The Impact of Surgical Timing on Pathologic Tumor Response after Short Course and Long Course Preoperative Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Association between personality types and low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients following surgery

PURPOSE

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) has had many impacts on the lives of patients and substantial differences in emotional and social functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation analysis of different personality traits in rectal cancer patients with LARS after undergoing curative surgery.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria included (1) participants diagnosed with rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection of malignant tumors and (2) ECOG 0-1. The primary outcome was the correlation between different personality traits and low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients after radical surgery. Low anterior resection syndrome incidence rates were estimated by questionnaires and personality groups by the Type A and Type D Scale-14 Personality Inventory.

RESULTS

For all 161 participants in this study, the presence of a tumor at the lower anal verge and the receipt of neoadjuvant CCRT had a statistically significant positive correlation with the LARS score at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year (Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.283, -0.374, and - 0.205, respectively), with a p value of less than 0.05. Personalities with Type A, Type D, and Type D-SI scores had a statistically significant positive correlation with LARS score at 1 month (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.172, 0.162, and 0,164, p value = 0.03, 0.04, and 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Type A and Type D personalities are highly linked to LARS. Personalized support approaches can ultimately assist rectal cancer patients in overcoming difficulties after surgery and recovery and enhance their functional outcomes.

Lateral Lymph Node Size and Tumor Distance From Anal Verge Accurately Predict Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection improves oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. However, the indication for this procedure remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for lateral lymph node metastasis and the indications for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

DESIGN

A multi-institutional retrospective study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at 3 university hospitals.

PATIENTS

This study involved 105 patients with locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer and clinically suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection between 2015 and 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Indications were set using lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis-associated preoperative factors.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients, 36 (34.3%) had pathologically confirmed lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and 77 (73.3%) underwent preoperative chemoradiation. Tumors located within 5 cm distance from the anal verge ( p = 0.02) and initial node size ≥ 6 mm ( p = 0.001) were significant predictors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity was 100% (36/36) with a cutoff of 6 mm for the initial node size and 94.4% (34/36) with a cutoff of 8 mm for the initial node size. When using initial node size cutoffs of 8 mm for anal verge-to-tumor distance of >5 cm and 6 mm for anal verge-to-tumor distance of ≤5 cm, the sensitivity of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis was found to be 100%.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective design and small sample size were the limitations of this study.

CONCLUSION

Initial node size and tumor height were significant predictors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. This study proposed that an initial node size of ≥8 mm with an anal verge-to-tumor distance of >5 cm and ≥6 mm with an anal verge-to-tumor distance of ≤5 cm are optimal indications for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C101 .

EL TAMAO DEL GANGLIO LINFTICO LATERAL Y LA DISTANCIA DEL TUMOR DESDE EL BORDE ANAL PREDICEN CON PRECISIN LOS GANGLIOS LINFTICOS PLVICOS LATERALES POSITIVOS EN EL CNCER DE RECTO UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO MULTIINSTITUCIONAL

