The Association of Acquired T790M Mutation with Clinical Characteristics after Resistance to First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Lung Adenocarcinoma

RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated, Metastatic NSCLC: Outcomes by EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Variants

Introduction

EGFR gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an EGFR-activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72).

Results

The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); EGFR E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). TP53 mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044-2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344-0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363-0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression EGFR T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups.

Conclusions

RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex19del variants.

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is brain metastasis (BM)-prone. We determined the impact of this hallmark, along with EGFR subtype and generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, on patients' outcome. 553 metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received front-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M rate were analysed. BM was observed in 211 (38.2%) patients. BM (HR 1.20 [95% CI 0.99-1.48]; p = 0.053), ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54-0.93]; p = 0.014) and afatinib treatment (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66-0.99]; p = 0.045) were associated with PFS. Afatinib-treated patients without BM demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (16.3 months) compared to afatinib-treated patients with BM (13.7 months) and to gefitinib/erlotinib-treated patients with (11.1 months) or without BM (14.2 months; p < 0.001). CNS-only progression trended higher in afatinib-treated patients. ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.31-0.56]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.13-1.88]; p = 0.003), but not BM, were the predictors for OS. BM (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.02-4.08]; p = 0.040), afatinib treatment (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.50]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.28-1.05]; p = 0.070) were associated with secondary T790M rate. In BM patients, gefitinib/erlotinib-treated ones with 19 deletion mutation and afatinib-treated ones with L858R mutation had the highest and the lowest T790M rate (94.4% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. BM and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly impact PFS and secondary T790M rate in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas OS was mainly associated with EGFR subtype.

Clinical outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients with different EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A single-center ambispective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clinical significance of various subtypes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion (ex19del) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed EGFR ex19del subtypes in NSCLC patients receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy at our center (January 2018-June 2022) and correlated them with median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS).

RESULTS

We identified 17 different EGFR ex19del variants in 101 patients. Between the classic (E746_A750del, 64.4%) and nonclassic groups (the rest variants), no significant difference was observed in mPFS (13.5 vs. 19.3 months, p = 0.18) or mOS (44.1 vs. 77.0 months, p = 0.06). mPFS showed no significant difference between ex19del subgroups classified based on the presence of insertion (ex19delins), starting position or length of deletion. However, patients with ex19delins starting at E746 showed longer mPFS than the others (29.7 vs. 12.5 months, p = 0.04), and patients with ex19del of 15 nucleotides had shorter mOS than the others (44.1 vs. 77.0 months, p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, ex19delins independently predicted a better PFS (HR = 0.311, p = 0.03); however, 15 nucleotide deletion was no longer associated with OS (HR = 0.181, p = 0.11). Secondary T790M mutation incidence was significantly higher in the ex19del subgroup starting at E746 than the others (64.7% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed potential differences in TKI efficacy, resistance mechanism, and prognosis of various EGFR ex19del subtypes in NSCLC, underscoring the need for precise selection of first-line therapy.

NSCLC presents metabolic heterogeneity, and there is still some leeway for EGF stimuli in EGFR-mutated NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Metabolic remodeling is crucial in carcinogenesis and cancer progression. Oncogenic mutations may promote metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells to support their energy and biomass requirements. EGFR mutations are commonly found in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may induce NSCLC metabolic rewiring. Whether EGFR-driven metabolic reprogramming triggers cell vulnerabilities with therapeutic potential remains unknown.

METHODS

The role of EGFR signaling activation by EGF was investigated using NSCLC cell lines with different EGFR and KRAS status: A549 (EGFR WT and KRAS c.34G > A), H292 (EGFR WT and KRAS WT) and PC-9 (EGFR exon 19 E746-A750 deletion and KRAS WT). The effect of EGF on NSCLC cell death and cell cycle was evaluated using flow cytometry, and cell migration was assessed through wound healing. EGFR, HER2, MCT1, and MCT4 expression was analyzed through immunofluorescence or western blotting. We explored the impact of glucose and lactate bioavailability on NSCLC cells' metabolic profile using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Moreover, the expression of several relevant metabolic genes in NSCLC cells or patient samples was determined by RT-qPCR.

RESULTS

We showed that cell lines presented different metabolic profiles, and PC-9 cells were the most responsive to EGF stimulus, as they showed higher rates of cell proliferation and migration, together with altered metabolic behavior. By inhibiting EGFR with gefitinib, a decrease in glucose consumption was observed, which may be related to the fact that despite PC-9 harbor EGFR mutation, they still express the EGFR WT allele. The analysis of NSCLC patients' RNA showed a correlation between MCT1/MCT4 and GLUT1 expression in most cases, indicating that the metabolic information can serve as a reference in patients' follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Together, this study shows that NSCLC cell lines have heterogeneous metabolic profiles, which may be underlaid by different genetic profiles, revealing an opportunity to identify and stratify patients who can benefit from metabolism-targeted therapies.

Efficacy of Osimertinib in Patients with Lung Cancer Positive for Uncommon EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Mutations

PURPOSE

The uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del), L747_A750>P, demonstrates reduced sensitivity to osimertinib compared with the common ex19del, E746_A750del in preclinical models. The clinical efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring L747_A750>P and other uncommon ex19dels is not known.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The AACR GENIE database was interrogated to characterize the frequency of individual ex19dels relative to other variants, and a multicenter retrospective cohort was used to compare clinical outcomes for patients with tumors harboring E746_A750del, L747_A750>P, and other uncommon ex19dels who received osimertinib in the first line (1L) or in second or later lines of therapy and were T790M+ (≥2L).

RESULTS

ex19dels comprised 45% of EGFR mutations, with 72 distinct variants ranging in frequency from 28.1% (E746_A750del) to 0.03%, with L747_A750>P representing 1.8% of the EGFR mutant cohort. In our multi-institutional cohort (N = 200), E746_A750del was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with 1L osimertinib versus L747_A750>P [median 21.3 months (95% confidence interval, 17.0-31.7) vs. 11.7 months (10.8-29.4); adjusted HR 0.52 (0.28-0.98); P = 0.043]. Osimertinib efficacy in patients with other uncommon ex19dels varied on the basis of the specific mutation present.

CONCLUSIONS

The ex19del L747_A750>P is associated with inferior PFS compared with the common E746_A750del mutation in patients treated with 1L osimertinib. Understanding differences in osimertinib efficacy among EGFR ex19del subtypes could alter management of these patients in the future.

FRET probe for detecting two mutations in one EGFR mRNA

Technologies for visualizing and tracking RNA are essential in molecular biology, including in disease-related fields. In this study, we propose a novel probe set (DAt-probe and T-probe) that simultaneously detects two mutations in the same RNA using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). The DAt-probe carrying the fluorophore Atto488 and the quencher Dabcyl were used to detect a cancer mutation (exon19del), and the T-probe carrying the fluorophore Tamra was used to detect drug resistance mutations (T790M) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mRNA. These probes were designed to induce FRET when both mutations were present in the mRNA. Gel electrophoresis confirmed that the two probes could efficiently bind to the mutant mRNA. We measured the FRET ratios using wild-type and double-mutant RNAs and found a significant difference between them. Even in living cells, the FRET probe could visualize mutant RNA. As a result, we conclude that this probe set provides a method for detecting two mutations in the single EGFR mRNA via FRET.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the clinical. outcomes of various immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The results predicted the treatment efficacy of these combinations.

