Identification of a Novel BRCA1 Pathogenic Mutation in Korean Patients Following Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants According to the ACMG Standards and Guidelines Using Relevant Ethnic Controls

Featuring BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutational landscape from Asturias (North Spain)

The singular BRCA1/2 mutational landscape of Asturias is updated 10 years after the first study. We analyzed BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in 1653 index cases. In total, 238 families were identified to carry a pathogenic variant, 163 families in BRCA1 and 75 families in BRCA2. This yielded a prevalence rate of 14.4%. Seven recurrent variants were found accounting for 55% of the cases. Among them, three are widely distributed (BRCA1 c.211A>G, c.470_471del and c.3331_3334del) and four had been reported as novel in Asturias: two in BRCA1 (c.1674del and c.2901_2902dup) and two in BRCA2 (c.2095C>T and c.4040_4035delinsC). A common haplotype was established for all recurrent variants indicating a shared ancestral origin. Three splicing analyses are shown: BRCA1:c.5152+3A>C and BRCA1:c.5333-3T>G that lead to skipping of exon 18, and 22 respectively, and BRCA1:c.5278-1G>T giving rise to two transcripts, one lacking exon 21 (p.Ille1760Glyfs*60) and one lacking the first 8 nucleotides of exon 21 (p.Phe1761Asnfs*14), supporting pathogenicity for these variants.

Reversion of pathogenic BRCA1 L1780P mutation confers resistance to PARP and ATM inhibitor in breast cancer

This study investigates the molecular characteristics and therapeutic implications of the BRCA1 L1780P mutation, a rare variant prevalent among Korean hereditary breast cancer patients. Using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and cell lines (PDX-derived cell line) from carriers, sequencing analyses revealed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the BRCA1 locus, with one patient losing the wild-type allele and the other mutated allele. This reversion mutation may cf. resistance to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-targeting drugs such as PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and ATM inhibitors (ATMi). Although HRDetect and CHORD analyses confirmed a strong association between the L1780P mutation and HRD, effective initially, drug resistance developed in cases with reversion mutations. These findings underscore the complexity of using HRD prediction in personalized treatment strategies for breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, as resistance may arise in reversion cases despite high HRD scores.

Variant reclassification and clinical implications

Genomic technologies have transformed clinical genetic testing, underlining the importance of accurate molecular genetic diagnoses. Variant classification, ranging from benign to pathogenic, is fundamental to these tests. However, variant reclassification, the process of reassigning the pathogenicity of variants over time, poses challenges to diagnostic legitimacy. This review explores the medical and scientific literature available on variant reclassification, focusing on its clinical implications.Variant reclassification is driven by accruing evidence from diverse sources, leading to variant reclassification frequency ranging from 3.6% to 58.8%. Recent studies have shown that significant changes can occur when reviewing variant classifications within 1 year after initial classification, illustrating the importance of early, accurate variant assignation for clinical care.Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are particularly problematic. They lack clear categorisation but have influenced patient treatment despite recommendations against it. Addressing VUS reclassification is essential to enhance the credibility of genetic testing and the clinical impact. Factors affecting reclassification include standardised guidelines, clinical phenotype-genotype correlations through deep phenotyping and ancestry studies, large-scale databases and bioinformatics tools. As genomic databases grow and knowledge advances, reclassification rates are expected to change, reducing discordance in future classifications.Variant reclassification affects patient diagnosis, precision therapy and family screening. The exact patient impact is yet unknown. Understanding influencing factors and adopting standardised guidelines are vital for precise molecular genetic diagnoses, ensuring optimal patient care and minimising clinical risk.

Genomic disparity impacts variant classification of cancer susceptibility genes in Turkish breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Turkish genome is underrepresented in large genomic databases. This study aims to evaluate the effect of allele frequency in the Turkish population in determining the clinical utility of germline findings in breast cancer, including invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (IDC-L), and ductal carcinoma (DC).

METHODS

Two clinic-based cohorts from the Umraniye Research and Training Hospital (URTH) were used in this study: a cohort consisting of 132 women with breast cancer and a non-cancer cohort consisting of 492 participants. The evaluation of the germline landscape was performed by analysis of 27 cancer genes. The frequency and type of variants in the breast cancer cohort were compared to those in the non-cancer cohort to investigate the effect of population genetics. The variant allele frequencies in Turkish Variome and gnomAD were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

The genetic analysis identified 121 variants in the breast cancer cohort (actionable = 32, VUS = 89) and 223 variants in the non-cancer cohort (actionable = 25, VUS = 188). The occurrence of 21 variants in both suggested a possible genetic population effect. Evaluation of allele frequency of 121 variants from the breast cancer cohort showed 22% had a significantly higher value in Turkish Variome compared to gnomAD (p < 0.0001, 95% CI) with a mean difference of 60 times (ranging from 1.37-354.4). After adjusting for variant allele frequency using the ancestry-appropriate database, 6.7% (5/75) of VUS was reclassified to likely benign.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study of population genetic effects in breast cancer subtypes in Turkish women. Our findings underscore the need for a large genomic database representing Turkish population-specific variants. It further highlights the significance of the ancestry-appropriate population database for accurate variant assessment in clinical settings.

