1
|
Bugazia D, Al-Najjar E, Esmail A, Abdelrahim S, Abboud K, Abdelrahim A, Umoru G, Rayyan HA, Abudayyeh A, Al Moustafa AE, Abdelrahim M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1386699. [PMID: 39011469 PMCID: PMC11247645 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1386699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doaa Bugazia
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ebtesam Al-Najjar
- Section of GI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abdullah Esmail
- Section of GI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Saifudeen Abdelrahim
- Challenge Early College HS, Houston Community College, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Karen Abboud
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Godsfavour Umoru
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hashem A Rayyan
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ala Abudayyeh
- Section of Nephrology, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Maen Abdelrahim
- Section of GI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang W, Wang S, Huang X, Meng H, Jiang Y, Li B, Chen K, Shen B, Lin X. The value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance whole-body scans and local enhancement scans in the preoperative staging and resectability assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:1768-1778. [PMID: 36915309 PMCID: PMC10006117 DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background In addition to contrast-enhanced multiphase computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) is increasingly being used for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore the value of hybrid 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MR imaging in preoperative assessment and treatment decision-making. Methods A retrospective data collection (of imaging, clinical, and pathological information) was conducted on patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/MR with clinically diagnosed or suspected pancreatic cancer from March 2018 to March 2022 in Ruijin Hospital. The data of 76 patients were initially included, with 1 of the 76 patients eventually being excluded due to a misdiagnosis of inflammatory disease. Of the 75 patients, 38 underwent pancreatic tumor resection and 10 underwent laparoscopic exploration. The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MR for pancreatic cancer staging and the assessment of pancreatic resectability was evaluated based on pathological results, intraoperative findings, and documented final clinical stages of illness. The adjustments to patient treatment plans were also analyzed before and after 18F-FDG PET/MR examination. Results The accuracy of clinical tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging of pancreatic cancer by 18F-FDG PET/MR was 73.3% (55/75). The area under the curve (AUC) of 18F-FDG PET/MR for diagnosing the advanced stage (III-IV) versus the nonadvanced stage (I-II) of disease was 0.922 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.852-0.993]. The treatment regimen of 20.0% (15/75) of patients was impacted. The accuracy of the evaluation of the resectability of pancreatic cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MR was 91.9% (34/37). With the surgical and pathological results being used as a reference, the overall accuracy of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/MR for T staging was 62.2%, and the AUC for diagnosing T4 versus T1-3 was 0.872 (95% CI: 0.660-1.000). Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/MR performs well in diagnosing advanced pancreatic cancer and thus may impact the treatment decisions for a considerable number of patients. 18F-FDG PET/MR has a high level of accuracy in evaluating the resectability of pancreatic cancer before surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weishen Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Research Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Siwen Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinyun Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongping Meng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Research Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Biao Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kemin Chen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Baiyong Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Research Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaozhu Lin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seufferlein T, Mayerle J, Böck S, Brunner T, Ettrich TJ, Grenacher L, Gress TM, Hackert T, Heinemann V, Kestler A, Sinn M, Tannapfel A, Wedding U, Uhl W. S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom – Langversion 2.0 – Dezember 2021 – AWMF-Registernummer: 032/010OL. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:e812-e909. [PMID: 36368658 DOI: 10.1055/a-1856-7346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stefan Böck
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum München, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Thomas Mathias Gress
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Endokrinologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Universität München-Campus Grosshadern, München, Germany
| | | | - Marianne Sinn
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II Onkologie Hämatologie, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Waldemar Uhl
- Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seufferlein T, Mayerle J, Böck S, Brunner T, Ettrich TJ, Grenacher L, Gress TM, Hackert T, Heinemann V, Kestler A, Sinn M, Tannapfel A, Wedding U, Uhl W. S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom – Kurzversion 2.0 – Dezember 2021, AWMF-Registernummer: 032/010OL. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:991-1037. [PMID: 35671996 DOI: 10.1055/a-1771-6811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stefan Böck
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum München, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Thomas Mathias Gress
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Endokrinologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Universität München-Campus Grosshadern, München, Germany
| | | | - Marianne Sinn
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II Onkologie Hämatologie, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Waldemar Uhl
- Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Farrukh J, Balasubramaniam R, James A, Wadhwani SS, Albazaz R. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: imaging techniques for diagnosis and management. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2022; 83:1-12. [PMID: 35653327 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2022.0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of death from cancer but only a minority of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are eligible for curative resection. The increasing role of neoadjuvant therapy provides hope of improving outcomes. However, progress is also reliant on advances in imaging that can identify disease earlier and accurately assess treatment response. Computed tomography remains the cornerstone in evaluation of resectability, offering excellent spatial resolution. However, in high-risk patients, additional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography may further guide treatment decisions. Conventional computed tomography can be limited in its ability to determine disease response after neoadjuvant therapy. Dual-energy computed tomography and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging perfusion studies emerging as potentially better alternatives. Combined with pioneering advances in radiomic analysis, these modalities also show promise in analysing tumour heterogeneity and thereby more accurately predicting outcomes. This article reviews these imaging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawaad Farrukh
- Department of Radiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Ravivarma Balasubramaniam
- Department of Radiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Anitha James
- Department of Radiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Sharan S Wadhwani
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raneem Albazaz
- Department of Radiology, St James's University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grenacher L, Juchems M, Schreyer AG, Wessling J, Ringe KI, Uhl W, Mayerle J, Seufferlein T. [Diagnostic Imaging of pancreatic carcinoma-Update of the new guideline]. Chirurg 2022; 93:429-440. [PMID: 35307787 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01617-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The new German S3 guidelines on ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma were published for the first time on the homepage of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) in December 2021 as a new update and thus the second update (first update 2013) and contain a large number of innovations in terms of diagnostics and treatment. The guidelines were organized and led by the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS). In this article we would like to present the central content and innovations related to the radiological diagnostics of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The most important innovations are the highest recommendation strength in favor of computed tomography (CT) when assessing tumor spread as well as the adaptation of the European guidelines for cystic tumors by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as the method of first choice. A further innovation is the implementation of a structured reporting of CT findings for describing the anatomical tumor resectability on the basis of the publication presented by the Abdominal Imaging Working Group and the Oncological Imaging Working Group of the German Radiological Society. There is no evidence for the implementation of radiological imaging in the field of aftercare or in the field of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Grenacher
- Conradia Radiologie München, Augustenstr. 115, 80798, München, Deutschland.
| | - M Juchems
- Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz, Deutschland
| | - A G Schreyer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Deutschland
| | - J Wessling
- Zentrum für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Clemenshospital, Raphaelsklinik, EVK Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - K I Ringe
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - W Uhl
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Joseph-Hospital Bochum, Klinik der Ruhr Universität, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - J Mayerle
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Großhadern, Universitätsklinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - T Seufferlein
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim MW, Koh H, Kim JY, Lee S, Lee H, Kim Y, Hwang HK, Kim SI. Tumor-Specific miRNA Signatures in Combination with CA19-9 for Liquid Biopsy-Based Detection of PDAC. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:13621. [PMID: 34948417 PMCID: PMC8703833 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered one of the most aggressive malignancies and has high mortality and poor survival rates. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover non-invasive biomarkers for early detection before PDAC reaches the incurable stage. We hypothesized that liquid biopsy of PDAC-derived extracellular vesicles (PDEs) containing abundant microRNAs (miRNAs) could be used for early diagnosis of PDAC because they can be selectively enriched and because they are biologically stable. We isolated PDEs by immunocapture using magnetic beads, and we identified 13 miRNA candidates in 20 pancreatic cancer patients and 20 normal controls. We found that expression of five miRNAs, including miR-10b, miR-16, miR-155, miR-429, and miR-1290, was markedly higher in PDEs. Furthermore, the miRNA signatures along with serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were optimized by logistic regression, and the miRNA signature and CA19-9 combination markers (CMs) were effective at differentiating PDAC patients from normal controls. As a result, the CMs represented a high sensitivity (AUC, 0.964; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 80%) and a high specificity (AUC, 0.962; sensitivity, 85.71%; specificity, 100%). These findings suggest that five miRNAs expressed in PDEs and CA19-9 are valuable biomarkers for screening and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by liquid biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Woo Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.W.K.); (J.Y.K.); (S.L.); (H.L.); (Y.K.)
