Impact of microsampling on toxicological evaluation in rodent safety studies

Recently, animal welfare has been attracting worldwide attention, and implementation of 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) is prioritized in every way possible in the drug development. Microsampling, in which small amounts of blood are collected, is attracting attention in this context. ICH S3A Q&A focused on microsampling was published in November 2017 to help accelerate the application of microsampling for toxicokinetic assessment. The increased sensitivity of drug measurement apparatuses such as mass spectrometers has made it possible to measure drug concentrations with small amounts of blood samples. In this review, we summarized the reports on toxicological influence of microsampling in rodents (rats and mice) with or without drug administration or recovery period after blood collection and influences that may arise from differences in the blood sampling site or blood sampling volume. We also summarized some perspectives on further implementation of microsampling in toxicology studies. The use of microsampling in regulatory toxicology studies has gradually increased, although at a lower rate than in discovery studies. Since more animals are used in GLP toxicology studies than in discovery studies, the effect of reducing the number of animals by microsampling is expected to be greater in the toxicology studies. This report aims to promote the application of microsampling to nonclinical studies, as it is beneficial for improving animal welfare and can contribute to the 3Rs.

A strategic approach to nonclinical immunogenicity assessment: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum

Immunogenicity assays are required to evaluate anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses that can be generated against biotherapeutic modalities. Regulatory guidelines focus on clinical requirements, yet it has become apparent that industry has applied these clinical recommendations for immunogenicity assessment to nonclinical studies in varying degrees. ADAs are an anticipated outcome of dosing a humanized or fully human biotherapeutic into an animal. However, a nonclinical ADA response is rarely predictive of the immunogenic potential in humans. The addendum to ICH S6 recommends that immunogenicity should be explicitly examined where there is: evidence of altered pharmacodynamic activity; unexpected changes in exposure in the absence of a pharmacodynamic marker or evidence of immuno-mediated reactions. The European Bioanalytical Forum has extensively discussed and reached a consensus on a minimal strategic approach of when and what to include for nonclinical immunogenicity assessments. Additionally, this paper recommends a strategy for ADA assay validation and sample analysis for those cases when it is considered necessary to include an immunogenicity assessment in nonclinical toxicology studies.

Emerging trends in paper spray mass spectrometry: Microsampling, storage, direct analysis, and applications

Recent advancements in the sensitivity of chemical instrumentation have led to increased interest in the use of microsamples for translational and biomedical research. Paper substrates are by far the most widely used media for biofluid collection, and mass spectrometry is the preferred method of analysis of the resultant dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Although there have been a variety of review papers published on DBS, there has been no attempt to unify the century old DBS methodology with modern applications utilizing modified paper and paper-based microfluidics for sampling, storage, processing, and analysis. This critical review will discuss how mass spectrometry has expanded the utility of paper substrates from sample collection and storage, to direct complex mixture analysis to on-surface reaction monitoring.

Microsampling: considerations for its use in pharmaceutical drug discovery and development

There is growing interest in the implementation of microsampling approaches for the quantitation of circulating concentrations of analytes in biological samples derived from nonclinical and clinical studies involved in drug development. This interest is partly due to the ethical advantages of taking smaller blood volumes, particularly for studies in rodents, children and the critically ill. In addition, these technologies facilitate sampling to be performed in previously intractable locations and occasions. Further, they enable the collection of samples for additional purposes (extra time points, biomarkers, sampling during a clinical event, etc). This article gives a comprehensive insight to the utilization of these approaches in drug discovery and development, and provides recommendations for best practice for nonclinical, clinical and bioanalytical aspects.

Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum liquid microsampling consortium: capillary liquid microsampling and assessment of homogeneity of the resultant samples

Following the completion of a detailed experimental protocol into the potential inhomogeneity of capillary liquid microsamples, which was performed at seven European Bioanalysis Forum member companies, the summary and conclusion on the data are reported here. It has been demonstrated that it is possible to generate homogeneous samples using these microsampling techniques; that the resultant microsamples can be accurate and precise and that capillary liquid microsampling data can be consistent with conventional larger volume plasma samples. However, the data contain some variability which is contributed to by the different range of experiences that each investigating site had with these techniques. Therefore, knowledge of the compounds, well-designed experiments and experience with these techniques are essential for the delivery of high quality data.

Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum liquid microsampling consortium: microsampling: assessing accuracy and precision of handheld pipettes and capillaries

Aim: Microsampling in preclinical pharmacokinetics (PK) studies is currently widely adopted across the pharmaceutical industry. Materials & methods: The European Bioanalysis Forum liquid microsampling consortium member companies assessed the accuracy and precision of handheld pipettes and microcapillaries at volumes of less than 10 μl. The following key factors on pipetting performance were also evaluated: Pipette type (positive displacement, air displacement and microcapillary), experience of user and the liquid type. Water was selected as a best-case scenario for accuracy and precision determination and blood plasma as a ‘real world’ bioanalysis sample type. Conclusion: Accuracy and precision on the pipetted volume decreased at lower volumes and experienced laboratory technicians performed better compared with the infrequent users. With respect to the pipetting devices used, microcapillaries showed better or equivalent accuracy and precision compared with handheld pipettes across the volume range 1–8 μl independent of the matrix used.