Quantitative thresholds for variant enrichment in 13,845 cases: improving pathogenicity classification in genetic hearing loss

BACKGROUND

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines recommend using variant enrichment among cases as "strong" evidence for pathogenicity per the PS4 criterion. However, quantitative support for PS4 thresholds from real-world Mendelian case-control cohorts is lacking.

METHODS

To address this gap, we evaluated and established PS4 thresholds using data from the Chinese Deafness Genetics Consortium. A total of 9,050 variants from 13,845 patients with hearing loss (HL) and 6,570 ancestry-matched controls were analyzed. Positive likelihood ratio and local positive likelihood ratio values were calculated to determine the thresholds corresponding to each strength of evidence across three variant subsets.

RESULTS

In subset 1, consisting of variants present in both cases and controls with an allele frequency (AF) in cases ≥ 0.0005, an odds ratio (OR) ≥ 6 achieved strong evidence, while OR ≥ 3 represented moderate evidence. For subset 2, which encompassed variants present in both cases and controls with a case AF < 0.0005, and subset 3, comprising variants found only in cases and absent from controls, we defined the PS4_Supporting threshold (OR > 2.27 or allele count ≥ 3) and the PS4_Moderate threshold (allele count ≥ 6), respectively. Reanalysis applying the adjusted PS4 criteria changed the classification of 15 variants and enabled diagnosis of an additional four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study quantified evidence strength thresholds for variant enrichment in genetic HL cases, highlighting the importance of defining disease/gene-specific thresholds to improve the precision and accuracy of clinical genetic testing.

Mutations of TP53 and genes related to homologous recombination repair in breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations

BACKGROUND

Germline mutations of breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2) are associated with elevated risk of breast cancer in young women in Asia. BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins contribute to genomic stability through homologous recombination (HR)-mediated double-strand DNA break repair in cooperation with other HR-related proteins. In this study, we analyzed the targeted sequencing data of Korean breast cancer patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations to investigate the alterations in HR-related genes and their clinical implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of the breast cancer patients with pathogenic gBRCA1/2 mutations and qualified targeted next-generation sequencing, SNUH FiRST cancer panel, were analyzed. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, small insertions, and deletions were analyzed with functional annotations using ANNOVAR. HR-related genes were defined as ABL1, ATM, ATR, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN1A, CDKN2A, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCA, FANCD2, FANCG, FANCI, FANCL, KDR, MUTYH, PALB2, POLE, POLQ, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51D, RAD54L, and TP53. Mismatch-repair genes were MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. Clinical data were analyzed with cox proportional hazard models and survival analyses.

RESULTS

Fifty-five Korean breast cancer patients with known gBRCA1/2 mutations and qualified targeted NGS data were analyzed. Ethnically distinct mutations in gBRCA1/2 genes were noted, with higher frequencies of Val1833Ser (14.8%), Glu1210Arg (11.1%), and Tyr130Ter (11.1%) in gBRCA1 and Arg2494Ter (25.0%) and Lys467Ter (14.3%) in gBRCA2. Considering subtypes, gBRCA1 mutations were associated with triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), while gBRCA2 mutations were more likely hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. At least one missense mutation of HR-related genes was observed in 44 cases (80.0%). The most frequently co-mutated gene was TP53 (38.1%). In patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations, however, genetic variations of TP53 occurred in locations different from the known hotspots of those with sporadic breast cancers. The patients with both gBRCA1/2 and TP53 mutations were more likely to have TNBC, high Ki-67 values, and increased genetic mutations, especially of HR-related genes. Survival benefit was observed in the TP53 mutants of patients with gBRCA2 mutations, compared to those with TP53 wild types.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed genetic heterogeneity of breast cancer patients with gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 mutations in the Korean populations. Further studies on precision medicine are needed for tailored treatments of patients with genetic diversity among different ethnic groups.

