1
|
Toyoshima MTK, Brandes PHR, da Paz Lauterbach G, Moraes JRA, de Paiva EF, Umpierrez GE, Nery M, Kondo RH. InsulinAPP application protocol for the inpatient management of type 2 diabetes on a hospitalist-managed ward: a retrospective study. ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM 2022; 66:498-505. [PMID: 35758838 PMCID: PMC10697650 DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Introduction We assessed metrics related to inpatient glycemic control using InsulinAPP, an application available for free in Brazil, on the hospitalist-managed ward of our hospital. Subjects and methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) admitted from November 2018 to October 2019. InsulinAPP recommends NPH and regular insulins three times a day, in bolus-correction or basal-bolus schemes. Parameters that included BG within range of 70-180 mg/dL, insulin treatment regimen and frequency of hypoglycemia were evaluated. Results A total of 147 T2D individuals (23% medicine and 77% surgery) were included (mean age 62.3 ± 12.7 years, HbA1c: 8.3 ± 3.0%). The initial insulin regimen was 50% bolus-correction, 47% basal-bolus and 3% with sliding scale insulin. During hospitalization, 71% patients required a bolus-basal regimen. In the first 10 days of the protocol, 71% BG measurements were between 70-180 mg/dL and 26% patients experienced one or more episodes of hypoglycemia < 70 mg/dL, and 5% with BG < 54 mg/dL. Conclusion The results of this retrospective study indicate the InsulinAPP application using human insulin formulations was effective and safe for the management of hyperglycemia on a hospitalist-managed ward, with more than 70% BG measurements within the therapeutic range and a low rate of hypoglycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Tadashi Kakitani Toyoshima
- Serviço de Onco-endocrinologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octávio Frias de Oliveira, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil,
- Serviço de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Serviço de Medicina Hospitalar, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Brandes
- Serviço de Medicina Hospitalar, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Gerhard da Paz Lauterbach
- Serviço de Medicina Hospitalar, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Jéssica Ribeiro Andrade Moraes
- Serviço de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Serviço de Medicina Hospitalar, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Edison Ferreira de Paiva
- Serviço de Medicina Hospitalar, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Guillermo E Umpierrez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Marcia Nery
- Serviço de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Rodrigo Hidd Kondo
- Serviço de Medicina Hospitalar, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lester PE, Ripley D, Grandelli R, Drew LA, Keegan M, Islam S. Interdisciplinary Protocol for Surgery in Older Persons: Development and Implementation. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022; 23:555-562. [PMID: 35227669 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
As the population ages, more older adults will undergo surgical procedures, and common physiologic changes can raise the risk for surgical complications while increasing morbidity and mortality. In conjunction with the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we piloted a comprehensive and interdisciplinary assessment and intervention protocol for perioperative care for patients aged ≥75 years undergoing elective general, gynecology-oncologic, and orthopedic surgery. The intervention included screening tools for cognitive, functional, and nutritional deficits, a Geriatric Nurse Champion on each inpatient surgical unit, and an interdisciplinary Geriatric Surgery Quality Committee. Our intervention group was compared to surgical patients during the same time period 1 year prior to the intervention, and the groups were well matched in demographics and comorbidities. The intervention group had significantly higher rates of advance care plan documentation in analysis of all patients (P < .001) and in subgroup analysis of those 85 and older (P = .006). The preintervention group had less postoperative delirium compared to the postintervention group but it was not significant and there was no difference in length of stay between groups. Various explanations for the minimal impact of the protocol exist: small sample size, presence of other hospital initiatives to reduce pressure ulcer and delirium, and clinician's awareness of project planning that led to incorporating ideas prior to official implementation. Future research implementing this protocol in naïve and/or underperforming institutions may demonstrate a greater effect. Larger sample size as well as implementation in other surgical fields may reveal a significant impact. However, if additional study does not reveal a meaningful impact of a comprehensive geriatric assessment for surgical patients, then consideration must be made regarding unrecognized factors in surgical care for older adults or perhaps that factors cannot be mitigated in older adults because they are intrinsically a higher surgical risk.