Recommendations and feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum Workshop: 1 year into ICH M10 - keeping our finger on the pulse

The ICH M10 guideline on bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis is being adopted since 2023. However, and inevitably, some paragraphs or requirements remain ambiguous and are open for different interpretations. In support of a harmonized interpretation by the industry and health authorities, the European Bioanalysis Forum organized a workshop on 14 November 2023 in Barcelona, Spain, to discuss unclear and/or ambiguous paragraphs which were identified by the European Bioanalysis Forum community and delegates of the workshop prior to the workshop. This manuscript reports back from the workshop with recommendations and aims at continuing an open scientific discussion within the industry and with regulators in support of a science-driven guideline for the bioanalytical community and in line with the ICH mission - that is, achieve greater harmonization worldwide to ensure that safe, effective and high-quality medicines are developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner.

LC-MS/MS methods for direct measurement of sepiapterin and tetrahydrobiopterin in human plasma and clinical applications

Aim: Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a natural cofactor of aromatic amino acid hydroxylases, and sepiapterin, a natural precursor of BH4, are endogenously present in human plasma. This is the first report on methods for direct quantification of sepiapterin and BH4 in human plasma by LC-MS/MS for pharmacokinetic assessment. Materials & methods: The analytes in plasma were harvested from blood that were treated with 10% ascorbic acid (AA) to a final concentration of 1% AA. Results & conclusion: The quantification methods were validated for calibration ranges of 0.75-500 ng/ml and 0.5-500 ng/ml for sepiapterin and BH4, respectively. Quantification of analytes was challenging due to their susceptibility to redox reactions. The validated methods were utilized successfully to support clinical development of sepiapterin.

Stability assessment of anti-bacterial antibodies in immunoglobulin G-depleted serum with validated immunoassays

Aim: To investigate the stability of the anti-pneumococcal (PCP) and anti-haemophilus type B (Hib) immunoglobulins (IgGs) in human IgG-depleted serum samples frozen at -20°C. Materials & methods: Modified commercially available immunoassays (ELISAs) were bioanalytically validated. These ELISAs were used to measure levels of the two anti-bacterial IgG in samples kept at -20°C for up to 15 months. Human IgG-depleted serum was spiked with GAMMAGARD Liquid to obtain those samples. Results: Both ELISAs passed the validation test. Anti-PCP IgG and anti-Hib IgG were shown to be stable for at least 15 months at -20°C. Conclusion: These data confirm the stability of anti-bacterial IgG in human IgG-depleted serum and support the common practice of testing frozen samples.

Fast Quantification Without Conventional Chromatography, The Growing Power of Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry (MS) in hyphenated techniques is widely accepted as the gold standard quantitative tool in life sciences. However, MS possesses intrinsic analytical capabilities that allow it to be a stand-alone quantitative technique, particularly with current technological advancements. MS has a great potential for simplifying quantitative analysis without the need for tedious chromatographic separation. Its selectivity relies on multistage MS analysis (MSⁿ), including tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), as well as the ever-growing advancements of high-resolution MS instruments. This perspective describes various analytical platforms that utilize MS as a stand-alone quantitative technique, namely, flow injection analysis (FIA), matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), including MALDI-MS imaging and ion mobility, particularly high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS). When MS alone is not capable of providing reliable quantitative data, instead of conventional liquid chromatography (LC)-MS, the use of a guard column (i.e., fast chromatography) may be sufficient for quantification. Although the omission of chromatographic separation simplifies the analytical process, extra procedures may be needed during sample preparation and clean-up to address the issue of matrix effects. The discussion of this manuscript focuses on key parameters underlying the uniqueness of each technique for its application in quantitative analysis without the need for a chromatographic separation. In addition, the potential for each analytical strategy and its challenges are discussed as well as improvements needed to render them as mainstream quantitative analytical tools. Overcoming the hurdles for fully validating a quantitative method will allow MS alone to eventually become an indispensable quantitative tool for clinical and toxicological studies.

Development and validation of bioanalytical methods to support investigations of AZD9496 in the clinic

Aim: AZD9496 is an oral nonsteroidal, potent and selective antagonist and degrader of ER-α. Two major active metabolites (M3 and M5 as diastereomers) were identified in humans. Methodology/results: Multianalyte, sensitive LC-MS/MS method in human plasma was developed and validated that overcame the challenges encountered. The method demonstrated acceptable precision, accuracy and selectivity for AZD9496 and two major metabolites. Incurred sample reanalysis was acceptable from evaluation in clinical studies, indicating adequate reproducibility. In addition, a urine method for AZD9496 was also developed and validated. Conclusion: Robust and sensitive LC-MS/MS assays for the quantitation of AZD9496 and two diastereomeric metabolites in human plasma and AZD9496 in human urine have been validated and successfully applied to clinical studies.

