Biologic drugs in the treatment of chronic inflammatory pulmonary diseases: recent developments and future perspectives

Chronic inflammatory diseases of the lung are some of the leading causes of mortality and significant morbidity worldwide. Despite the tremendous burden these conditions put on global healthcare, treatment options for most of these diseases remain scarce. Inhaled corticosteroids and beta-adrenergic agonists, while effective for symptom control and widely available, are linked to severe and progressive side effects, affecting long-term patient compliance. Biologic drugs, in particular peptide inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies show promise as therapeutics for chronic pulmonary diseases. Peptide inhibitor-based treatments have already been proposed for a range of diseases, including infectious disease, cancers and even Alzheimer disease, while monoclonal antibodies have already been implemented as therapeutics for a range of conditions. Several biologic agents are currently being developed for the treatment of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary sarcoidosis. This article is a review of the biologics already employed in the treatment of chronic inflammatory pulmonary diseases and recent progress in the development of the most promising of those treatments, with particular focus on randomised clinical trial outcomes.

The future of inhalation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The inhaled route is critical for the administration of drugs to treat patients suffering from COPD, but there is still an unmet need for new and innovative inhalers to address some limitations of existing products that do not make them suitable for many COPD patients. The treatment of COPD, currently limited to the use of bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and antibiotics, requires a significant expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium that is closely linked to the widening of knowledge on the pathogenesis and evolution of COPD. The great interest in the development of new drugs that may be able to interfere in the natural history of the disease is leading to the synthesis of numerous new molecules, of which however only a few have entered the stages of clinical development. On the other hand, further improvement of inhaled drug delivery could be an interesting possibility because it targets the organ of interest directly, requires significantly less drug to exert the pharmacological effect and, by lowering the amount of drug needed, reduces the cost of therapy. Unfortunately, however, the development of new inhaled drugs for use in COPD is currently too slow.

An Overview of the Safety and Efficacy of Monoclonal Antibodies for the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Several mAbs have been tested or are currently under clinical evaluation for the treatment of COPD. They can be subdivided into those that aim to block specific pro-inflammatory and pro-neutrophilic cytokines and chemokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, CXCL8 and IL-1β, and those that act on T2-mediated inflammation, respectively, by blocking IL-5 and/or its receptor, preventing IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, affecting IL-33 pathway and blocking TSLP. None of these approaches has proved to be effective, probably because in COPD there is no dominant cytokine or chemokine and, therefore, a single mAb cannot be effective on all pathways. With a more in-depth understanding of the numerous pheno/endotypic pathways that play a role in COPD, it may eventually be possible to identify those specific patients in whom some of these cytokines or chemokines might predominate. In this case, it will be possible to implement a personalized treatment, but the use of each mAb will only be reserved for a very limited number of subjects.

Impact of long-term doxycycline on lung function & exacerbations: A real-world open, prospective pilot observation on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background & objectives:

Upregulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is related to the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed at assessing the tolerability and impact of long-term use of MMP inhibitor doxycycline in COPD.

Methods:

A cohort of COPD patients was randomized to continue a uniform COPD treatment with or without add-on long-term oral doxycycline. The lung exacerbations (spirometry), adverse events and health status (COPD Assessment Test score) were noted at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of therapy. Measurement of the serum MMP-2, and 9 and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels was done at the start of the study and at three months, whenever possible.

Results:

There were 27, 19, 13 and 10 patients with add-on doxycycline group and 22, 19, 11 and 7 patients with COPD treatment alone at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment respectively. The improvement was obviousaconsistent and serial improvement of health st nd mostly (at 6 and 12 months) significant (P>0.05) for lung function parameters [forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), FEV₁/forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of FVC (FEF_25-75)] and universal for health status at all measurements, with an overall 26.69 per cent reduction in exacerbations. The analysis with the lung function changes in the available population with protocol violation also supported the same trend. The concomitant reduction in serum MMP-9 (P=0.01), MMP-2 (P=0.01) and hs-CRP (P=0.0001) levels (n=21) at three months was also significant. The adverse reactions with add-on doxycycline appeared acceptable.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Long-term doxycycline appears well tolerated and seems to improve lung function, health status and exacerbations in COPD. The claim needs further scientific validations.