1
|
Zimmer J, Hays A, Lester T, Diaz M, Thomas E, O'Dell M, Hyer E, Tangri S, Dakappagari N, Yuan M, Lavelle A, Karnik S, Liu A, Xu B, Sales K, Gorityala S, Reynolds G, Sangster T, Franckaert D, Love I, Patel V, Roberge M, Lin J, Jerks E, Xu T, Garofolo W, Nadarajah S, Kernstock R, Dufield D, Ambrose D, Warrino D, Luna M, Marco CD, Tudoroniu A, Iordachescu A, Sanghvi M, Barton H, Brown M, Hoffpauir B, Rocha A, Dong K, Yamashita J. 16 th GCC Closed Forum: ICH M10 implementation; NGS, qPCR/dPCR, flow cytometry validation; tissue biomarkers; IS response; immunogenicity harmonization; bioanalytical industry status. Bioanalysis 2024; 16:505-517. [PMID: 38864397 PMCID: PMC11299793 DOI: 10.1080/17576180.2024.2342691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The 16th GCC Closed Forum was held in Orlando, FL, USA, on 23 June 2023. Representatives from international bioanalytical Contract Research Organizations were in attendance in order to discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues discussed at the meeting included: IS response, flow cytometry, changes to the bioanalytical industry, NGS assays, biomarker assay for tissues, dPCR validation, immunogenicity harmonization and ICH M10 implementation. Conclusions and consensus from discussions of these topics are included in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Manisha Diaz
- Eurofins Viracor, BioPharma Services, Lenexa, Kansas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Moucun Yuan
- PPD Clinical Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Amy Lavelle
- PPD Clinical Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Shane Karnik
- Aliri Bioanalysis, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| | - Aihua Liu
- Resolian (Formally Alliance Pharma), Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bin Xu
- Accurant Biotech, Cranbury, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Iain Love
- Charles River Laboratories, Edinburgh, Tranent, UK
| | - Vimal Patel
- Charles River Laboratories, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Martin Roberge
- CIRION BioPharma Research (a Cerba Research Company), Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jenny Lin
- CMIC, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, USA
| | - Erik Jerks
- Eurofins Pharma Bioanalytics, Lake St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Tao Xu
- Frontage Laboratory, Exton, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Dawn Dufield
- KCAS Bioanalytical & Biomarker Services, Olathe, Kansas, USA
| | - David Ambrose
- KCAS Bioanalytical & Biomarker Services, Olathe, Kansas, USA
| | - Dominic Warrino
- KCAS Bioanalytical & Biomarker Services, Olathe, Kansas, USA
| | - Marsha Luna
- KCAS Bioanalytical & Biomarker Services, Olathe, Kansas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Hollie Barton
- PPD Clinical Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kelly Dong
- United-Power Pharma Tech Co., Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathews J, Amaravadi L, Eck S, Stevenson L, Wang YMC, Devanarayan V, Allinson J, Lundsten K, Gunsior M, Ni YG, Pepin MO, Gagnon A, Sheldon C, Trampont PC, Litwin V. Best practices for the development and fit-for-purpose validation of biomarker methods: a conference report. AAPS OPEN 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s41120-021-00050-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractThis conference report summarized a full-day workshop, “best practices for the development and fit-for-purpose validation of biomarker methods,” which was held prior to the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) PharmSci360 Congress, San Antonio, TX, November 2019. The purpose of the workshop was to bring together thought leaders in biomarker assay development in order to identify which assay parameters and key statistical measures need to be considered when developing a biomarker assay. A diverse group of more than 40 scientists participated in the workshop. The workshop and subsequent working dinner stimulated robust discussion. While a consensus on best practices was not achieved, some common themes and major points to consider for biomarker assay development have been identified and agreed on. The focus of this conference report is to summarize the presentations and discussions which occurred at the workshop. Biomarker assay validation is a complex and an evolving area with discussions ongoing.
Collapse
|
5
|
Recommendations for the content and management of Certificates of Analysis for reference standards from the GCC for bioanalysis. Bioanalysis 2021; 13:609-619. [PMID: 33847160 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2021-0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The 13th Global CRO Council (GCC) closed forum for bioanalysis was held in New Orleans, LA, USA on 5 April 2019. This GCC meeting was organized to discuss the contents of the 2019 ICH M10 Bioanalytical Method Validation Draft Guideline published in February 2019 and consolidate the feedback of the GCC members. While ICH M10 will cover requirements for reference standards, one of the biggest challenges facing the CRO community is the lack of consistency and completeness of Certificates of Analysis for reference standards used in regulated bioanalysis. Similar challenges exist with critical reagents (e.g., capture and detection antibodies) used for assays supporting biologics. The recommendations provided in this publication are the minimum requirements for the content that GCC members believe should be included in Certificates of Analysis for reference standards obtained from commercial vendors, sponsors and compendial suppliers, for use in regulated bioanalytical studies. In addition, recommendations for internal standards, metabolites and critical reagents are discussed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Desvignes C, Ternant D, Lecomte T, Lièvre A, Ohresser M, Chautard R, Raoul W, Paintaud G. A robust enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure serum ramucirumab concentrations. Bioanalysis 2021; 13:565-574. [PMID: 33769095 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2020-0199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Ramucirumab, an anti-VEGFR2 monoclonal antibody, has been approved for the treatment of metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer. An assay measuring ramucirumab serum concentrations was needed to investigate its pharmacokinetics and concentration-response relationship. Results: An ELISA was developed and validated according to the international guidelines for ligand-binding assays. Ramucirumab calibration standards ranged from 0.125 to 40 mg/l. Low, middle and high quality controls were spiked at 0.2, 4 and 8 mg/l, respectively. The limits of quantification were established to be 0.125 and 10 mg/l for LLOQ and ULOQ, respectively. No cross-reactivity with anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR was detected. Conclusion: This in-house-developed ELISA is sensitive, accurate, reproducible and suitable for pharmacokinetic studies of ramucirumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Desvignes
- CHRU de Tours, Plateforme Recherche, Centre Pilote de Suivi Biologique des Traitements par Anticorps (CePiBAc), Tours, France
- Université de Tours, EA4245 Transplantation, Immunologie, Inflammation, Tours, France
| | - David Ternant
- CHRU de Tours, Plateforme Recherche, Centre Pilote de Suivi Biologique des Traitements par Anticorps (CePiBAc), Tours, France
- Université de Tours, EA4245 Transplantation, Immunologie, Inflammation, Tours, France
- CHRU de Tours, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Tours, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- CHRU de Tours, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, Tours, France
- Université de Tours, EA 7501 Groupe Innovation et Ciblage Cellulaire, Tours, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- CHU Pontchaillou, Service de Gastroentérologie, Rennes, France
- INSERM U1242, Oncogenesis, Stress & Signaling, Rennes, France
| | - Marc Ohresser
- Université de Tours, EA4245 Transplantation, Immunologie, Inflammation, Tours, France
| | - Romain Chautard
- CHRU de Tours, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, Tours, France
| | - William Raoul
- Inserm UMR 1069, Nutrition Croissance et Cancer (N2C), Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Gilles Paintaud
- CHRU de Tours, Plateforme Recherche, Centre Pilote de Suivi Biologique des Traitements par Anticorps (CePiBAc), Tours, France
- Université de Tours, EA4245 Transplantation, Immunologie, Inflammation, Tours, France
- CHRU de Tours, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|