1
|
Wisse PHA, de Boer SY, Oudkerk Pool M, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Verveer C, Meijer GA, Dekker E, Spaander MCW. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in a national fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2024; 56:364-372. [PMID: 38101446 DOI: 10.1055/a-2230-5563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) decrease the effect of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. To enable PCCRC incidence reduction in the long-term, we classified PCCRCs diagnosed after colonoscopies performed in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS PCCRCs diagnosed after colonoscopies performed between 2014-2016 for a positive FIT in the Dutch CRC screening program were included. PCCRCs were categorized according to the World Endoscopy Organization consensus statement into (a) interval PCCRC (diagnosed before the recommended surveillance); (b) non-interval type A (diagnosed at the recommended surveillance interval); (c) non-interval type B (diagnosed after the recommended surveillance interval); or (d) non-interval type C (diagnosed after the intended recommended surveillance interval, with surveillance not implemented owing to co-morbidity). The most probable etiology was determined by root-cause analysis. Tumor stage distributions were compared between categories. RESULTS 116362 colonoscopies were performed after a positive FIT with 9978 screen-detected CRCs. During follow-up, 432 PCCRCs were diagnosed. The 3-year PCCRC rate was 2.7%. PCCRCs were categorized as interval (53.5%), non-interval type A (14.6%), non-interval type B (30.6%), and non-interval type C (1.4%). The most common etiology for interval PCCRCs was possible missed lesion with adequate examination (73.6%); they were more often diagnosed at an advanced stage (stage III/IV; 53.2%) compared with non-interval type A (15.9%; P<0.001) and non-interval type B (40.9%; P=0.03) PCCRCs. CONCLUSIONS The 3-year PCCRC rate was low in this FIT-based CRC screening program. Approximately half of PCCRCs were interval PCCRCs. These were mostly caused by missed lesions and were diagnosed at a more advanced stage. This emphasizes the importance of high quality colonoscopy with optimal polyp detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter H A Wisse
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sybrand Y de Boer
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Oudkerk Pool
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Claudia Verveer
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Denis B, Bertolaso A, Gendre I, Perrin P, Hammas K. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: A population-based cohort study of fecal occult blood test-positive colonoscopies. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2024; 48:102285. [PMID: 38246488 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) after fecal occult blood test (FOBT)-positive colonoscopies is scarce (guaiac-based (gFOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)). AIMS Evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of PCCRCs in the French gFOBT CRC screening program. METHODS Retrospective population-based cohort study of all gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed among individuals aged 50-74 between 2003 and 2014 within the CRC screening program organized in the Haut-Rhin (Alsace, France). The main outcome was PCCRC-3y rate. Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) calculated on gFOBT-positive colonoscopies were compared to those calculated on FIT-positive colonoscopies performed by the same gastroenterologists. RESULTS Overall, 9106 gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed by 36 gastroenterologists were included. Sixteen PCCRC-3y and 31 PCCRC-5y were diagnosed (68.8 % and 58.1 % were true interval PCCRCs respectively). The unadjusted PCCRC-3y rate was 2.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.4 %-3.9 %]. The risk for PCCRC-5y was significantly higher when the gastroenterologist's ADR was <35 % compared to ≥35 % (HR 2.17 [95 %CI 1.19-3.93]). The mean absolute difference for ADR between gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies was 16.3 % in favor of FIT-positive colonoscopies. CONCLUSION PCCRC-3y prevalence was low, estimated at 2.4 %. We suggest that the minimum standard for ADR in gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies should be set at 35 % and 50 % to 55 % respectively, in the French screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Denis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pasteur Hospital, 39 avenue de la Liberté, Colmar 68024, France; ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France.
