.02) were significantly lower than the transurethral group. No difference was seen regarding surgical margins (3.1% vs 2.4%, p = 0.27) or DSM (16.8% vs 14.3%, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

No prospective, randomized comparisons exist for distal ureterectomy at nephroureterectomy. In this analysis, patients undergoing BCE had more advanced disease burden compared with the transurethral group. Despite this, the BCE group had statistically lower intravesical and local/distant recurrence. Further prospective research should be encouraged to identify gold standard ureter management.