ANTECEDENTES:La disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales mejora los resultados oncológicos en pacientes con cáncer de recto con sospecha de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Sin embargo, la indicación de este procedimiento sigue sin estar clara.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue identificar los factores predictivos de la metástasis de los ganglios linfáticos laterales y las indicaciones para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multiinstitucional.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en tres hospitales universitarios.PACIENTES:Este estudio involucró a 105 pacientes con cáncer de recto medio/bajo localmente avanzado y sospecha clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales que se sometieron a una escisión mesorrectal total con disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales entre 2015 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las indicaciones se establecieron utilizando los factores preoperatorios asociados con la metástasis de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.RESULTADOS:Entre 105 pacientes, 36 (34,3%) tenían metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales confirmada patológicamente y 77 (73,3%) se sometieron a quimiorradiación preoperatoria. Los tumores ubicados dentro de los 5 cm desde el borde anal ( p = 0,02) y el tamaño inicial del ganglio ( p = 0,001) fueron predictores significativos de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. La sensibilidad fue del 100 % (36/36), con un punto de corte de 6 mm para el tamaño inicial del ganglio, seguido de 8 mm para el tamaño inicial del ganglio (94,4%, 34/36). Cuando se utilizó un tamaño de corte inicial del ganglio de 8 mm para una distancia entre el borde anal y el tumor >5 cm y 6 mm para una distancia entre el borde anal y el tumor ≤5 cm, la sensibilidad de la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales fue del 100 %.LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospectivo y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:El tamaño inicial del ganglio y la altura del tumor fueron predictores significativos de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Este estudio propuso que un tamaño de ganglio inicial de ≥8 mm con un tumor a >5 cm del margen anal y ≥6 mm con un tumor a ≤5 cm del margen anal son indicaciones óptimas para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en el cáncer de recto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C101 . (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Could Harvest More Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes over Laparoscopic Approach for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) is a technically demanding procedure. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic LPNDs. This multi-institutional retrospective study included 108 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision with LPND for locally advanced rectal cancer. There were 74 patients in the laparoscopic and 34 in the robotic groups. The median operation time was longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (353 vs. 275 min, p < 0.001). No patients underwent conversion to open surgery in either group. Pathological LPN metastases were observed in 24 and 8 patients in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.347). Although the number of harvested mesorectal lymph nodes was similar (15.5 vs. 15.0, p = 0.968), the number of harvested LPNs was higher in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (7.0 vs. 5.0, p = 0.004). Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were similar (robotic vs. laparoscopic, 35.3% and 7 days vs. 37.8% and 7 days, respectively). Both laparoscopic and robotic LPND are safe and feasible for locally advanced rectal cancers, but robotic LPND showed more harvested lateral lymph node than laparoscopic LPND.

Predicting Factors of Complete Pathological Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Background: Current treatment of choice for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) followed by surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Some patients may experience complete pathological response (cPR) after the neoadjuvant treatment. However, the predicting factors are still debated. Methods: In this registry-based retrospective cohort study, 258 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included. Patients were categorized into two groups with or without cPR. Logistic regression analysis was recruited to investigate the odds ratio for all independent variables, and those with significant results were included in multivariate regression analysis. Results: Achievement of cPR was 21.3%. The odds ratio of cPR was significantly lower when the tumor distance from the anal verge was>10 centimeters (OR=0.24, P=0.040). Also, the odds of cPR with N1 involvement in comparison with N0 involvement decreased for 0.41 (P=0.043). It was also true for patients with N2 involvement in comparison with N0 involvement (OR=0.31, P=0.031). Higher odds ratio of cPR was observed in patients who underwent surgery in>12 weeks after neo-CRT (OR=2.9, P=0.022). Furthermore, the odds of cPR decreased for 0.9 with increasing in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P=0.044). Conclusion: Patients with rectal cancer in clinical stage II or lower, without the involvement of the lymphatic system at diagnosis, and with tumors located in the lower parts of the rectum, with lower levels of CEA, and longer duration between neo-CRT and surgery were more likely to achieve cPR after neo-CRT. With the current knowledge, the "wait and watch policy" is still debated and needs to be defined more precisely by upcoming studies.

Does a long interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery benefit the clinical outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer? A systematic review and meta analyses

PURPOSE

The study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy after 8 weeks (long interval, LI) between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

The PubMed database, EMBASE database, and the Cochrane Library (deadline: September 25, 2021) were searched to select clinical studies that compared two intervals between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: after 8 weeks (long interval, LI) and within 8 weeks (short interval, SI). The included studies were screened and evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included, with 9070 cases in the LI group and 14,207 cases in the SI group. The analysis results showed that the pathologic complete response (PCR) rate in the LI group was higher than that in the SI group (P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate (P = 0.85), anal preservation rate (P = 0.89), morbidity rate (P = 0.60), anastomotic leakage rate (P = 0.06), operation time (P = 0.58), local recurrence rate (P = 0.56), distant metastasis rate (P = 0.32), or overall survival (OS) rate (P = 0.17) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

A longer interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery can improve the PCR rate; however, it has no significant impact on the clinical efficacy or long-term prognosis. Due to some limitations in the number and quality of the studies, these findings still need to be further verified by multicenter, large-sample high-quality RCTs in the future.

