A strategic approach to nonclinical immunogenicity assessment: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum

A generic anti-drug antibody assay for monoclonal antibody therapeutics with broad dynamic range eliminates the need for titer evaluation in preclinical studies

In preclinical protein therapeutic development studies, the emergence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) can potentially impact drug pharmacokinetics and safety. While immunogenicity assessment is not mandatory in preclinical studies, banking samples can be valuable for interpreting unexpected pharmacological responses. Immunoassays that use generic reagents across different drug molecules can simplify ADA assessment and expedite sample evaluations. This work showcases the ability of the Gyrolab automated immunoassay platform to detect and quantify both drug-free and drug-bound (total) ADAs to monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics in cynomolgus monkey preclinical studies. Compared to the previously reported total ADA ELISA, the Gyrolab assay exhibited a wider signal dynamic range and increased drug tolerance. Similar sensitivity, dynamic range and cut point factors were observed for four therapeutic mAbs of different isotypes using the Gyrolab assay. Here we present a comparison of ADA assays using bridging ELISA, total ADA ELISA and total ADA Gyrolab formats in a cynomolgus monkey study where the subjects were treated with a single dose of a mAb therapeutic. We demonstrate that the total ADA assays detected host ADA responses at earlier time points compared to the bridging ELISA. The Gyrolab assay has the best correlation between signal-to-noise (S/N) and titer over a wide ADA concentration range, highlighting the utility of Gyrolab in S/N reporting of ADA response to eliminate the need for secondary titer assays. Collectively, our results demonstrate that the generic ADA Gyrolab assay minimizes the necessity for extensive assay development and optimization for therapeutic mAbs, streamlining preclinical immunogenicity assessment to enable interpretation of pharmacological data.

Re-thinking the current paradigm for clinical immunogenicity assessment: an update from the discussion in the European Bioanalysis Forum

Immunogenicity regulatory guidance and industry recommendations have evolved over the last two decades since unexpected immune reactions were first reported with erythropoietin. Since then, the guidelines and practices for immunogenicity have stemmed from a reaction to a high-risk molecule causing significant clinical impact. Similar thinking is often applied to all biotherapeutic drugs, even when a well-defined risk assessment suggests otherwise. In recent years, the current testing paradigm for immunogenicity has been challenged with more informative approaches being proposed. In a Focus Workshop held by the European Bioanalysis Forum in September 2023, the current immunogenicity testing paradigm was challenged based on the experience and learning of 20+ years of immunogenicity strategies. The workshop recommendations proposed a new paradigm, challenging the value of multiple tiers depending on the immunogenicity risk assessment based on context of use and moving toward treating immunogenicity as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for the drug. Such rethinking ultimately results in the appropriate and efficient focusing of resources on immunogenicity testing strategies that benefit patients most, moving to a new paradigm where implementation of appropriate and truly informative immunogenicity testing strategies, depending on the context-of-use, become the norm .

The European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on establishing appropriate drug tolerance levels in antidrug antibody assays

The European Bioanalysis Forum, in collaboration with several key industry stakeholders, has recently led discussions that address international immunogenicity guidance documents, specifically the three tier approach for immunogenicity testing strategies, after more than 20 years of experience with biotherapeutics. As part of this, the strategy and methods used to assess drug tolerance across all immunogenicity assays are challenged, emphasizing that bioanalytical scientists need to consider the context-of-use of each assay. Here, recommendations for drug tolerance assessments, driven by strong scientific rationale and subject to reevaluation as needed, are provided. This includes carefully considering the drug and positive control concentrations considered to be appropriate and which tiers are most relevant for performing drug tolerance assessments.

Strategy and validation of a nonclinical generic plug-and-play antidrug antibody method for human monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics

The measurement of antidrug antibodies (ADA) in nonclinical studies provides limited value because the formation and incidence of nonclinical ADA does not translate to clinical experience. The formation and presence of ADA in nonclinical species can, however, correlate to reduced drug exposure and safety observations including vasculitis and immune complex disease. Generic ADA methods for humanized monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics mitigate the need to develop bespoke ADA methods during nonclinical drug development. A drug-tolerant, sensitive, generic ADA immunoassay has been developed and validated for measuring ADA in cynomolgus monkey serum samples, allowing for immediate qualification of future monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics. This approach allows us to differentiate complexed and free ADA in a rapidly deployable manner when needed.

