Advances in testing for sample manipulation in clinical and forensic toxicology - Part A: urine samples

In many countries, adherence testing is used to monitor consumption behavior or to prove abstinence. Urine and hair are most commonly used, although other biological fluids are available. Positive test results are usually associated with serious legal or economic consequences. Therefore, various sample manipulation and adulteration strategies are used to circumvent such a positive result. In these critical review articles on sample adulteration of urine (part A) and hair samples (part B) in the context of clinical and forensic toxicology, recent trends and strategies to improve sample adulteration and manipulation testing published in the past 10 years are described and discussed. Typical manipulation and adulteration strategies include undercutting the limits of detection/cut-off by dilution, substitution, and adulteration. New or alternative strategies for detecting sample manipulation attempts can be generally divided into improved detection of established urine validity markers and direct and indirect techniques or approaches to screening for new adulteration markers. In this part A of the review article, we focused on urine samples, where the focus in recent years has been on new (in)direct substitution markers, particularly for synthetic (fake) urine. Despite various and promising advances in detecting manipulation, it remains a challenge in clinical and forensic toxicology, and simple, reliable, specific, and objective markers/techniques are still lacking, for example, for synthetic urine.

Effects of the Storage Conditions on the Stability of Natural and Synthetic Cannabis in Biological Matrices for Forensic Toxicology Analysis: An Update from the Literature

The use and abuse of cannabis, be it for medicinal or recreational purposes, is widely spread among the population. Consequently, a market for more potent and consequently more toxic synthetic cannabinoids has flourished, and with it, the need for accurate testing of these substances in intoxicated people. In this regard, one of the critical factors in forensic toxicology is the stability of these drugs in different biological matrices due to different storage conditions. This review aims to present the most updated and relevant literature of studies performed on the effects of different storage conditions on the stability of cannabis compounds present in various biological matrices, such as blood and plasma, urine, and oral fluids, as well as in alternative matrices, such as breath, bile fluid, hair, sweat, cerumen, and dried blood spots.

Metabolomic Strategies in Biomarker Research-New Approach for Indirect Identification of Drug Consumption and Sample Manipulation in Clinical and Forensic Toxicology?

Drug of abuse (DOA) consumption is a growing problem worldwide, particularly with increasing numbers of new psychoactive substances (NPS) entering the drug market. Generally, little information on their adverse effects and toxicity are available. The direct detection and identification of NPS is an analytical challenge due to their ephemerality on the drug scene. An approach that does not directly focus on the structural detection of an analyte or its metabolites, would be beneficial for this complex analytical scenario and the development of alternative screening methods could help to provide fast response on suspected NPS consumption. A metabolomics approach might represent such an alternative strategy for the identification of biomarkers for different questions in DOA testing. Metabolomics is the monitoring of changes in small (endogenous) molecules (<1,000 Da) in response to a certain stimulus, e.g., DOA consumption. For this review, a literature search targeting "metabolomics" and different DOAs or NPS was conducted. Thereby, different applications of metabolomic strategies in biomarker research for DOA identification were identified: (a) as an additional tool for metabolism studies bearing the major advantage that particularly a priori unknown or unexpected metabolites can be identified; and (b) for identification of endogenous biomarker or metabolite patterns, e.g., for synthetic cannabinoids or also to indirectly detect urine manipulation attempts by chemical adulteration or replacement with artificial urine samples. The majority of the currently available literature in that field, however, deals with metabolomic studies for DOAs to better assess their acute or chronic effects or to find biomarkers for drug addiction and tolerance. Certain changes in endogenous compounds are detected for all studied DOAs, but often similar compounds/pathways are influenced. When evaluating these studies with regard to possible biomarkers for drug consumption, the observed changes appear, albeit statistically significant, too small to reliably work as biomarker for drug consumption. Further, different drugs were shown to affect the same pathways. In conclusion, metabolomic approaches possess potential for detection of biomarkers indicating drug consumption. More studies, including more sensitive targeted analyses, multi-variant statistical models or deep-learning approaches are needed to fully explore the potential of omics science in DOA testing.