European Bioanalysis Forum feedback on draft ICH M10 guideline on bioanalytical method validation during the Step 2b public consultation period

Once released, the ICH M10 Guideline on bioanalytical method validation will become one of the most important milestones in the history of regulated bioanalysis, closing a chapter on intense discussions among the industry and health authorities started in Crystal City in 2001. In this manuscript, the European Bioanalysis Forum community reports back on their feedback on the ICH M10 draft guideline gathered during the public consultation period. The comments given are intended to contribute to a guideline that combines several decades of experience and current scientific vision. They should provide future generations of bioanalytical scientist a regulatory framework so their bioanalytical work can contribute to safe, effective and high-quality medicines, which can be developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner.

Determination of osimertinib in human plasma, urine and cerebrospinal fluid

Aim: Osimertinib (Tagrisso, AZD9291) has been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic EGFRm T790M non-small-cell lung cancer. Results: Rapid and sensitive LC–MC/MS methods were developed for osimertinib and its metabolites, AZ13597550 and AZ13575104, in human plasma (low- and high-range), urine and cerebrospinal fluid. We discuss the challenges of these multi-analyte and multiple matrix assays. The methods have been successfully validated and used for the analysis of over 20,000 clinical samples, with successful incurred sample reproducibility. Conclusion: The assays have been shown to be selective, accurate and robust, providing high-throughput analysis during the clinical development of osimertinib.

Incurred Sample Reanalysis: Time to Change the Sample Size Calculation?

Reliable results of pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic studies are vital for correct decision making during drug discovery and development. Thus, ensuring high quality of bioanalytical methods is of critical importance. Incurred sample reanalysis (ISR)-one of the tools used to validate a method-is included in the bioanalytical regulatory recommendations. The methodology of this test is well established, but the estimation of the sample size is still commented on and contested. We have applied the hypergeometric distribution to evaluate ISR test passing rates in different clinical study sizes. We have tested both fixed rates of the clinical samples-as currently recommended by FDA and EMA-and a fixed number of ISRs. Our study revealed that the passing rate using the current sample size calculation is related to the clinical study size. However, the passing rate is much less dependent on the clinical study size when a fixed number of ISRs is used. Thus, we suggest using a fixed number of ISRs, e.g., 30 samples, for all studies. We found the hypergeometric distribution to be an adequate model for the assessment of similarities in original and repeated data. This model may be further used to optimize the sample size needed for the ISR test as well as to bridge data from different methods. This paper provides a basis to re-consider current ISR recommendations and implement a more statistically rationalized and risk-controlled approach.

Bioanalytical method validation: new FDA guidance vs. EMA guideline. Better or worse?

Bioanalysis concerns the identification and quantification of analytes in various biological matrices. Validation of any analytical method helps to achieve reliable results that are necessary for proper decisions on drug dosing and patient safety. In the case of bioanalytical methods, validation additionally covers steps of pharmacokinetic and toxicological studies - such as sample collection, handling, shipment, storage, and preparation. We drew our attention to the difference of both the newest FDA Guidance and the EMA Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. We aimed to point out advantages of both documents from the laboratory perspective. The FDA and the EMA documents are similar, but not identical. The EMA describes the practical conduct of experiments more precisely, while the FDA presents reporting recommendations more comprehensively. There are also differences in recommended validation parameters. We hope that the International Council for Harmonisation will combine advantages of both documents to avoid confusing differences in terminology as well as the unnecessary effort of being compliant with two or more guidelines.

A decade of incurred sample reanalysis: failures, investigations and impact

Incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) is used to ensure the validity and reliability of bioanalytical data. Additionally, ISR results also help identify issues that could influence or bias the data. Overall, based on a decade of experimental data generated at Eli Lilly and Company, ISR failures are few with less than 5% of ISR samples failing to meet acceptance criteria. In a majority of situations, the cause for ISR failures has been ‘human-error.’ However, there are examples where ISR has helped identify issues related to the stability of the analyte or the ruggedness of the method. As a strategy, it is beneficial to conduct ISR following the completion of a few sample runs, so any potential issues impacting the validity and reliability of the data can be identified and rectified early.