| | - Alice Bertolaso
- Haut-Rhin Cancer Registry, GHRMSA, 87 avenue d'Altkirch, Mulhouse, France
| | - Isabelle Gendre
- ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France; CRCDC Grand Est, Site de Colmar, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - Philippe Perrin
- ADECA Alsace, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France; CRCDC Grand Est, Site de Colmar, 122 rue de Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - Karima Hammas
- Haut-Rhin Cancer Registry, GHRMSA, 87 avenue d'Altkirch, Mulhouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee JK, Kang JHE, Merchant SA, Jensen CD, Burr NE, Corley DA. Overall and Annual Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Rates in a Large Integrated Healthcare Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:188-190.e5. [PMID: 36965651 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey K Lee
- Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - James H-E Kang
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California; East of England Deanery, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie A Merchant
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Christopher D Jensen
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Nicholas E Burr
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Institute of Cancer and Pathology and Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Pinderfields General Hospital, Wakefield, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas A Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tran CTD, Nguyen MVT, Tran MT, Tuong TTV, Tran QH, Le LC, Pham HTT, Bui NC, Vu HH, Nguyen TTC, Ta PQ, Ha HTT, Trinh DT, Bui HTM, Trinh DQ, Van Nguyen K, Le SH, Van Vu K, Van Tran T, Tran HTT, Shrubsole MJ, Ye F, Cai Q, Zheng W, Boffetta P, Shu XO, Luu HN. Findings from the first colorectal cancer screening among 103 542 individuals in Vietnam with systematic review of colorectal cancer screening programs in Asia-Pacific region. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:707-715. [PMID: 35383373 PMCID: PMC9264238 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a leading cancer incidence and cause of death worldwide and in Vietnam. Although screening is considered an effective measure to prevent and control colorectal cancer, there is no such effort in Vietnam. METHODS Between 01 January 2018 and 31 October 2019, a population-based colorectal cancer screening program was conducted in Hanoi, Vietnam. A health advocacy campaign and follow-up phone calls were used to enroll residents aged ≥40 years old to complete an immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing. Positive immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing was followed by a colonoscopy. We also conducted a systematic review of the colorectal cancer screening programs in the Asia-Pacific region that used similar approach by searching Ovid Medline and PubMed databases. RESULTS During study period, 103 542 individuals among 672 742 eligible residents attended the screening of whom 81.5% participants finished immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing test and the positive rate was 6.1%. The coverage rate for immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing test was 11.9%. Among 2278 individuals who underwent colonoscopy, 3.5% were histologically diagnosed with cancer, 17.8% with advanced adenomas, and 23.1% with non-advanced adenomas. Males had significantly higher detection rate of advanced adenomas, cancer or ≥ two polyps/tumor than females (P < 0.0001). The systematic review showed that in two-step modality (i.e. immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing/fecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy), the test positive was from 4.1 to 10.6%. Once colonoscopy was performed subsequently, the rate of cancer among positive participants was from 1.7 to 16.4% and that of advanced adenomas was from 7.1 to 23.1%. CONCLUSION We showed that the two-step modality is a promising strategy for colorectal cancer screening in Vietnam that might apply to similar settings with limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Thi-Du Tran
- Vietnam Colorectal Cancer and Polyps Research Program, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
- College of Health Sciences, VinUniversity (VinUni), Hanoi, Vietnam
- Center of Applied Sciences, Regenerative Medicine and Advanced Technology (CARA), Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Mai Vu-Tuyet Nguyen
- Vietnam Colorectal Cancer and Polyps Research Program, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Mo Thi Tran
- Vietnam Colorectal Cancer and Polyps Research Program, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Thuy Thi-Van Tuong
- Vietnam Colorectal Cancer and Polyps Research Program, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Quang Hong Tran
- Vietnam Colorectal Cancer and Polyps Research Program, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Linh Cu Le
- College of Health Sciences, VinUniversity (VinUni), Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Huong Thi-Thu Pham
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Nam Chi Bui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Hien Huy Vu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tu Thi-Cam Nguyen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Phuong Que Ta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Hien Thi-Thu Ha
- Department of Histopathology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Dung Tuan Trinh
- Department of Histopathology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Department of Histopathology, Tam Anh General Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Hanh Thi-My Bui
- Department of Histopathology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Dien Quang Trinh
- Department of Histopathology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Khanh Van Nguyen
- Department of Histopathology, Vinmec International Hospital at Times City, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Song Huu Le
- Center of Molecular and Genetic Research, 108 Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Khien Van Vu
- Department of Gastroenterology, 108 Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Thuan Van Tran