Hereditary variants of unknown significance in African American women with breast cancer

Expanded implementation of genetic sequencing has precipitously increased the discovery of germline and somatic variants. The direct benefit of identifying variants in actionable genes may lead to risk reduction strategies such as increased surveillance, prophylactic surgery, as well as lifestyle modifications to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, patients with African ancestry are more likely to receive inconclusive genetic testing results due to an increased number of variants of unknown significance decreasing the utility and impact on disease management and prevention. This study examines whole exome sequencing results from germline DNA samples in African American women with a family history of cancer including 37 cases that were diagnosed with breast cancer and 51 family members. Self-identified ancestry was validated and compared to the 1000 genomes population. The analysis of sequencing results was limited to 85 genes from three clinically available common genetic screening platforms. This target region had a total of 993 variants of which 6 (<1%) were pathogenic or likely pathogenic, 736 (74.1%) were benign, and 170 (17.1%) were classified as a variant of unknown significance. There was an average of 3.4±1.8 variants with an unknown significance per individual and 85 of 88 individuals (96.6%) harbored at least one of these in the targeted genes. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were only found in 6 individuals for the BRCA1 (p.R1726fs, rs80357867), BRCA2 (p.K589fs, rs397507606 & p.L2805fs, rs397507402), RAD50 (p.E995fs, rs587780154), ATM (p.V2424G, rs28904921), or MUTYH (p.G396D, rs36053993) genes. Strategies to functionally validate the remaining variants of unknown significance, especially in understudied and hereditary cancer populations, are greatly needed to increase the clinical utility and utilization of clinical genetic screening platforms to reduce cancer incidence and mortality.

Pathogenicity Reclassification of Genetic Variants Related to Early-Onset Breast Cancer among Women of Mongoloid Origin

BACKGROUND

Germline alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other genes are responsible for early-onset breast cancer. However, up to 20% of molecular tests report genetic variant of unknown significance (VUS) or novel variants that have never been previously described and their clinical significance are unknown. This study aimed to reclassify variant of unknown significance (VUS) or novel variants by using the ActiveDriveDB database that annotates variants through the lens of sites of post-translational modifications (PTM).

METHODS

Our study included thirty-eighth young Buryat BC patients, belonging to the Mongoloid race and anthropologically to the Central Asia. Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood lymphocytes using the phenol/chloroform method. DNA library were prepared using the Hereditary Cancer SolutionTM kit (Sophia GENETICS, Switzerland) to cover 27 genes, such as ATM, APC, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, FAM175A, MLH1, MRE11A, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PIK3CA, PMS2, PMS2CL, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53, and XRCC2. Paired-end sequencing (2 x 150 bp) was conducted using NextSeq 500 system (Illumina, USA).

RESULTS

We re-examined 135 rare variants (41 VUS, 25 conflicting, 64 benign and 5 new variants). We identified 10 out of 135 (7.4%) mutations that affected the sites of post-translational modification in proteins. Of 135 rare mutations, 1 benign variant was reclassified as network-rewiring - motif loss mutation, 3 VUS and 1 new variant were reclassified as distal PTM- mutations, 2 new and 1 benign variant were classified as proximal PTM- mutations and 1 benign and 1 conflicting variant were classified as direct PTM- mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, 7.4% (10 out of 135) of mutations that affected the sites of post-translational modification in proteins were identified among early-onset breast cancer women of Mongoloid origin.

Molecular Characterization of BRCA1 c.5339T>C Missense Mutation in DNA Damage Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BRCA1 L1780P BRCT domain mutation has been recognized as a pathogenic mutation in patients with breast cancer. However, the molecular significance of this mutation has not yet been studied in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells in vitro. We established MDA-MB 231, HCC1937, and HCC1395 TNBC cell lines expressing BRCA1 L1780P mutant. BRCA1 L1780P mutant TNBC cells showed increased migration and invasion capacity, as well as increased sensitivity to olaparib and carboplatin compared to BRCA1 wild-type cells. BRCA1 L1780P mutant TNBC cells showed decreased RAD51 expression and reduced nuclear RAD51 foci formation following carboplatin and olaparib treatment. The molecular interaction between p-ATM and BRCA1 was abrogated following introduction of BRCA1 L1780P mutant plasmid in TNBC cells, suggesting that the BRCA1 L1780P mutation disrupts the p-ATM-BRCA1 protein-protein interaction. We established an olaparib-resistant BRCA1 L1780P mutant TNBC cell line by chronic drug treatment. Olaparib-resistant cell lines showed upregulation of RAD51 expression upon olaparib treatment, and reduction in RAD51 expression in olaparib-resistant cells restored olaparib sensitivity. Collectively, these results suggest that the BRCA1 L1780P mutation impairs RAD51 recruitment by disrupting p-ATM-BRCA1 interaction, which is a crucial molecular factor in homologous recombination and olaparib sensitivity. Further therapeutic targeting of RAD51 in BRCA1 L1780P mutant breast cancer is warranted.