METHODS

From July 15, 2016 to March 22, 2022, 85 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, enrolled at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, received ICI combinations after resistance to prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). These patients were diagnosed with EGFR mutations using an amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Survival times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in survival time between patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy and patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy or ICIs combined with chemotherapy, which was due to the limitation sample size of patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. Patients with L858R mutations had a longer PFS and OS than patients with exon 19 deletions. T790M negative patients benefited more from ICI combinations, compared with T790M positive patients. In addition, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with TP53 co-mutations and patients without a TP53 co-mutation. We also found that patients with prior first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance had longer PFS and OS than prior third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance patients. There was no new adverse event in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR-mutated patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy had longer PFS and OS than patients with ICIs combined with chemotherapy. Patients with L858R or without T790M mutation benefited more from ICI combinations. Besides, patients with prior first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance could benefit more from ICIs combinations than prior third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance patients.

Monitoring of T790M in plasma ctDNA of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients on first- or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The T790M mutation is the major resistance mechanism to first- and second-generation TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This study aimed to investigate the utility of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for detection of T790M in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and explore its impact on prognosis.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 80 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib for TKI-sensitizing mutations between 2015 and 2019. Plasma samples were collected before TKI therapy and at tri-monthly intervals thereafter. Genotyping of ctDNA for T790M was performed using a ddPCR EGFR Mutation Assay. Patients were followed up until the date of death or to the end of 2021.

RESULTS

Seventy-five of 80 patients experienced progressive disease. Fifty-three (71%) of 75 patients underwent rebiopsy, and T790M mutation was identified in 53% (28/53) of samples. Meanwhile, plasma ddPCR detected T790M mutation in 23 (43%) of 53 patients. The concordance rate of T790M between ddPCR and rebiopsy was 76%, and ddPCR identified 4 additional T790M-positive patients. Ten (45%) of 22 patients who did not receive rebiopsy tested positive for T790M by ddPCR. Serial ddPCR analysis showed the time interval from detection of plasma T790M to objective progression was 1.1 (0-4.1) months. Compared to 28 patients with rebiopsy showing T790M, the overall survival of 14 patients with T790M detected solely by ddPCR was shorter(41.3 [95% CI, 36.6-46.0] vs. 26.6 months [95% CI, 9.9-43.3], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Plasma ddPCR-based genotyping is a useful technology for detection and monitoring of the key actionable genomic alteration, namely, T790M, in patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib for activating mutations, to achieve better patient care and outcome.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided re-biopsy of non-small cell lung cancer with acquired resistance after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

BACKGROUND

Few studies assessed the use of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided re-biopsy for detecting the T790M mutation after epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) failure.

METHODS

A total of 2996 EBUS procedures were performed during the study period (January 2019-June 2022). In total, 44 consecutive patients who underwent EBUS-guided re-biopsy (56 procedures) for detecting the T790M mutation were analyzed. The success rates and T790M mutation frequencies were analyzed according to the re-biopsy site and EBUS method. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the likelihood of the T790M mutation.

RESULTS

The success rates for the mutation analyses using EBUS with a guide-sheath (EBUS-GS), EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), and EBUS-GS with EBUS-TBNA for re-biopsy were 80.6% (29/36), 93.3% (14/15), and 100% (5/5), respectively. Patients who underwent lymph node biopsy using EBUS-TBNA had an increased rates of the T790M mutation compared with those undergoing lung biopsy using EBUS-GS (EBUS-TBNA, 60.0%; EBUS-GS with EBUS-TBNA, 40.0%; EBUS-GS, 11.1%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the use of a first-generation EGFR-TKI (odds ratio [OR], 4.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-17.58; p = 0.043) was associated with occurrence of the T790M mutation. Re-biopsy of the metastatic site tended to be associated with a higher T790M mutation rate. Mild hemoptysis occurred in 3.6% (2/56) of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-guided re-biopsy can be used for detecting the T790M mutation in patients who failed EGFR-TKI therapy. The T790M mutation frequency differed according to the re-biopsy site. The use of a first-generation EGFR-TKI was an independent predictor of the T790M mutation.

Efficacy and Failure Patterns of Early SBRT to the Primary Tumor in Advanced EGFR-Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer with EFGR-TKI Treatment: A Prospective, Single Arm, Phase II Study

Early stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor combined with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EFGR-TKI) treatment may increase progression-free survival (PFS) by delaying resistance in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this prospective, single arm, phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with EGFR-TKI (icotinib 125 mg tid or gefitinib 250 mg qd) for one month followed by SBRT (40-60 Gy/5-8 F/5-10 d) to the primary tumor with concurrent EGFR-TKI until disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS and the patterns of failure. Overall survival (OS) and adverse effects (AEs) were secondary endpoints. Overall, 41 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations received treatment with 24.42 months of median follow-up time. On average, SBRT was initiated 1.49 months after EGFR-TKI administration. Tumors were found to have an average shrinkage rate of 42.50%. Median PFS was 15.23 months (95% CI 13.10-17.36), while median OS was 27.57 months (95% CI 23.05-32.09). Thirty-three patients were found to have disease progression, of which new site failure (NF) (22 patients, 66.66%) was the most common pattern, followed by original site failure (OF) (7 patients, 21.21%) and simultaneous OF/NF (ONF) (4 patients, 12.12%). There were no Aes equal to or greater than grade 3, with the most frequent AE being radiation pneumonitis. Therefore, administering therapy targeted at the primary tumor using early SBRT after EGFR-TKI initiation is a new potentially safe and effective approach to treat EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

Real-World Testing Practices, Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients from Central Eastern Europe with EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review Study (REFLECT)

The targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against the epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) changed the treatment paradigm. REFLECT study (NCT04031898) explored EGFR/T790M testing and treatment patterns in EGFRm NSCLC patients receiving first- or second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR TKIs as front-line (1L) in eight countries. Pooled data from Central Eastern Europe (CEE) countries from this study (Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovenia) are presented here. This physician-led chart review study was conducted in patients with confirmed-EGFRm NSCLC initiating 1L 1G/2G EGFR TKIs between 2015–2018. The CEE cohort included 389 patients receiving 1L erlotinib (37%), afatinib (34%), and gefitinib (29%). Overall, 320 (82%) patients discontinued 1L, and 298 (77%) progression events were registered. Median progression free survival on 1L TKIs was 14.0 (95% CI: 12.6–15.6) months. Median overall survival from 1L start was 26.6 (95% CI: 24.1–29.0) months. Attrition rate between 1L and next line was 30%. Among patients with 1L progression, 200 (67%) were tested for T790M and 58% were positive. This first CEE analysis of treatments and outcomes in EGFRm NSCLC patients highlights the importance of using the most efficacious therapies currently available in 1L to reduce attrition and improve patient outcomes.

Optimizing Patient Outcomes Through Sequential EGFR TKI Treatment in Asian Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC

Patients from Asia with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often have mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. While an increasing number of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now available for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, most patients inevitably develop resistance to the treatment. Evidence from clinical studies suggests that treatment outcomes and resistance mechanisms vary depending on the choice of TKI therapy in the first-line setting. Hence, it is important to develop optimal treatment sequencing strategies that can provide maximum survival benefit for the patient. In this review we present clinical evidence in Asian patients with NSCLC for various EGFR TKIs, with the goal of supporting the optimization of treatment sequencing.