| | - Hani Koh
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea;
| | - Jee Ye Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.W.K.); (J.Y.K.); (S.L.); (H.L.); (Y.K.)
| | - Suji Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.W.K.); (J.Y.K.); (S.L.); (H.L.); (Y.K.)
| | - Hyojung Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.W.K.); (J.Y.K.); (S.L.); (H.L.); (Y.K.)
| | - Young Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.W.K.); (J.Y.K.); (S.L.); (H.L.); (Y.K.)
| | - Ho Kyoung Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea;
| | - Seung Il Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.W.K.); (J.Y.K.); (S.L.); (H.L.); (Y.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gassert FG, Ziegelmayer S, Luitjens J, Gassert FT, Tollens F, Rink J, Makowski MR, Rübenthaler J, Froelich MF. Additional MRI for initial M-staging in pancreatic cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:2448-2456. [PMID: 34837511 PMCID: PMC8921086 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08356-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pancreatic cancer is portrayed to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death within the next years. Potentially complicating surgical resection emphasizes the importance of an accurate TNM classification. In particular, the failure to detect features for non-resectability has profound consequences on patient outcomes and economic costs due to incorrect indication for resection. In the detection of liver metastases, contrast-enhanced MRI showed high sensitivity and specificity; however, the cost-effectiveness compared to the standard of care imaging remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze whether additional MRI of the liver is a cost-effective approach compared to routinely acquired contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in the initial staging of pancreatic cancer. METHODS A decision model based on Markov simulation was developed to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs of the diagnostic modalities. Model input parameters were assessed based on evidence from recent literature. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was set to $100,000/QALY. To evaluate model uncertainty, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS In the base-case analysis, the model yielded a total cost of $185,597 and an effectiveness of 2.347 QALYs for CE-MR/CT and $187,601 and 2.337 QALYs for CE-CT respectively. With a net monetary benefit (NMB) of $49,133, CE-MR/CT is shown to be dominant over CE-CT with a NMB of $46,117. Deterministic and probabilistic survival analysis showed model robustness for varying input parameters. CONCLUSION Based on our results, combined CE-MR/CT can be regarded as a cost-effective imaging strategy for the staging of pancreatic cancer. KEY POINTS • Additional MRI of the liver for initial staging of pancreatic cancer results in lower total costs and higher effectiveness. • The economic model showed high robustness for varying input parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix G Gassert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Ziegelmayer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Johanna Luitjens
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian T Gassert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Fabian Tollens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Johann Rink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marcus R Makowski
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias F Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guo D, Chen C, Lv S, Wu G, Shi W, Li H, Hu H. Management of Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Case Report. Front Surg 2021; 8:700229. [PMID: 34765634 PMCID: PMC8575694 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.700229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas (SCCP) is a rare malignant tumor that has been reported in individual case reports only. The clinical data on primary SCCP treatment are limited. Therefore, the appropriate management strategy for this disease should be standardized. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 63-year-old man admitted to our hospital for upper left abdominal pain for 2 months without weight loss or jaundice. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen revealed a mixed solid and cystic lesion in the pancreatic tail, measuring 35 × 37 mm in maximum diameter with enhancement. The patient was diagnosed with primary SCCP without metastasis, based on radiological and pathological findings. He did not receive neoadjuvant therapy postoperatively and was followed up by CT and MRI for 18 months without recurrence or metastasis. Result: Complete resection is the most effective treatment for early stage primary SCCP. Abdominal MRI is an effective imaging tool for preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up of primary SCCP. The need for neoadjuvant therapy depends on various factors. Conclusion: Primary SCCP is a tumor with poor prognosis. Risk factor control, early accurate radiologic evaluation, and individualized treatment strategies improve the quality of life and prolong the overall survival period of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danling Guo
- Department of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China
| | - Chao Chen
- Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sangying Lv
- Department of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China
| | - Guanzuan Wu
- Department of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China
| | - Wei Shi
- Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huaifeng Li
- Department of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China
| | - Hongjie Hu
- Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Okada KI, Kawai M, Hirono S, Sho M, Tani M, Matsumoto I, Yamada S, Amano R, Toyama H, Yamashita YI, Gocho T, Shibuya K, Nagai M, Maehira H, Kamei K, Ohira G, Shirai Y, Takami H, Kimura N, Fukumoto T, Baba H, Kodera Y, Nakao A, Shimokawa T, Katsuda M, Yamaue H. ISOlation Procedure vs. conventional procedure during Distal Pancreatectomy (ISOP-DP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:633. [PMID: 34530885 PMCID: PMC8447574 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05523-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is an isolation procedure in pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic body/tail cancer. Connective tissues around the bifurcation of the celiac axis are dissected, followed by median-to-left retroperitoneal dissection. This procedure has the potential to isolate blood and lymphatic flow to the area of the pancreatic body/tail and the spleen to be excised. This is achieved by division of the inflow artery, transection of the pancreas, and then division of the outflow vein in the early phases of surgery. In cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the procedure has been shown to decrease intraoperative blood loss and increase R0 resection rate by complete clearance of the lymph nodes. This trial investigates whether the isolation procedure can prolong the survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who undergo distal pancreatosplenectomy (DPS) compared with those that undergo the conventional approach. METHODS/DESIGN Patients with PDAC scheduled to undergo DPS are randomized before surgery to undergo either a conventional procedure (arm A) or to undergo the isolation procedure (arm B). In arm A, the pancreatic body, tail, and spleen are mobilized, followed by removal of the regional lymph nodes. The splenic vein is transected at the end of the procedure. The timing of division of the splenic artery (SA) is not restricted. In arm B, regional lymph nodes are dissected, then we transect the root of the SA, the pancreas, then the splenic vein. At the end of the procedure, the pancreatic body/tail and spleen are mobilized and removed. In total, 100 patients from multiple Japanese high-volume centers will be randomized. The primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative blood loss, R0 resection rate, and overall survival. DISCUSSION If this trial shows that the isolation procedures can improve survival with a similar R0 rate and with a similar number of lymph node dissections to the conventional procedure, the isolation procedure is expected to become a standard procedure during DPS for PDAC. Conversely, if there were no significant differences in endpoints between the groups, it would demonstrate justification of either procedure from surgical and oncological points of view. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000041381 . Registered on 10 August 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04600063 . Registered on 22 October 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken-Ichi Okada
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan
| | - Manabu Kawai
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan
| | - Seiko Hirono
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Masaji Tani
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Ōtsu, Japan
| | - Ippei Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Suguru Yamada
- Department of Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Amano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hirochika Toyama
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yo-Ichi Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Takeshi Gocho
- Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuto Shibuya
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Maehira
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Ōtsu, Japan
| | - Keiko Kamei
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Go Ohira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Shirai
- Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Takami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nana Kimura
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Takumi Fukumoto
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Akimasa Nakao
- Department of Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toshio Shimokawa
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Katsuda
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Partelli S, Sclafani F, Barbu ST, Beishon M, Bonomo P, Braz G, de Braud F, Brunner T, Cavestro GM, Crul M, Trill MD, Ferollà P, Herrmann K, Karamitopoulou E, Neuzillet C, Orsi F, Seppänen H, Torchio M, Valenti D, Zamboni G, Zins M, Costa A, Poortmans P. European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102208. [PMID: 34238640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) are written by experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care in Europe. They give patients, health professionals, managers and policymakers a guide to essential care throughout the patient journey. Pancreatic cancer is an increasing cause of cancer mortality and has wide variation in treatment and care in Europe. It is a major healthcare burden and has complex diagnosis and treatment challenges. Care must be carried out only in pancreatic cancer units or centres that have a core multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an extended team of health professionals detailed here. Such units are far from universal in European countries. To meet European aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Partelli
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO); IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Sclafani
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- Pancreatic Cancer Europe (PCE); Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Marc Beishon