Incurred sample reanalysis at GSK: what have we learned?

Outcomes of incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) studies have been reviewed from a decade of internally supported bioanalysis. From over 1000 bioanalytical pharmacokinetic end points, 26 bioanalytical studies have failed against predefined ISR acceptance criteria, ultimately resulting in the rejection of three partial and two full datasets (instability or preanalytic contamination). The remaining investigations highlighted methodological root causes including unexpected within-study assay variability, inappropriate assay range and sample homogeneity. However, the data variability remained acceptable for the purposes of decision-making and asset progression. Overall, ISR adds value in early development to characterize the reliability of a nascent assay and then also at the latter stages where pharmacokinetic data are pivotal to submission. However, for the intermediate development studies there is a question whether ISR adds much additional value in understanding assay performance or whether the industry is just too conservative to follow the guidance. This is where the future debate must be.

Incurred sample reproducibility: 10 years of experiences: views and recommendations from the European Bioanalysis Forum

With 10 years of experiences on incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) as an integrated part of regulated bioanalysis, the European Bioanalysis Forum has reflected on the implementation and the use of ISR. Three surveys were conducted in 2016 and 2017 as a revisit of the ISR experiences within European pharmaceutical industry and contract research organizations: has ISR become a tool for postvalidation and process check of a bioanalytical method performance and has ISR become a routine in our laboratories? Do we agree on the interpretation of guidelines/guidance and are we aligned in our approach – among others?

Incurred sample reanalysis in AstraZeneca small molecule portfolio – what have we learned and where do we go next?

In this paper, experiences and learnings are shared from the 10-year application of incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) in support of the AstraZeneca small molecule portfolio. The conclusions from including ISR in every clinical bioanalysis study for a period of 5 years, generating ISR data from 550 studies, are shared. Our preclinical ISR approach is described and data generated using capillary microsampling demonstrate confidence in its routine application. The data demonstrate that ISR failures are very rare and the assessment can and should therefore be limited. Dialogue between the bioanalytical teams internally, as well as with the partner contract research organizations, is however critical for a successful bioanalytical method validation and to avoid any ISR failures.

ISR: what have we learned after a decade of experience?

Within our company, incurred sample reproducibility (ISR) was implemented a decade ago. Only 11 studies (<2%) with failed ISR were identified over that period. These cases are described along with the strategy followed to resolve the issue. For three studies the failing ISR was caused by a method failure and all instances could be traced back to an instability problem. The majority of the failed ISR experiments were due to human error. For most of the studies the issue could be resolved and results reported. In two studies, no valid results could be generated. Based on this analysis we advise to limit the number of studies that require ISR assessment.

Dried Blood Spot Methodology in Combination With Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry Facilitates the Monitoring of Teriflunomide

Background:

Teriflunomide, a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, is eliminated slowly from plasma. If necessary to rapidly lower plasma concentrations of teriflunomide, an accelerated elimination procedure using cholestyramine or activated charcoal may be used. The current bioanalytical assay for determination of plasma teriflunomide concentration requires laboratory facilities for blood centrifugation and plasma storage. An alternative method, with potential for greater convenience, is dried blood spot (DBS) methodology. Analytical and clinical validations are required to switch from plasma to DBS (finger-prick sampling) methodology.

Methods:

Using blood samples from healthy subjects, an LC-MS/MS assay method for quantification of teriflunomide in DBS over a range of 0.01–10 mcg/mL was developed and validated for specificity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and stability. Results were compared with those from the current plasma assay for determination of plasma teriflunomide concentration.

Results:

Method was specific and selective relative to endogenous compounds, with process efficiency ∼88%, and no matrix effect. Inaccuracy and imprecision for intraday and interday analyses were <15% at all concentrations tested. Quantification of teriflunomide in DBS assay was not affected by blood deposit volume and punch position within spot, and hematocrit level had a limited but acceptable effect on measurement accuracy. Teriflunomide was stable for at least 4 months at room temperature, and for at least 24 hours at 37°C with and without 95% relative humidity, to cover sampling, drying, and shipment conditions in the field. The correlation between DBS and plasma concentrations (R² = 0.97), with an average blood to plasma ratio of 0.59, was concentration independent and constant over time.

Conclusions:

DBS sampling is a simple and practical method for monitoring teriflunomide concentrations.