State-of-the-Art Molecular Oncology of Lung Cancer in Taiwan

Lung cancers are life-threatening malignancies that cause great healthcare burdens in Taiwan and worldwide. The 5-year survival rate for Taiwanese patients with lung cancer is approximately 29%, an unsatisfactorily low number that remains to be improved. We first reviewed the molecular epidemiology derived from a deep proteogenomic resource in Taiwan. The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2)antioxidant mechanism was discovered to mediate the oncogenesis and tumor progression of lung adenocarcinoma. Additionally, DNA replication, glycolysis and stress response are positively associated with tumor stages, while cell-to-cell communication, signaling, integrin, G protein coupled receptors, ion channels and adaptive immunity are negatively associated with tumor stages. Three patient subgroups were discovered based on the clustering analysis of protein abundance in tumors. The first subgroup is associated with more advanced cancer stages and visceral pleural invasion, as well as higher mutation burdens. The second subgroup is associated with EGFR L858R mutations. The third subgroup is associated with PI3K/AKT pathways and cell cycles. Both EGFR and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways have been shown to induce NRF2 activation and tumor cell proliferation. We also reviewed the clinical evidence of patient outcomes in Taiwan given various approved targeted therapies, such as EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)inhibitors, in accordance with the patients’ characteristics. Somatic mutations occurred in EGFR, KRAS, HER2 and BRAF genes, and these mutations have been detected in 55.7%, 5.2%, 2.0% and 0.7% patients, respectively. The EGFR mutation is the most prevalent targetable mutation in Taiwan. EML4-ALK translocations have been found in 9.8% of patients with wild-type EGFR. The molecular profiling of advanced NSCLC is critical to optimal therapeutic decision-making. The patient characteristics, such as mutation profiles, protein expression profiles, drug-resistance profiles, molecular oncogenic mechanisms and patient subgroup systems together offer new strategies for personalized treatments and patient care.

Impact of sequential therapy with osimertinib on the overall survival in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to investigate the associations between clinical factors and the overall survival.

Methods

We retrieved the patient data from the medical charts. Patients who were diagnosed as having EGFR-mutant NSCLC and treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) between 2007 and 2020 at our institution were included in the analysis.

Results

A total of 130 patients were included in the analysis. A log-rank test identified EGFR exon 19 deletion in the tumor, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, local therapy for brain metastasis, and sequential osimertinib therapy for patients with the T790M mutation acquired after primary EGFR-TKI therapy as being significantly associated with a better overall survival. Analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model identified EGFR exon 19 deletion in the tumor, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, local therapy for brain metastasis, and sequential therapy with osimertinib as being independently associated with a prolonged overall survival.

Conclusion

Our analysis suggested that EGFR mutation status, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, local therapy for brain metastasis, and sequential therapy with osimertinib were associated with overall survival in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC in clinical practice settings.

Risk Stratification Using a Novel Nomogram for 2190 EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients Receiving the First or Second Generation EGFR-TKI

Simple Summary

No comprehensive and simple prognostic model based on pretreatment factors exists for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). A total of 11 independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis, including performance status, morphology, mutation, stage, EGFR-TKIs, and metastasis to liver, brain, bone, pleura, adrenal gland, and distant lymph nodes. We established a nomogram based on independent pretreatment factors and used it to stratify EGFRm+ NSCLC patients undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment into five different risk groups for survival using recursive partitioning analysis. The performance of this nomogram was good and feasible, providing clinicians and patients with additional information for evaluating therapeutic options.

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the standard treatment for EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to create a novel nomogram to help physicians suggest the optimal treatment for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC. Records of 2190 patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs (including gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) at the branches of a hospital group between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathological characteristics, clinical tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors to create a nomogram for risk stratification. Univariate analysis identified 14 prognostic factors, and multivariate analysis confirmed the pretreatment independent factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, morphology, mutation, stage, EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib), and metastasis to liver, brain, bone, pleura, adrenal gland, and distant lymph nodes. Based on these factors, a novel nomogram was created and used to stratify the patients into five different risk groups for PFS and OS using recursive partitioning analysis. This risk stratification can provide additional information to clinicians and patients when determining the optimal therapeutic options for EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and cigarette smoking as prognostic factors in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib

Background

The remarkable efficacy of osimertinib in non‒small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with acquired T790M mutation has been widely documented in clinical trials and real-world practice. However, some patients show primary resistance to this drug. Even patients who initially show a favorable response have inconsistent clinical outcomes later. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify additional clinical predictive factors for osimertinib efficacy.

Methods

A prospective cohort of patients with acquired T790M positive stage IV lung adenocarcinoma treated with osimertinib salvage therapy in Hallym University Medical Center were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-one eligible patients were analyzed, including 38 (62%) women and 39 (64%) who never smoked. Their mean age was 63.3 years. The median follow-up after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was 36.0 months (interquartile range, 24.7–50.2 months). The majority (n=45, 74%) of patients were deceased. Based on univariate analysis, low baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR), age ≥50 years, never-smoking history, stage IVA at osimertinib initiation, and prolonged response to previous TKIs (≥10 months) were associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis showed that never-smoking status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30–0.98; p=0.041) and a baseline NLR less than or equal to 3.5 (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12–0.45; p<0.001) were independently associated with a prolonged PFS with osimertinib.

Conclusion

Smoking history and high NLR were independent negative predictors of osimertinib PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC developing EGFR T790M resistance after the initial EGFR-TKI treatment.

Afatinib treatment in a large real-world cohort of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with common and uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) afatinib improves survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation. We analysed the outcome between EGFR mutation subtypes in a large afatinib-treated cohort in which 516 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving afatinib as front-line treatment. EGFR uncommon mutations include exon 20 insertion, de novo T790M of high or low allele frequency (dT790M_HAF /dT790M_LAF ), non-T790M compound mutation and others, where EGFR exon 20 insertion and dT790M_HAF were defined as type-I and the rest as type-II uncommon mutation. Four hundred and sixty-one (89.3%) and 55 (10.7%) patients were common and uncommon mutation, respectively. Exon 20 insertion and dT790M_HAF patients demonstrated a significantly shortened progression-free survival (PFS) (2.6 and 4.1 months) compared to EGFR common mutation, dT790M_LAF and other uncommon mutation patients (15.1, 27.0 and 18.4 months; P = 3 × 10^-8 ). Type-I uncommon mutation was an independent predictor of PFS (HR 4.46 [95% CI, 2.60-7.64]; P < .001) and OS (HR 2.56 [95% CI, 1.37-4.75]; P = .003). EGFR L858R patients demonstrated a significantly higher CNS progression (cause-specific HR, 3.16; 95% CI 1.24-8.08; P = .016), and type-I uncommon mutation patients exhibited a significantly higher systemic progression (cause-specific HR, 4.95; 95% CI 2.30-10.60; P = 4.3 × 10^-5 ). Tendencies of higher CNS and lower systemic progression were observed in type-II uncommon mutation patients. A PFS ≥ 12 months (OR 2.38 [95% CI, 1.18-4.89]; P = .016) and uncommon EGFR mutation (OR 0.08 [95% CI, 0.01-0.48]; P = .021) were independent predictors of secondary T790M. Afatinib-treated NSCLC patients presented an EGFR genotype-specific pattern of disease progression and outcome.

