Simultaneous Determination of Four Tanshinones by UPLC-TQ/MS and Their Pharmacokinetic Application after Administration of Single Ethanol Extract of Danshen Combined with Water Extract in Normal and Adenine-Induced Chronic Renal Failure Rats

Salvia miltiorrhiza, one of the major traditional Chinese medicines, is commonly used and the main active ingredients—tanshinones—possess the ability to improve renal function. In this paper, the UPLC-TQ/MS method of simultaneously determining four tanshinones—tanshinone IIA, dihydrotanshinone I, tanshinone I, and cryptotanshinone—was established and applied to assess the pharmacokinetics in normal and chronic renal failure (CRF) rat plasma. The pharmacokinetics of tanshinones in rats were studied after separately intragastric administration of Salvia miltiorrhiza ethanol extract (SMEE) (0.65 g/kg), SMEE (0.65 g/kg) combined with Salvia miltiorrhiza water extract (SMWE) (1.55 g/kg). The results showed C_max and AUC_0–t of tanshinone IIA, tanshinone I, cryptotanshinone reduced by 50%~80% and CLz/F increased by 2~4 times (p < 0.05) in model group after administrated with SMEE. Nevertheless, after intragastric administration of a combination of SMWE and SMEE, the C_max and AUC_0–t of four tanshinones were upregulated and CLz/F was downregulated, which undulated similarity from the model group to the normal group with compatibility of SMEE and SMWE. These results hinted that SMWE could improve the bioavailability of tanshinones in CRF rats, which provides scientific information for further exploration the mechanism of the combination of SMWE and SMEE and offers a reference for clinical administration of Salvia miltiorrhiza.

2012 white paper on recent issues in bioanalysis and alignment of multiple guidelines

Over 400 professionals representing pharmaceutical companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies participated in the 6th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB). Like the previous sessions, this event was in the format of a practical, focused, highly interactive and informative workshop aiming for high-quality, improved regulatory compliance and scientific excellence. Numerous 'hot' topics in bioanalysis of both small and large molecules were shared and discussed, leading to consensus and recommendations among panelists and attendees representing the bioanalytical community. The major outcome of this year's workshop was the noticeable alignment of multiple bioanalytical guidance/guidelines from different regulatory agencies. This represents a concrete step forward in the global harmonization of bioanalytical activities. The present 2012 White Paper acts as a practical and useful reference document that provides key information and solutions on several topics and issues in the constantly evolving world of bioanalysis.

Regulated drug bioanalysis for human pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug management

Regulated drug bioanalysis (i.e., determination of drug concentrations in biological matrices for regulated studies) usually refers to animal toxicokinetics, bioavailability/bioequivalence and clinical pharmacokinetic studies. However, there is another important regulated drug bioanalysis – therapeutic drug management (TDM). In the USA, TDM is regulated by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. In this article, we review and compare human pharmacokinetic sample analysis and TDM sample analysis. The US FDA/Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance and the American Association for Clinical Chemistry/TDM Roundtable Recommended Generic Assay Validation Guidance are also compared. Some regulated drug bioanalysis issues, such as terminology, validation concepts and acceptance criteria, are discussed. Fostering interaction between bioanalysts from pharmaceutical science and clinical chemistry and reducing the regulatory gaps between different agencies for drug bioanalysis is our objective.

Conference report: Discussion on harmonization and globalization of bioanalytical guidances at the 19th International Reid Bioanalytical Forum

The 19th International Reid Bioanalytical Forum was held in July 2011 in the UK. This open forum was an ideal meeting for extensive discussions on topics, such as global harmonization of bioanalytical guidance, in both formal and informal settings. Indeed, this meeting is well-known for its numerous networking opportunities during the 3-day conference and for an ethos of debate on practical solutions to problems encountered in bioanalytical science.

2011 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis and Regulatory Findings from Audits and Inspections

The 5th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) was organized by the Calibration and Validation Group as a 2-day full immersion workshop for pharmaceutical companies, CROs and regulatory agencies to discuss, review, share perspectives, provide potential solutions and agree upon a consistent approach to recent issues in the bioanalysis of both small and large molecules. High quality, better compliance to regulations and scientific excellence are the foundation of this workshop. As in the previous editions of this significant event, recommendations were made and a consensus was reached among panelists and attendees, including industry leaders and regulatory experts representing the global bioanalytical community, on many ‘hot’ topics in bioanalysis. This 2011 White Paper is based on the conclusions from this workshop, and aims to provide a practical reference guide on those topics.

