Pheochromocytoma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: When Should it Be Suspected?

[Neurofibromatosis type 1 associated with pheochromocytoma: a case report with a brief review of the literature]

We presented the clinical case of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) associated with pheochromocytoma (PHEO) in a man under 40 years old without family history. The diagnosis of NF-1 was established based on 4 signs of the disease (multiple café au lait macules, scoliotic changes in posture, the presence of multiple neurofibromas, Lisch nodules). The diagnosis of PHEO was determined by a significant increase of free metanephrin/normethanephrin levels in daily urine, a malignant CT phenotype of the right adrenal tumor, and confirmed by pathomorphological study. Genetic tests revealed a new mutation in one of the alleles of NF1 gene, a deletion of a 566 bp gene fragment, including exon 19 with a size of 73 bp. This mutation leads to splicing of exons 18 and 20, frameshift, and termination of protein synthesis. A study of the level of transcription of the genes associated with PHEO (RET, TMEM127, MAX, FGFR, MET, MERTK, BRAF, NGFR, Pi3, AKT, MTOR, KRAS, MAPK) was conducted, a statistically significant decrease in the level of transcription of the KRAS and BRAF genes and increase in the level of transcription of the TMEM127 gene in comparison with control samples have been detected. This case demonstrates the need for timely recognition of NF-1 for further appropriate patient's follow up and show the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and treatment of NF-1-associated catecholamine-secreting tumors.

An Uncommon Presentation of Pheochromocytoma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and the Importance of Long-Term Follow-Up

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NFT1) is a disease caused by mutations in the tumor suppressor gene NF1. It is associated with a higher incidence of chromaffin cell tumors which are usually adrenal, unilateral and benign. The presence of these tumors during pregnancy is extremely rare and frequently associated with fatal outcomes. We report the case of a female patient with NFT1, who presented with paroxysmal spells of headache, palpitations, dizziness and pre-cordial discomfort, starting immediately after the delivery of her third child. Diagnostic work-up came to reveal a bilateral pheochromocytoma and the patient underwent bilateral adrenalectomy. Over 12 years after the initial surgery, metastatic disease was diagnosed, and a reintervention was performed. This is a rare presentation of bilateral malignant pheochromocytoma in a patient with NFT1, with postpartum occurrence of the first symptoms. This text focuses the important details and challenges found at each stage of diagnosis and follow-up.

[Pheochromocytoma associated with primary hyperparathyroidism and type 1 neurofibromatosis]

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) is a predominantly inherited genetic disease with prevalence of 1 per 2500-3000 newborns and based on clear clinical criteria. In addition to common neurofibromas and gliomas of the visual pathways, these patients have a higher risk of various benign and malignant tumors throughout their lives including tumors of the central nervous system, membranes of peripheral nerves, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leukemia. Endocrine diseases and neoplasms also occur in patients with NF-1 and can include extrarenal paraganglioma, primary hyperparathyroidism, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, thyroid tumors and other adrenal neoplasms. We demonstrate multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia (MEN 2A) of neurofibromatosis type 1 combined with pheochromocytoma and primary hyperparathyroidism in a woman with a long history of palpitations, paroxysmal hypertension and osteoporosis. Biochemical analysis revealed severe hypercalcemia with elevated parathyroid hormone indicating primary hyperparathyroidism, as well as high fractionated normetanephrine and metanephrine in the urine as a sign of catecholamine-releasing pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Further scintigraphy revealed signs of solitary parathyroid adenoma causing primary hyperparathyroidism and right-sided pheochromocytoma. Clinical diagnosis of MEN-2 syndrome is based on combination of at least two major MEN-2-associated endocrine tumors. Resection of parathyroid adenoma and pheochromocytoma normalized biochemical parameters and blood pressure. Combination of pheochromocytoma with primary hyperparathyroidism and type 1 neurofibromatosis is discussed.

