Thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology in Taiwan: a nationwide survey and literature update

Diagnostic values of SurePath liquid-based cytology versus conventional smear in thyroid aspiration samples: A 13-year experience at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the most useful tool in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is replacing the conventional smear (CS) for evaluation of thyroid FNAC. In our institution, thyroid FNAC preparation was changed from CS to LBC SurePath in July 2016. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of SurePath with that of CS in thyroid lesions.

METHODS

A total of 35,406 samples of thyroid FNAC (11,438 CS and 23,968 SurePath), collected from January 2010 to December 2022, were included in this study. We also examined the malignant rate using the surgical pathology diagnosis as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The distribution of TBSRTC cytological categories was equivalent between CS and SurePath. The rate of nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory category was higher in CS compared to SurePath (43.4% vs. 22.3%; p < .05). After routine use of SurePath, the surgical resection rate was reduced from 12.0% to 8.6% (p < .05) and the malignant rate increased from 32.2% to 41.5% (p < .05). The sensitivities of CS and SurePath were 71.0% and 82.0%, respectively, and the specificities were 99.0% and 97.3%, respectively, whereas the positive predictive values were 97.8% and 96.8%, respectively, and the negative predictive values were 85.0% and 84.6%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of CS and SurePath were 88.5% and 89.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

SurePath can increase the sample adequacy, increase the sensitivity and reduce the workload and avoid unnecessary surgeries with similar accuracy to CS.

Identification of NIFTP-Specific mRNA Markers for Reliable Molecular Diagnosis of Thyroid Tumors

Non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) is a low-risk thyroid tumor with a favorable prognosis. Nonetheless, differentiating NIFTP from other thyroid tumors remains challenging, necessitating reliable diagnostic markers. This study is aimed at discovering NIFTP-specific mRNA markers through RNA sequencing analysis of thyroid tumor tissues. We performed mRNA expression profiling for 74 fresh frozen thyroid tissue samples, including NIFTP and benign and malignant follicular-cell-derived tumors. NIFTP/malignant tumors showed 255 downregulated genes and 737 upregulated genes compared to benign tumors. Venn diagram analysis revealed 19 significantly upregulated and 7 downregulated mRNAs in NIFTP. Akaike information criterion analysis allowed us to select OCLN, ZNF423, LYG1, and AQP5 mRNA markers. We subsequently developed a predictive model based on logistic regression analysis using these four mRNAs, which we validated in independent samples (n = 90) using a qRT-PCR assay. This model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting NIFTP in discovery dataset (AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic) = 0.960) and the validation dataset (AUC = 0.757). Our results suggest that OCLN, ZNF423, LYG1, and AQP5 mRNA markers might serve as reliable molecular markers for identifying NIFTP among other thyroid tumors, ultimately aiding in accurate diagnosis and management of NIFTP patients.

Comparison of fine-needle aspiration with fine-needle capillary cytology in thyroid nodules

INTRODUCTION

High false-negative results have been reported for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in thyroid nodules. Fine-needle capillary (FNC) cytology is an alternative technique that prevents aspiration, reducing tissue damage. This study aimed to compare FNA and FNC in assessing thyroid nodules and in terms of their predictive role in the appropriate diagnosis of malignancy.

METHODS

This is a comparative prospective study conducted on 486 patients. FNA was performed in 235 patients during 2016 and 2017 and FNC in 251 patients during 2018 and 2019. The quality of cytological specimens was compared and then correlated with the final histopathological findings of 39 patients who underwent thyroidectomy.

RESULTS

Both groups were statistically similar regarding age and sex distribution. The FNA technique yielded significantly higher adequate specimens compared with FNC (p<0.001). Abundant blood in the background was found more frequently in the FNA technique (p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of FNA for malignancy diagnosis were both 100%, compared with 83.3% and 57.7% for FNC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The two methods, FNA and FNC, did not differ in terms of overall quality. FNA was superior regarding consistency with the histopathological results and the ability to diagnose malignancy.

Thyroid malignancy rates according to the Bethesda reporting system in Israel - A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology was developed in 2007 to facilitate an accurate, reproducible communication of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) interpretations between clinicians and cytopathologists and to serve as a guide for treatment. Based on large patient series, the system details the risk of malignancy for each category as well as a suggested management for each FNA result. Though this system has been widely adopted, there are only few studies to determine whether results are applicable for Israel.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective analysis of medical charts of all patients who underwent thyroid surgery between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2016 in four medical centers in Israel was performed. Data was analyzed for the overall risk of malignancy for the Bethesda system groups as well as comparison between the different laboratories performing the test.

RESULTS

Records of 810 thyroidectomies in which preoperative cytological reports and final pathology were available and reviewed. The malignancy rates according to the Bethesda groups' I-VI for our cohort were: 27.8%, 17.6%, 41.4%, 41.4%, 86.9%, and 98.1% respectively. Similar results were seen when results were analyzed according to the different laboratories performing the tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-surgical review of all Bethesda groups had higher malignancy rates than those reported in the original report. These results indicate a difference in the malignancy rates for the different Bethesda system groups in Israel compared to those reported. Physicians are encouraged to use data validated for their own country or patients' community in addition to published values.