The impact of race and ethnicity in breast cancer-disparities and implications for precision oncology

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and is one of the leading causes of cancer death. The incidence, pathological features, and clinical outcomes in breast cancer differ by geographical distribution and across racial and ethnic populations. Importantly, racial and ethnic diversity in breast cancer clinical trials is lacking, with both Blacks and Hispanics underrepresented. In this forum article, breast cancer researchers from across the globe discuss the factors contributing to racial and ethnic breast cancer disparities and highlight specific implications of precision oncology approaches for equitable provision of breast cancer care to improve outcomes and address disparities.

Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants found in ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

Objective

We investigated the proportions of and reclassified BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance (VUS) in Korean patients with epithelial ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers.

Methods

Data from 805 patients who underwent genetic testing for BRCA1/2 from January 1, 2006 to August 31, 2018 were included. The VUS in BRCA1/2 were reclassified using the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology standards and guidelines.

Results

A BRCA1 pathogenic variant was found in 17.0% (137/805) of the patients, and BRCA1 VUS were found in 15.9% (128/805) of the patients. Further, 8.7% (69/805) of the patients possessed a BRCA2 pathogenic variant and 18.4% (148/805) of the patients possessed BRCA2 VUS. Fifty-three specific BRCA1 VUS were found and 20 were further reclassified as benign (n=11), likely benign (n=5), likely pathogenic (n=3), and pathogenic (n=1). The remaining 33 remained classified as VUS. For BRCA2, 55 specific VUS were detected; among these, 14 were reclassified as benign or likely benign, and 2 were reclassified as likely pathogenic. Among the 805 patients, 195 were found to have only VUS and no pathogenic variants (PV), and 41.5% (81/195) were reclassified as benign or likely benign, and 10.3% (20/195) as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants.

Conclusions

Approximately 33.3% (36/108) of the specific BRCA1/2 variants analyzed in this study that were initially classified as VUS over a 13-year period were reclassified. Among these, 5.6% (6/108) were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants.

A Population-Based Analysis of BRCA1/2 Genes and Associated Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in Korean Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Simple Summary

Although it has been suggested that cancer risk and genetic variation vary by population, there is still a lack of research on non-European populations. In this study, we applied Korean patients as a model to find out the way to conduct BRCA1/2-related clinical studies in non-European populations who do not have as much clinical data as Europeans. The BRCA1/2 variants were classified following the 2015 ACMG standards/guidelines and using a multifactorial probability-based approach. To estimate the additional sample numbers needed to resolve BRCA1/2 unclassified status, we applied a simulation analysis considering population-specific clinical characteristics. In addition, we estimated the risks of breast or ovarian cancer for BRCA1/2 carriers by mutation regions. Data from this study reveal that BRCA1/2 variants in the non-European population are highly specific; therefore, population-specific study is essential for clinical application of treatment or prevention for breast or ovarian cancer.

Abstract

In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of BRCA1/2 variants and associated cancer risk in Korean patients considering two aspects: variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2. This study included 5433 Korean participants who were tested for BRCA1/2 genes. The BRCA1/2 variants were classified following the standards/guidelines for interpretation of genetic variants and using a multifactorial probability-based approach. In Korea, 15.8% of participants had BRCA1 or BRCA2 PLPVs. To estimate the additional sample numbers needed to resolve unclassified status, we applied a simulation analysis. The simulation study for VUS showed that the smaller the number of samples, the more the posterior probability was affected by the prior probability; in addition, more samples for BRCA2 VUS than those of BRCA1 VUS were required to resolve the unclassified status, and the presence of clinical information associated with their VUS was an important factor. The cumulative lifetime breast cancer risk was 59.1% (95% CI: 44.1–73.6%) for BRCA1 and 58.3% (95% CI: 43.2–73.0%) for BRCA2 carriers. The cumulative lifetime ovarian cancer risk was estimated to be 36.9% (95% CI: 23.4–53.9%) for BRCA1 and 14.9% (95% CI: 7.4–28.5%) for BRCA2 carriers.