Comparison of long course and short course preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

rectal cancer (RC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and different preoperative radiotherapies may lead to different outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of long-course (LC) and short-course radiotherapy (SC), with or without chemotherapy, for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

studies published up to March 31st 2018 were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and EMABSE. Randomized control or consort control trials that reported the outcomes of short or long course radiotherapy were eligible. Either a fixed or random effects model was used to access the overall combined risk estimates.

RESULTS

sixteen studies with a total of 2,773 RC patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between LC and SC therapies with regard to the following: pathological complete response (PCR) (I2 = 78%, p < 0.05, RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.26-1.10); tumor downstaging (I2 = 79%, p < 0.05, RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.17); local recurrences (I2 = 22%, p = 0.27, RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.26-1.16); distant metastases (I2 = 29%, p = 0.22, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.77-1.37); mortality (I2 = 0%, p = 0.78, RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.78-1.15) and serious late toxicity (I2 = 74%, p = 0.01, RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.37-3.26). In the subgroup analysis, LC had a better PCR and tumor downstaging rate compared with SC in the RCT subgroup. Besides, LC also presented a better PCR rate compared with SC without chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LC and SC are both effective in the preoperative treatment of RC with regard to PCR, tumor downstaging, local recurrences, distant metastases, mortality and serious late toxicity. Furthermore, chemotherapy may enhance the efficacy of preoperative treatment.

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) with delayed surgery versus preoperative long-course radiotherapy for locally resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy (PSRT) and preoperative long-course radiotherapy (PLRT) are standard treatment regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, whether the efficacy and safety of PSRT with delayed surgery (more than 4 weeks) are superior to those of PLRT remains unresolved and was explored in this meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies published in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched. RevMan 5.3 was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HR) and relative risk (RR).

RESULTS

Seven studies including 4973 patients were identified in the meta-analysis. Pooled statistics showed that there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.58-2.89, P = 0.52) or disease-free survival (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.73-1.66, P = 0.64) between the preoperative short-course and long-course radiotherapy groups. Moreover, pathological complete remission, early postoperative complications, treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity, local recurrence, and distant metastasis were similar between the two groups. Interestingly, a subgroup analysis revealed that preoperative short-course radiotherapy without adjuvant chemotherapy not only resulted in lower treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity than the long-course radiotherapy group (RR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.48, P < 0.01) but also resulted in significantly lower overall survival and pathological complete remission (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, respectively). Disappointingly, pooled statistics observed few advantages over long-course radiotherapy in short-course radiotherapy with the adjuvant chemotherapy subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

PSRT with delayed surgery was as effective as PLRT for the management of locally resectable rectal cancer. However, not adding additional chemotherapy to PSRT not only significantly decreased grade 3/4 toxicity but also decreased pathological complete remission and overall survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol for this meta-analysis was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019133641).

Meta-analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long-course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Surgery is conventionally performed approximately 6-8 weeks after nCRT. This study aimed to determine the effect on outcomes of extending this interval.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed for studies reporting oncological results that compared the classical interval (less than 8 weeks) from the end of nCRT to TME with a minimum 8-week interval in patients with LARC. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival, local recurrence and distant metastasis rates, R0 resection rates, completeness of TME, margin positivity, sphincter preservation, stoma formation, anastomotic leak and other complications. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Twenty-six publications, including four RCTs, with 25 445 patients were identified. A minimum 8-week interval was associated with increased odds of pCR (odds ratio (OR) 1·41, 95 per cent c.i. 1·30 to 1·52; P < 0·001) and tumour downstaging (OR 1·18, 1·05 to 1·32; P = 0·004). R0 resection rates, TME completeness, lymph node yield, sphincter preservation, stoma formation and complication rates were similar between the two groups. The increased rate of pCR translated to reduced distant metastasis (OR 0·71, 0·54 to 0·93; P = 0·01) and overall recurrence (OR 0·76, 0·58 to 0·98; P = 0·04), but not local recurrence (OR 0·83, 0·49 to 1·42; P = 0·50).

CONCLUSION

A minimum 8-week interval from the end of nCRT to TME increases pCR and downstaging rates, and improves recurrence-free survival without compromising surgical morbidity.