- Vietnam Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Vietnam National Cancer Institute, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Huong Thi-Thanh Tran
- Vietnam National Cancer Institute, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Martha J Shrubsole
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Fei Ye
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Qiuyin Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paolo Boffetta
- Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brooke University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Hung N Luu
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kang JHE, Evans N, Singh S, Samadder NJ, Lee JK. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the prevalence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers using the World Endoscopy Organization nomenclature. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 54:1232-1242. [PMID: 34587323 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) have been proposed as a performance metric for colonoscopy quality assurance programs. Previously, there was no standardised terminology or reporting methods. In 2018, the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) advised standardised definitions and prevalence calculation methodology. AIMS To assess PCCRC burden using WEO standardised methods, to explore causes of heterogeneity, and to review changes in prevalence over time METHODS: We updated a prior systematic review by searching Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1 January 2013 to 31 January 2021 to identify population-based studies (or multicentre studies representative of the local population) reporting PCCRC prevalence (PROSPERO [CRD42020183796]). Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed quality, and extracted data. We estimated the PCCRC 3-year prevalence using WEO-recommended methodologies and investigated between-study sources of heterogeneity. We examined changes in prevalence over time. RESULTS Fifteen studies reporting on 25 872 PCCRC cases met eligibility criteria. Pooled PCCRC 3 year prevalence was 8.2% (95% CI = 6.9%-9.4%, I2 = 98.2%) across four European studies using WEO precise methodology. Proximal PCCRC prevalence was greater than distal (9.7% [95% CI = 7.0%-12.4%] vs 5.4% [95% CI = 2.9%-7.8%], I2 = 99.2%). Seven studies reporting PCCRC rates over time showed no consistent trend: four showed a decrease, one an increase and two were unchanged. Between-study heterogeneity was high. CONCLUSIONS Pooled 3-year PCCRC prevalence was 8.2% (95% CI = 6.9%-9.4%). Despite WEO standardised methodology to define and calculate PCCRC rates, there was significant heterogeneity among studies. Comparing rates between populations remains challenging and additional studies are needed to better understand the global PCCRC burden to inform quality assurance programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole Evans
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Niloy J Samadder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim KO, Huh KC, Hong SP, Kim WH, Yoon H, Kim SW, Kim YS, Park JH, Lee J, Lee BJ, Park YS. Frequency and Characteristics of Interval Colorectal Cancer in Actual Clinical Practice: A KASID Multicenter Study. Gut Liver 2019; 12:537-543. [PMID: 29938454 PMCID: PMC6143441 DOI: 10.5009/gnl17485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The aims of the present study were to determine the frequency of interval colorectal cancers (CRCs) after surveillance colonoscopy and to compare the clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes with those of non-interval CRCs. Methods From January 2003 to December 2013, 66,016 follow-up colonoscopies for 38,412 patients performed within recommended time were reviewed retrospectively based on data from 11 tertiary hospitals in South Korea. To compare clinicopathologic features and survival rates for interval CRC, 106 patients with non-interval CRC matched in age and gender were included. Results Among the 66,016 colonoscopies performed within the surveillance period, 63 cases (63/66,016) of interval CRC were detected, and 53 were finally included in the analysis. The mean age was 69.9±8.8 years, and the male to female ratio was 1.94:1. Although the occurrence rate of cancer in the right side colon was higher than that of non-interval CRC, interval CRCs were predominantly left sided. Other clinicopathologic features and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups. Missed lesion was suspected to be the most common cause (29 cases, 54.7%). Conclusions The frequency of interval CRC among patients who had undergone a surveillance colonoscopy was 0.095%. While sharing some similar clinical features and survival outcomes, interval CRCs in Korea developed more often in males and on the left side in contrast to results from Western studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyeong Ok Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kyu Chan Huh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sung Pil Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Hee Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hyuk Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sang Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Yeon Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jong Ha Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Jun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Bum Jae Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Sook Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eulji Hospital, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Amitay EL, Cuk K, Niedermaier T, Weigl K, Brenner H. Factors associated with false‐positive fecal immunochemical tests in a large German colorectal cancer screening study. Int J Cancer 2019; 144:2419-2427. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Efrat L. Amitay
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Katarina Cuk
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Tobias Niedermaier
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Medical FacultyHeidelberg University Heidelberg Germany
| | - Korbinian Weigl
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Medical FacultyHeidelberg University Heidelberg Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|