Parafibromin Staining Characteristics in Urothelial Carcinomas and Relationship with Prognostic Parameters

The roles of the tumor suppressor parafibromin in cancer

In this review, we discuss parafibromin protein, which is encoded by CDC73. A mutation in this gene causes hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor (HPT-JT) syndrome, an autosomal dominant disease. CDC73 is transcriptionally downregulated by the Wilms’ tumor suppressor gene WT1 and translationally targeted by miR-182-3p and miR-155. In the nucleus, parafibromin binds to RNA polymerase II and PAF1 complex for transcription. Parafibromin transcriptionally increases the expression of c-Myc, decreases CPEB1 expression by interacting with H3M4, and reduces cyclin D1 expression by binding to H3K9. The RNF20/RNF40/parafibromin complex induces monoubiquitination of H2B-K120, and SHP2-mediated dephosphorylation of parafibromin promotes the parafibromin/β-catenin interaction and induces the expression of Wnt target genes, which is blocked by PTK6-medidated phosphorylation. Parafibromin physically associates with the CPSF and CstF complexes that are essential for INTS6 mRNA maturation. In the cytosol, parafibromin binds to hSki8 and eEF1Bγ for the destabilization of p53 mRNA, to JAK1/2-STAT1 for STAT1 phosphorylation, and to actinin-2/3 to bundle/cross-link actin filaments. Mice with CDC73 knockout in the parathyroid develop parathyroid and uterine tumors and are used as a model for HPT-JT syndrome. Conditional deletion of CDC73 in mesenchymal progenitors results in embryos with agenesis of the heart and liver while its abrogation in mature osteoblasts and osteocytes increases cortical and trabecular bone. Heterozygous germline mutations in CDC73 are associated with parathyroid carcinogenesis. The rates of CDC73 mutation and parafibromin loss decrease from parathyroid adenoma to atypical adenoma to carcinoma. In addition, down-regulated parafibromin is closely linked to the tumorigenesis, subsequent progression, or poor prognosis of head and neck, gastric, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancers, and its overexpression might reverse the aggressiveness of these cancer cells. Therefore, parafibromin might be useful as a biological marker of malignancies and a target for their gene therapy.

Prognostic role of parafibromin staining and CDC73 mutation in patients with parathyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on individual patient data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a rare malignant neoplasm with a relatively poor prognosis. The loss of parafibromin expression or the presence of CDC73 mutation has been found to be remarkably associated with malignancy in parathyroid tumours. However, the prognostic role of them in PC has not yet been shown due to sampling limitations. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on individual patient data to clarify the performance of parafibromin immunohistochemical staining and CDC73 gene sequencing in predicting outcomes for patients PC.

METHODS

Published studies from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Scopus Databases were searched using the terms 'parafibromin', 'CDC73', 'HRPT2' and 'parathyroid' to identify eligible studies. From the included studies, the survival data of patients with PC were extracted, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 193 patients from 9 studies were included in this survival analysis. Negative immunohistochemical staining of parafibromin was shown to be a risk factor for recurrence/metastasis (HR 2.73, P = .002) and death (HR 2.54, P = .004). Patient age ≥ 50 years was significantly related to lower OS (HR 2.37, P = .004) but not to DFS. CDC73 mutation was not statistically related to DFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative parafibromin staining indicated a higher risk of recurrence/metastasis and mortality. The immunohistochemical staining of parafibromin seems to be more promising in predicting outcomes for patients with PC than the sequencing of CDC73.

The clinicopathological and prognostic significances of CDC73 expression in cancers: a bioinformatics analysis

CDC73 interacts with human PAF1 complex, histone methyltransferase complex and RNA polymerase II for transcription elongation and 3’ end processing. Its down-regulated expression was immunohistochemically detected in gastric, colorectal, ovarian and head and neck cancers, and positively correlated with aggressive behaviors and unfavorable prognosis of malignancies. We performed a bioinformatics analysis by using Oncomine, TCGA and KM plotter databases. It was found that CDC73 mRNA was overexpressed in gastric, lung, breast and ovarian cancers, even stratified by histological subtypes (p<0.05). CDC73 mRNA expression was stronger in gastric intestinal- than diffuse-type carcinomas (p<0.05), and positively correlated with distant metastasis and TNM staging of lung cancer (p<0.05). CDC73 mRNA expression was positively related to both overall and progression-free survival rates of the patients with gastric cancer, even stratified by gender, lymph node involvement, or treatment (p<0.05), while versa for breast cancer (p<0.05). The prognostic significance of CDC73 mRNA was dependent on the datasets and pathological grouping in lung and ovarian cancers. These findings indicated the CDC73 mRNA overexpression was positively linked to carcinogenesis. It is cautious to employ CDC73 mRNA to evaluate the clinicopathological behaviors and prognosis of cancers.

The in vitro and vivo effects of nuclear and cytosolic parafibromin expression on the aggressive phenotypes of colorectal cancer cells: a search of potential gene therapy target

Down-regulated parafibromin is positively linked to the pathogenesis of parathyroid, lung, breast, ovarian, gastric and colorectal cancers. Here, we found that wild-type (WT) parafibromin overexpression suppressed proliferation, tumor growth, induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells (p<0.05), but it was the converse for mutant-type (MT, mutation in nucleus localization sequence) parafibromin (p<0.05). Both WT and MT transfectants inhibited migration and invasion, and caused better differentiation (p<0.05) of cancer cells. WT parafibromin transfectants showed the overexpression of Cyclin B1, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E, p38, p53, and AIF in HCT-15 and HCT-116 cells, while MT parafibromin only up-regulated p38 expression. There was lower mRNA expression of bcl-2 in parafibromin transfectants than the control and mock, while higher expression of c-myc, Cyclin D1, mTOR, and Raptor. According to transcriptomic analysis, WT parafibromin suppressed PI3K-Akt and FoxO signaling pathways, while MT one promoted PI3K-Akt pathway, focal adhesion, and regulation of actin cytoskeleton. Parafibromin was less expressed in colorectal cancer than paired mucosa (p<0.05), and inversely correlated with its differentiation at both mRNA and protein levels (p<0.05). These findings indicated that WT parafibromin might reverse the aggressive phenotypes of colorectal cancer cells and be employed as a target for gene therapy. Down-regulated parafibromin expression might be closely linked to colorectal carcinogenesis and cancer differentiation.

Significance of Parafibromin Expression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Parafibromin is a product of the tumor suppressor gene that has been studied as a potential indicator of tumor aggressiveness in the parathyroid, breast, colorectum, and stomach. However, the clinical significance and potential function of parafibromin expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas remain largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of parafibromin in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and to verify its potential as a biomarker of tumor behavior.

METHODS

Parafibromin expression was evaluated in 30 cases of LSCC using immunohistochemistry. The correlations between parafibromin expression and clinicopathologic parameters were investigated.

RESULTS

Parafibromin expression was positive in 15 cases (50%) and negative in 15 cases (50%). Tumor size and T stage showed a statistically significant inverse relationship with parafibromin expression (p=.028 and p<.001, respectively). Parafibromin expression was not associated with age, sex, lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, or tumor location. There was no statistically significant relationship between parafibromin expression and progression-free survival in the patients (p>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the downregulation or loss of parafibromin expression can be employed as a novel marker of tumor progression or aggressiveness in LSCC.