Aspects of bioanalytical method validation for the quantitative determination of trace elements

Bioanalytical methods are used to quantitatively determine the concentration of drugs, biotransformation products or other specified substances in biological matrices and are often used to provide critical data to pharmacokinetic or bioequivalence studies in support of regulatory submissions. In order to ensure that bioanalytical methods are capable of generating reliable, reproducible data that meet or exceed current regulatory guidance, they are subjected to a rigorous method validation process. At present, regulatory guidance does not necessarily account for nuances specific to trace element determinations. This paper is intended to provide the reader with guidance related to trace element bioanalytical method validation from the authors’ perspective for two prevalent and powerful instrumental techniques: inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-MS.

Incurred sample reanalysis (ISR): a decisive tool in bioanalytical research

The AAPS Workshop 2008 on Current Topics in GLP Bioanalysis: Assay Reproducibility for Incurred Samples was the defining moment in establishing incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) as a mandatory exercise in demonstrating assay reproducibility using incurred (study) samples. The importance of ISR can be envisaged from its role in clinical as well as non-clinical studies. Incurred samples can differ significantly in their composition when compared with the calibration standards and quality control samples that are used to validate the developed method. The present article attempts to summarize five troubleshooting cases encountered in the analyses of incurred samples for bioanalytical methods developed in our laboratory for mesalamine, hydrochlorothiazide, clopidogrel, sildenafil and rabeprazole. The issues identified were related to: sample inhomogeneity, sample processing error, impact of buffer pH during sample preparation, instability of metabolite and change in laboratory environment. The steps taken to trace and correct these incidents are discussed with adequate data. These examples will further broaden the scope and emphasize the significance of ISR. We believe this investigation will help to develop more reliable and efficient bioanalytical methods.

Implications of differences in bioanalytical regulations between Canada, USA and South America

To complete globally, pharmaceutical companies desire to use bioanalytical data and reports as a single version for all filings; not revising for specific countries or regions. Historically, this meant following the US FDA and International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidance/guidelines; finding them sufficient to achieve global acceptance. However, a growing challenge of the past decade has been additional country-specific and regional regulations that have been released. The differences between the bioanalytical regulations among countries have been recognized as a challenge to the pharmaceutical industry and its CRO partners. Harmonization of the regulations at a global level has been the subject of a number of recent articles and editorials, and the topic has been vigorously discussed at several conferences over the past year. Since all have been in agreement about the need to harmonize regulations, this article will not focus on harmonization but rather it will provide a comparison of the USA/Canadian regulations versus those of South America, in particular Brazil, noting the additional work needed to achieve compliance with country-specific regulations. All countries discussed have specific guidance or regulations on clinical bioequivalence studies, and due to the higher standards for these studies, the regulations for bioequivalence studies will be used as the basis for comparison in the article.

Conference Report: The 1st Conference in Asia-Pacific on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis

The 1st Conference in Asia-Pacific on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis was organized by the Calibration and Validation Group. This event, a 2-day full-immersion conference, was the first of this kind in the Asia-Pacific region, following four successful editions held in Montreal, Canada. This conference brought together scientists and experts from across Asia-Pacific and the rest of the world to discuss, review, share perspectives, provide potential solutions and agree upon consistent approaches on recent issues in bioanalysis. A total of 27 invited speakers from worldwide regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies and CROs provided interesting and pertinent oral presentations. All discussions were focused on high-quality, better compliance to regulations and scientific excellence.

Historical perspective on the development and evolution of bioanalytical guidance and technology

Bioanalytical methods employed for the quantitative determination of drugs and their metabolites in biological fluids provide essential regulatory data for bioavailability, bioequivalence, pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic studies. The quality of these studies is directly related to the underlying bioanalytical data. Data generated by a typical bioanalytical laboratory is submitted to not only the local regulatory agency, but also to multiple regulatory agencies worldwide. Many pharmaceutical companies and CROs are now performing bioanalytical work for global submissions and the regulatory agencies are often reviewing the bioanalytical work performed in other countries. The bioanalytical workplace has become global and therefore needs universal rules for quality and compliance of bioanalysis. This paper provides a historical perspective and insight into the development and evolution of the regulatory guidance for bioanalytical method validation and analysis of samples.

2010 White Paper on Recent Issues in Regulated Bioanalysis & Global Harmonization of Bioanalytical Guidance

The 4th Calibration and Validation Group Workshop on Recent Issues in Regulated Bioanalysis, a 2-day full immersion workshop, was organized by the Calibration and Validation Group. Contract research organizations, pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies came together to discuss several ‘hot’ topics concerning bioanalytical issues and regulatory challenges and to reach a consensus among panelists and attendees on many points regarding method validation of small and large molecules.