Incurred sample reanalysis: adjusted procedure for sample size calculation

Aim: The incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) helps to assure bioanalysis reliability. The regulatory guidelines recommend the reanalysis of up to 10% of the study samples for this test, but not all reanalyses are necessary to evaluate the test result. Materials & methods: We have optimized ISR sample size calculation to eliminate negligible reanalyses. Results: Adjusted procedure eliminates negligible reanalyses – up to 66% of currently analyzed ISRs – without affecting the test outcome. Conclusion: The procedure is universal as it may be applied in the studies compliant with EMA and US FDA requirements, for both small and large molecules. It may assist the evolution of bioanalytical method validation as the current ISR sample size recommendations seem to be ill-matched with the acceptance criteria.

Implementing a tiered approach to bioanalytical method validation for large-molecule ligand-binding assay methods in pharmacokinetic assessments

Bioanalytical methods must enable the delivery of data that meet sound, scientifically justified, fit-for-purpose criteria. At early phases of biotherapeutic drug development, suitable criteria of a ligand-binding assay could be met for pharmacokinetic (PK) in-study sample testing without a full validation defined by regulatory guidelines. To ensure fit-for-purpose methods support PK testing through all phases of biotherapeutic development, three tiers of method validation - regulatory, scientific and research validations - are proposed. The three-tiered framework for method validation outlines the differences in the parameters that should be assessed, the acceptance criteria that may be applied, and the documentation necessary at each level. The criteria for selecting the appropriate application of each of these PK method validation workflows are discussed.

Development of a validated LC- MS/MS method for the quantification of 19 endogenous asthma/COPD potential urinary biomarkers

Obstructive airways inflammatory diseases sometimes show overlapping symptoms that hinder their early and correct diagnosis. Current clinical tests are tedious and are of inadequate specificity in special population such as the elderly and children. Therefore, we are developing tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) methods for targeted analysis of urine biomarkers. Recently, proton-nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H-NMR) analysis proposed 50 urinary metabolites as potential diagnostic biomarkers among asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Metabolites are divided into 3 groups based on chemical nature. For group 1 (amines and phenols, 19 urinary metabolites), we developed and validated a high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC)-MS/MS method using differential isotope labeling (DIL) with dansyl chloride. Method development included the optimization of the derivatization reaction, the MS/MS conditions, and the chromatographic separation. Linearity varied from 2 to 4800 ng/mL and the use of ¹³C₂-labeled derivatives allowed for the correction of matrix effects as well as the unambiguous confirmation of the identity of each metabolite in the presence of interfering isomers in urine. Despite the challenges associated with method validation, the method was fully validated as per the food and drug administration (FDA) and the European medicines agency (EMA) recommendations. Validation criteria included linearity, precision, accuracy, dilution integrity, selectivity, carryover, and stability. Challenges in selectivity experiments included the isotopic contributions of the analyte towards its internal standard (IS), that was addressed via the optimization of the IS concentration. In addition, incurred sample analysis was performed to ensure that results from patient samples are accurate and reliable. The method was robust and reproducible and is currently being applied in a cohort of asthma and COPD patient urine samples for biomarker discovery purposes.

Incurred sample reanalysis of fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate in blood: stability evaluation and application to a rat pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

Incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) is an in-study validation parameter, which reinforces that the validated bioanalytical methods are reproducible. ISR of whole blood samples is complex when the test compounds can interconvert, ex vivo. Fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate are highly distributed in the blood cellular components and undergo rapid interconversion, both in vivo and ex vivo. An LC-MS/MS method capable of simultaneous quantification of fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate with the controlled sample preparation procedure is essential.

RESULTS

The ex vivo analyte interconversion in blood was controlled by lysing the blood cells.

CONCLUSION

Lysis of blood samples not only controlled the interconversion but also rendered homogeneity to the sample, which led to acceptable ISR results from the study.

From patient to tube: the importance of physiologically relevant quantitative bioanalytical assays

Circulating drug concentrations (clinical or preclinical) underly many interactions between industry and regulators; expressing safety coverage, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships or defining bioequivalence and dosing regimens. Accurate and precise measurement of these circulating concentrations is pivotal to the evolution and validation of any bioanalytical method that supports regulatory interactions. Since the bioanalyst is presented with a sub-aliquot of sampled biological matrix, how do they ensure this aliquot reflects the concentration in the subject at the time of collection? Here we share experiences from project support (internal and at CROs) that suggests we need to be ever vigilant translating the needs of bioanalysis with those of project teams. The simple mantra is for bioanalytical measurements to be physiologically relevant to the patient.