Successful Development of Nonclinical Anti-Drug Antibody Assays to Support Zinpentraxin Alfa Reproductive Toxicology Studies

Immunogenicity assessment is an essential part of biotherapeutic drug development. While the immune response in animals is not always representative of the human immune response, immunogenicity data obtained in animal models is still informative for the evaluation of drug exposure and safety. The most common assay format used for the detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in preclinical and clinical studies is the bridging format. The advantage of this method is that it can detect all antibody isotypes generated against the therapeutic. However, the method development can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, due to the need for labeling of the drug which is used both as capture and detection. Various generic ADA assays have been successfully implemented to overcome these disadvantages and to enable faster assay development timelines to support nonclinical toxicology studies. Here, we describe the challenges in the development of an assay to detect antibodies to zinpentraxin alfa, a recombinant human pentraxin-2, in rabbit and rat toxicology studies. Our initial efforts to develop a bridging assay failed, prompting us to develop a method adapted from generic assay formats to detect anti-zinpentraxin alfa antibodies in the serum of different species with minimal optimization. However, while the general assay format remained similar, assay reagents were adapted between the different species, resulting in the development of two distinct assays for the detection of ADAs in rat and rabbit. Here, we share the final development/validation data and the immunogenicity study results. Our work highlights the need for the evaluation of alternate assay formats when evaluating novel drug modalities.

T and B cell epitope analysis for the immunogenicity evaluation and mitigation of antibody-based therapeutics

The surge in the clinical use of therapeutic antibodies has reshaped the landscape of pharmaceutical therapy for many diseases, including rare and challenging conditions. However, the administration of exogenous biologics could potentially trigger unwanted immune responses such as generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Real-world experiences have illuminated the clear correlation between the ADA occurrence and unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes as well as immune-related adverse events. By retrospectively examining research involving immunogenicity analysis, we noticed the growing emphasis on elucidating the immunogenic epitope profiles of antibody-based therapeutics aiming for mechanistic understanding the immunogenicity generation and, ideally, mitigating the risks. As such, we have comprehensively summarized here the progress in both experimental and computational methodologies for the characterization of T and B cell epitopes of therapeutics. Furthermore, the successful practice of epitope-driven deimmunization of biotherapeutics is exceptionally highlighted in this article.

Fit-for-purpose validation of a drug-tolerant immunogenicity assay for a human mAb drug in animal safety studies

A modified biotin-drug extraction and acid dissociation (BEAD) immunogenicity assay was developed to detect anti-drug-antibodies (ADA) against the human anti-FXIIa monoclonal antibody (mAb) drug, Garadacimab (previously called CSL312). Multiple strategies were tested to optimize the signal-to-background (S/B) ratio, assay sensitivity and the drug tolerance. The modified BEAD assay was found to be highly drug tolerant (>500 μg/ml) with a sensitivity of 100 ng/ml, in line with current FDA regulatory guidelines. The assay was validated for use in a repeat-dose animal safety study and showed an acceptable intra-assay precision and robustness but a lower inter-assay precision. In-study sample analysis confirmed that the assay was fit-for-purpose (FFP) for the context-of-use (COU) in the nonclinical study and the results obtained were deemed meaningful.

Recommendations and discussion points on immunogenicity, biomarkers, automation/technology and protein-MS from the 2021 European Bioanalysis Forum Focus Workshops

During the first half of 2021, and due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic preventing in-person meetings, the European Bioanalysis Forum organized four workshops as live interactive online meetings. The themes discussed at the workshops were carefully selected to match the cyberspace dynamics of the meeting format. The first workshop was a training day on challenges related to immunogenicity. The second one focused on biomarkers and continued the important discussion on integrating the principles of Context of Use (CoU) in biomarker research. The third workshop was dedicated to technology, that is, cutting-edge development in cell-based and ligand-binding assays and automation strategies. The fourth was on progress and the continued scientific and regulatory challenges related to peptide and protein analysis with MS. In all four workshops, the European Bioanalysis Forum included a mixture of scientific and regulatory themes, while reminding the audience of important strategic aspects and our responsibility toward the patient.