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sadhu AR, Patham B, Vadhariya A, Chikermane SG, Johnson ML. Outcomes of "Real-World" Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia. J Endocr Soc 2021; 5:bvab101. [PMID: 34235360 PMCID: PMC8252645 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Guidelines recommend scheduled long-acting basal and short-acting bolus insulin several times daily to manage inpatient hyperglycemia. In the “real world,” insulin therapy is complicated, with limited data on the comparative effectiveness of different insulin strategies. Objective This work aimed to evaluate the association of different insulin strategies with glucose control and hospital outcomes after adjustment for patient and physician factors that influence choice of therapy. Methods This retrospective, observational study took place at an academic hospital. Participants included noncritically ill hospitalized medical/surgical patients (n = 4558) receiving subcutaneous insulin for 75% or longer during admission. Insulin therapy was grouped into 3 strategies within the first 48 hours: basal bolus (BB: scheduled long and short/rapid n = 2358), sliding scale (SS: short/rapid acting n = 1855), or basal only (BO: long only: n = 345). Main outcome measures included glucose control: hypoglycemic days, hyperglycemic days, euglycemic days, mean glucose; and hospitalization: in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. Results Initial therapy with BB was associated with more hypoglycemic (2.40; CI, 2.04 to 2.82) (P < .001) and fewer euglycemic days (0.90; CI, 0.85 to 0.97) (P = .003) than SS, whereas BO was associated with fewer hyperglycemic days (0.70; CI, 0.62 to 0.79) (P < .001), lower mean glucose (–18.03; CI, –22.46 to –12.61) (P < .001), and more euglycemic days (1.22; CI, 1.09 to 1.37) (P < .001) compared to SS. No difference in mortality, LOS, and readmissions was found. However, decreased LOS was observed in the BB subgroup with a medical diagnostic related group (0.93; CI, 0.89 to 0.97) (P < .001). Conclusion BO had a more favorable hyperglycemia profile than SS. BB, on the other hand, showed worse glycemic control as compared to SS. In the real-world hospital, BO may be a simpler and more effective insulin strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aisha Vadhariya
- University of Houston, College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | | | - Michael L Johnson
- University of Houston, College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shelton C, Demidowich AP, Motevalli M, Sokolinsky S, MacKay P, Tucker C, Abundo C, Peters E, Gooding R, Hackett M, Wedler J, Alexander LA, Barry L, Flynn M, Rios P, Fulda CL, Young MF, Kahl B, Pummer E, Mathioudakis NN, Sidhaye A, Howell EE, Rotello L, Zilbermint M. Retrospective Quality Improvement Study of Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia and Implementation of Hospital-Wide Initiatives. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:733-740. [PMID: 33880952 PMCID: PMC8258511 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211008513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalized patients who are receiving antihyperglycemic agents are at increased risk for hypoglycemia. Inpatient hypoglycemia may lead to increased risk for morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and readmission within 30 days of discharge, which in turn may lead to increased costs. Hospital-wide initiatives targeting hypoglycemia are known to be beneficial; however, their impact on patient care and economic measures in community nonteaching hospitals are unknown. METHODS This retrospective quality improvement study examined the effects of hospital-wide hypoglycemia initiatives on the rates of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in a community hospital setting from January 1, 2016, until September 30, 2019. The potential cost of care savings has been calculated. RESULTS Among 49 315 total patient days, 2682 days had an instance of hypoglycemia (5.4%). Mean ± SD hypoglycemic patient days/month was 59.6 ± 16.0. The frequency of hypoglycemia significantly decreased from 7.5% in January 2016 to 3.9% in September 2019 (P = .001). Patients with type 2 diabetes demonstrated a significant decrease in the frequency of hypoglycemia (7.4%-3.8%; P < .0001), while among patients with type 1 diabetes the frequency trended downwards but did not reach statistical significance (18.5%-18.0%; P = 0.08). Based on the reduction of hypoglycemia rates, the hospital had an estimated cost of care savings of $98 635 during the study period. CONCLUSIONS In a community hospital setting, implementation of hospital-wide initiatives targeting hypoglycemia resulted in a significant and sustainable decrease in the rate of insulin-induced hypoglycemia. These high-leverage risk reduction strategies may be translated into considerable cost savings and could be implemented at other community hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carter Shelton
- Ambulatory Services, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew P. Demidowich
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Community Physicians at Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mahsa Motevalli
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Community Physicians at Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sam Sokolinsky