Determination of selumetinib, N-desmethyl selumetinib and selumetinib amide in human biological samples by LC–MS/MS

Aim: Selumetinib is an inhibitor of MEK1/2 in Phase III development that has activity in multiple tumor types. Validated bioanalytical methods were required to quantitate selumetinib and its N-desmethyl and amide metabolites in a variety of human biological matrices. Methodology & results: LC–MS/MS assays were developed and validated that demonstrated acceptable precision, accuracy and selectivity for selumetinib and the two metabolites in human plasma, urine, blood dialysate and plasma ultrafiltrate. Incurred sample re-analysis was acceptable and issues observed in plasma with the amide metabolite, due to potential instability, were addressed. Conclusion: Robust and sensitive LC–MS/MS assays for the quantification of selumetinib and two of its metabolites were validated in human biological matrices and are being used to support the clinical development program.

Bioanalysis of ibrutinib and its active metabolite in human plasma: selectivity issue, impact assessment and resolution

Ronald de Vries graduated in Organic and Analytical Chemistry at the Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. After working in a Contract Laboratory (CRO) for 7 years, he joined Janssen R&D in 1998. At Janssen R&D, Belgium, Ronald worked in the bioanalytical department that supports both clinical and nonclinical bioanalysis. In this department he had several roles, such as providing the bioanalytical support for various drug development programs and leading the method establishment group. He has done numerous global assay transfers to/from Janssen from/to other laboratories and plays an important role in the introduction and application of new technologies and applied innovation in the department. In 2014 he started in the drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics department of Janssen R&D, where his main tasks are in vivo and in vitro metabolite identification using high resolution MS and Radiodetection.

Justifying the lack of incurred sample reproducibility in a study: considerations and strategies

In 2012 with the issuance of its Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) made the incurred sample reproducibility (ISR) assessment a requirement for studies to be submitted to European authorities. Since then 2012, European agencies have started to issue deficiencies to pharmaceutical companies for lack of ISRs in studies submitted recently but performed prior to the issuance of the 2012 Guideline. It now becomes the applicant's responsibility to justify scientifically the departure from the new guideline even for less recent studies. This article details the different strategies to provide an adequate justification for the absence of ISR data in studies performed prior to February 2012 but submitted to European agencies after that date.

The quest for assay robustness across the life cycle of a bioanalytical method

White has been an analytical chemist for 28 years, with a range of knowledge and experience across multiple disciplines including pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs, environmental and forensic analysis. Steve works within the regulated bioanalytical group at GSK supporting both preclinical and clinical bioanalysis. His responsibilities have included leadership of bioanalytical, dose formulation and sample management teams as well as assisting with the set up of the Anti-Doping Testing Laboratory for the London 2012 Olympics. In his current role, Steve is part of the UK bioanalytical leadership team with a focus on regulatory & compliance issues. Steve is the small molecule rep for GSK within the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF), a member of the EBF Steering Committee and also contributed to the Global Bioanalysis Consortium S2 team. The successful validation or qualification of an assay plus incurred sample reproducibility gives the bioanalyst confidence of assay suitability. However, these elements alone do not give the full picture of how reliable an assay may be during routine production use for analysis of unknown study samples. The robustness of an assay can be understood by applying key performance indicators to monitor assay performance pre- and post-transfer between laboratories, plus a cross-validation step during assay transfer. The measurement of assay robustness (beyond the context of cross-validation) should not be considered as yet another regulatory layer, but more as a means for the bioanalyst to better understand an individual assay within a large portfolio, when used for its intended purpose.

Stability of anti-immunotherapeutic antibodies in frozen human serum samples

BACKGROUND

To generate exhaustive data on the stability of human anti-immunotherapeutic antibodies.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Samples collected from over 100 different subjects at various timepoints were analyzed shortly after serum collection using specific ELISAs and re-analyzed after long-term storage or multiple cycles of freeze-thaw. The general acceptance criteria for incurred sample reanalysis for ligand-binding assays were applied, as well as alternative stricter acceptance criteria promoted by various white papers.

RESULTS

Anti-immunotherapeutic antibodies are stable in undiluted serum samples stored at -80°C for at least 3.5 years and 3-12 freeze-thaw cycles.

CONCLUSION

Samples were selected to cover the heterogeneity of the polyclonal human immune response, therefore this stability data can be extended to all anti-vaccine and anti-drug antibodies.

Rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, and vinorelbine in human plasma

BACKGROUND

A rapid and sensitive analytical method using liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed for the determination of paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, and vinorelbine in human plasma.

METHODS

A simple liquid-liquid extraction procedure was applied using only 100-μL plasma. Chromatographic separation of these anticancer drugs was achieved with an isocratic mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile/aqueous buffer (10 mmol/L ammonium acetate and 0.1% formic acid in 70:30, vol/vol) at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min in a short time (4.5 minutes).

RESULTS

The calibration curves for paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, and vinorelbine in spiked human plasma ranged from 25 to 2500, 10 to 1000, 10 to 1000, and 10 to 1000 ng/mL, respectively. The squares of the linear correlation coefficients were all more than 0.99. The intraday and interday relative standard deviations across 3 validation runs over the entire concentration range were less than 9.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The established method should be helpful for the pharmacokinetic monitoring of paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, and vinorelbine in the human plasma of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Determination of the rifamycin antibiotics rifabutin, rifampin, rifapentine and their major metabolites in human plasma via simultaneous extraction coupled with LC/MS/MS

A novel assay using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to mass spectrometer (MS) detection was developed and validated for the rifamycin anti-tuberculosis antibiotics rifampicin (RIF), rifabutin (RBT), rifapentine (RPT) and their active desacetyl metabolites (dRIF, dRBT and dRPT, respectively) in human plasma. The assay uses 50 μL of human plasma with a quick and simple protein-precipitation extraction to achieve a dynamic range of 75-30,000 ng/mL for RIF, RBT and RPT and 37.5-15,000 ng/mL for dRIF, dRBT and dRPT, respectively. The average %CV and %deviation were less than 20% at the lower limit of quantitation and less than 15% over the range of the curve. The method was fully validated according to FDA criteria for bioanalytical assays and has successfully been used to support three large international tuberculosis trials.

Analysis of imprecision in incurred sample reanalysis for small molecules

Over the years, incurred sample (IS) reanalysis (ISR) has become a tool to confirm the reliability of bioanalytical measurements. The recommendation for ISR acceptance criterion for small molecules is at least 67% of ISR samples that have reanalyzed concentrations within 20% of their original concentrations when normalized to their means. To understand the relevance of the ISR acceptance criterion and sample size requirements, simulated ISR studies evaluated the probability of ISR studies passing the acceptance criterion (ISR pass rate) as a function of IS imprecision and sample size. When IS imprecision (percent coefficient of variation: %CV) is low (≤ 10 or 1-10% CV), high ISR pass rate (≥ 99%) is attained with <50 samples. At intermediate IS imprecision (e.g., 12% CV or 7-12% CV range), 80-160 samples are required for a high ISR pass rate. When IS imprecision is at the higher end of the acceptance limit, ISR pass rate decreases significantly, and increasing sample size fails to achieve high ISR pass rate. The effect of systematic bias (e.g., instability, interconversion) on ISR pass rate is strongly dependent on sample size at intermediate IS imprecision. The results provide an understanding of the effect of IS imprecision on ISR pass rates and a framework for selection of ISR sample sizes.

Conference Report: AAPS and US FDA Crystal City V meeting on Quantitative Bioanalytical Method Validation and Implementation: feedback from the EBF

Crystal City V meeting on Quantitative Bioanalytical Method Validation and Implementation: 2013 Revised US FDA Guidance

3–5 December 2013, Hilton Baltimore, MD, USA

The meeting provided an opportunity for Industry and regulators from the US FDA to discuss the recently published revised draft FDA Guidance for Industry on Bioanalytical Methods Validation during the 90 day review period. Key perspective and philosophical positions were shared leading to a healthy exchange of views and ideas on topics in the revised document. Discussions covered all aspects of bioanalytical method validation and method utilization. However, the main dialogue was focused on chromatographic methods, ligand-binding assay methods and biomarker analysis. The resulting open debate led to greater understanding of the document, but also provided clear feedback, including the request on harmonization with approved Bioanalytical Methods Validation guidance‘s release from other health authorities, as well as the consensus view between industry and the FDA. Members of the European Bioanalysis Forum summarized prospective discussions during the meeting in Baltimore; however, this Report is not intended to constitute the official proceedings from the meeting, which are expected to be published later this year.