Analysis of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in the prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is crucial in diagnosing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes and has increased with the development of multigene panel tests. However, results classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) present challenges to clinicians in attempting to choose an appropriate management plans. We reviewed a total of 676 breast cancer patients included in the Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer (KOHBRA) study with a VUS on BRCA mutation tests between November 2007 and April 2013. These results were compared to the ClinVar database. We calculated the incidence and odds ratios for these variants using the Korean Reference Genome Database. A total of 58 and 91 distinct VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified in the KOHBRA study (comprising 278 and 453 patients, respectively). A total of 27 variants in the KOHBRA study were not registered in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database. Among BRCA1 VUSs, 20 were reclassified as benign or likely benign, four were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and eight remained as VUSs according to the ClinVar database. Of the BRCA2 VUSs, 25 were reclassified as benign or likely benign, two were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and 33 remained as VUS according to the ClinVar database. There were 12 variants with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity for BRCA1 and 18 for BRCA2. Among them, p.Leu1780Pro showed a particularly high odds ratio. Six pathogenic variants and one conflicting variant identified using ClinVar could be reclassified as pathogenic variants in this study. Using updated ClinVar information and calculating odds ratios can be helpful when reclassifying VUSs in BRCA1/2.

Clinical phenotypes combined with saturation genome editing identifying the pathogenicity of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance in breast cancer

Characterizing the pathogenicity of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) is a major bottleneck in clinical management of BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Saturation genome editing (SGE) was recently reported as an innovative laboratory-based approach to assess the pathogenicity of BRCA1 variants. We combined clinical phenotypes and SGE score to identify the pathogenicity of BRCA1 VUSs detected in a cohort of 8,085 breast cancer patients. According to SGE function score, 33 out of 144 BRCA1 VUSs detected were classified into "loss of function" (n = 13), "intermediate" (n = 2), and "functional" (n = 18) groups. Compared with non-carriers, "loss of function" VUS carriers (n = 19) presented significantly worse clinicopathological characteristics. These included younger age at breast cancer diagnosis (44.4 years vs. 51.2 years, P = 0.01), stronger family history of any cancer (57.9% vs. 32.3%, P = 0.017) especially breast or ovarian cancer (47.4% vs. 9.3%, P < 0.001), more bilateral breast cancer (31.6% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.001), and triple-negative breast cancer (47.4% vs. 12.8%, P < 0.001), which were comparable to those of pathogenic variant carriers. In contrast, the clinical phenotypes of "functional" VUS carriers were similar to those of non-carriers. These results indicated that SGE was a reliable method in BRCA1 variant classification. Combining SGE function score and the available evidence, twelve out of 33 BRCA1 VUSs were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and one was benign.

Retrospective reinterpretation and reclassification of BRCA1/2 variants from Chinese population

BACKGROUND

The accurate interpretation of BRCA1/2 variants becomes increasingly important in breast cancer and other related cancers including ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer and so forth. In the past decades, especially before year 2015, limitations of techniques and lack of databases and guidelines have led to possible misinterpretation of the clinical significance of sequence variants of BRCA1/2. A published study reported reclassification of some BRCA1/2 variants previously classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to likely pathogenic in breast or ovarian cancer patients from Korea. However, little is known about the situation in Chinese population.

METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved 109 publications studying about BRCA1/2 variants of Chinese population from the year 1999 to year 2019 (March). After excluding publications of meta-analysis and publications with missing data, 72 publications were eventually retained for subsequent analysis. In total, 1,351 BRCA variants (673 BRCA1 variants and 678 BRCA2 variants) derived from 42,430 Chinese cancer patients were standardized and reinterpreted using ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines and China Expert Consensus on BRCA variant interpretation by genetic counselors.

RESULTS

Among the 1,351 BRCA variants, the majority of interpretation (91.7%, 1,239/1,351) remained the same as previously published. However, there were 112 (8.3%, 112/1,351) variants (64 BRCA1, 48 BRCA2) reclassified with different categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that clinical significance of not only VUS, but also pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants varied from time to time in the Chinese population. Precise reinterpretation of BRCA1/2 variants is of crucial importance to genetic counseling or clinical decision-making for risk individuals or patients.

Patient perspectives on variant reclassification after cancer susceptibility testing

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the impact of reclassification on patients' perception of medical uncertainty or trust in genetics-based clinical care.

METHODS

Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 patients who had received a reclassified genetic test result related to hereditary cancer. All participants had undergone genetic counseling and testing for cancer susceptibility at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Hereditary Cancer Clinic within the last six years.

RESULTS

Most of the participants did not express distress related to the variant reclassification and only a minority expressed a decrease in trust in medical genetics. However, recall of the new interpretation was limited, even though all participants were recontacted by letter, phone, or clinic visit.