Atypical and typical course of neurofibromatosis type 1 in combination with pheochromocytoma

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a hereditary disease that has a multisystem character of organism damage, a wide variability of clinical manifestations, up to the almost complete absence of typical symptoms. Phenotypic manifestations, their expressiveness and heaviness can be varied even among members of the same family with identical mutations. One of the possible clinical manifestations of this pathology is pheochromocytoma, the development of which is associated with a high risk of developing life-threatening conditions. Timely diagnosis of the disease, the choice of treatment tactics for the patient, genetic testing of blood relatives can significantly improve the survival rate and prognosis of the disease. In this article, on the presented clinical examples of patients with a typical and atypical course of type 1 neurofibromatosis in combination with pheochromocytoma, the issues of managing patients with this pathology are outlined.

[Clinical and laboratory features of hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma]

The widespread introduction of genetic testing in recent years has made it possible to determine that more than a third of cases of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPPGs) are caused by germline mutations. Despite the variety of catecholamine-producing tumors manifestations, there is a sufficient number of clinical and laboratory landmarks that suggest a hereditary genesis of the disease and even a specific syndrome. These include a family history, age of patient, presence of concomitant conditions, and symptoms of the disease. Considering that each of the mutations is associated with certain diseases that often determine tactics of treatment and examination of a patient, e.g. high risk of various malignancies. Awareness of the practitioner on the peculiarities of the course of family forms of PPPGs will allow improving the tactics of managing these patients.The article provides up-to-date information on the prevalence of hereditary PPPGs. The modern views on the pathogenesis of the disease induced by different mutations are presented. The main hereditary syndromes associated with PPPGs are described, including multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2A and 2B, type 1 neurofibromatosis, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, hereditary paraganglioma syndrome, as well as clinical and laboratory features of the tumor in these conditions. The main positions on the necessity of genetic screening in patients with PPPGs are given.

Genetics of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes our current understanding of germline and somatic genetics and genomics of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PCC/PGL), describes existing knowledge gaps, and discusses future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) are found in up to 40% of those with PCC/PGL. Tumors with germline PVs are broadly categorized as Cluster 1 (pseudohypoxia), including those with SDH, VHL, FH, and EPAS1 PVs, or Cluster 2 (kinase signaling) including those with NF1, RET, TMEM127, and MAX PVs. Somatic driver mutations exist in some of the same genes (RET, VHL, NF1, EPAS1) as well as in additional genes including HRAS, CSDE1 and genes involved in cell immortalization (ATRX and TERT). Other somatic driver events include recurrent fusion genes involving MAML3.

SUMMARY

PCC/PGL have the highest association with germline PVs of all human solid tumors. Expanding our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PCC/PGL is essential to advancements in diagnosis and surveillance and the development of novel therapies for these unique tumors.

Phakomatoses and Endocrine Gland Tumors: Noteworthy and (Not so) Rare Associations

Phakomatoses encompass a group of rare genetic diseases, such as von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and Cowden syndrome (CS). These disorders are due to molecular abnormalities on the RAS-PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway for NF1, TSC and CS, and to hypoxia sensing for VHL. Phakomatoses share some phenotypic traits such as neurological, ophthalmological and cutaneous features. Patients with these diseases are also predisposed to developing multiple endocrine tissue tumors, e.g., pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas are frequent in VHL and NF1. All forms of phakomatoses except CS may be associated with digestive neuroendocrine tumors. More rarely, thyroid cancer and pituitary or parathyroid adenomas have been reported. These susceptibilities are noteworthy, because their occurrence rate, prognosis and management differ slightly from the sporadic forms. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on endocrine glands tumors associated with VHL, NF1, TSC, and CS, especially neuroendocrine tumors and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. We particularly detail recent advances concerning prognosis and management, especially parenchyma-sparing surgery and medical targeted therapies such as mTOR, MEK and HIF-2 α inhibitors, which have shown truly encouraging results.

