Stability of sample extracts of vitamin D3 metabolites after chemical derivatization for LC-MS/MS analysis

Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is widely used to determine vitamin D₃ metabolites in biological samples. The ionization efficiencies of these metabolites, however, are poor under electrospray ionization conditions. Moreover, the chromatographic separation of multiple vitamin D metabolites and their epimers can be challenging. For these reasons, chemical derivatization reagents are often used to improve sensitivity and selectivity of analysis. While the derivatization schemes have been proven to be very effective, one missing aspect is the investigation of the stability of the chemical derivatization products in stored sample extracts. In this study, we investigated the long-term stability of several vitamin D₃ metabolites after 1 and 3 months of storage at - 20 °C. Five vitamin D₃ metabolites were examined after derivatization with seven different derivatization reagents. Generally, Amplifex products were the most stable in the long term in our study with 11-20% degraded after 1 month of storage and 14-35% after 3 months. The stabilities for some of the metabolites' 4-[2-(6,7-dimethoxy-4-methyl-3-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinoxalyl)ethyl]-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (DMEQ-TAD), 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FMP-TS), isonicotinoyl chloride (INC) and 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione acetylated (PTAD-Ac) products were also acceptable after 1 month of storage. Other derivatized metabolites, however, degraded extensively already after 1 month of storage, such as 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (PTAD) (54-72% degradation) and 2-nitrosopyridine (PyrNO) (32-100% degradation). Importantly, for every metabolite, there was an optimum derivatization reagent that met the criteria of stability proposed by international regulatory bodies after 1 month of storage. Some derivatives were stable for even up to 3 months of storage, with degradation of less than 15%.

Handling unstable analytes: literature review and expert panel survey by Japan Bioanalysis Forum Discussion Group

Analyzing unstable small molecule drugs and metabolites in blood continues to be challenging for bioanalysis. Although scientific countermeasures such as immediate cooling, immediate freezing, addition of enzyme inhibitors, pH adjustment, dried blood spot or derivatization have been developed, selecting the best practices has become an issue in the pharmaceutical industry as the number of drugs with such problems is increasing, even for generic drugs. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive literature review and a questionnaire survey to determine a suitable practice for evaluating instability and implementing countermeasures. Three areas of focus, matrix selection, effect of hemolysis and selection of esterase inhibitors, are discussed.

The impact of hemolysis on stability of N-desethyloxybutynin in human plasma

Aim: Stability must be evaluated before quantitation of drugs or metabolites concentrations in biological matrices. We reported a case study where instability of a drug metabolite was mediated by hemolysis. Materials & methods: The instability of both enantiomers of N-desethyloxybutynin was observed in hemolyzed plasma stored at -20°C. The investigations indicated that heme-mediated oxidation converted the metabolite to its N-oxide. Storing samples under lower temperature (-50°C or below) or treatment with the antioxidant ascorbic acid stabilized the metabolite. Conclusion: The evaluation of the stability of some analytes in a hemolyzed sample is crucial as it may negatively impact incurred sample reanalysis or pharmacokinetic profiles on highly hemolyzed samples.

Stabilization of clinical samples collected for quantitative bioanalysis – a reflection from the European Bioanalysis Forum

In bioanalysis of small molecules, the analyte concentration in the measured samples should reflect the concentration during sample collection. Precautions may be needed to prevent over- or under-estimation of the obtained result. This might require the addition of stabilizers to prevent degradation or nonspecific binding. For unstable drugs, it is essential to know how analytes can be stabilized before the start of the clinical study. Although the stabilization methods are well documented, the impact of the stabilization on the clinical workflow is not properly addressed. Already during method development, the clinical implications in terms of personnel safety, ease of use, training possibilities and staff capacity should be taken into account, and validation of the bioanalytical method should reflect collection procedures.