Evaluation of endogenous urinary biomarkers for indirect detection of urine adulteration attempts by five different chemical adulterants in mass spectrometry methods

Reliable detection of urine adulteration attempts to circumvent positive drug testing represents a critical step for laboratories in abstinence control settings. An ideal workflow for high-throughput testing would involve simultaneous detection of adulteration attempts in the same run with drug detection. Monitoring of degraded or oxidized endogenous urinary compounds as indirect markers has been previously evaluated for that purpose exemplified for the adulterant potassium nitrite (KNO₂ ). Fifteen, previously identified endogenous markers should now be evaluated for their general applicability to detect adulteration attempts for the adulterants hypochlorite-based bleach (NaOCl), peroxidase and peroxide (H₂ O₂ ), pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC), and iodine (I₂ ). Initial experiments revealed similar results for the tested adulterants regarding degradation of indolylacryloylglycine (IAG), uric acid (UA), or UA derivatives. 5-Hydroxyisourate (HIU), the oxidation product of UA, was however only formed by KNO₂ , PCC, and H₂ O₂ . Amino acids showed larger adulterant-dependent differences. All reactions were shown to be influenced by the adulterant concentration and the urinary pH with large variances depending on compound and adulterant. Except for HIU/PCC, all markers were stable within +/- 30% variation for all adulterants at -20°C. Receiver operating characteristics indicated best sensitivity and specificity over all adulterants for IAG (specificity 0.9, sensitivity 1.0) and UA (specificity 1.0, sensitivity 0.9). HIU gave best results for KNO₂ , PCC, and H₂ O₂ and N-acetylneuraminic acid for PCC and H₂ O₂ , respectively. When integrating a limited number of targets into existing screening methods, monitoring of UA, IAG, N-acetylneuraminic acid, and HIU is recommended.

Suitability evaluation of new endogenous biomarkers for the identification of nitrite-based urine adulteration in mass spectrometry methods

Urine adulteration to circumvent positive drug testing is a fundamental challenge for toxicological laboratories all over the world. Untargeted mass spectrometry (MS) methods used in metabolomics had previously revealed uric acid (UA), histidine, methylhistidine, and their oxidation products, for example 5-hydroxyisourate (HIU) as potential biomarkers for urine adulteration using potassium nitrite (KNO₂ ). These markers should be further evaluated for their reliability, stability, and routine applicability. Influence of KNO₂ concentration, urinary pH, reaction time, and stability at room temperature, 4°C, and - 20°C was determined in urine under varying conditions. Analysis was performed after protein precipitation with acetonitrile by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was applied for cut-off evaluation after biomarker quantification (n = 100 per group). Blinded measurements (n = 50) were performed to check the general applicability to identify adulterated samples under routine conditions. The higher the adulterant concentration, the lower the concentrations of histidine, methylhistidine, and UA. In return, amounts of their oxidation products increased. Highest changes were observed under weak acid conditions (pH 4-5). Storage at -20°C ensured sufficient stability for all oxidative markers over one month. ROC evaluated biomarker performance and application to unknown samples revealed satisfying results, with HIU as the most suitable biomarker (positive predictive value (PPV) 100%), followed by UA (PPV 93%). HIU and UA proved suitable markers to identify urine adulteration using KNO₂ and are ready for implementation into routine MS procedures.

False-negative results in the immunoassay analysis of drugs of abuse: can adulterants be detected by sample check test?

Background

The dilution or adulteration of urine is a serious problem in drugs of abuse testing. Tests to identify adulteration are currently available. This study investigated the ability of the CEDIA® sample check to detect adulteration.

Methods

Eight different drugs of abuse were added to a urine sample obtained from a healthy, drug-free subject: 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, benzoylecgonine, D-amphetamine sulphate, ethyl-D-glucuronide, morphine sulphate, oxazepam, (-)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Urine samples were diluted to yield three samples of drugs of abuse concentrations close to general cut-offs as used in methadone treatment centres, by health authorities for psychological tests and in traffic medicine. Aspirin, citric acid, CrO3, H2O2, soap, sodium metaborate, vitamin C were added in three, HCl and NaOH in one, and NaN3 in two concentrations. All samples were measured with commercially available immunological assays shortly after sample preparation and 24 h later. All samples were further analysed with the CEDIA® sample check reaction which may identify adulteration.

Results

Oxidizing reagents (H2O2 or CrO3) are most effective in interfering in the measurement of benzoylecgonine, EDDP, ethyl-D-glucuronide and morphine sulphate. The measurement of (-)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol is affected by many adulterants. Adulteration with HCl and NaOH was identified with the sample check reaction. NaN3 generated false negative results for a number of drugs of abuse.