Screening for Hereditary Pheochromocytoma in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Case Report

Pheochromocytoma (PHEO) is a rare tumour that arises from adreno-medullary chromaffin cells and secretes catecholamines. These hormones are also secreted by paragangliomas, which derive from extra-adrenal cells of the sympathetic paravertebral ganglia. At least one-third of PHEOs are familial. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), or von Recklinghausen's disease, is diagnosed upon clinical criteria, and the study of PHEO is advised if hypertension is present. The incidence of PHEO in NF1 is 0.1-5.7% and explains hypertension in 20-50% of these patients. Recent advances in the treatment of this condition and preoperative preparation allow us to reduce its high cardiovascular morbimortality. Here we present the case of a 31-year-old female with known NF1 who presented with 5 months' history of non-specific symptoms and an episode of intraoperative hypertensive crisis. The workup detected a left sided PHEO, which was treated surgically. Our case illustrates the high prevalence of hereditary PHEO and how its presentation can go unnoticed. It reinforces the significance of screening for PHEO in patients with NF1.

Screening for Hereditary Pheochromocytoma in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Case Report

Collapse

Pheochromocytoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumours in an adult neurofibromatosis type 1 patient: a rare co-occurrence

The risk of tumours including pheochromocytoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) has been reported to be higher in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. The concomitant occurrence of these two tumours was rare in NF1 patient and most were symptomatic. In this case report, we describe the case of a 47-year-old man with NF1 who presented with microscopic haematuria. Neither hypertension nor any gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by the patient. While investigating for haematuria, left adrenal mass and arterial enhancing lesions in the small bowel were incidentally documented during computerised urography. The patient subsequently underwent a left adrenalectomy and small bowel resection. The pheochromocytoma and multiple GIST tumours were diagnosed based on pathology. Here, we discuss the rare association of pheochromocytoma and GIST and the asymptomatic presentation of those tumours in an NF1 patient. We further suggest that in NF1 patients a heightened level of vigilance can help identify this infrequent combination.

18F-FDOPA PET/CT accurately identifies MEN1-associated pheochromocytoma

SUMMARY

Pheochromocytoma (PHEO) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is extremely rare. The incidence is reported as less than 2%. We report a case of a 76-year-old male with familial MEN1 who was found to have unilateral PHEO. Although the patient was normotensive and asymptomatic, routine screening imaging with CT demonstrated bilateral adrenal masses. The left adrenal mass grew from 2.5 to 3.9 cm over 4 years with attenuation values of 9 Hounsfield units (HU) pre-contrast and 15 HU post-contrast washout. Laboratory evaluation demonstrated an adrenergic biochemical phenotype. Both 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG) scintigraphy demonstrated bilateral adrenal uptake. In contrast, 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) PET/CT demonstrated unilateral left adrenal uptake (28.7 standardized uptake value (SUV)) and physiologic right adrenal uptake. The patient underwent an uneventful left adrenalectomy with pathology consistent for PHEO. Post-operatively, he had biochemical normalization. A review of the literature suggests that adrenal tumors >2 cm may be at higher risk for pheochromocytoma in patients with MEN1. Despite a lack of symptoms related to catecholamine excess, enlarging adrenal nodules should be biochemically screened for PHEO. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT may be beneficial for localization in these patients.

LEARNING POINTS

18F-FDOPA PET/CT is a beneficial imaging modality for identifying pheochromocytoma in MEN1 patients. Adrenal adenomas should undergo routine biochemical workup for PHEO in MEN1 and can have serious peri-operative complications if not recognized, given that MEN1 patients undergo frequent surgical interventions. MEN1 is implicated in the tumorigenesis of PHEO in this patient.

Detection of severe hypertension in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 during anesthesia induction: a case report

Background

Neurofibromatosis type 1 has a higher prevalence of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma than the general population: 1.0–5.7% versus 0.2–0.6%. Currently, there are no generally accepted guidelines for screening for pheochromocytoma and paragangliomas in asymptomatic patients with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Case presentation

Severe hypertension developed during anesthesia induction in our patient, a 44-year-old Chinese man with neurofibromatosis type 1. We screened for catecholamine level after glioma resection, and the patient was diagnosed with combined pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Conclusions

A delay in diagnosis or lack of a diagnosis in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma may increase the perioperative morbidity and mortality risk due to excess catecholamine secretion. Therefore, routine pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma screening preoperatively in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 is very important.