Liquid Biopsy for EGFR Mutation Analysis in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Thoughts Drawn from a Real-Life Experience

Background: Liquid biopsy analysis for EGFR detection in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from NSCLC patients has become routine. The aim of this study was to explore its applicability in clinical practice. Methods: We collected data of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with liquid biopsy analysis. Data included test timing, concomitant tissue re-biopsy, therapy change, histology, stage, smoking habits, gender and age. All analyses were performed via a real-time PCR method to analyze EGFR mutations at exons 18, 19, 20 and 21. Variant allele frequency was performed for patients with available sequential EGFR mutation analysis in cfDNA. Overall survival was analyzed through the Kaplan–Meier method. We designed flow charts to show the real-life application of liquid biopsy. Results: We found that liquid biopsy is used in treatment-naïve patients as an alternative to EGFR detection in tumor tissue, and in patients with positive or negative EGFR from tumor biopsy. The majority of liquid biopsy analyses were performed in NSCLC patients who were disease progressive during TKI therapy. The presence of EGFR mutation in cfDNA was associated with a worse prognosis. In two patients, VAF of EGFR mutations in cfDNA was concordant with tumor volume changes. Conclusion: These findings suggest that liquid biopsy for EGFR detection can continue to be useful.

Association of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment With Progression-Free Survival Among Taiwanese Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma and EGFR Mutation

Background: There is limited data on the relative survival rate of first-line therapy of gefitinib, erlotinib (first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor [EGFR-TKI]), and afatinib (second-generation EGFR-TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma in real-world data, especially in the Asian population. This study aimed to compare the relative survival rate of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma by real-world data in Taiwan. Methods: This retrospective cohort population-based study included untreated adult patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who were identified in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 2014 and 2017. The date of EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis was referred as index date. This outcome evaluated overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) between gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. Switching EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy and new development of brain metastases were proxies of TTF. Estimated relative treatment effects on OS and TTF among EGFR-TKIs were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score (PS) matched pair analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: The study cohort included 3,695 patients initiated with gefitinib, 3,310 with erlotinib, and 3,041 with afatinib. The mean age among the three treatment groups was 70.4 (±11.6), 66.8 (±11.6), and 64.3 (±11.4) years, and the female percentage was 70.4, 58.6, and 57.7%, respectively. Afatinib showed longer median OS than gefitinib (23.9 vs. 21.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.87; p < 0.001) and erlotinib (23.9 vs. 21.8 months; aHR, 0.87; p = 0.001). Consistent results were observed with TTF outcomes. For patients with brain metastases at diagnosis, afatinib showed similar OS with erlotinib (p = 0.917) but superior to gefitinib (p = 0.028). PS matching had similar results with IPTW adjustment in the study population. Conclusion: Afatinib as first-line therapy had better survival outcomes for EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma than gefitinib and erlotinib in the Taiwan population. Both erlotinib and afatinib demonstrated superior treatment effect in patients with initial brain metastases than gefitinib.

Elevated exosome-derived miRNAs predict osimertinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations will inevitably develop drug resistance after being treated with the third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib. Recently, the drug resistance information transmitted by exosomal miRNAs has attracted much attention. However, the mechanism of exosome-derived miRNAs in osimertinib resistance remains unexplored.

METHODS

We extracted and sequenced exosomes from the supernatant of the osimertinib-resistant cell line, H1975-OR, and the sensitive cell line, H1975. The results were compared with plasma exosome sequencing before and after the appearance of drug resistance in three NSCLC clinical patients treated with oral osimertinib. Exosome-derived miRNAs that had significantly increased expression levels after osimertinib resistance were screened for expanded validation in other 64 NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

Cluster analysis of the target genes revealed that exosomal miRNAs participate in osimertinib resistance mechanisms through the activation of bypass pathways (RAS-MAPK pathway abnormality and PI3K pathway activation). Exosome-derived miR-184 and miR-3913-5p expression levels increased significantly after the onset of osimertinib resistance. Exosomal miR-3913-5p was associated with TNM stage, platelet count, tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen, and distant metastases. In patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, the increased expression levels of miR-184 and miR-3913-5p derived from serum exosomes indicated osimertinib resistance. Similarly, for T790M-positive patients, the level of exosome-derived miR-3913-5p can be used as a predictive marker for osimertinib resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression levels of miR-184 and miR-3913-5p derived from exosomes in the peripheral blood of NSCLC patients could be used as biomarkers to indicate osimertinib resistance.

The Clinical Outcomes of Different First-Line EGFR-TKIs plus Bevacizumab in Advanced EGFR-mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of various epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus bevacizumab in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Materials and Methods

From August 2016 to October 2020, we enrolled advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R receiving gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for the purposes of analysis.

Results

A total of 36 patients were included in the final analysis. Three patients received gefitinib, 17 received erlotinib, and 16 received afatinib combined with bevacizumab as the first-line treatment. The objective response rate was 77.8%, and disease control rate was 94.4%. The overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months, while the median PFS was 17.1 months in patients with exon 19 deletion, and 16.2 months in patients with L858R mutation (p=0.311). Regarding the use of different EGFR-TKIs, the median PFS was 17.1 months in the erlotinib group and 21.6 months in the afatinib group (p=0.617). In patients with brain metastasis at baseline, the median PFS was 18.9 months in the erlotinib group and 16.4 months in the afatinib group (p=0.747). Amongst patients harboring exon 19 deletion, the median PFS was 16.2 months in the erlotinib group and not-reached in the afatinib group (p=0.141). In patients with L858R mutation, the median PFS was 18.9 months in the erlotinib group and 16.2 months in the afatinib group (p=0.481).

Conclusion

Our research demonstrates that not only erlotinib combined with bevacizumab, but also afatinib plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment, provides solid clinical efficacy in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients.

First- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a large, real-world cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

There are limited comparisons of first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in large, real-world cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC (N = 612) with common EGFR mutations receiving first-line gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib were grouped and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutations were analyzed.

Results

The gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib groups each contained 206 patients after matching. Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, patients receiving afatinib achieved longer median PFS (16.3 versus 14.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.020) and had a lower risk of progression [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-0.94); p = 0.017]. Median OS (37.3 versus 34.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.500) and reduction in risk of death [HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.65-1.23); p = 0.476] did not differ significantly between groups. T790M positivity was significantly higher in the gefitinib/erlotinib than afatinib group (70.9% versus 44.6%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that afatinib was independently associated with lower T790M positivity [odds ratio (OR) 0.27 (95% CI, 0.14-0.53); p < 0.001], whereas ⩾12 months PFS after EGFR-TKI treatment [OR 3.00 (95% CI, 1.56-5.98); p = 0.001] and brain metastasis [OR 2.12 (95% CI, 1.08-4.26); p = 0.030] were associated with higher T790M positivity. Sequential third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment was administered to 63 patients, in whom median OS after the second-third-generation and first-third-generation EGFR-TKI sequences were 38.8 and 29.1 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, afatinib had a higher treatment efficacy and a lower secondary T790M positivity in a large, real-world cohort of Asian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Real-world efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in treating advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation is a rare driver mutation in lung cancer. This study was aimed to report on the efficacy of lorlatinib in real-world practice and to evaluate the impact of prior ALK inhibitor treatments.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with lorlatinib regarding its efficacy, the impact of prior ALK inhibitor treatments and the adverse events, in particular dyslipidemia.