ISR: background, evolution and implementation, with specific consideration for ligand-binding assays

ISR was highlighted as a topic of major interest to the US FDA in 2006, having been previously required, then discontinued, by Canadian regulatory authorities. Following an FDA focus on ISR, this topic has also been emphasized by regulatory agencies in Europe, Asia and Latin America. Extensive discussions on proper implementation of programs have taken place in multiple settings, including pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies, professional associations and CROs. These efforts have led to recommendations for ISR conduct that are now included in a final guideline on bioanalytical method validation from the European Medicines Agency, a draft validation guidance from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan and a revised draft validation guidance from the FDA. In this Review we look at the background, evolution and implementation of ISR for all assays, while including some specific considerations on this topic for ligand-binding assays.

Evaluation of peripheral blood microsampling techniques in combination with liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry for the determination of drug pharmacokinetics in clinical studies

New bioanalytical assays were developed, validated, and applied in a clinical study for quantitative measurement of acetaminophen concentrations in blood and plasma samples. Furthermore, after validation, the bioanalytical assays were used for determination of pharmacokinetics within a group of six healthy male human volunteers after admission of a single oral dose of 500 mg of acetaminophen. Quantitative analyses were done by means of liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry and blood samples were collected at various sampling time points using different peripheral blood microsampling techniques. Post-dose peripheral collected blood samples were applied for the preparation of dry blood spots, dried matrix on paper discs, and peripheral plasma. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined were clearance (Cl), area under the curve (AUC), volume of distribution (Vd ), peak concentration (Cmax ), time of occurrence of peak concentration (Tmax ) and half-life time (T½ ). Observed pharmacokinetic values were not statistically (ANOVA) different compared to in literature reported values based on venous blood collection. The present pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of peripheral blood microsampling techniques in combination with quantitative liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry analysis for the determination of pharmacokinetics in clinical studies.

The European Bioanalysis Forum community's evaluation, interpretation and implementation of the European Medicines Agency guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation

The European Medicines Agency's (EMA) 2011 guideline on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) was evaluated and subsequently intensely discussed by the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) during a 2-day workshop (EBF Workshop on the implementation of the EMA guideline on BMV, Château de Limelette, Limelette, Belgium, 15-16 March 2012). The goal of the evaluation and discussions was to come to a uniform interpretation of the guideline and thus to help facilitate a smooth implementation at our laboratories. Up front preparations for the workshop by dedicated teams concentrated on challenges on implementation: ambiguities, technical or operational challenges and issues in general. In addition, common understandings were identified as well as main differences to the 2011 US FDA guideline. The guideline was perceived as being well written with a clear structure, separating method validation from sample analysis and treating all relevant aspects one-by-one in a logical order. It is the first BMV guideline clearly addressing the specifics for ligand binding assays and it shows a good match with current scientific thinking. The EBF community considers the EMA BMV guideline an excellent basis for countries that are in the process of developing or updating their own BMV guideline.

Managing scientific, technical and regulatory innovation in regulated bioanalysis: a discussion paper from the European Bioanalysis Forum

On 12–13 June 2012, the European Bioanalysis Forum hosted its third Focus Meeting in Brussels (Belgium). At the meeting, a panel discussion was held on the hurdles that the bioanalytical community encounters when adopting new technologies or managing regulated bioanalysis expectations around emerging technologies. Over the last few years, the industry has seen many new technologies maturing. As they became available, the bioanalytical scientist has observed that implementing these technologies in the regulated environment has become increasingly challenging. For one, scientific developments and regulatory expectations may not go hand in hand. At the same time, the pharmaceutical industry has become increasingly risk averse in their response to these real or perceived higher expectations in regulated bioanalysis. As a downstream consequence, the potential result of overinterpretation of guidance or occasional widespread and premature implementation of responses to health authority inspections, industry may be contributing significantly to raising the bar on some processes related to day-to-day practices in the bioanalytical laboratory. Last but not least, with the community being satisfied with the performance of the current tools, potential complacency can be observed in the regulated bioanalytical community because existing technologies, such as LC–MS/MS and ligand-binding assays, have served and still are serving them extremely well. Hence, the question ‘what’s next after LC–MS/MS or ELISA?’ is not resonating with many scientists as pertinently compared with ‘What’s next after RIA, GC or LC–UV?’, which was the key question in the 1990s, certainly in the context of an increasing effort needed to validate these new tools. With this article, the European Bioanalysis Forum aims to stimulate an open dialogue between all stakeholders in regulated bioanalysis to positively influence how we balance science, process and regulations in day-to-day work. This discussion should facilitate the evaluation and the subsequent implementation of innovative techniques for the benefit of the patient, while stimulating our community to raise the bar on added-value science, but at the same time removing the bar on processes with limited or no added value.