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Phaeochromocytomas/Paragangliomas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Introduction: Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are at risk of developing phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PHAEO/PG). Unlike in other familial PHAEO/PG syndromes, there are no published guidelines regarding screening in asymptomatic or normotensive patients with NF1. This strategy may be associated with preventable morbidities in those patients who ultimately present with symptomatic PHAEO/PG. Objective: To describe the mode of presentation and the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes attributed to PHAEO/PG in NF1. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary referral centre in collaboration with a national complex NF1 centre. Hospital records and databases between 1998–2018 were searched. Results: Twenty-seven patients with NF1 and PHAEO/PG were identified. In all but one, PHAEO/PG was diagnosed after NF1. The median age at the time of diagnosis of PHAEO/PG was 43 years (range 22–65) and 21/27 (78%) were females. The diagnosis was mostly incidental in 13/27 (48%) while classical PHAEO/PG symptoms were found in 15/27 (56%), and hypertension was found in 14/27 (52%) of NF1 patients prior to PHAEO/PG diagnosis. No patient had undergone biochemical screening for PHAEO/PG. Metastatic disease was evident in 2/27 patients, 8 suffered potentially avoidable complications attributed to PHAEO/PG (including two deaths). Conclusion: The course of PHAEO/PG in NF1 is associated with an unpredictable presentation and potentially avoidable adverse outcomes. We recommend that routine biochemical screening for PHAEO/PG should be part of the care package offered to all patients with NF1 by regular measurements of plasma free or urinary fractionated metanephrines starting from early adolescence and repeated every 3 years.

Health Supervision for Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem disorder that primarily involves the skin and peripheral nervous system. Its population prevalence is approximately 1 in 3000. The condition is usually recognized in early childhood, when pigmentary manifestations emerge. Although NF1 is associated with marked clinical variability, most children affected follow patterns of growth and development within the normal range. Some features of NF1 can be present at birth, but most manifestations emerge with age, necessitating periodic monitoring to address ongoing health and developmental needs and minimize the risk of serious medical complications. In this report, we provide a review of the clinical criteria needed to establish a diagnosis, the inheritance pattern of NF1, its major clinical and developmental manifestations, and guidelines for monitoring and providing intervention to maximize the health and quality of life of a child affected.

Phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with neurofibromatosis-1

INTRODUCTION

Phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PHAEO/PG) are linked to hereditary syndromes including neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). Current guidelines do not recommend biochemical screening for PHAEO/PG in asymptomatic or normotensive patients with NF-1. This strategy may miss preventable morbidities in those patients who ultimately present with symptomatic PHAEO/PG. Our aim was to review the literature and extract data on mode of presentation and the incidence of reported adverse outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE literature search using the keywords "Phaeochromocytoma", "Paraganglioma" and "Neurofibromatosis" was performed looking for reported cases from 2000 to 2018.

RESULTS

73 reports of NF-1 patients with PHAEO/PG were found. Patients were predominately women (n=40) with a median age of 46 years (range 16-82). PHAEO/PG was found incidentally in most patients, 36/73 did not present with typical symptoms while 27 patients were normotensive at diagnosis. 31 patients had adverse outcomes including metastases and death.

CONCLUSION

Given the protean presentation of PHAEO/PG, relying on symptomology and blood pressure status as triggers for screening is associated with adverse outcomes. Further studies are required to ascertain whether biochemical screening in asymptomatic and normotensive patients with NF-1 can reduce the rate of adverse outcomes.

Concurrent primary hyperparathyroidism and pheochromocytoma in a Chinese lady with neurofibromatosis type 1

We report a case of elderly Chinese lady with neurofibromatosis type-1 presenting with longstanding palpitation, paroxysmal hypertension and osteoporosis. Biochemical testing showed mild hypercalcaemia with non-suppressed parathyroid hormone level suggestive of primary hyperparathyroidism, and mildly elevated urinary fractionated normetanephrine and plasma-free normetanephrine pointing to a catecholamine-secreting pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Further scintigraphic investigation revealed evidence of a solitary parathyroid adenoma causing primary hyperparathyroidism and a left pheochromocytoma. Resection of the parathyroid adenoma and pheochromocytoma resulted in normalization of biochemical abnormalities and hypertension. The rare concurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism and pheochromocytoma in neurofibromatosis type-1 is discussed.