CONCLUSION

Reclassification of genetic tests is an important issue in modern healthcare because changes in interpretation have the potential to alter previously recommended management. Participants in this study did not express strong feelings of mistrust or doubt about their genetic evaluation. However, there was a low level of comprehension and information retention related to the updated report. Future research can build on this study to improve communication with patients about their reclassified results.

Clinicopathological Features of Patients with the BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.Leu1780Pro) Variant

PURPOSE

Recent studies revealed the BRCA1 c.5339T>C, p.Leu1780Pro variant (L1780P) is highly suggested as a likely pathogenic. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinicopathologic features of L1780P with breast cancer (BC) using multicenter data from Korea to reinforce the evidence as a pathogenic mutation and to compare L1780P and other BRCA1/2mutations using Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer (KOHBRA) study data.

Materials and Methods

The data of 54 BC patients with L1780P variant from 10 institutions were collected and the clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients were reviewed. The hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer-related characteristics of the L1780P variant were compared to those of BC patients in the KOHBRA study.

RESULTS

The median age of all patients was 38 years, and 75.9% of cases showed triple-negative breast cancer. Comparison of cases with L1780P to carriers from the KOHBRA study revealed that the L1780P patients group was more likely to have family history (FHx) of ovarian cancer (OC) (24.1% vs. 19.6% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001 and p=0.001) and a personal history of OC (16.7% vs. 2.9% vs. 1.3%, p=0.003 and p=0.001) without significant difference in FHx of BC and bilateral BC. The cumulative risk of contralateral BC at 10 years after diagnosis was 31.9%, while the cumulative risk of OC at 50 years of age was 20.0%. Patients with L1780P showed similar features with BRCA1 carriers and showed higher penetrance of OC than patients with other BRCA1 mutations.

CONCLUSION

L1780P should be considered as a pathogenic mutation. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is highly recommended for women with L1780P.

Establishment of chemosensitivity tests in triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models

Purpose

A patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model is an in vivo animal model which provides biological and genomic profiles similar to a primary tumor. The characterization of factors that influence the establishment of PDX is crucial. Furthermore, PDX models can provide a platform for chemosensitivity tests to evaluate the effectiveness of a target agent before applying it in clinical trials.

Methods

We implanted 83 cases of breast cancer into NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Sug/Jic mice, to develop PDX models. Clinicopathological factors of primary tumors were reviewed to identify the factors affecting engraftment success rates. After the establishment of PDX models, we performed olaparib and carboplatin chemosensitivity tests. We used PDX models from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or germline BRCA1 mutations in chemosensitivity tests.

Results

The univariate analyses (p<0.05) showed factors which were significantly associated with successful engraftment of PDX models include poor histologic grade, presence of BRCA mutation, aggressive diseases, and death. Factors which were independently associated with successful engraftment of PDX models on multivariate analyses include poor histologic grade and aggressive diseases status. In chemosensitivity tests, a PDX model with the BRCA1 L1780P mutation showed partial response to olaparib and complete response to carboplatin.

Conclusions

Successful engraftment of PDX models was significantly associated with aggressive diseases. Patients who have aggressive diseases status, large tumors, and poor histologic grade are ideal candidates for developing successful PDX models. Chemosensitivity tests using the PDX models provide additional information about alternative treatment strategies for residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Challenges and Considerations in Sequence Variant Interpretation for Mendelian Disorders

In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), together with the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), published the latest guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants, which have been widely adopted into clinical practice. Despite these standardized efforts, the degrees of subjectivity and uncertainty allowed by the guidelines can lead to inconsistent variant classification across clinical laboratories, making it difficult to assess the pathogenicity of identified variants. We describe the critical elements of variant interpretation processes and potential pitfalls through practical examples and provide updated information based on a review of recent literature. The variant classification we describe is meant to be applicable to sequence variants for Mendelian disorders, whether identified by single-gene tests, multi-gene panels, exome sequencing, or genome sequencing. Continuing efforts to improve the reproducibility and objectivity of sequence variant interpretation across individuals and laboratories are needed.

Effect of BRCA mutational status on survival outcome in advanced-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Objective

To evaluate impact of germline BRCA mutational status on prognosis in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods

A total of 128 patients diagnosed with FIGO stage III-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) between 2008 and 2017 and underwent BRCA1/2 gene testing at the time of or within two years from cancer diagnosis were included in this study. We compared patients’ clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes after primary treatment according to germline BRCA mutational status. Treatment-related factors that might affect patients’ survival outcome were also investigated.