Clinical application of microsampling versus conventional sampling techniques in the quantitative bioanalysis of antibiotics: a systematic review

Conventional sampling techniques for clinical pharmacokinetic studies often require the removal of large blood volumes from patients. This can result in a physiological or emotional burden, particularly for neonates or pediatric patients. Antibiotic pharmacokinetic studies are typically performed on healthy adults or general ward patients. These may not account for alterations to a patient’s pathophysiology and can lead to suboptimal treatment. Microsampling offers an important opportunity for clinical pharmacokinetic studies in vulnerable patient populations, where smaller sample volumes can be collected. This systematic review provides a description of currently available microsampling techniques and an overview of studies reporting the quantitation and validation of antibiotics using microsampling. A comparison of microsampling to conventional sampling in clinical studies is included.

Investigation of the effect of blood hematocrit and lipid content on the blood volume deposited by a disposable dried blood spot collection device

When using dried blood spot (DBS) sampling for the quantitative bioanalysis of circulating concentrations of drugs, metabolites and endogenous analytes, it is important that a fixed volume of blood is deposited to overcome the issues associated with blood hematocrit (HCT) and homogeneity. The volumetric performance of the KTH DBS collection device was tested with radiolabelled [¹⁴C]-diclofenac. It was demonstrated that the device deposits a fixed volume of blood (13.5μL) regardless of the HCT (25-65%), or lipid content of the blood sample. Further, it was found that the precision and accuracy of the derived dried blood samples were at least as good as those of a positive displacement pipette. The device was found to be easy to use and gave acceptable dried samples for 92.9% of the tests performed (n=42).

Outsourcing bioanalytical services at Janssen Research and Development: the sequel anno 2017

The strategy of outsourcing bioanalytical services at Janssen has been evolving over the last years and an update will be given on the recent changes in our processes. In 2016, all internal GLP-related activities were phased out and this decision lead to the re-orientation of the in-house bioanalytical activities. As a consequence, in-depth experience with the validated bioanalytical assays for new drug candidates is currently gained together with the external partner, since development and validation of the assay and execution of GLP preclinical studies are now transferred to the CRO. The evolution to externalize more bioanalytical support has created opportunities to build even stronger partnerships with the CROs and to refocus internal resources. Case studies are presented illustrating challenges encountered during method development and validation at preferred partners when limited internal experience is obtained or with introduction of new technology.

Capillary microsampling in nonclinical safety assessment: practical sampling and bioanalysis from a CRO perspective

Microsampling has the 3R benefits of refining blood collection techniques while reducing the number of animals required for rodent safety assessment studies. There are significant scientific benefits of correlating study findings with systemic exposure and consequently, there is an industry drive to utilize microsampling in regulatory toxicology studies. This article will focus on capillary microsampling and will discuss the initial considerations before using capillary microsampling, study design and some practicalities of sample collection. From a bioanalytical perspective, the impact of different sample collection and storage workflows on the design of method validation experiments, the suitability of using microsampling for unstable analytes and aspects supporting analysis of peptides, large molecules and for biomarker applications will be discussed.

The application of capillary microsampling in GLP toxicology studies

Aim: Capillary microsampling (CMS) to collect microplasma volumes is gradually replacing traditional, larger volume sampling from rats in GLP toxicology studies. Methodology: About 32 µl of blood is collected with a capillary, processed to plasma and stored in a 10- or 4-µl capillary which is washed out further downstream in the laboratory. CMS has been standardized with respect to materials, assay validation experiments and application for sample analysis. Conclusion: The implementation of CMS has resulted in blood volume reductions in the rat from 300 to 32 µl per time point and the elimination of toxicokinetic satellite groups in the majority of the rat GLP toxicology studies. The technique has been successfully applied in 26 GLP studies for 12 different projects thus far.

Development of a novel noncapillary plasma microsampling device for ultra-low volume of blood collection

The desire for serial microsampling in mice has led to extensive research in this field within the pharmaceutical industry. The ability to profile a compound's in vivo properties with less material and fewer mice has obvious advantages. A new device and workflow was developed at the Takeda Oncology site to allow scientists to isolate plasma from very low volumes of mouse blood (as low as 20 μl) collected using standard microsampling techniques. A side-by-side in vitro comparison of plasma concentrations was performed using this new device and conventional sampling methods with commercial and in-house molecules. The plasma concentrations of the molecules tested were very consistent between the conventional sampling techniques and this new device/workflow. In addition, several in-life studies have also been conducted to validate this new technique as a primary PK screening tool at the Takeda Boston. The new device is simple to use and very cost effective with the added benefit that no additional training is needed for the animal technicians and the same centrifuge equipment can be employed. This device can be used for blood volumes ranging from 20 to 100 μl enabling studies not just in rat and dog but more importantly in mice.