- JHHS Quality and Clinical Analytics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Periwinkle MacKay
- Department of Nursing Education, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cynthia Tucker
- Department of Nursing Education, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cora Abundo
- Readmission Department, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eileen Peters
- Readmission Department, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Joyce Wedler
- Department of Information Systems, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Luvenia Barry
- Community Health and Wellness, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mary Flynn
- Community Health and Wellness, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Patricia Rios
- Community Health and Wellness, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Michelle F. Young
- Department of Food and Nutrition, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Barbara Kahl
- Patient and Family Advisory Council, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eileen Pummer
- Department of Quality, Safety, and Performance Improvement, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nestoras N. Mathioudakis
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aniket Sidhaye
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Leo Rotello
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Community Physicians at Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mihail Zilbermint
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Community Physicians at Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Mihail Zilbermint, MD, FACE, Division of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Community Physicians at Suburban Hospital, 8600 Old Georgetown Road, 6th Floor Endocrinology Office, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. Twitter: @Zilbermint; LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mishazilbermint/
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lansang MC, Zhou K, Korytkowski MT. Inpatient Hyperglycemia and Transitions of Care: A Systematic Review. Endocr Pract 2021; 27:370-377. [PMID: 33529732 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The transition of diabetes care from home to hospital, within the hospital, and upon discharge is fraught with gaps that can adversely affect patient safety and length of stay. We aimed to highlight the variability in care during these transitions and point out areas where research is needed. METHODS A PubMed search was performed with a combination of search terms that pertained to diabetes, hyperglycemia, hospitalization, locations in the hospital, discharge to home or a nursing facility, and diabetes medications. Studies with at least 50 patients that were written in the English language were included. RESULTS With the exception of transitioning from intravenous insulin infusion to subcutaneous insulin and perhaps admission to the regular floors, few studies pointedly focused on transitions of care, leading us to extrapolate recommendations based on data from disparate areas of care in the hospital. There is evidence at every stage of care, starting from the entry into the hospital and ending with discharge home or to a facility, that patients benefit from having protocols in place guiding overall care. CONCLUSION Pockets of care exist in hospitals where methods of effective diabetes management have been studied and implemented. However, there is no sustained continuum of care. Protocols and care teams that follow patients from one physical location to the other may result in improved clinical outcomes during and following a hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Cecilia Lansang
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Keren Zhou
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mary T Korytkowski
- Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The goal of this review is to summarize information about insulin dosing software and calculators used as computerized decision support systems or electronic glucose management systems (eGMS). These are used for hospitalized, insulin-treated patients with diabetes. We describe the advantages and disadvantages and the rationale for their use. RECENT FINDINGS We compared commercially available insulin dosing software, namely, Glucommander™, EndoTool®, GlucoStabilizer®, and GlucoTab®, in addition to computerized order entry systems that are available in electronic health records. The common feature among these eGMS is their ability to limit occurrences of hypoglycemia while achieving and maintaining patients at target blood glucose level. More research needs to be done examining the efficacy of eGMS in disease-specific states and their benefits and utility in preventing adverse outcomes. Their long-term benefits to health care systems are beginning to emerge in cost-saving benefits and prevention of readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jagdeesh Ullal
- Center for Diabetes and Endocrinology, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Joseph A Aloi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Endocrinology and Metabolism, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|