Learning points

All NF-1 patients who have symptoms suggestive of a pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL), even remotely, should undergo biochemical testing.The initial biochemical tests of choice for PPGL in NF-1 are either plasma-free metanephrines or urinary fractionated metanephrines. Any elevations of metanephrines should be carefully evaluated for the presence of PPGLs in NF-1 patients.Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is described in subjects with NF-1. Due to the lack of epidemiological and functional studies, their association is yet to be substantiated. Meanwhile, PHPT may further exacerbate the metabolic bone defect in these patients and should be treated when present according to published guidelines.Coexistence of PPGL and PHPT can occur in subjects with NF-1, mimicking multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2).

Looking beyond the thyroid: advances in the understanding of pheochromocytoma and hyperparathyroidism phenotypes in MEN2 and of non-MEN2 familial forms

Over the last years, the knowledge of MEN2 and non-MEN2 familial forms of pheochromocytoma (PHEO) has increased. In MEN2, PHEO is the second most frequent disease: the penetrance and age at diagnosis depend on the mutation of RET Given the prevalence of bilateral PHEO (50% by age 50), adrenal sparing surgery, aimed at sparing a part of the adrenal cortex to avoid adrenal insufficiency, should be systematically considered in patients with bilateral PHEO. Non-MEN2 familial forms of PHEO now include more than 20 genes: however, only small phenotypic series have been reported, suggesting that phenotypic features of isolated hereditary PHEO must be better explored, and follow-up series are needed to better understand the outcome of patients carrying mutations of these genes. The first part of this review will mainly focus on these points. In the second part, a focus will be given on MEN2 and non-MEN2 familial forms of hyperparathyroidism (HPTH). Again, the management of MEN2 HPTH should be aimed at curing the disease while preserving an optimal quality of life by a tailored parathyroidectomy. The phenotypes and outcome of MEN1-, MEN4- and HRPT2-related HPTH are briefly described, with a focus on the most recent literature data and is compared with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia.

The importance of pheochromocytoma case detection in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: A case report and review of literature

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a complex, multi-system genetic disorder that is associated with an increased prevalence of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma compared to the general population, 1.0%–5.7% versus 0.2%–0.6%, respectively. A delay in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma diagnosis or undiagnosed pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, as seen in normotensive and asymptomatic patients, may portend a significant morbidity and mortality risk due to excess catecholamine secretion. Currently, there are no generally accepted guidelines of screening for pheochromocytoma and paragangliomas in asymptomatic individuals of this population with approaches and practices varying considerably between physicians. Emerging data suggest benefit in routine pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma screening of all individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. Herein, we present a case to highlight how routine case detection screening would have identified pheochromocytoma earlier in an active duty military member.

Giant phaeochromocytoma presenting with an acute stroke: reappraising phaeochromocytoma surveillance for the neurofibromatosis type 1 phakomatosis

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem genetic disorder associated with reduced lifespan attributed largely to malignancy and vascular causes. One of the tumours associated with NF1 is phaeochromocytoma. The phaeochromocytoma has earned the moniker, a 'great mimicker', due to its varied means of presentation. We present a patient with NF1 who was diagnosed with a giant 20 cm phaeochromocytoma after suffering from an ischaemic stroke. Current guidelines do not advocate surveillance of phaeochromocytoma in asymptomatic patients with NF1, unlike other genetic syndromes associated with phaeochromocytoma. However, there is increasing evidence that this approach may not help in the early detection and treatment of this potentially life-threatening disease. Our patient remained hypertensive after surgery despite achieving biochemical cure. The suggested chronicity of the underlying tumour in our patient is a reminder to practising clinicians to rethink our strategy in identifying phaeochromocytoma in adults with NF1.