RESULTS

A total of 22 ALK-positive patients were analyzed. All patients had received at least one second-generation ALK inhibitor(s), while 12 patients had a history of crizotinib treatment. For lorlatinib, the objective response rate was 35.7%, and disease control rate was 64.3%. Their progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months. With prior therapies, patients receiving only second-generation ALK inhibitor(s) treatment showed PFS longer than those with both crizotinib and second-generation ALK inhibitor(s) treatments (15.2 vs. 6.2 months). Moreover, patients who showed benefits from prior ALK inhibitor(s) also had a PFS longer than those who did not (6.5 vs. 3.5 months). Regarding adverse events, 94.7% of patients had dyslipidemia and 21.1% of them were in grade 3 or 4. None of these patients discontinued the treatment due to dyslipidemia. No acute complication occurred with dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSION

The real-world efficacy of lorlatinib and adverse events were similar to those reported in clinical trials. Interestingly, the history and responses of prior ALK inhibitor treatments may influence the efficacy of subsequent lorlatinib treatment.

The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M

The impact of different first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)s to the clinical efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired T790M was still unclear. We enrolled 733 advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib as first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment for analysis. 373 patients received re-biopsies after progressive disease to first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment, and the total positive rate of T790M was 51.7%. 151 patients who harbored T790M received osimertinib as subsequent treatment. Among them, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line EGFR-TKI (PFS1) was 14.0 months, and the median PFS of osimertinib (PFS2) was 10.1 months. The median PFS1 + PFS2 was 27.5 months, and the median overall survival from first-line EGFR-TKI was 61.3 months. Concerning different first-line EGFR-TKIs, the median PFS2 was 10.9 months in the gefitinib group, 10.0 months in the erlotinib group, and 6.7 months in the afatinib group (p = 0.534). The median PFS1 + PFS2 was 27.7 months, 26.8 months and 24.0 months in the gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib group, respectively (p = 0.575). In conclusion, both first-generation and second-generation EGFR-TKIs sequential osimertinib treatment provided good clinical efficacy in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutation.

EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab versus EGFR-TKI monotherapy for patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer-A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent study showed that the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab had better disease control than erlotinib monotherapy in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is lack of real-world evidence for this therapeutic regimen. We aimed to compare outcomes between patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and bevacizumab and those treated with EGFR-TKI alone in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-line EGFR-TKI in a tertiary referral center from October 1, 2013 to December 31, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. We performed 1:2 propensity score-matching: one EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab recipient with two patients who received EGFR-TKI alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

Total 313 patients were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 45 patients who received first-line EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab and 89 patients who received EGFR-TKI alone were analyzed. The combination group showed improved PFS (17.0 vs. 11.0 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48; p = 0.002) compared to the monotherapy group. In subgroup analysis of patients with an L858R mutation, the combination group showed longer PFS (23.1 vs. 10.7 months; HR = 0.40; p = 0.011) and OS (not reached vs. 40.6 months; HR = 0.27; p = 0.040) than the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the combination of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab could improve PFS in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. In patients harboring L858R mutation, the combination therapy provides better OS than TKI alone.

The Impact of Acquired EGFR T790M Mutation and EGFR Circulating Cell-Free DNA on Survival in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma Following EGFR-TKI Therapy

Objective

To utilize liquid biopsy to investigate the potential clinical factors influencing the incidence of the acquired epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation, and the impact of EGFR circulating cell-free DNA (CfDNA) on overall survival for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma resistant to first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to analyze EGFR-mutated stage IIIB-IV adenocarcinoma patients who received an EGFR-TKI (gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib) as first-line therapy and then underwent a liquid biopsy exam at disease progression.

Results

A total of 135 patients were included, and the T790M mutation was detected in 51 patients (37.7%). The incidence of T790M mutation increased with the number of initial metastatic sites (p = 0.015). Liver metastasis (odds ratio [OR], 3.373; p = 0.017) and other metastasis (OR, 3.063; p = 0.023) were also independently correlated with T790M mutation incidence. T790M mutation was also associated with more than two progressive sites (OR, 3.382; p = 0.006), liver progression (OR, 6.204; p = 0.002), and bone progression (OR, 3.366; p = 0.004). However, central nervous system progression was inversely correlated with T790M mutation (OR, 0.183; p = 0.027). Overall survival was the longest among the patients without CfDNA, followed by those shedding T790M mutation and those shedding Del 19/L858R mutations (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Initial metastasis to the liver and other sites may be independent factors for secondary EGFR T790M mutation. T790M-positive lung adenocarcinoma has specific progression patterns. Moreover, not having EGFR CfDNA, being positive for Del19/L858R mutations, and being positive for T790M mutation have differing impacts on overall survival for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma resistant to first-line EGFR-TKI.

Association of hOGG1-Cys variants with occurrence of p53 and EGFR deletion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The human 8‐oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (hOGG1) gene encodes a DNA glycosylase that removes 8‐hydroxy‐2‐deoxyguanine (8‐OH‐dG) DNA damage to protect against gene mutations. The association of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with lung cancer risk has predicted that hOGG1‐Cys variants are less effective at removing 8‐OH‐dG damage from DNA; therefore, these variants might show an increased occurrence of tumor suppressor gene and oncogene mutations. However, no evidence has yet supported this hypothesis.

Methods

Direct sequencing was performed to examine the mutations of p53 and EGFR genes in lung tumors from patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP) was used to examine hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism in this study population.

Results

A total of 99 p53‐mutated and 99 EGFR‐mutated patients with NSCLC were selected to explore the possible associations of these mutations with hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism. The p53‐mutated and EGFR‐mutated patients were divided into nondeletion and deletion subgroups. P53 deletion mutations were more commonly observed in male than in female patients (P = 0.030). However, EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations were more prevalent in female and adenocarcinoma patients than in male and squamous cell carcinoma patients (P = 0.028 for genders, P = 0.017 for tumor histology). Interestingly, p53 and EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations were more frequent in patients with hOGG1 Ser/Cys + Cys/Cys hOGG1‐Cys variants than with the hOGG1 Ser/Ser genotype (P = 0.010 for p53, P = 0.032 for EGFR).

Conclusions

We suggest that the association of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with lung cancer risk could be partially explained by increases in p53 and EGFR deletion mutations.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

NSCLC patients with hOGG1‐Cys variants may have a higher risk of p53 and EGFR deletion mutations than with hOGG1 Ser/Ser genotype.

What this study adds

NSCLC patients with hOGG1‐Cys variants might be helpful to predict patients having higher risk of EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations and these patients who were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib could be a higher risk to occur EGFR T790M mutation.

NSCLC patients with hOGG1‐Cys variants may have higher risk of p53 and EGFR deletion mutations than with hOGG1 Ser/Ser genotype. NSCLC patients with hOGG1‐Cys variants might be helpful to predict patients with higher risk of EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations and these patients who were treated with gefitinib and erlotinib were more common to occur EGFR T790M mutation.

A Highly Sensitive Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Genotyping Platform for EGFR Mutations in Plasma from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

In this study, Sel-Cap^TM, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genotyping platform, showed high sensitivity for detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in plasma samples collected from 185 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the early-stage NSCLC, Sel-Cap liquid biopsy was able to detect more than half the EGFR mutations, which were detected in tumor tissue (sensitivity: 50% and 78% for Ex19del and L858R respectively, with tumor results as the references), while the conventional NGS could not detect any. Sel-Cap liquid biopsy was particularly sensitive for resistant mutation T790M (sensitivity: 88%). In addition, we conducted a retrospective study to monitor T790M using Sel-Cap in 34 patients who progressed on first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The study suggested that the first appearance of T790M in plasma, ranging from at treatment baseline to over three years post-EGFR-TKI initiation, may be useful for prediction of disease progression (around 5 months in advance).