Results

Germline BRCA1/2 mutations were observed in 51 women (39.8%). There were no differences in age and serum CA-125 levels at the time of HGSOC diagnosis, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), extent of debulking surgery, and overall survival (OS) between the BRCA mutation and wild-type BRCA groups. In contrast, the BRCA mutation group displayed longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 22.9 vs. 16.9 months, P = 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified germline BRCA1/2 mutation as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted HR, 0.502; 95% CI, 0.318–0.795; P = 0.003). In the wild-type BRCA group, patients who received NAC as the primary treatment had shorter PFS compared to those who received primary debulking surgery (PDS) (median, 14.2 vs. 16.9 months, P = 0.003). However, in the BRCA mutation group, PFS did not differ between the NAC and PDS groups (P = 0.082).

Conclusions

In advanced-stage HGSOC, patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations have better prognosis with longer PFS than those lacking BRCA mutations. Prognosis after NAC was different according to the BRCA mutational status.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13048-019-0511-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines

BACKGROUND

Although BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genetic testing plays an important role in determining treatment modalities in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, sequence variants with unknown clinical significance or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) have limited use in medical decision-making. With vast quantities of gene-related data being updated, the clinical significance of VUS may change over time. We reinterpreted the sequence variant previously reported as BRCA1/2 VUS results in patients with breast or ovarian cancer and assessed whether the clinical significance of VUS was changed.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 423 breast or ovarian cancer patients who underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing from 2010 to 2017. The VUSs in BRCA1/2 were reanalyzed using the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology standards and guidelines (ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines) and the VUS was reclassified into five categories: "pathogenic", "likely pathogenic", "VUS", "likely benign", and "benign".

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients (48 sequence types of VUS) were identified as carrying either one or more VUS in BRCA1/2. Among the 75 patients, two patients (2.7%) were reclassified as "likely pathogenic", 30 patients (40.0%) were reclassified as either "benign" or "likely benign", and the remaining 43 patients (57.3%) were still classified as VUS category.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the clinical significance of VUS in BRCA1/2 may vary from time to time, reinterpretation of the VUS results could contribute to clinical decision-making.

Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) variants classified ambiguously as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a major challenge for clinical genetic testing in breast cancer; their relevance to the cancer risk is unclear and the association with the response to specific BRCA1/2-targeted agents is uncertain. To minimise the proportion of VUS in BRCA1/2, we performed the multifactorial likelihood analysis and validated this method using an independent cohort of patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

We used a data set of 2115 patients with breast cancer from the nationwide multicentre prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study. In total, 83 BRCA1/2 VUSs (BRCA1, n=26; BRCA2, n=57) were analysed. The multifactorial probability was estimated by combining the prior probability with the overall likelihood ratio derived from co-occurrence of each VUS with pathogenic variants, personal and family history, and tumour characteristics. The classification was compared with the interpretation according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. An external validation was conducted using independent data set of 810 patients.

RESULTS

We were able to redefine 38 VUSs (BRCA1, n=10; BRCA2, n=28). The revised classification was highly correlated with the ACMG/AMP guideline-based interpretation (BRCA1, p for trend=0.015; BRCA2, p=0.001). Our approach reduced the proportion of VUS from 19% (154/810) to 8.9% (72/810) in the retrospective validation data set.

CONCLUSION

The classification in this study would minimise the 'uncertainty' in clinical interpretation, and this validated multifactorial model can be used for the reliable annotation of BRCA1/2 VUSs.

Prevalence and oncologic outcomes of BRCA 1/2 mutations in unselected triple-negative breast cancer patients in Korea

PURPOSE

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of all diagnosed BCs and it is enriched in BRCA1 mutation. Guidelines for Western countries suggest that BRCA 1/2 genetic testing should be done for patients with TNBC diagnosed less than 60 years, but there is lack of evidence supporting genetic testing in Asian populations. We determined the prevalence of germline BRCA 1/2 mutations among unselected Korean patients with TNBC and analyzed oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

From among 1628 women with TNBC who underwent surgery at Samsung Medical Center (SMC) between Jul 2008 and Jan 2016, 999 samples were available in the SMC biobank for testing germline BRCA 1/2 mutations using next-generation DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Overall, 131 Korean patients (13.1%) had BRCA 1/2 mutations: 97 (9.7%) were in BRCA 1, and 35 (3.5%) were in BRCA 2. One patient had both BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutations. Overall, 68 distinct pathologic or likely pathogenic variants (43 BRCA1 and 25 BRCA2) were found. Among those diagnosed at ≤ 60 years, the prevalence of BRCA 1/2 mutation was 14.5%. The mean age of diagnosis of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was significantly younger than that of non-carriers (45.6 vs. 50.1 years, p < 0.0001). The median follow-up duration was 53.6 months. There were no significant differences in disease-free survival, overall survival, or breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.799, 0.092, and 0.124, respectively) between BRCA 1/2 carriers and non-carriers, although BRCA 1/2 carriers showed significantly worse contralateral breast cancer-free survival (p < 0.0001) than non-carriers.