Evaluation of dried blood spot (DBS) technology versus plasma analysis for the determination of MK-1775 by HILIC-MS/MS in support of clinical studies

The collection of human blood samples as dried blood spots (DBS) for the pharmacokinetic assessment of investigational drugs in clinical trials offers a number of advantages over conventional plasma sampling, namely, small sample volume, simplified sample handling, and cost-effective shipping and storage. The use of DBS coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis was evaluated for the quantification of MK-1775, a Wee-1 inhibitor under development as a chemo/radio-sensitizer for the treatment of cancer. The DBS method exhibited an assay performance comparable to that of the existing plasma assay, which is currently used in support of clinical studies. Both assays used the same linear dynamic range of 2-1,000 ng/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 2 ng/mL. Based on the intra-day assay validation results, the accuracy of the DBS method ranged from 94.0 to 105.0%, with a coefficient of variation of <4.8%. The blood-to-plasma ratio calculated from the DBS data (blood concentrations) and the plasma data (plasma concentrations) was in good agreement with the one obtained from the in vitro assessment using conventional methodology. No significant hematocrit impact on the assay was observed as hematocrit ranged from 16 to 85%. The correlation between the measured MK-1775 concentrations in plasma and that determined in dried blood spots from oncology patients during the ongoing clinical study was discussed.

Investigation of microbore UPLC and nontraditional mobile phase compositions for bioanalytical LC-MS/MS

BACKGROUND

The movement towards environmentally friendly or green chemistry solutions has gained more prominence recently in the scientific community. One way in which scientists can address this issue is to limit the use of hazardous chemicals in their everyday processes. Therefore, the focus of this study was on the utilization of microbore-scale chromatography and nontraditional alcoholic mobile phases as an alternative approach to traditional bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assay parameters.

RESULTS

Replacement of the traditional narrowbore LC column with a microbore format reduced solvent consumption and produced a greater than threefold increase in S/N. The nontraditional alcoholic mobile phases, ethanol or isopropanol, produced either greater peak area counts, or S/N, for over half of the compounds evaluated, compared with the traditional organic mobile phases of acetonitrile and methanol. These nontraditional alcoholic mobile phases also showed improved capability in the removal of plasma phospholipid components from the chromatographic column. The ionizable background detected in each of the organic mobile phases utilized in this study produced a unique background that may or may not interfere with compounds undergoing analysis.

CONCLUSION

The combination of microbore columns and nontraditional alcoholic mobile phases has been shown to produce effective, alternative method conditions to traditional bioanalytical LC-MS/MS method parameters.

Incurred sample reanalysis comparison of dried blood spots and plasma samples on the measurement of lopinavir in clinical samples

BACKGROUND

Undoubtedly, incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) will become an integral part of regulated bioanalysis of dried blood spot (DBS) samples. In this article, we report results from an ISR study on DBS specimen and their corresponding plasma samples. Incurred samples were reanalyzed on their concentration of the antiretroviral drug lopinavir (LPV).

RESULTS

Bland-Altman comparison plots showed a high degree of agreement between the measurements; 94.7% of observed LPV concentrations were within bias ±2 SD. Moreover, 73.7% of obtained LPV concentrations from DBS ISR were in good compliance with general acceptance criteria (4-6-20 rule) on ISR testing, while plasma ISR failed on these acceptance criteria due to the low compliance of 10.5%.

CONCLUSION

It was demonstrated that plasma ISR testing failed on acceptance criteria while corresponding incurred DBS specimens passed. Furthermore, the current article demonstrates that the stability of the antiretroviral drug LPV was significantly different in both biological matrices.

Conference Report: The 3rd Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis at the International Reid Bioanalytical Forum

The 3rd Global CRO Council Closed Forum was held on the 3rd and 4th July 2011 in Guildford, United Kingdom, in conjunction with the 19th International Reid Bioanalytical Forum. In attendance were 21 senior-level representatives from 19 CROs on behalf of nine European countries and, for many of the attendees, this occasion was the first time that they had participated in a GCC meeting. Therefore, this closed forum was an opportunity to increase awareness of the aim of the GCC and how it works, share information about bioanalytical regulations and audit findings from different agencies, their policies and procedures and also to discuss some topics of interest and aim to develop ideas and provide recommendations for bioanalytical practices at future GCC meetings in Europe.