Pheochromocytomas are diagnosed incidentally and at older age in neurofibromatosis type 1

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines do not currently recommend routine systematic hormonal screening for pheochromocytoma (PHEO) in all/normotensive patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), in contrast to other PHEO-predisposing genetic syndromes such as Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize and compare parameters of PHEO in patients with NF1 to patients with or without other germline mutations.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with histologically proven PHEO at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal from 2000 through 2015.

RESULTS

Neurofibromatosis type 1 was diagnosed clinically in nine patients in our cohort of 145 PHEO (6·2%). The mean age at diagnosis was 48 ± 14 years, and seven patients had hypertension. No PHEO was diagnosed by systematic clinical screening. The mode of presentation was adrenal incidentalomas in five patients. Urinary metanephrines were elevated in 5/9 cases. Mean tumour diameter was 3·5 cm (min-max 1·5-12·5 cm). One had bilateral PHEO and none were malignant to date. Statistically significant differences were noted when comparing PHEO in NF1 to other genetic syndromes (n = 20), in terms of age at diagnosis (mean 48 vs 30 years P < 0·05), initial mode of presentation (no PHEO detected by routine screening in NF1 vs 40% in other genetic syndromes P < 0·05) and familial history of catecholamine-secreting tumour (none in NF1 vs 55% in patients with other genetic syndrome P < 0·05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pheochromocytoma in NF1 occurs in older patients with no family history compared to other syndromes; it is mostly unilateral, secretory and benign. The older age at diagnosis of PHEO could be secondary to delay in identification due to lack of systematic screening for PHEO in NF1.

Endocrine implications of neurofibromatosis 1 in childhood

In 1882, von Recklinghausen described a group of patients with multiple tumors arising from the 'endoneurium' of peripheral nerves, and called them 'neurofibromas'. The term von Recklinghausen disease was used up to the end of the 20th century, when the gene of neurofibromatosis (NF1) was cloned on chromosome 17q11.2. The gene product is a cytoplasmic protein termed neurofibromin, regulating proliferation and maturation of both glial and neuronal progenitors during embryogenesis. Loss of neurofibromin function determines the hyperactivation of the proto-oncogene RAS, leading to an increased risk of tumor formation, predominantly affecting the skin, bone and the nervous system. NF1 is clinically and genetically distinct from neurofibromatosis type 2, characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas and other nervous system tumors. An increased incidence of central precocious puberty, diencephalic syndrome, GH deficiency and GH hypersecretion has been described in NF1 children. These conditions are commonly complications of optic pathway gliomas (OPG) involving the hypothalamic and sellar region. Nevertheless, these endocrine disorders have been observed also in children without evidence of OPG at magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical and laboratory follow-up is crucial in all children with NF1, particularly in those with an OPG, aiming at the early identification of signs suggestive of secondary endocrine alterations.

Pheochromocytoma and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 in a Patient with Hypertension

BACKGROUND:

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is an autosomal dominant condition that has a variety of clinical manifestations. Essential or secondary hypertension may be associated with neurofibromatosis. A rare finding is hypertension due to pheochromocytoma in patient with neurofibromatosis type 1.

CASE REPORT:

We present a case with a 7-year medical history of hypertension which was poorly controlled and with wide variations of blood pressure before the examination. Investigations did not reveal a secondary cause of hypertension. After the physical examination and establishing the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis, as well as the history of symptomes suggestive of catecholamine discharge, diagnostic procedures for pheochromocytoma were undertaken. Abdominal CT and MRI have proven the presence of a right adrenal tumor mass which was suspected to be a pheochromocytoma. Patient was preoperatively treated for two weeks with alpha and beta blokers and right adrenalectomy was performed. Perioperatively and on a longer term, blood pressure remained well controlled with less antihypertensive therapy. Diagnosis and management of pheochromocytoma in neurofibromatosis involves a dermatologist, endocrinologist, nephrologist and an urologist and requires a well-coordinated multidisciplinary approach.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pheochromocytoma, although a rare condition in patients with neurofibromatosis, may be a cause for uncontrolled hypertension, as well as other cardiovascular complications and the clinician should do all available clinical investigations to confirm it or exclude it on time.