Echocardiographic Improvements with Pacemaker Optimization in the Chronic Post Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Setting

Long-Term Echocardiographic Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Initial Nonresponders

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and clinical implications of a delayed echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

BACKGROUND

Long-term prognosis for CRT patients is routinely based on the assessment of echocardiograms after 6 to 12 months of therapy. Some patients, however, may require a longer period of therapy before echocardiographic improvements are detectable.

METHODS

This observational study included all patients with heart failure (HF) receiving a CRT device at a single center from 2003 to 2011. Eligible patients met current indications and had technically adequate echocardiograms from before implantation, approximately 1 year after implantation (mid-term), and ≥3 years after implantation (long-term). A positive echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15%. All-cause mortality was compared for patients in 3 response groups: mid-term responders, long-term responders, and nonresponders.

RESULTS

During this study, 294 patients met the study criteria. Of the 120 patients who were nonresponders after 1 year, 52 (43%) experienced a delayed positive response. Delayed, long-term responders had mortality and hospitalization rates similar to mid-term responders and significantly lower than nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients surviving at least 3 years after implantation of a CRT device and with echocardiographic follow-up, a significant portion of nonresponders after 1 year of CRT experience a delayed echocardiographic response after a longer period of time. Survival and hospitalization rates were similar for all echocardiographic responders, regardless of the time at which the response occurred.

Comparison of cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in patients with New York Heart Association functional class I/II versus III/IV heart failure

BACKGROUND

Several randomized trials have shown that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I/II heart failure (HF) patients, but it is unknown if similar outcomes occur in the real-world.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients receiving CRT between 2003 and 2008 with ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and QRS duration ≥120 ms were included. Outcomes assessed were subjective clinical response, echocardiographic response, and survival free of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization. Baseline demographics in functional class I/II (n = 155) and functional class III/IV (n = 512) were similar, except for differences in age and several comorbidities. Clinical response was similar in both groups. The functional class I/II group had a greater decrease in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension (P = .031), and trended toward greater improvements in LV end-systolic dimension (P = .056) and EF (P = .059). The functional class I/II group had a better 5-year survival rate (79 vs 54%; P < .0001) and survival free of CV hospitalization (45% vs 26%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world clinical scenario, NYHA functional class I/II CRT patients improved clinical status, and LV function and size as good as or better than those in NYHA functional class III/IV patients. These observations provide further support for the use of CRT in patients with mild symptoms of HF.