Abstract

Sel-Cap^TM, a digital enrichment next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based cancer panel, was assessed for detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in plasma for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and for application in monitoring EGFR resistance mutation T790M in plasma following first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment. Using Sel-Cap, we genotyped plasma samples collected from 185 patients for mutations Ex19del, L858R, and T790M, and compared results to those of PNAclamp^TM tumor biopsy (reference method, a peptide nucleic acid-mediated polymerase chain reaction clamping) and two other NGS liquid biopsies. Over two-thirds of activating mutations (Ex19del and L858R), previously confirmed by PNAclamp, were detected by Sel-Cap, which is 4–5 times more sensitive than NGS liquid biopsy. Sel-Cap showed particularly high sensitivity for T790M (88%) and for early-stage plasma samples. The relationship between initial T790M detection in plasma and progression-free survival (PFS) following first-line EGFR-TKIs was evaluated in 34 patients. Patients with T790M detected at treatment initiation (±3 months) had significantly shorter PFS than patients where T790M was first detected >3 months post treatment initiation (median PFS: 5.9 vs. 26.5 months; p < 0.0001). However, time from T790M detection to disease progression was not significantly different between the two groups (median around 5 months). In conclusion, Sel-Cap is a highly sensitive platform for EGFR mutations in plasma, and the timing of the first appearance of T790M in plasma, determined via highly sensitive liquid biopsies, may be useful for prediction of disease progression of NSCLC, around 5 months in advance.

Association of Tumor PD-L1 Expression with the T790M Mutation and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving EGFR-TKI Therapy

Background: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of the epidermal growth receptor gene (EGFR) after first-line treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patient groups with and without tumor expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). Methods: Data of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using the 22C3 antibody. T790M gene mutation was evaluated by Cobas EGFR assay using tissues or humoral specimens. Results: Data of 47 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were analyzed. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS in the PD-L1-negative and -positive patient groups were 12.9 (9.7–15.4) months and 9.0 (5.1–12.3) months, respectively (p = 0.029). T790M gene mutation was analyzed in 27 patients. The proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of EGFR after first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI was higher in the PD-L1-negative patient group than in the PD-L1-positive patient group (8/11 patients (72.7%) vs. 4/16 patients (25.0%); p = 0.022). Conclusions: Patients with negative tumor PD-L1 expression showed longer PFS and a higher proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of EGFR after first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI.

The impact of EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes on clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The study investigated the resistant pattern and clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion (19del) subtypes to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Two hundred eight treatment naive NSCLC patients detected as EGFR 19del using amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS) were included. DNA sequencing was used to detect the subtypes. Clinicopathological features as well as patients’ outcomes treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs were analyzed.

Results

Thirteen EGFR 19del subtypes were confirmed in 181 samples (87.0%). Among these, delE746_A750 was the most frequent subtype (130/181, 71.8%). delE746_A750 and deletions starting from E746 were frequently found in female (P=0.003 and P=0.013, respectively) and never smokers (P=0.002 and P=0.014, respectively) than non-delE746_A750 and deletions starting from L747 patients, respectively. T790M was more frequently occurred in delE746_A750 than non-delE746_A750 (P=0.001) and deletions starting from E746 than L747 patients (P=0.006) after first-line EGFR-TKIs resistance. Patients harboring deletions starting from L747 with insertions had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than deletions starting from L747 without insertion (8.3 vs. 15.0 m, P=0.017), or all other patients (8.3 vs. 12.6 m, P=0.027). Different 19del subtypes with T790M mutation had similar PFS when treated with osimertinib (P=0.102).

Conclusions

Patients with EGFR 19del subtypes had different clinicopathological features, and resistant pattern when treated with first-line TKIs. Patients harboring deletions starting from L747 with insertions had inferior outcomes than other subtypes.

Refined Stratification Based on Baseline Concomitant Mutations and Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Under Gefitinib Treatment

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains challenging because of intratumor heterogeneity. We aimed to explore a refined stratification model based on the integrated analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tracking.

METHODS

ctDNA was prospectively collected at baseline and at every 8 weeks in patients with advanced treatment-naive EGFR-mutant LUAD under gefitinib treatment enrolled in a phase 2 trial and analyzed using next-generation sequencing of a 168-gene panel.

RESULTS

Three subgroups categorized by baseline comutations-EGFR-sensitizing mutations (59, 32.8%), EGFR-sensitizing mutations with tumor suppressor mutations (97, 53.9%), and EGFR-sensitizing mutations with other driver mutations (24, 13.3%)-exhibited distinct progression-free survival (13.2 [11.3-15.2] versus 9.3 [7.6-10.5] versus 4.0 [2.4-9.3] months) and overall survival (32.0 [29.2-41.5] versus 21.7 [19.3-27.0] versus 15.5 [10.5-33.7] months, respectively), providing evidence for initial stratification. A total of 63.7% of the patients achieved week 8 ctDNA clearance, with significant difference noted among the three subgroups (74.5% versus 64.0% versus 29.4%, respectively, p = 0.004, Fisher's exact test). Patients without week 8 ctDNA clearance had worse progression-free survival (clearance versus nonclearance 11.2 [9.9-13.2] versus 7.4 [5.6-9.6] months, p = 0.016, Cox regression], especially in the second subgroup [5.8 (5.6-11.5) months], suggesting the necessity of adaptive stratification during treatment. During follow-up, 56.0% and 20.8% of the patients eventually harbored p.T790M and non-p.T790M mutations, respectively, with a significant difference in non-p.T790M mutations among the three subgroups (7.5% versus 15.7% versus 80.0%, respectively, p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test), giving clues to postline treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with baseline comutations and ctDNA nonclearance at first visit might require combined therapy because of the limited survival benefit of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy. We proposed a refined stratification mode for the whole-course management of EGFR-mutant LUAD.

An Observational Study of Acquired EGFR T790M-Dependent Resistance to EGFR-TKI Treatment in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Taiwan

In Taiwan, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib are served as first-line therapy for non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR sensitizing mutations. However, the majority of patients who initially respond to EGFR-TKIs, progress through acquiring EGFR T790M mutations (T790M), which is the most common resistant mechanism. Patients with T790M gain the opportunity of subsequent treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib. This study aimed to evaluate the association between prior EGFR-TKI therapy and incidence of acquired T790M resistance in lung adenocarcinoma patients who have progressed on first/second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy. This retrospective study included lung adenocarcinoma patients who had a radiographically-confirmed progressive disease under EGFR-TKI treatment and had re-biopsy samples for T790M testing from seven medical centers in Taiwan from June 2013 to December 2018. Patients harboring de novo T790M or using more than one EGFR-TKI were excluded. Of the 407 patients enrolled, the overall T790M acquisition rate was 52.8%. The patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib had a statistically significant difference in the T790M rates (59.9, 45.5, and 52.7%, respectively; p = 0.037) after disease progression. Patients with common baseline EGFR mutations (Del-19 and L858R) (p = 0.005) and longer treatment duration with EGFR-TKIs (p < 0.001) had higher chances of T790M acquisition. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further showed that patients with common baseline EGFR mutations, gefitinib (compared to erlotinib) administration, and longer treatment duration with EGFR-TKIs had higher T790M incidence. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acquired T790M between different re-biopsy tissue samples or complications. In conclusion, this study showed that patients who progressed from gefitinib treatment, bearing common EGFR mutations, and with longer EGFR-TKI treatment duration had increased incidence of T790M acquisition and, therefore, were suitable for subsequent osimertinib treatment.