CONCLUSION

In unselected TNBC patients, we found BRCA 1/2 mutations in 13.1% of overall patients and 14.5% of patients ≤ 60 years. We suggest that Korean women with TNBC diagnosed at ≤ 60 years should be tested for BRCA1/2 mutation.

Detection of novel germline mutations in six breast cancer predisposition genes by targeted next-generation sequencing

In this study, a customized amplicon-based target sequencing panel was designed to enrich the whole exon regions of six genes associated with the risk of breast cancer. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for 146 breast cancer patients (BC), 71 healthy women with a family history of breast cancer (high risk), and 55 healthy women without a family history of cancer (control). Sixteen possible disease-causing mutations on four genes were identified in 20 samples. The percentages of possible disease-causing mutation carriers in the BC group (8.9%) and in the high-risk group (8.5%) were higher than that in the control group (1.8%). The BRCA1 possible disease-causing mutation group had a higher prevalence in family history and triple-negative breast cancer, while the BRCA2 possible disease-causing mutation group was younger and more likely to develop axillary lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Among the 146 patients, 47 with a family history of breast cancer were also sequenced with another 14 moderate-risk genes. Three additional possible disease-causing mutations were found on PALB2, CHEK2, and PMS2 genes, respectively. The results demonstrate that the six-gene targeted NGS panel may provide an approach to assess the genetic risk of breast cancer and predict the clinical prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Difference in Risk of Breast and Ovarian Cancer According to Putative Functional Domain Regions in Korean BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the relative risk of breast and ovarian cancers related to the putative functional domain regions, obesity, and parity among Korean BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the clinical characteristics, cancer history, and mutations according to the putative functional domain of BRCA proteins among 229 women with BRCA1/2 mutations who were treated at Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital between January 2009 and March 2017.

RESULTS

Twenty-two carriers (18.8% of 117 BRCA1 mutation carriers) with mutations located in the BRCT domain region had a higher risk of breast cancers (hazard ratio [HR], 2.851; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.614-5.039; P < .001) than those with mutations outside of the putative functional domains of BRCA1. The risk of ovarian cancer was increased in 13 (11.6%) of 112 BRCA2 mutation carriers, with mutations located on BRC repeat regions (HR, 3.129; 95% CI, 1.123-8.720; P = .029). The term-pregnancies number was a significant risk-reducing factor for breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR per pregnancy, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.508-0.806; P < .001), for breast cancers in BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR per pregnancy, 0.534; 95% CI, 0.419-0.681; P < .001), and for ovarian cancers for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR per pregnancy, 0.625; 95% CI, 0.474-0.824; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Among Korean women with the BRCA1/2 mutation, the location of the mutations may influence the risk of breast and ovarian cancers according to the putative functional domain regions. Further investigations are required for risk prediction and preventive strategies in the BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Suggestion of BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.L1780P) variant confer from 'unknown significance' to 'Likely pathogenic' based on clinical evidence in Korea

PURPOSE

We describe a rationale for the re-classification of the BRCA1 c.5539T>C (L1780P) variant using a clinical evidence.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients with breast or ovarian cancer and the L1780P variant between 2002 and 2015 at a single institution.

RESULTS

We identified the BRCA1/2 genetic mutation test results of 1223 breast cancer patients and 174 patients with ovarian cancer. Of the 160 BRCA 1/2 variant unknown significance, 16 (10.0%) patients were identified as having the L1780P variant. Among them, 10 had breast cancer, 4 had ovarian cancer, and 2 had both breast and ovarian cancer. Thirteen (81.3%) patients with this variant had family histories of breast or ovarian cancer. Two (16.7%) also had comorbid ovarian cancer. Two patients with this variant showed that co-segregation of the disease in multiple family members and family histories of breast and ovarian cancer. This variant was found to be either absent or at extremely low frequency in general population databases.

CONCLUSION

The L1780P variant might confer to "Likely pathogenic" according to a clinical evidence and the ACMG standards and guidelines. A nation-wide or global survey and a functional analysis are needed to confirm the pathogenicity of the L1780P variant.