Conclusions

Urine samples with drugs of abuse concentrations above cut-offs can be successfully tampered with adulterants in a way which cannot be detected with the CEDIA® sample check assay.

A new metabolomics-based strategy for identification of endogenous markers of urine adulteration attempts exemplified for potassium nitrite

Urine adulteration to circumvent positive drug testing represents a problem for toxicological laboratories. While creatinine is a suitable marker for dilution, detection of chemicals is often performed by dipstick tests associated with high rates of false positives. Several methods would be necessary to check for all possible adulterants. Untargeted mass spectrometry (MS) methods used in metabolomics should theoretically allow detecting concentration changes of any endogenous urinary metabolite or presence of new biomarkers produced by chemical adulteration. As a proof of concept study, urine samples from 10 volunteers were treated with KNO₂ and analyzed by high-resolution MS. For statistical data evaluation, XCMS^plus and MetaboAnalyst were used. Compound identification was performed by database searches using an in-house database, Chemspider, METLIN, HMDB, and NIST. Principle component analysis revealed clear separation between treated and untreated urine samples. In detail, 307 features showed significant concentration changes with fold changes greater than 2 (79 decreased; 228 increased). Mainly amino acids (e.g., histidine, methylhistidine, di- and trimethyllysine) and purines (uric acid) were detected in lower amounts. 5-HO-isourate was found to be formed as a new compound from uric acid and, e.g., imidazole lactate concentrations increased due to the breakdown of histidine. This metabolomics-based strategy allowed for a broad identification range of markers of urinary adulteration. More studies will be needed to investigate routine applicability of identified potential markers exploring urinary conditions of their formation and stability. Selected markers might then be integrated into routine MS screening procedures allowing for detection of adulteration within routine MS analysis. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Adulterants in Urine Drug Testing

Urine drug testing plays an important role in monitoring licit and illicit drug use for both medico-legal and clinical purposes. One of the major challenges of urine drug testing is adulteration, a practice involving manipulation of a urine specimen with chemical adulterants to produce a false negative test result. This problem is compounded by the number of easily obtained chemicals that can effectively adulterate a urine specimen. Common adulterants include some household chemicals such as hypochlorite bleach, laundry detergent, table salt, and toilet bowl cleaner and many commercial products such as UrinAid (glutaraldehyde), Stealth® (containing peroxidase and peroxide), Urine Luck (pyridinium chlorochromate, PCC), and Klear® (potassium nitrite) available through the Internet. These adulterants can invalidate a screening test result, a confirmatory test result, or both. To counteract urine adulteration, drug testing laboratories have developed a number of analytical methods to detect adulterants in a urine specimen. While these methods are useful in detecting urine adulteration when such activities are suspected, they do not reveal what types of drugs are being concealed. This is particularly the case when oxidizing urine adulterants are involved as these oxidants are capable of destroying drugs and their metabolites in urine, rendering the drug analytes undetectable by any testing technology. One promising approach to address this current limitation has been the use of unique oxidation products formed from reaction of drug analytes with oxidizing adulterants as markers for monitoring drug misuse and urine adulteration. This novel approach will ultimately improve the effectiveness of the current urine drug testing programs.

Elucidation of markers for monitoring morphine and its analogs in urine adulterated with pyridinium chlorochromate

Aim: Currently, procedures that identify the drugs ‘destroyed’ in adulterated urine specimens are very limited. This study aimed to determine the effect of pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC) on routine opiate assays and identify reaction products formed. Results/methodology: Opiate-positive urines adulterated with PCC (20 and 100 mM) were analyzed using CEDIA® immunoassay and GC–MS. Urine and water samples spiked with 6-monoacetylmorphine, morphine and its glucuronides (10 µg/ml) and PCC (0.02–100 mM) were monitored with LC–MS, and the products characterized. Conclusion: PCC significantly decreased the abundance of morphine, codeine and IS. Adulterated water and urine samples containing 6-monoacetylmorphine, morphine and morphine-3-glucuronide yielded morphinone-3-glucuronide, 7,14-dihydroxy-6-monoacetylmorphine, 7,8-diketo-6-monoacetylmorphine and 7,8-diketo-morphine (tentative assignment). Reaction pathways may be different in the two matrices.

Oxidation of testosterone by permanganate and its implication in sports drug testing

Adulteration of urine with permanganate can lead to depletion of testosterone and formation of new reaction products (4α,5α- and 4β,5β-dihydroxytestosterone).