Clinical implication and usefulness of de novo EGFR T790M mutation in lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitizing mutation

In total, 102 cases diagnosed as lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitizing mutations (mEGFR) and had been treated with 1^st ~ 2^nd generation EGFR-TKI alone were enrolled for this study. De novo T790 M status was tested using the tissues at the initial diagnosis and positivity was defined as the ratio of T790 M/wild-type copies over 0.00294 by ddPCR.

Seventy patients (68.6%) harbored the de novo T790 M. De novo T790 M was more frequently detected in cases with EGFR L858 R mutation than those with EGFR exon 19 deletion (E19d) mutations (P = 0.024). Forty-three patients underwent rebiopsy due to disease progression. The cases who experienced progression due to acquired T790 M were more likely to have E19d at initial diagnosis and the presence of de novo T790 M and the ratio of T790 M/wild-type copies did not relate to the emergence of acquired T790 M. On the other hand, the cases with a longer duration of disease-control by EGFR-TKI had higher change to get acquired T790 M mutation (P-value = 0.040).

The presence of de novo T790 M has limitation in predicting disease progression by acquired T790 M, suggesting that identifying de novo T790 M through the ultrasensitive methods may not be necessary identifying patients who would be beneficial by 3rd-generation EGFR-TKI as the 1st line treatment.

Post-Progression Survival in Secondary EGFR T790M-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With and Without Osimertinib After Failure of a Previous EGFR TKI

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is effective in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an acquired epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation, the most common resistance mechanism to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate survival outcome of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who have progressed on previous EGFR TKI therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation after acquired resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKI who received tumor rebiopsy after EGFR TKI failure from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017 were reviewed. Patient clinical characteristics, T790M mutation status, and post-progression survival (PPS) were recorded by chart review.

RESULTS

We included 240 patients and the percentage of secondary T790M mutations in first time tissue rebiopsy was 52.9%. 38 of the initial T790M-negative patients received second rebiopsies and 14 (36.8%) of these were T790M positive. The duration between first and second rebiopsy tended to be longer in patients who had T790M mutation in the second biopsy (11.5 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.043). After EGFR TKI failure, the median PPS of patients who had the T790M mutation and history of osimertinib use was 42.6 months (95% CI 34.6-50.5), compared to 18.0 (95% CI 9.6-26.4) months in T790M-positive patients without a history of osimertinib use, and 18.8 (95% CI 9.3-28.4) months in patients with no T790M mutation (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that history of osimertinib use was correlated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These data further emphasize that osimertinib should be a standard of care in patients with pretreated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC.

EGFR mutation genotypes affect efficacy and resistance mechanisms of osimertinib in T790M-positive NSCLC patients

Background

Osimertinib is a potent third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust activity in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with T790M resistance mutation. However, a broad interpatient variability was observed. This study aimed to evaluate whether EGFR-mutant genotypes affect the clinical outcomes and resistance mechanisms in T790M-positive NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib therapy.

Methods

All NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib in our institute were screened. We included those with known EGFR-mutant genotypes and T790M positivity. Clinical outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), were evaluated and compared between different EGFR genotypes. Patients with next-generation sequencing testing or tumor rebiopsy after osimertinib treatment were analyzed for resistance mechanisms.

Results

ORR, CBR, PFS, and OS were all non-significantly different among patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion (19Del, n=136), L858R (n=93), and uncommon mutations (n=6). However, a subset of tumors with deletion starting at E746 (ΔE746, n=98), but not non-ΔE746 tumors (n=38), had better clinical outcomes than L858R tumors (n=93). Frequencies of T790M loss and C797S acquisition after osimertinib treatment were similar between 19Del (n=56) and L858R tumors (n=33). However, compared with L858R tumors (n=33), those with 19Del ΔE746 subtype (n=40) had a higher whereas non-ΔE746 subtype (n=16) had a similar frequency of acquired C797S mutation. Combined analysis of our cohort and public cohort confirmed these findings.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the EGFR 19Del subtypes affect the clinical outcomes and resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in T790M-positive patients. Identifying patients with relatively worse treatment outcomes may be informative for establishing new therapies for these patients.

Prior EGFR-TKI Treatment in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Affects the Allele Frequency Fraction of Acquired T790M and the Subsequent Efficacy of Osimertinib

BACKGROUND

The first (1G) and second (2G) generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show differential inhibitory capacities towards EGFR T790M-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ratio of the allele fractions of T790M (AF_T790M) to EGFR-activating mutations (AF_mEGFR) in patients treated with 1G and 2G EGFR TKIs who acquired T790M-mediated resistance and to determine the relationship between AF and the later efficacy of osimertinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The efficacy of osimertinib was reviewed for 54 T790M-positive EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients grouped by the generation of prior EGFR TKI use (1G vs. 2G). AF_mEGFR and AF_T790M were determined by QuantStudio digital PCR using tissues obtained upon acquired resistance.

RESULTS

The progression-free survival (PFS; 20.3 vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.031) and the 1-year PFS rate (63.2 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.029) for osimertinib were significantly better for group 1G compared to group 2G. The ratio of AF_T790M to AF_mEGFR in group 1G was significantly higher than in group 2G (46.16 ± 5.40% vs. 25.86 ± 4.25%, p = 0.009). An unbiased analysis revealed three AF-associated clusters (ARCs) suggesting the ratio of AF_T790M to AF_mEGFR correlates with the efficacy of osimertinib. We found all patients in ARC2 having the highest ratio of AF_T790M to AF_mEGFR to have previously been treated with a 1G EGFR TKI and to show the longest osimertinib PFS compared to ARC3 (NR vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.060) and ARC1 (NR vs. 12.4 month, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Acquired T790M fraction of EGFR-mutated NSCLC is linked to different generations of prior EGFR TKI use and the later efficacy of osimertinib.

Detection of plasma T790M mutation after the first generation EGFR-TKI resistance of non-small cell lung cancer in the real world

Background

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene has been identified as the driving gene of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has shown efficacy, but acquired resistance is inevitable. It has been confirmed that the secondary EGFR Thr790Met (T790M) mutation accounts for about 50% of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. The third-generation of EGFR-TKI has significantly efficacy in advanced T790M-positive NSCLC patients. Therefore, it is necessary to detect the status of T790M in patients with acquired resistance after first generation EGFR-TKI. The objective of this study was to investigate the positive rate of plasma test T790M mutation and its relationship with different clinical characteristics, and the frequency of T790M mutation in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with acquired resistance after firstline EGFR-TKI treatment.

Methods

Patients from a single clinical center (Taizhou hospital) were recruited prospectively from September 2017 to June 2018. The eligibility criteria of the trial included the following: (I) aged 18 years or older, histologically confirmed NSCLC stage IIIB/st and EGFR mutation positive; (II) progressive disease (PD) after first generation EGFR-TKI by RECIST v1.1, with PFS>3 months; (III) no third generation TKI treatment. All patients signed informed consent, had 10 mL of blood drawn, and were evaluated for the presence of T790M gene by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Taizhou Hospital (ethical batch number: 201637).

