Use of onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder with concomitant warfarin

Intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy

AIMS

To determine the bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (AP) before onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) injections and improve peri-operative decision making and counseling.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients having intravesical BoNT-A in three teaching hospitals from January 2016 to July 2018. Demographic data, indication for intravesical BoNT-A injection, and side-effects of significant bleeding requiring intervention were recorded.

RESULTS

Five hundred and thirty-two patients had intravesical BoNT-A injections during this time. Sixty-three patients of mean age 69 years (range 19-89) had a total of 114 separate rounds of BoNT-A injections whilst on treatment dose AC/AP therapy. Of the 63, there were 33 males, with 46 having idiopatic detrusor overactivity and 17 with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Each patient had between 1 and 7 repeat injections during the studied period. AC/AP use across the 114 episodes included; aspirin 44, clopidogrel 37, warfarin 19, and NOAC (novel/non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant) 14. Patients on warfarin who had point of care testing all had international normalized ratio less than 3. BoNT-A dose varied from 100U to 300U-modal dosage was 200U.1/114(0.88%) injection episodes resulted in postinjection hematuria requiring overnight admission. This resolved spontaneously, with an overnight catheter. This patient was on rivaroxaban and had 300U of BoNT-A injected through 20 sites, on a background of previous prostate radiotherapy and self-catheterization.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuation of AP/AC therapy during intravesical BoNT-A injection treatment appears to be safe-with a 0.88% rate of spontaneously resolving hematuria.

Intravesicular Onabotulinumtoxin A Hemorrhage on Rivaroxaban

Overactive bladder (OAB) is urgency, with or without urgency incontinence. For OAB, an injection of onabotulinumtoxin A (BOTOX®) can be a low-risk outpatient procedure. We present a patient on a novel anticoagulant that experienced excessive bleeding after this procedure. This 80-year-old G2P2002 Caucasian female had a history of urge urinary incontinence. She presented for intravesicular onabotulinumtoxin A injection (150 units) after recent initiation of rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) for her atrial fibrillation. Several hours after an uncomplicated procedure, she presented with anuria and pain after gross hematuria earlier in the day. Her pain was immediately alleviated with bladder irrigation. She was discharged home and remained asymptomatic. With the popularity of the novel anticoagulants, new guidance on management of these medications during procedures is limited. When managing a patient on a novel anticoagulant before any procedure, even a low risk procedure, several factors should be considered to determine if the medication should be held, bridged, or continued. In sum, each patient on anticoagulation undergoing any procedure should be assessed individually for thrombotic risk, bleeding risk, and the procedural risk to best avoid postprocedural hemorrhage.