- Cancer World, European School of Oncology (ESO), Milan, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Flims Alumni Club (FAC); Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Graça Braz
- European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS); Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Brunner
- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO); Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Giulia Martina Cavestro
- European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG); IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirjam Crul
- European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP); Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Netherlands
| | - Maria Die Trill
- International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS); ATRIUM: Psycho-Oncology & Clinical Psychology, Madrid, Spain
| | - Piero Ferollà
- International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance (INCA); Umbria Regional Cancer Network, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ken Herrmann
- European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM); University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva Karamitopoulou
- European Society of Pathology (ESP); Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Franco Orsi
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL); Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martina Torchio
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Danila Valenti
- European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC); Palliative Care Network, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Zamboni
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI); University Hospital Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marc Zins
- European Society of Radiology (ESR); Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France
| | | | - Philip Poortmans
- European Cancer Organisation (ECCO); Iridium Kankernetwerk and University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee JE, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Choi SY, Lee S, Lee BR. A Comparative Study of Survivor Outcomes between Preoperative Evaluation Using CT Alone and Combined CT and MRI in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2021; 82:638-653. [PMID: 36238786 PMCID: PMC9432452 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2020.0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Materials and Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Seong Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon Jin Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Youn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bo Ra Lee
- Department of Biomedical Statistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rhee H, Park MS. The Role of Imaging in Current Treatment Strategies for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2020; 22:23-40. [PMID: 32901458 PMCID: PMC7772381 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In pancreatic cancer, imaging plays an essential role in surveillance, diagnosis, resectability evaluation, and treatment response evaluation. Pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals has been attempted using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Imaging diagnosis and resectability evaluation are the most important factors influencing treatment decisions, where computed tomography (CT) is the preferred modality. EUS, MRI, and positron emission tomography play a complementary role to CT. Treatment response evaluation is of increasing clinical importance, especially in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. This review aimed to comprehensively review the role of imaging in relation to the current treatment strategy for pancreatic cancer, including surveillance, diagnosis, evaluation of resectability and treatment response, and prediction of prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyungjin Rhee
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Suk Park
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kobi M, Veillette G, Narurkar R, Sadowsky D, Paroder V, Shilagani C, Gilet A, Flusberg M. Imaging and Management of Pancreatic Cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2020; 41:139-151. [PMID: 32446428 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2019.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with rising incidence and high mortality despite advances in imaging and therapeutic options. Surgical resection is currently the only curative treatment, with expanding roles for adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Accurate detection, staging, and post-treatment monitoring of pancreatic cancer are critical to improving survival and imaging plays a central role in the multidisciplinary approach to this disease. This article will provide a broad overview of the imaging and management of pancreatic cancer with a focus on diagnosis and staging, operative and nonoperative treatments, and post-therapeutic appearances after surgery and chemoradiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariya Kobi
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Roshni Narurkar
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
| | - David Sadowsky
- Department of Radiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Anthony Gilet
- Department of Radiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
| | - Milana Flusberg
- Department of Radiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kobi M, Veillette G, Narurkar R, Sadowsky D, Paroder V, Shilagani C, Gilet A, Flusberg M. DUPLICATE: Imaging and Management of Pancreatic Cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2019. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|