Results

A total of 189 patients were included in the analysis. The overall T790M mutation rate of plasma detection was 36.51% (69/189). The positive rate of T790M mutation after the failure of first generation EGFR-TKI treatment was not correlated with the patient’s age, sex, and the type of first generation TKI drugs. However, it was related to the mutation type of EGFR in baseline and the mode of progression according to reports by Wu et al. The frequency of T790M mutation among patients with initial exon 19 deletion mutation, exon 21 L858R point mutation, and other mutations were 45.45%, 26.19% and 33.33%, respectively. The mutation rate of T790M in 19del mutant patients was higher than that of L858R mutation and other mutations (P=0.026). The frequency of T790M mutation in local progression patients was 50% after the first generation TKI was resistant to drug treatment: in gradual progression it was 26.92%, and in dramatic progression it was 38.10%. The frequency of T790M mutation of patients with local progression was significantly higher (P=0.031).

Conclusions

The patients with EGFR mutations after the first generation of EGFR-TKI-acquired resistance of NSCLC were evaluated for their plasma EGFR mutation status, and the overall T790M mutation rate of was 36.51%. The frequency of T790M mutation with initial mutation of 19 del was higher than that of L858R mutation and other mutations, and local progression was higher than that in patients with gradual progression and dramatic progression.

Comparison detection methods for EGFR in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of patients with NSCLC

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important gene in the development of lung cancer. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common lung cancer. In the present study, the expression of EGFR in 717 patients with NSCLC was detected by Ventana automatic immunohistochemical technique, and the samples was verified by Real-time PCR, and then the results were compared with the data acquired by next-generation sequencing technology (NGS), which is the high throughput, multiple sites for EGFR gene mutation testing. The expression of Ventana EGFR in 717 cases of NSCLC was detected by immunohistochemistry, and the positive rate was 60.70 % (435 / 717). The mutation rate of EGFR was 57.60 % (413/717). The coincidence rate of Ventana EGFR immunohistochemical assay and Real-time PCR assay reached 94.94 %, and the two had high consistency. The coincidence rate of Ventana EGFR immunohistochemical assay and NGS were high correlation. Based on these results, Ventana EGFR automatic immunohistochemical detection has high accuracy, simple operation process, low price and easy interpretation. It can be used as the preferred method for EGFR detection.

Association Of Initial Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment And EGFR Exon 19 Deletion With Frequency Of The T790M Mutation In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Resistance To First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Background

The present study analyzed the relationship between clinical features and the T790M mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) treatment.

Methods

NSCLC patients with resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs in which the disease control time was more than 6 months after initial TKI treatment were enrolled. T790M mutation analysis was performed using one of the following methods according to each manufacturer’s protocols: Cobas EGFR mutation test (41/105, 39.0%), digital PCR (42/105, 40.0%) or Scorpion amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) (22/105, 21.0%). Sample type of T790M was from tissue only (53/105, 50.5%), plasma only (46/105, 43.8%), tissue and plasma (6/105, 5.7%).

Results

Of 105 patients, 57 were T790M-positive and 48 were T790M-negative. T790M-positive patients had longer progression-free survival (PFS) after initial EGFR-TKI treatment (p = 0.019). T790M positivity was more frequent in patients treated with gefitinib than in those treated with icotinib (65% vs 40.54%, p = 0.018). The rate of T790M positivity was lower in patients with EGFR L858R (44.44%, 12/27) before TKI treatment than in those with EGFR 19del (72.0%, 36/50, p = 0.036). Patients who achieved PR after initial EGFR-TKI treatment had a higher rate of T790M positivity than those with SD (75.76% vs 50%, p = 0.023). There was no relationship between T790M status and age, gender, primary site, metastasis site, or treatment before TKI.

Conclusion

Progression-free survival (PFS), drug type, response to initial EGFR-TKI treatment, and EGFR status before initial EGFR treatment were associated with the frequency of T790M mutation.

Clinical Features and Progression Pattern of Acquired T790M-positive Compared With T790M-negative EGFR Mutant Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Catching Tumor and Clinical Heterogeneity Over Time Through Liquid Biopsy

BACKGROUND

Clinical-pathologic predictors of acquired T790M epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in Caucasian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after first-/second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is an open field for research. Similarly, the best time point for T790M detection by liquid or tissue biopsy after disease progression is currently matter of debate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is an observational study at 7 Italian centers enrolling patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC progressing after first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs, between 2014 and 2018, aiming at comparing baseline clinical-pathologic features and progression patterns in acquired T790M-positive compared with T790M-negative cases.

RESULTS

A total of 235 patients received first-line treatment with gefitinib (N = 126; 53%), erlotinib (N = 51; 22%), or afatinib (N = 58; 25%). In 120 (51%) cases, T790M was detected in liquid biopsy, tissue biopsy, or both. Age younger than 65 years (P = .037), the presence of common mutations (P = .004), and better response to first-line TKI (P = .023) were correlated with T790M positivity. T790M detection was associated with higher number of new progressing sites (P = .04), liver progression (P = .002), and a lower frequency of lung metastases (P = .027). When serial liquid biopsies were performed (N = 15), an oligoprogressive disease was correlated with a negative test outcome, whereas systemic progression was observed at the time of T790M positivity.

CONCLUSION

This study on a Caucasian population showed that age, type of EGFR mutation at diagnosis, response to first-line treatment, and peculiar progression pattern are associated with T790M status. Serial liquid biopsy might be useful for treatment selection, especially when tissue rebiopsy is not feasible.

Clinical outcomes and secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation among first-line gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations

Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib are approved for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) bearing an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, the clinical outcomes among the three EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are still controversial. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and secondary EGFR T790M mutation among the three EGFR TKIs. From May 2014 to January 2016, a total of 301 patients received treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, based on their clinicians' choice. The median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 months. Although the baseline characteristics of patients were unequal, progression-free survival and OS did not differ among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis found that gefitinib (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-9.46, p = 0.027), EGFR TKI treatment duration more than 13 months (aOR 3.16, 95% CI, 1.20-8.33, p = 0.020), male (aOR 3.25, 95% CI, 1.10-9.66, p = 0.034), initial liver metastasis (aOR 4.97, 95% CI 1.18-20.96, p = 0.029) and uncommon EGFR mutation (aOR 0.14, 95% CI, 0.02-0.97, compared to EGFR deletion 19, p = 0.047) were independent factors for secondary T790M mutation. In real-world practice, choosing first line EGFR TKI based on the patients' clinical characteristics yielded good clinical outcomes. First-line gefitinib, longer EGFR TKI treatment duration, male, initial liver metastasis and uncommon EGFR mutations may be independent factors for secondary EGFR T790M mutation.

Rare Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Osimertinib in Korean Patients with EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‒tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective clinical therapeutics for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib, a thirdgeneration EGFR TKI, has proven effective against T790M mutations. However, the vast majority of patients acquire resistance following successful treatment. A 59-year-old female patient with metastatic NSCLC developed resistance after 43 weeks of osimertinib. CancerSCAN of the metastatic liver lesion revealed a EGFR C797G mutation at an allele frequency of 72%, a preexisting T790M mutation (73%) in cis and an exon 19 deletion (87%). Another 53-year-old female patient developed systemic progression after 10 months of osimertinib. CancerSCAN of the lung biopsy identified an EGFR L718Q mutation at an allele frequency of 7%, concomitant PIK3CA E545K (12.90%) and preexisting EGFR L858R (38%), but loss of the T790M mutation. The heterogeneity of osimertinib resistance mechanisms warrants further investigation into novel or combination agents to overcome the rare acquired resistances.