Nonclinical Evaluation of PF-06438179: A Potential Biosimilar to Remicade® (Infliximab)

Introduction

PF-06438179, a potential biosimilar to Remicade^® (infliximab, Janssen Biotech, Inc.), is a chimeric mouse–human monoclonal antibody targeting human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF).

Methods

Analytical (small subset reported here) and nonclinical studies compared the structural, functional, and in vivo nonclinical similarity of PF-06438179 with Remicade sourced from the United States (infliximab-US) and/or European Union (infliximab-EU).

Results

The peptide map profiles were superimposable, and peptide masses were the same, indicating identical amino acid sequences. Data on post-translational modifications, biochemical properties, and biological function provided strong support for analytical similarity. Administration of a single intravenous (IV) dose (10 or 50 mg/kg) of PF-06438179 or infliximab-EU to male rats was well tolerated. There were no test article-related clinical signs or effects on body weight or food consumption. Systemic exposures [maximum drug concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)] in rats administered PF-06438179 or infliximab-EU were similar, with mean exposure ratio of PF-06438179 relative to infliximab-EU ranging from 0.88 to 1.16. No rats developed anti-drug antibodies. A 2-week IV toxicity study was conducted with once-weekly administration of 10 or 50 mg/kg of PF-06438179 to male and female rats. PF-06438179-related hyperplasia of sinusoidal cells occurred in the liver in rats administered 50 mg/kg, but was not adverse based on its minimal to mild severity. The no-observed adverse-effect level for PF-06438179 was 50 mg/kg. At this dose, C_max was 1360 µg/mL and AUC at 168 h was 115,000 µg h/mL on day 8.

Conclusions

The analytical and nonclinical studies have supported advancement of PF-06438179 into global comparative clinical trials.

Funding

Pfizer Inc.

Frontiers in nonclinical drug development: biosimilars

Biopharmaceuticals, produced by recombinant DNA technology, are generally more complicated to produce than small molecule drugs. As patents around the development and manufacturing of these biopharmaceuticals expire, biosimilars are being developed as comparable and more affordable alternatives to improve patient access and market competition. This commentary explains what a biosimilar is; it compares and contrasts biosimilar production with that of small molecule, generic, and other biological drugs; and it describes basic principles of the nonclinical development program for monoclonal antibody biosimilars.

Optimized nonclinical safety assessment strategies supporting clinical development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies targeting inflammatory diseases

An increasing number of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and IgG Fc fusion proteins are either approved or in early-to-late stage clinical trials for the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions, autoimmune diseases and organ transplant rejection. The exquisite specificity of mAbs, in combination with their multi-functional properties, high potency, long half-life (permitting intermittent dosing and prolonged pharamcological effects), and general lack of off-target toxicity makes them ideal therapeutics. Dosing with mAbs for these severe and debilitating but often non life-threatening diseases is usually prolonged, for several months or years, and not only affects adults, including sensitive populations such as woman of child-bearing potential (WoCBP) and the elderly, but also children. Immunosuppression is usually a therapeutic goal of these mAbs and when administered to patients whose treatment program often involves other immunosuppressive therapies, there is an inherent risk for frank immunosuppression and reduced host defence which when prolonged increases the risk of infection and cancer. In addition when mAbs interact with the immune system they can induce other adverse immune-mediated drug reactions such as infusion reactions, cytokine release syndrome, anaphylaxis, immune-complex-mediated pathology and autoimmunity. An overview of the nonclinical safety assessment and risk mitigation strategies utilized to characterize these immunomodulatory mAbs and Fc fusion proteins to support first-in human (FIH) studies and futher clinical development in inflammatory disease indications is provided. Specific emphasis is placed on the design of studies to qualify animal species for toxicology studies, early studies to investigate safety and define PK/PD relationships, FIH-enabling and chronic toxicology studies, immunotoxicity, developmental, reproductive and juvenile toxicity studies and studies to determine the potential for immunosuppression and reduced host defence against infection and cancer. Nonclinical strategies to facilitate clinical and market entry in the most efficient timeframe are presented.

Is the decision on the use of biosimilar growth hormone based on high quality scientific evidence? - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The authors carried out a systematic and critical review of the scientific literature regarding the possible development of neutralising antibodies developed in patients treated with growth hormone biosimilars (defined as a drug expected to be similar to the originator or original pharmaceutical -European Medicines Agency) as compared to the reference drug. As a consequence, we discovered two major issues, namely, the poor quality of the comparative clinical trials and the poor quality of the antibody assays used during the trials.

METHODS

The literature review was performed according to the principle of the Cochrane Collaboration and SBU. The electronic literature search included the databases PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library up to December 2012. Two independent reviewers assessed abstracts and full-text articles.

RESULTS

The search identified 1,553 abstracts related to the subject. Only six articles contained data on biosimilar growth hormone or antibody results obtained with appropriate methods. None of the studies fulfilled the criteria for high quality randomised controlled trials. Qualitative rather than quantitative assays were used for monitoring antibody formation.

CONCLUSIONS

It is our firm opinion , that since biosimilars are not identical, emphasis must be placed on the quality of the comparative clinical trials performed and the quality of the analytical studies in order to guarantee patient safety. Clinical trials should follow established quality rules for controlled comparative randomised clinical trials. A whole set of new guidelines is required.